Register for free to join AR editors and AR Future Projects winners at Dropcity during the Salone del MobileWinner of AR Future Projects Gort Scott will present their winning project, New Court for Girton College at University of Cambridge, on Wednesday 9 April at Dropcity in Milan, during the Salone del Mobile.AR Future Projects Live 2025Wednesday 9 April, 6pmDropcity, 60 Via Giovanni Battista Sammartini, 20125 MilanoRegister hereto attend for freeNew Court for Girton College at University of Cambridge by Gort ScottWe will also hear from Malta-based practice AP Valletta as well as Guillaume Othenin-Girard at the University of Hong Kong about their highly commended projects: the restoration of a school in Ghana and an archaeological field laboratory in Armenia.Osu Salem Presbyterian School in Accra, Ghana, designed by AP Valletta and David Kojo DerbanGlkhatun archaeological field laboratory in Urtsadzor, Armenia, designed by Guillaume Othenin-Girard and the University of Hong KongLaunched in 2002, the AR Future Projects awards are a window into tomorrows cities. Spanning 12 categories, they celebrate excellence in unbuilt and incomplete projects, and the potential for positive contribution to communities, neighbourhoods and urban landscapes around the world. Find out more about this years winners here.All winners have been published in the 2025 Future Projects awards catalogue purchase a copy here2025-03-26AR EditorsShare

dMFK Architects renovation of the fin de sicle offices of a wallpaper manufacturer strikes a delicate balance between restoration and upgradingMathilda Lewis of dMFK Architects is shortlisted for the MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice 2024. Find out more about the W Awards hereDoes a landmark have to mark the landscape? Voysey House is nestled in a network of alleys off Chiswick High Road in west London. Anattentive stroller might easily miss it. Yetfor admirers of the fin de sicle architect and designer CFA Voysey, it is a landmark indeed, even if you have to peep down one of the slender passages that surround it to see its gleaming white brick walls and Portland stone peaks. I think the photographers feltduped, says Mathilda Lewis of Londonbased firm dMFK Architects, whenthey came and realised that they couldnt get the perspective for a great photo.Voysey specialised in a distinctively streamlined Arts and Crafts style. His country houses reconcile vernacular forms such as pitched roofs with clean, modernising features like white rendered walls. Completed at the height of his practice, Voysey House transferred his ethos to a structure of a verydifferent stripe. Previously known as the White Building, it was erected for the wallpaper manufacturer Arthur Sanderson & Sons in 1902 to complement a redbrick Victorian factory across the passage.After a fire gutted the Victorian factory in 1928, Sanderson moved out to Perivale. Now its successor company, Sanderson Design Group, has moved back in, thanks to property developer and investor Dorrington. After buying the building in 2020, Dorrington invited Sanderson back and began a competition for its restoration. This waswon by dMFK, with Lewis as project architect. Work started on the site in January 2021 and construction took three years.Its architect aside, the building has a significant place in design history. Sanderson was established in 1860, a year before William Morris started his own company. At one point its Chiswick factory accounted for 98 per centof all British wallpaper manufacture. Sanderson hired many of the leading designers of the day, including Voysey. In1940, it bought the wallpaper business, blocks, logbooks, stock and name of Morris & Co, absorbing its most famous rival. The present incarnation encompasses six British luxury interior brands. The companys 75,000item archive, now housed within thebuilding, is a remarkable repository ofwallpaper design.Voysey approached his sole industrial commission with a typical combination offunctionalism and flourish. The buildings hulking dimensions allowed rolls of wallpaper the length of tube carriages to be unfurled atonce. The walls are built of white glazed bricks, with plinths and window frames in a Staffordshire blue variety. Voysey installed huge windows with curved frames toallow in light for work, but also punched whimsical portholelike round windows onthe top floor. The buildings buttresses resemble those of a parish church. Seen from the south, the roof alternates the crowns ofthese structures with parapets topped with cambered Portland stone coping. But any lofty ornamental flourishes are balanced with concessions to the reality of a working building in a 20thcentury city: the buttresses are fitted with urine deflectors to protect them from drinkers from the adjacent pub.Originally known as the White Building, wallpaper-maker Sandersons office used to be connected to its factory across the passage. Its architect wasthe arts and crafts designer CFA VoyseyCredit:RIBA CollectionsAfter Sanderson left, the White Building became a printing works. In 1968, it was purchased by the National Transit Insurance Company. During this period two shuttered garage doors were sawed into the west end of Voyseys structure. They made partitions, added an internal glass lobby and raised deck and removed the original roof. When it was Grade II* listed in 1973 the transformations had already been done. In the 1980s, architect Charles Lawrence bought the building. Lawrence was a member of the Voysey Society and engaged in piecemeal restoration. He rented out the lower three storeys as anoffice while converting the uppermost into a family home, adding another floor, alightwell and a roof terrace while doing so.Over the years, Voyseys bricks had deteriorated. dMFK collaborated with stonework and restoration contractor Paye to repair them, brick by brick. Lewis worked with the client to mark up every damaged brick. It was almost like a game of Jenga, she smiles. How many bricks could we remove without the building falling down? This was possibly the most painful bit of thejob, and in the end you almost dont notice itbecause its so seamlessly repaired.The practices plan sought to bring the building closer to Voysey without turning back time.dMFK director Joshua Scott says: Refurbished glazed brick buildings canlooklike theyve just come outof the factory.They look almost like afacsimile ofthemselves rather than an authentic restoration. dMFK and their partners aimed to instead embrace the buildings wear and age. The exterior isconsequently clean but not glossy.By renewing Voysey House, the architects have made its layers of history all the more conspicuousThe approach continues inside the building. The steel structure is visible, painted in an intumescent paint to protect it from fire. Voyseys original ceiling of white corrugated metal has been cleaned, but dMFK has kept its joins and irregularities. The first and second floors, home to Sandersons offices and design studios, retain Voyseys original wooden flooring, with visible ink stains andmarks from the presses.dMFK also retained Voyseys service coreat the eastern end of the building, adding modern amenities such as showers and bicycle storage, extending the lift to the upper storey and redesigning the staircase with a bespoke nosing of brass inlay and Staffordshire blue brick. These are all hidden from the main space. Network and power sockets are also concealed behind skirting and in the ceiling. The partitions, lobby and raised deck were removed to create freeflowing, open spaces, as Voysey would have recognised. The ground floor is fitted with movable wall panels, allowing separate areas to be created while retaining sight of the entire space.For the windows, dMFK restored the aesthetics of Voyseys original while doing something new. dMFK reimplememted hissmall panes and thick metal frames, replacing his castiron with heatretaining steel. This has both a heritage and security function, with the portcullislike lattice making it difficult for breakins and dispensing with the need for shutters. Through material investigation the architects also discovered and reapplied the frames original bottle green colour.These windows use double glazing, which enhances the buildings heat retention. Thiswas something weve had to fight for in planning, recalls Lewis, because Hounslow Council has a blanket no double glazing policy to avoid double reflectivity. The solution was to place ultrathin panels of Fineo glazing close together. This decreased the buildings Uvalue by over 50 per cent. Itunlocked us getting an EPC A rating, which is quite an achievement for a building of this age, adds Scott.dMFK did not reverse all the interventions of the previous century. The garage doors wereturned into large windows, allowing thebuildings ground floor to serve as a showroom. Lawrences upper floors and lightwell were kept, but heavily adapted. The third floor, with abundant natural light on one side but none on the other, was perfect for Sandersons climatecontrolled archive, while the floor above has been converted into an office space, retaining Lawrences undulating steel ceiling. Weinitially wondered whether this was a good addition, says Lewis. Do we want to embrace it? But taking all that steel away didnt seem like the right thing to do in thecurrent climate. Other features were removed. There were some very strange drainage strategies when we got in, explains Scott. There used to be an internal gulley where rainwater would just run down. Youdpull a bit of wood off the top and thered be water flowing through it. The lightwell was turned into a terrace, with architectural metalwork and vaulted transoms that resemble the outer windows. dMFK clad the walls of the lightwell with TECU oxidised brass panelling. It already demonstrates a vivid patina. In this it represents the project as a whole. By renewing Voysey House, dMFK has madeits layers of history all the more conspicuous. Returning to the building over the past year has been a reminder that its not the glossy photographs that bring the most joy at the end of a job, says Lewis, but seeing how the spaces work for the people who usethem.

