TL;DR:Position: Experienced Laravel dev (5+ years) who can also navigate a Vue 3 frontend when needed.Project: Stable, long-term, fully remote.Hours: Ideally full-time, but part-time can work too.Compensation: $60k-$90k/year or around $50/hour (negotiable, heavily dependent on skills & experience).Why Join: Youll help modernize and expand a platform (16Personalities) that has already impacted hundreds of millions of people.What Youll DoImprove Testing & Modernize Legacy CodeIncrease test coverage (currently using PHPUnit; open to alternatives).Refactor older Laravel code to align with modern best practices and the L11 structure.Integrate robust testing into our deployment pipelines.Build New FeaturesDevelop new functionality rapidly while maintaining clean, maintainable code.Optimize database queries and cache strategies.Collaborate closely with the team to ensure smooth feature rollouts.Dive into the Full Stack (When Needed)Primary focus: Laravel backend.Occasionally jump into the Vue 3 frontend to debug or confirm data flow.You should be comfortable switching contexts to ensure end-to-end coherence.Embrace AI ToolsExplore how AI can speed up your own development or test writing.Assist with separate mini-projects involving AI model querying, message batching, output processing etc.Who You AreSeasoned Laravel Dev5+ years of practical Laravel experience.Well-versed in the latest Laravel versions, writing elegant, clear, performant code.Some Vue 3 KnowledgeAt least a couple of years using Vue 2/3.Able to navigate frontend components as needed (no design work, just enough to fix issues or align data).Independent & ReliableFully remote means you're responsible for your schedule.Deliver on time without needing constant follow-ups.Communicate clearly, keep the team in the loop, and own your s**t.Agile & CuriousThrive in a fast-paced, evolving environment.Take pride in your work; constantly seek ways to improve the code and test coverage.Fun to Work WithYoure intellectually honest, and you can argue your viewpoint while staying open to others.You have a sense of humor and a life outside of code. What We OfferRemote SetupWork from anywhere, on your own schedule.Join a small, friendly, and driven team that values creativity and independence.Fair Compensation$60k$90k/year salary range (negotiable based on your skill set, plus any rarer expertise you bring).Part-time is around $50/hour.If youre exceptional, were open to discussing more.Meaningful WorkWeve helped hundreds of millions of people understand themselves better over the past 10+ years.What you do wont be lost in yet another short-lived startup idea - your work will have a real, lasting impact.Creative AutonomyOperate in a quality-first, agile environment with freedom to innovate.Room to propose and implement process improvements.Potential for GrowthWe value learning and will happily consider new tools and methods you propose.As we expand, so do opportunities for leadership or tackling more complex full-stack tasks.Interested? Please fill out the linked form so we can learn more about you. What to Expect Next:Well review your application and reach out if its a good fit.An initial chat to understand your experience and see if we mesh well.Possibly a short technical interview or a quick code test.A final talk about terms and next steps. Related Jobs See more Back-End Programming jobs

Looking forthe most recentMini Crossword answer?Click here for today's Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.Happy Groundhog Day! TheNYT Mini Crosswordtoday fittingly paid a little homage to this weird...event? Holiday? But the toughest clue for me today was 4-Down. Is this a word everyone else knew but me? Or was I not rich enough to ever experience this experience? Regardless, if you need some more help with today's Mini Crossword, read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.The Mini Crossword is just one of many games in the Times' games collection. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visitCNET's NYT puzzle hints page.Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini CrosswordLet's get at those Mini Crossword clues and answers. The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for Feb. 2, 2025. NYT/Screenshot by CNETMini across clues and answers1A clue: Punxsutawney ___, Groundhog Day characterAnswer: PHIL5A clue: Bird with "great blue" and "great white" varietiesAnswer: HERON7A clue: Something rehabilitated by a P.R. firmAnswer: IMAGE8A clue: Material for party balloons and hospital glovesAnswer: LATEX9A clue: Home made of sticks, sayAnswer: NESTMini down clues and answers1D clue: ___ Connors, Bill Murray's character in "Groundhog Day"Answer: PHIL2D clue: Muscled guyAnswer: HEMAN3D clue: So, so angryAnswer: IRATE4D clue: Pricey sections of theatersAnswer: LOGES6D clue: "Ready for another customer!"Answer: NEXTHow to play more Mini CrosswordsThe New York Times Games section offers a large number of online games, but only some of them are free for all to play. You can play the current day's Mini Crossword for free, but you'll need a subscription to the Times Games section to play older puzzles from the archives.