An ideas competition is being held to rethink a soon-to-be-demolished flyover in Newcastle, England (Deadline: 28 April)The contest organised by Newcastles Farrell Centre with support from the Northern Architectural Association seeks concepts to transform the A167 Gateshead flyover which closed amid safety concerns at the end of last year and is now expected to be demolished.The competition invites participants to put forward bold, original and compelling solutions to transform the raised road running between St Edmunds Road and Gateshead Foodbank into a new accessible destination which serves as a connector for the local area.The Gateshead flyoverCredit:Image by the Farrell CentreAccording to the brief: This ideas competition looks beyond demolition to explore the possibilities for re-using, re-imagining and re-constituting the Gateshead flyover and what that could offer the city and the region: from the environmental and economic upsides, to the opportunities for supporting health, wellbeing and civic pride by creating a new green space in the heart of Gateshead.Entries will be reviewed by a panel of experts who will select four winning projects, which will be displayed in a small exhibition at the Farrell Centre in May 2025.Gateshead is large town of around 200,000 inhabitants located on the south banks of the River Tyne opposite Newcastle. Local landmarks include the Anthony Gormley-designed Angel of the North sculpture on the town's fringes.The Flyover Futures contest focusses on transforming the elevated Gateshead flyover which closed to traffic in December 2024 following the discovery of structural defects that could have led to its collapse.The Gateshead flyoverCredit:Image by the Farrell CentreThe structure is expected to be demolished and replaced with a new surface-level boulevard however the contest organisers are seeking surprising and transformative ideas to re-use the structure as an ecologically vibrant destination for pedestrians and active travel.Participants are encouraged to consider new ways of accessing the structure and also the inclusive re-development of the immediate environment. The competition is open to everyone with multidisciplinary teams encouraged.Applications should include a maximum of three images and a short 300-text of description. The four winning teams due to be announced on 21 May will each receive a 250 honorarium.How to applyDeadline: 28 AprilCompetition funding source: Northern Architectural AssociationProject funding source: N/AOwner of site(s): Gateshead CouncilContact details: hello@farrellcentre.org.ukVisit the competition website for more information

Lynch Architects renovation andextension of Westminster Coroners Court reintroduces death in the city while paying particular attention to the needs of the bereavedRachel Elliott of Lynch Architects is shortlisted for the MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice 2024. Find out more about the W Awards hereWestern culture does not seemto be growing any less squeamish about death. Not for us the towers of silence, or dakhma, of Zoroastrianism, where the dead are left in soaring stone structures for vultures to consume. Passing on in Britain today is perhaps even more taboo than it was for the Victorians, with their jetblack mourning jewellery and widows weeds.With the silhouette of a little Queen Anne house and the colouring and magpielike architectural expression of late Victorian civic values, Westminster Coroners Court was built in 1893 to the designs of municipal architect and surveyor, GRW Wheeler. Themain function of the building, which lies not far from the UKs Houses of Commons and Lords, is a firstfloor courtroom with acoved ceiling and skylight hidden from view by the domestic front of a hipped roof. In the 1990s, an anonymous mortuary was added to the rear, while to the side an innocentlooking taxi rank doubles as overspill space in the event of terror incidents like the 2018 Westminster Bridge attack or tragedies such as the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire.The buildings original purpose to investigate the circumstances of unexplained deaths remains unchanged. In recent decades, Westminster Coroners Court hasbeen used by four London boroughs to process some of the around 200,000 deaths reported annually to coroners across England and Wales. Around 40 per cent ofthese require inquests a procedure that involves bereaved people, witnesses, police, lawyers and sometimes jurors (the salacious nature of some cases attracts paparazzi like flies to jam). What have shifted since 1893, along with perceptions of thestate, are attitudes to the needs of thebereaved, something architect Patrick Lynch has written about in relation to hisown experience of a coroners court following thedeath of his father in a 1992 accident.The job of extending and renovating the Grade IIlisted building was won by Lynch Architects in 2016. What was needed was an additional courtroom, an improved entrance sequence, dedicated waiting spaces, more meeting rooms and modern office space. Project architect Rachel Elliott has been with the job since the beginning, attending competition interviews with Lynch shortly before maternity leave and returning to seethe building through design development tolast summers practical completion (by which time her child was well advanced at primary school).Lynch Architects urbanminded response to an ostensibly practical brief was to offset the Victorian aedicule with the monumental (and far more ancient) counterpoint of a barrelvaulted tomb or stone sarcophagus a move that unequivocally introduces the spectre of death into the teeming life of thecity. From Horseferry Road today, theundeniably tombstonelike face of thepalenew volume ghosts the red brick and Portland stone banding of the old structure in two cuts of Jura limestone, aseam formed millions of years ago.A dimly lit, timberlined space offers a cavelike embrace to the bereavedAccessed from the original front door andbreaking through the existing west wall, thenew wing comprises a tall, barrelvaulted courtroom with a zincclad roof above offices and a waiting area a dimly lit, timberlined space offering a cavelike embrace to the bereaved. Here, the 19thcentury memorial symbolism of a truncated stone column, speaking of life cut short, is borrowed to provide a prop or leaning postfor people unmoored by grief and circumstance. Aleitmotif of arches emanating from Lynchand Elliotts first readings of thesite,including the main elevations projecting apse of window seat, isextended through new and remodelled interiors to signal key spaces and routes. The architects wanted people to be aware of transitioning from old to new; this is achieved at ground level by the marker of a line of exposed CLT columns running through the new openplan office space. Upstairs, openings through theold fabric to the new corridor link are arched and colonnaded, facing off against the limestoneclad wall of the courtroom in atall channel. Passing through to the court, the eye might catch a line from Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, Wordsworths odeto London, chiselled in cursive script high up on the wall like a frieze. The lofty character of the inner chamber, which can besubdivided to accommodate different scales and styles of hearing, echoes the calm, toplit dignity of the original court, including its cloak of timber panelling. Outside, the whole is flanked by a pair ofnew secluded gardens, offering space for finding composure alongside flowing water and greenery. (To provide mourning space for the Grenfell bereaved, the eastern garden was accelerated as a separate contract in 2018.) The shadow gap of glazed link that connects old and new was set deeper during design development at the suggestion of Westminsters planners and Historic England. It was a good call, and one of very few comments. Now you can see the corners of both buildings clearly, says Elliott.Soon after the commission became public, artist Brian Clarke contacted the architects with the offer of customdesigned stained glass. Like Lynch, Clarke had experienced the inside of coroner courts, not least as executor for artist Francis Bacon, and had strong views on how user experience might be improved. The stained glass is a way of elevating a secular building, of adding a dimension, comments Elliott. Clarkes panels, evocative of flora that might be found in cemeteries or left by graves, are employed to inject poetry and privacy at key junctures: the ends of the glazed link, the family waiting room, and as a glowing, westfacing triptych in the courtroom. Incorporating a gift into a contractual situation was actually quite tricky, observes Elliott. For the art to be fundamental to the building, the points where the architecture and stained glass meet were important in terms of detailing.In contrast to protracted groundworks involving sheetpiling of the entire site, the buildings CLT structure from Eurban went up in five days during the summer of 2023, with an accuracy and speed Elliott describes as incredibly satisfying. By March 2024, thenew build was watertight and the internal openings could be punched through. Changing attitudes and legislation after the Grenfell tragedy meant that fire engineering was the projects biggest challenge, according to Elliott. Although one cost consultant did suggest that the stone cladding be omitted from the rear of the extension because only the dead in the adjacent mortuary would notice.Elliott studied at Glasgows Mackintosh School of Architecture in the era of Isi Metzstein and Andy MacMillan, where, shesays, the social purpose of architecture was deeply instilled. Her postqualification experience at van Heyningen & Haward Architects fuelled afurther line of interest in working with historic fabric, leading toaccreditation as anRIBA Conservation Architect as well as aBuilding History masters at Cambridge. AtWestminster Coroners Court, Elliotts work contributed to embedding the spirit of an architectural concept deep into the design development and execution of a newbuild and restoration hybrid, ensuring that the quality of spatial and emotional experience befits the weight and substance of the buildings ongoing public duty. Over time, moving stories of personal encounters with the new building and its stainedglass illuminated spaces willno doubt emerge as part of Londons collective consciousness. Interms of the social mores of death in the city, I would suggest that postoccupancy evaluation might take another century or so.