A senior U.S. lawmaker says representatives of Elon Musk were granted full access to a U.S. Treasury payments system used to disperse trillions of dollars to Americans each year, and warned that Musks access to the system poses a national security risk.Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democratic senator from Oregon and ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, said in a post on Bluesky on Saturday that sources told his office Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gave Musks team, known as the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, authorization to access the highly sensitive Treasury system on Friday. The authorization comes following a standoff earlier in the week, in which the Treasurys highest-ranking career official left the department following requests from Musks team for access to the system.Social Security and Medicare benefits, grants, payments to government contractors, including those that compete directly with Musks own companies. All of it, wrote Wyden in the post, referring to DOGEs access.The New York Times also reported that Bessent granted DOGE access to the Treasurys payment system on Friday. One of the DOGE representatives granted access is said to be Tom Krause, the chief executive of Cloud Software Group, which owns Citrix and several other companies. Krause did not return TechCrunchs request for comment. A spokesperson for the Treasury did not comment when emailed Saturday.This is the latest effort by Musk and his associates to take over the inner workings of the U.S. federal government following President Trumps return to office on January 20. Following his inauguration, Trump immediately ordered Musk to begin making widespread cuts to federal government spending.The system run by the Treasurys Bureau of the Fiscal Service controls the disbursements of around $6 trillion in federal funds to American households, including Social Security and Medicare benefits, tax refunds, and payments to U.S. federal employees and contractors, according to a letter written by Wyden and sent to Bessent a day earlier. Access to the payments system was historically limited to a few staff because it contains personal information about millions of Americans who receive payments from the federal government, per the Times.According to Wydens letter, the payments system simply cannot fail, and any politically-motivated meddling in them risks severe damage to our country and the economy.In his letter, Wyden said he was concerned that Musks extensive business operations in China endangers U.S. cybersecurity and creates conflicts of interest that make his access to these systems a national security risk.Last year, the Biden administration blamed China for a series of intrusions targeting U.S. critical infrastructure, the theft of senior American officials phone records during breaches of several U.S. phone and internet giants, and a breach of the Treasurys own systems late last year. Wyden, also a long-serving member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said it was unusual to be granting access to sensitive systems to an individual with such significant business interests in China.Several other federal departments are under scrutiny by DOGE, including the federal governments own human resources department, known as the Office of Personnel Management.Reuters reported on Friday that Musks representatives locked out career civil servants from computer systems, which contain the personal data and human resources files of millions of federal employees. The OPM was hacked in 2015, which the U.S. government later attributed to China, resulting in the theft of personnel records on more than 22 million U.S. government employees, including staff with security clearances.

Chinese fast-fashion retailer Shein has relaunched in India through a partnership with Reliance Retail, nearly five years after it was banned amid diplomatic tensions between New Delhi and Beijing.The new Shein India Fast Fashion app, developed and launched by billionaire Mukesh Ambanis Reliance Retail, marks the firms significant return to one of Asias largest retail markets. The apps revival comes under stringent conditions that give Reliance complete control over operations and data.Under the partnership structure disclosed recently by Indias commerce ministry Shein will operate purely as a technology partner, with Reliance maintaining full ownership of the platform through its subsidiary. The arrangement requires all customer data to be stored in India, with Shein having no access rights.Shein is initially offering delivery in select cities including New Delhi, Bengaluru and Mumbai and plans to expand it to across India soon, according to the app description. Products include dresses priced from 350 rupees ($4), with all items designed and manufactured in India by local manufacturers. The OG is back, Shein greets on its India app.The deal represents a rare exception to Indias ban on Chinese apps, which has affected over 300 platforms since 2020. To secure approval, Shein agreed to unprecedented oversight measures, including regular security audits by government-approved cybersecurity firms.Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said recently that the approval process involved extensive vetting by multiple ministries, including IT and Home Affairs. The arrangement aims to boost Indias textile manufacturing sector while maintaining strict data sovereignty.For Reliance, the partnership marks a departure from its traditional strategy of incorporating brands such as Japans Muji into its flagship Ajio fashion app.