An open international architecture and urban design contest is being held for a 24.5 million (CSK 730 million) new bus station and civic complex in Valask Mezi, Czechia (Deadline: 17 April)The two-stage competition organised by the Centre for Central European Architecture (CCEA MOBA) on behalf of the City of Valask Mezi will select a design team to create a new bus terminal, municipal office and parking garage in the centre of the historic settlement.The 24.5 million (CSK 730 million) project will transform a large former timber yard located next to Valask Mezis main station. New public spaces and two residential apartment blocks are also planned.Competition site: Valask Mezi bus station, CzechiaAccording to the brief: The city of Valask Mezi is announcing an open, two-phase architectural competition for the design of a bus terminal, municipal office, and parking garage.The competition also includes the design of public space and a conceptual proposal for two residential buildings.The competition is based on an urban study from 2021. The traffic solution, including the roundabout and the underpass connecting the project site with the railway station building and its platforms, is already defined and forms part of the framework for the design.Valask Mezi is a small town of around 23,000 inhabitants located in the Zln Region of eastern Czechia. The town is situated at the convergence of the Ronovsk and Vsetnsk Beva rivers, and includes a major train station.The latest contest comes just months after international competitions were announced for the 244 million upgrade of flood defences in Olomouc and to transform the disused Hotel Stroja in nearby Perov.Competition site: Valask Mezi bus station, CzechiaKey aims of the phased project include creating a new public park, station forecourt and park as well as delivering a new 22-bay bus terminal, a 6,600m municipal office block, a 250-capacity car park and residential development.Judges will include vice-mayor Yvona Wojaczkov, local assembly member Alena Carbolov, Pavla Matjka Enochov of the practice A69, and the towns chief architect Ondej Chybk.The contest language is Czech and English. Submissions will be judged on architectural quality, urban design quality, sustainability and technical design.The overall winner will receive a 33,500 (CZK 1 million) prize while a second prize of 23,500 (CZK 700,000) and third prize of 16,800 (CZK 500,000) will also be awarded.How to applyDeadline: 17 AprilCompetition funding source: The Municipality of Valask MeziProject funding source: The Municipality of Valask MeziOwner of site(s): The Municipality of Valask MeziContact details: ask@cceamoba.czVisit the competition website for more information

The six finalist concepts in an international contest for a $160 million-to-$170 million upgrade of the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City have been revealedUS, international, emerging and established architects were invited to participate in the two-stage contest for a 5,670m extension to the historic free-to-visit art museum located at 45th and Oak Streets in the centre of Kansas City.The finalists are Kengo Kuma & Associates of Tokyo, Renzo Piano Building Workshop of Genoa, Selldorf Architects from New York, Studio Gang from Chicago, Weiss/Manfredi Architecture of New York, and WHY Architecture of Los Angeles.The shortlisted concepts feature in a free exhibition at The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art and in an online gallery with the public invited to submit comments.The project will upgrade the museums original Beaux Arts building while also creating an additional extension featuring a new primary entrance and foyer, a photography centre, exhibition galleries, learning spaces, a theatre and a restaurant for indoor/outdoor dining and events.The first stage of the competition, which launched in October 2024, attracted 182 teams from 30 countries on six continentsRound one applications required architect-led multidisciplinary teams to submit details of project approach, team composition and experience. The six finalists each received a US$75,000 competition fee to draw up concept designs.Evelyn Craft Belger, chair of the museums board of trustees and the architect selection committee, said: These six concept designs articulate six unique visions of a new and even more dynamic Nelson-Atkins.This is a thrilling moment for the museum and our community when we start to visualise an identity that will carry us through the coming decades. We encourage our community to visit the exhibition and share your thoughts which proposal best realises your aspirations?Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art director and chief executive Julin Zugazagoitia said: We asked for bold, inspiring moves that also respected the existing museum campus and Im so happy to say weve received them in these initial designs. Each is a fascinating response to a complex project brief, together they bring myriad perspectives.The teams have shone their beams of thought on our big questions: how do we synthesise our existing icons with a new proposition? How do we modernise and embrace the future but keep the best of our history? And, most of all, how do we create a museum that is transparent for all and instills a sense of belonging and well-being?Originally founded in 1933 the fine art museum has more than 42,000 items in its collection and is particularly known for its displays of Asian art, European and American paintings, photography, modern sculpture, and for its Native American and Egyptian galleries.The museum occupies a historic Beaux Arts building along with a 2007 extension which is known as the Bloch Building and was designed by US architect Steven Holl and a 9ha sculpture park.The latest project aims to integrate the museums existing facilities into a cohesive new experience.Key aims include attracting new audiences and creating a museum for all that speaks to community.An overall winner will be announced in spring 2025.The Nelson-Atkins Museum of ArtCredit:Image courtesy of The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art

HAT Projects community and industrial centre in Jaywick Sands offers vendors and small businesses much-needed room for growthRebecca Kalbfell of HAT Projects is shortlisted for the MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice 2024. Find out more about the W Awards hereIn 1970, the council in charge of the small coastal settlement of Jaywick Sands in Essex issued 770 compulsory purchase orders. The plan was to buy up the marshy land on which the community had grown since the late 1920s, demolish its largely selfbuilt homes, and redevelop Jaywick in its entirety. The residents fought back, winning a High Court order that halted the purchases and the bulldozers. Today, Jaywick is one of the last remaining plotlands in Essex, a rare survival of the relatively unregulated settlements built by workers from Londons East End first for holidaying, later for permanent residence on the inexpensive, floodprone land around the Thames Estuary.The council back then saw Jaywick as a problem that they could just get rid of, says Rebecca Kalbfell, associate at HAT Projects, an architecture practice based in Colchester, 20 minutes inland by car. The local authority restructured into Tendring District Council shortly after the episode, but attitudes towards Jaywick took time to shift. A swathe of masterplans were produced from the 1980s to the early 00s, all of which involved partial demolition and most of which were roundly rejected by residents. But Tendring has changed its tack recently, and its language: in 2018, it commissioned HAT to put together a place plan for Jaywick focused on building new homes and propping up its infrastructure and flood defences rather than flattening it.Kalbfell, who joined HAT in 2014, has worked on the place plan since its inception. Jaywick, the team found, shares many chronic challenges with other seaside communities around the UK. The decline of domestic tourism in the postwar years means that nothing remains of the casino, arcade and boating lake that once sat between Jaywicks Brooklands and Grasslands, stitching the two seafront neighbourhoods together. All those I know who were kids in the 70s would have gone to Jaywick in the summer, says Kalbfell, who grew up in Essex in the 1990s and 00s. Its one of the nicest beaches along this stretch of coast. But for my generation, it wasnt a thing.Compounding its vulnerability is Jaywicks plotlands status. Its lowslung chalets mostly sit just below sea level, and were never meant to be permanent homes; Brooklands and Grasslands were without basic utilities until the 1980s. The roads and lanes remain private; National Highways has no obligation to maintain them. In recent decades, the cheapest chalets have attracted absentee landlords who let them to people claiming housing benefit, while allowing the properties to deteriorate far below the national Decent Homes Standard. As HATs interim report reads, There is a clear correlation between low owner occupation and poor housing conditions. Jaywick topped the governments Deprivation Index for England in 2010, 2015 and 2019.It soon became clear to HAT that residents top priority was the creation of commercial opportunities. As part of their work on the place plan, they helped form a brief for a business and industrial centre where Frank Ernest Bromiges longdemolished art deco arcade first known as the Playdium, then as Sunspot had once stood. Here, on derelict land, a weekly car boot sale was already taking place, but without as much as a pavement, let alone cover. From speaking to residents, we knew that this type of space was missing, says Kalbfell. People did in fact have their own businesses, but they were running them out of their kitchens. Had statistical analysis been done from afar by an agency, that may not have registered, suggests Kalbfell. They would have said there is no demand in Jaywick, because there was nothing here already.When Tendring District Council put out the business centre to tender, HAT were the obvious choice, and Kalbfell became its project architect. With combined funding from Tendring, the Getting Building Fund, Essex County Council and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, the 5.3 million development was named Sunspot after the old arcade. It was slated for long meanwhile use meaning 2550 years and designed by HAT to be