The International Union of Architects (UIA) has launched an ideas contest calling on young architects to rethink UNESCO World Heritage Sites within urban contexts (Deadline: 7 March)The competition is based on the theme of the UN-Habitat World Architecture Day 2024 Empowering the Next Generation in Participatory Urban Design and invites architects born after 1 January 1989 to provide innovative solutions to contemporary challenges facing landmark heritage sites around the world.The overall winners will share a 15,000 prize fund and will be announced at an awards ceremony held in Palazzo Zorzi the UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe as part of the opening of this years Venice Architecture Biennale. The winning concepts will also feature in an exhibition inside Palazzo Zorzi from 8 to 15 May.According to the brief: The UIA and UNESCO, through the UNESCO-UIA Charter for Architectural Education, have long been dedicated to preparing future architects to devise innovative solutions for the present and the future.As new eras usher in profound and complex challenges, particularly regarding the social and functional degradation of many human settlements, the need for visionary architectural responses becomes increasingly critical in shaping the qualitative development of the built environment in a rapidly changing world.This initiative offers young architects an opportunity to contribute to one of the most prestigious cultural initiatives the Biennale di Venezia. Through their participation, the next generation can demonstrate their vision for enhancing the experience of UNESCO World Heritage Sites.The latest competition aligns with an exhibition being hosted by UNESCO in collaboration with The Royal Commission for AlUla looking at how Deep Surface: Polyfunctional architecture could enhance the experience of UNESCO-designated sites.The exhibition will focus on good heritage practice at UNESCO-designated sites and will be hosted inside the UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe in Venice from 10 May to 23 November this year.Borobudur, BorneoCredit:Image by UNESCO Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licenseSubmissions to the ideas contest will be judged on response to the competition goals, urban and architectural design, social impact, sustainability, contribution to improved Site Management and the coherence of the overall concept.Judges will include Magdalena Landry, director of UNESCO Office Venice; Doan Than H, founder of H&P Architects; and Omar Degan, Founder and Principal of DO Architecture Group.The overall winner of the contest will receive a 5,000 prize while a second prize of 4,000, third prize of 3,000, fourth prize of 2,000 and fifth prize of 1,000 will also be awarded.Competition detailsDeadline: Midday, 8 April 2025Competition funding source: Not suppliedProject funding source: Not suppliedOwner of site(s): Not suppliedVisit the competition website for more information

Be on the watch for human-AI communication ambiguities when using generative AI and LLMs, especially ... [+] in vital circumstances.gettyIn todays column, I examine the fraught nature of human-AI communications ambiguities that occur in the daily use of generative AI and large language models (LLMs). Ambiguities in communication can lead to woeful results. The recent mid-air collision of a military helicopter and a commercial plane has brought human-to-human communication ambiguities to the fore a matter that has been widely reported in the mainstream media. Insights concerning communication ambiguities arise from this incident.Lets talk about it.This analysis of an innovative AI considerations is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here).Ambiguity In CommunicationsYou undoubtedly are aware of the recent mid-air collision in Washington D.C. that involved a miliary helicopter and a passenger plane. The NTSB is investigating the tragic crash and will ultimately provide an analysis of what exactly happened.The news media already posted some of the air traffic control (ATC) audio that took place just prior to the incident. Various commentary about the audio suggested that perhaps a form of communication ambiguity might have played a role in the crash. Until the NTSB completes its assessment, such interpretation of the audio should be undertaken cautiously.I have previously conducted in-depth research on the interaction of controllers and pilots, doing so in conducting studies of how automation and AI impacts the tasks performed by ATCs. It is instructive to closely examine the discussion that took place between the helicopter pilot and the controller in this particular instance.Some background will be helpful. In the audio, the designation PAT-25 refers to the military helicopter that ended up in the collision (PAT means priority air transport), while the designation CRJ generically refers to the passenger plane. Please be aware that CRJ is a broad acronym meaning Canadair Regional Jet and is a family of jets. I mention this because there were other planes in the same vicinity at that time that were also CRJs -- thus referring to CRJ in this context is relatively non-specific and essentially ambiguous with respect to a specific plane per se.Here is a transcribed portion of that audio:ATC Controller: PAT-25, do you have the CRJ in sight?ATC Controller: PAT-25, pass behind the CRJ.Helicopter pilot: PAT-25 has aircraft in sight. Request visual separation.Closely observe the wording used in that transcribed audio and lets unpack it together.Interpreting The InteractionThe controller asks the military helicopter (PAT-25) if they have the passenger plane (CRJ) in sight. Additionally, the controller tells the military helicopter that it is to pass behind the passenger plane. This would be a somewhat conventional verbiage that a controller might issue to a pilot.The response by the helicopter pilot states that the aircraft is in sight. The pilot also makes a request for visual separation. Again, this is relatively routine communication and nothing unusual.A key consideration is that the controller has been ambiguous about precisely which plane the helicopter is supposed to be wary of. Recall that CRJ is non-specific since there are other CRJs nearby. When the helicopter pilot seemingly confirms having seen the passenger plane, the controller has no means of knowing which plane the helicopter pilot is referring to. In that sense, the response by the helicopter pilot is also ambiguous.In essence, it could be that the controller was referring to the plane that the helicopter collided with, while the helicopter pilot was referring to a different passenger plane and likely far enough away that the helicopter pilot assessed there was no direct danger of a collision.It appears that the controller and the pilot spoke past each other, unknowingly so.The controller presumably was referring to the passenger plane that was ultimately in the crash. The helicopter pilot might not have seen that plane and instead saw a different CRJ, of which, the pilot might have mentally calculated as being far enough away that no immediate danger existed. It will be instructive to see what if any significance the NTSB report puts on this seeming ambiguity in communications.About Controller-Pilot AmbiguitiesThe possibility of controllers and pilots speaking past each other is a known issue and a longstanding one. At times, the controller believes they are being specific, even if the reality is that their reference is ambiguous. Similarly, at times, a pilot will believe they are being specific, even if their reference is ambiguous.Often, one of the two will realize that an ambiguity is at play and attempt to rectify or clarify the situation.For example, a controller might be ambiguous, but the pilot asks for clarification or provides a more specific designation of their sightings so that the controller will subtly realize if there is a difference in understanding going on. Things can go in the other direction too, namely the pilot states something ambiguous and the controller says something that explicitly seeks to clarify the ambiguity.If both parties are ambiguous, and if neither party realizes that ambiguity is underway, the differences in understanding of the real-time situation can drift significantly from each other. One party is thinking of blue, the other is thinking of orange, but they are under the assumption that the other party clearly knows which color is at the heart of the interaction. It is an especially disconcerting and altogether disturbing circumstance.I would like to add that pilots and controllers are often overloaded. There is a tremendous amount of real-time activity and information flowing when aircraft are in the air. Pilots have their hands full. Controllers have their hands full.Ambiguities are bound to arise.Furthermore, it is an easy mental trap to assume that the pilot is fully cognizant of what the controller is thinking of, and that the controller is fully cognizant of what the pilot is thinking of. In the throes of flight, this is not necessarily true. During the bulk of flying, this might not pose crucial difficulties. It is generally of minimal consequence. But there are times when it can lead to dreadful consequences.Human-To-Human Versus Human-To-AIThe instance described involves human-to-human ambiguity in communications.Lets shift gears and bring AI into the picture and discuss human-to-AI communications.People are increasingly using generative AI for all types of purposes, see my coverage at the link here. Some uses are for fun and of idle importance. Ambiguities during the interaction between the user and the AI might be of little concern. Realize though that others are using generative AI for exceedingly crucial matters, perhaps even involving high-risk life-related facets. Ambiguity in human-to-AI communication can be of great significance in those settings.Consider these two vital questions:(1) Human awareness of ambiguities. Do the people immersed in those human-to-AI circumstances realize that ambiguity might be afoot, or do they inadvertently let their guard down?(2) AI design about ambiguities. Do those devising and fielding AI realize that the AI ought to explicitly deal with said potential ambiguities?In the madcap rush to get the latest generative AI out the door and into the hands of users, there is a solid chance that neither side is keeping ambiguities at the top of mind. This could lead to regrettably untoward consequences.Examples Of Generative AI Usage AmbiguitiesI will showcase four quick examples of how ambiguity in communications can arise when using AI.These ambiguities can occur in any of the major generative AI apps such as ChatGPT, GPT-4o, o1, o3, Claude, Llama, CoPilot, Gemini, etc. I went ahead and used ChatGPT since it is widely popular and garners over 300 million weekly active users. The other generative AI apps responded in approximately the same way.The four examples will consist of:(a) Human is ambiguous, AI seeks clarification(b) AI is ambiguous, human seeks clarification(c) Human is ambiguous, AI is ambiguous (this is the double-whammy)(d) Human is clearcut or non-ambiguous, AI is clearcut or non-ambiguousI decided to derive examples that are relatively low-key and dont involve high risk. That being said, please envision that these are easily recast in much more life-dependent settings.Human Is Ambiguous, AI Seeks ClarificationI logged into generative AI and entered a prompt saying that I needed help with a report that I am writing. This is somewhat out-of-the-blue in the sense that I didnt start by telling the AI which report I am working on. Nor did I preface my question with any specifics about the kind of help I am seeking. My prompt is quite ambiguous.Here we go.My entered prompt: Can you help me with my report?Generative AI response: Of course! Could you specify what kind of help you need? Are you looking for research, editing, formatting, or something else?My entered prompt: Turns out that I specifically need help summarizing the key points."The generative AI determined that my request for help was ambiguous and thus sought to gain some clarification on what I had in mind. I replied and gave some specifics.This then is an example of the user being ambiguous, and, luckily, the AI catching on to the ambiguity to ask for clarification. Envision what might have happened if the AI made assumptions about my request and just started to proceed without double-checking with me. Up the ante and think about settings in which the AI doesnt seek clarification and for which the user stated request is high risk. The AI could barrel ahead and take undesirable actions. Not good.AI Is Ambiguous, Human Seeks ClarificationYou are undoubtedly catching on to how these examples are illustrative of human-to-AI ambiguities in communication. The next example entails AI being ambiguous and the human opting to seek clarification.This is how things went.My entered prompt: Whats the best investment for me?Generative AI response: Real estate could be a great option.My entered prompt: What do you mean by 'great option'? Are you basing this on market trends, my risk tolerance, or something else?Generative AI response: Good question! I based that answer on general market trends. Would you like me to factor in your risk tolerance and financial goals?"Here you can see that the generative AI recommended my investing in real estate. The recommendation said that doing so would be a great option. I wasnt sure what the notion of being great entails in this context, so I asked for clarification.Human Is Ambiguous, AI Is AmbiguousThe likely worst of the four scenarios is having the user acting ambiguously and the AI also acting ambiguously. Thats a double whammy.Take a look.My entered prompt: Tell me about the car that I am considering buying.Generative AI response: The car is a good choice for you.My entered prompt: "Thanks, I will go ahead and buy the car.Generative AI response: "Great, let me know if you need any assistance in doing so and I can bring up the details and pricing of the car.Suppose that I am thinking of buying a luxury car, but the AI is responding based on a compact car that I had also been looking at. The AI tells me that the car is a good choice for me. That would be the compact car. I mistakenly interpret the response to mean that the luxury car is a good choice.We are speaking past each other and neither side has gone to the trouble of seeking clarification.Human Is Clearcut, AI Is ClearcutIn this last of the four examples, we explore a human-to-AI interaction that generally is clearcut and doesnt leave much room for ambiguity.My entered prompt: "Show me the two key bullet points from my meeting notes, titled Marketing Strategy, which I uploaded into my Shared AI folder.Generative AI response: "Based on the meeting notes entitled Marketing Strategy that I found posted in your Shared AI folder, here are the two key points identified: (1) Define your marketing goals, and (2) Specify tangible marketing metrics associated with each of the goals.My entered prompt: "This is great! Could you expand on the first key point regarding defining marketing goals and give me a full sentence articulating the topic?Generative AI response: "Absolutely! A more detailed indication about defining marketing goals is this draft sentence: Marketing professionals must carefully specify in writing the requisite marketing goals that are associated with an overall marketing strategy that they are planning to undertake.I would assess that there isnt much missed communication in that interaction but fully recognize that there is always room for ambiguity to edge into any conversation.Insights On Human-AI CommunicationA principle that is essential to natural language interaction is that natural languages are inherently semantically ambiguous. The words we use can be interpreted in a multitude of ways. There have been extensive court cases debating the seemingly simplest of words such as the word is. Natural language is not a precise means of communicating.Much of the time, human-to-human communication flows in and out of ambiguity, whereby the participants are shifting into ambiguous territory of the discussion at hand. The dire rub is when this happens if time is short, and the risks are high.Our interaction with generative AI is subject to the same qualms. You are interacting in natural language with a computational and mathematical system based on patterns of human writing and interactions. The human can be ambiguous. The AI can be ambiguous.One manifest viewpoint is that the effort to detect and deal with ambiguity ought to be on the shoulders of the generative AI. AI developers and AI makers should be held to accountability that their AI will always seek to reduce ambiguities. If the user provides an ambiguous instruction or prompt, the AI should directly seek clarification. When the AI is providing a response to a prompt, the AI should ensure that the response is clearcut, including verifying with the user that their interpretation matches to what the AI stated.All of that is certainly sensible, though we are going to need to also make sure that users realize they too play a crucial role in the ambiguitys milieu. If they arent requiring clarifications, the odds are that the AI makers might not perceive a need to cope with the matter. Some suggest that perhaps we need to devise regulations or laws that compel generative AI to contend with ambiguities, see my discussion on such matters at the link here.A concluding thought for now.Please be on your toes when using AI. Human-to-AI communication has ambiguities as does human-to-human interaction. Do not let your guard down simply because you are using some state-of-the-art advanced AI. Always be on your guard.As Adam Smith wisely noted: On the road from the City of Skepticism, I had to pass through the Valley of Ambiguity.So do we all.

Claressa ShieldsCredit: GettyClaressa Shields will look to become an undisputed champion in her fifth weight class when she faces Danielle Perkins in a heavyweight clash on Sunday at the Dort Financial Center in her hometown of Flint, Michigan.The event begins at 7:30 PM (ET) and will be streamed live on DAZN.Shields and Perkins weighed in on Saturday. Shields came in under the light heavyweight limit at 173.6 pounds, while Perkins tipped the scales at 177.2 pounds.DETROIT, MICHIGAN - JANUARY 31: Claressa Shields poses for a portrait during the open media workout ... [+] on January 31, 2025 at Downtown Boxing Gym in Detroit, Michigan. (Photo by Nic Antaya/Getty Images)Getty ImagesShields remains undefeated at 15-0 with 3 KOs. The GWOAT will be defending her WBC heavyweight title, while the vacant WBA, IBF, and WBO belts will also be on the line.Perkins, 42 years old, enters this fight with limited experience, having just five professional bouts under her belt, though she remains undefeated. Both fighters last competed in July 2024 on the same card in Detroit.DETROIT, MICHIGAN - JANUARY 31: Danielle Perkins poses for a portrait during the open media workout ... [+] on January 31, 2025 at Downtown Boxing Gym in Detroit, Michigan. (Photo by Nic Antaya/Getty Images)Getty ImagesMORE FOR YOUThat night, Shields secured a second-round TKO over Vanessa Lepage-Joanisse in the main event, capturing the WBO light heavyweight, WBC, and WBF heavyweight titles. Meanwhile, Perkins won a unanimous decision over Christianne Fahey.Given their placement on the same card in July, this matchup was likely part of a broader plan for Shields quest to become undisputed in yet another weight class. With her 30th birthday approaching next month, she may choose to remain at light heavyweight and heavyweight for the remainder of her career.If thats the case, Shields could become a trailblazer for heavier divisions in womens boxing. Traditionally, most of the focus has been on lower-weight classes. The question remainscan Shields help bring greater attention to the light heavyweight and heavyweight divisions in womens boxing?Its certainly possible, but to do so, shell need to continue winning and face opponents with stronger rsums than Perkins. Still, this bout is expected to be historic, and the atmosphere will be electric as Shields' hometown fans rally behind her.Here is a look at the upcoming boxing schedule following Shields vs. Perkins.Saturday, February 8, 2025Dereck Chisora vs. Otto WallinLocation: Co-Op Live Arena, Manchester, GBTime: 2:00 PM (ET)Friday, February 14, 2025WBO World Lightweight Championship: (c) Denys Berinchyk vs. Keyshawn DavisXander Zayas vs. Slawa SpomerVito Mielnicki vs. Connor CoyleJared Anderson vs. Marios KolliasAbdullah Mason vs. Manuel JaimesLocation: The Theater at MSG, New York City, USTime: 8:00 PM (ET)Saturday, February 15, 2025Jack Catterall vs. Arnold BarbozaLocation: Co-Op Live Arena, Manchester, GBTime: Noon (ET)Oscar Duarte vs. Regis PrograisLocation: Honda Center, Anaheim, California, USTime: 8:00 PM (ET)Saturday, February 22, 2025The Ring, WBA, WBC, WBO, and IBF Light Heavyweight Championship: (c) Artur Beterbiev vs. Dmitry BivolIBF Heavyweight Championship: (c) Daniel Dubois vs. Joseph ParkerWBC Lightweight Championship: (c) Shakur Stevenson vs. Floyd SchofieldWBC Middleweight Championship: (c) Carlos Adames vs. Hamzah SheerazVergil Ortiz Jr. vs. Israil MadrimovJoshua Buatsi vs. Callum SmithZhilei Zhang vs. Agit KabayelLocation: Kingdom Arena, Riyadh, SATime: Noon (ET)Monday, February 24, 2025WBC World Bantamweight Championship: (c) Junto Nakatani vs. David Cuellar ContrerasLocation: Ariake Arena, Tokyo, JPTime: 2:00 AM (ET)Saturday, March 1, 2025WBA World Lightweight Championship: (c) Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach Jr.Location: Barclays Center, New York City, USTime: 8:00 PM (ET)Friday, March 7, 2025The Ring Welterweight Championship: (c) Natasha Jonas vs. Lauren PriceLocation: Royal Albert Hall, London, GBTime: 1:00 PM (ET)Saturday, March 15, 2025WBA World Featherweight Championship: (c) Nick Ball vs. TJ DohenyLocation: M&S Bank Arena, Liverpool, GBTime: 1:00 PM (ET)Sunday, March 16, 2025Callum Walsh vs. Dean SutherlandLocation: The Theater at MSG, New York City, USTime: 9:00 PM (ET)

White House / DADA PartnersSave this picture! Ranjan Sharma / Lightzone IndiaArchitects: DADA PartnersAreaArea of this architecture projectArea:9000 mYearCompletion year of this architecture project Year: 2022 PhotographsPhotographs:Ranjan Sharma / Lightzone IndiaManufacturersBrands with products used in this architecture project Manufacturers: Alcoi India, Amit marbles, FCML, Jindal Steel, Modifloat Glass, Nuance Studio Lead Architects: Mukul Arora More SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!Text description provided by the architects. The minimalist design approach of this project allows for a tactile reading of its sunlight spaces and volumes. Designed as a white stucco house, the projects clean planar volumes allow a calm and meditative reading of the spaces. By introducing smaller courtyards and multiple terraces, creates multiple voids in this otherwise inert and solid white mass. This alternating series of solid-void composition captures the sun and shade in simple yet powerful ways.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!The L-shaped layout allows for a large central green court, with a narrow swimming pool adjacent to it. The East facing front elevation is muted in its expression with just one corner window allowing a peek into the house. The formal lounge is placed along the front and has views on three sides. The central block of the house that faces the green holds the bar, informal family lounge, dining room, and the stairhall. Two bedrooms are positioned towards the southern end. The upper floor is designed for a centrally placed family loungeand four bedrooms. Each of these rooms enjoy large terraces.Save this picture!Project gallerySee allShow lessAbout this officeDADA PartnersOfficeMaterialConcreteMaterials and TagsPublished on February 02, 2025Cite: "White House / DADA Partners" 02 Feb 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1026327/white-house-dada-partners&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save!ArchDaily?You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

submitted by /u/CommercialPay2379 [link] [comments]