easily dismantled and reconstructed elsewhere. A simple steel frame encased in corrugated aluminium and polycarbonate panels, it has piles that burrow deep into the marshy ground. It took only 18 months to construct, completing in September 2023. There are modest flourishes: a sawtooth roofline that mimics the wide pitched roofs of Jaywicks distinctive chalets; bright yellow awnings; red structural steel; a facade the colour of mint ice cream.Sunspots smallest business units face the seafront, forming a promenade along the freshly paved stretch of road. Current groundfloor tenants include Buddies Barbers, the Rainy Bakes bakery and dog groomers Spotty Dotty & Friends, which recently expanded into another larger unit around the back with a pet shop. Upstairs units are accessed via intercom through the main entrance; these house an AI consultant, a masseuse, a handbag designer and a florist, among other businesses. At its eastern end, facing Grasslands and ClactononSea, is a caf run by the charity The Active Wellbeing Society; at the other, facing Brooklands and the holiday parks of Seawick, a doubleheight event space hosts markets, concerts, workshops and exercise classes year round. Within six months of opening, Sunspot hit nearly full occupancy, with one upstairs unit the largest kept empty for 15perday hotdesking.Were inclusive to everyone, says Mick Lister, who manages Sunspot for Tendring District Council. The units are affordable, ranging from 250 to 1,200 per month, and the notice is only 30 days, so if it is not working out for you, you just leave the unit as you found it. Two winters in, however, the pattern is of businesses growing, rather than shuttering. Something of a pipeline has emerged: Two people started in the market, and have gone into units, explains Lister. Eight businesses have gone into small units and then expanded into bigger ones. And the hotdesking option has paid off too, with one person starting there, later taking on a unit. Today, there is a waiting list to rent a business unit at Sunspot.This flexibility is reflected in the barebones design of the building. Groundfloor units are prefitted with a coldwater run which can be connected to the mains if necessary. Businesses such as Rainy Bakes have opted to install ventilation for their ovens an adaptation made relatively simple through easily accessible service hatches on the first floor. The point is that the services are only plugged in if required by the tenant. Not everyone needs it, says Kalbfell. And if you dont need it, you dont pay for it.Jaywick is a resilient community. On a blustery January morning this year, the car boot sale is in full swing in the market space, with the beachfacing shutters pulled close to block out the icy North Sea wind. Inside, the bunting is up, and a space heater hums in the corner. At the other end of the building, the caf is nearly full. The thought that keeps returning when I see all the people in there, says Lister, is where did they go before? The first summer was busier still, with a noticeable uptick in beachgoers coming in from neighbouring areas. Public toilets were previously tucked behind a curtain shop in Grasslands you wouldnt know unless you lived here, says Lister and were frequently shut. Sunspots accessible toilets, by contrast, face the beach and are clearly signposted.While her work on Sunspot is done, Kalbfell has returned to Jaywick over the past 18 months, often walking her dog along the sands. Eyeing a new set of curtains or fresh signage, she will know that another tenant has moved in and personalised their unit. I love that, she says. Its not precious. The building is there to be owned by the businesses. Soon, she will continue work on the place plan with the HAT team: 20 million of government funding was secured at the end of last year to carry out its next phases. This will involve, among other things, raising the seawall to protect Jaywick from flood risk that will only worsen in the coming halfcentury.Nearer in time, Lister is planning a community day during school summer holidays, including live music in Sunspots market space and a sandcastle competition on the beach. He hopes Kalbfell will join as a judge to assess the castles on their architectural merit and, he laughs, do some snagging.2025-03-20Reuben J BrownShare AR March 2025W AwardsBuy Now

Spanning both research and design, this practice documents the layers of Saudi Arabias architectural heritage and breathes new life into historic sitesSara Alissa and Nojoud Alsudairi areshortlisted in the 2025 Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementAmong the most beautiful installations at the 2024 Desert X AlUla biennial in north-western Saudi Arabia was a jagged cut zigzagging into the desert landscape. Invisible until you got up close, the excavated pathway sloped down into an angular, stepped gathering place before narrowing again, holding visitors within rammed-earth retaining walls. Rather than building upwards and trying to compete with the monumental landscape of AlUla, the installation allowed the subterranean contours of the earth to perform as architecture.Another subtle and poetic temporary space, built for the inaugural Islamic Arts Biennale in Jeddah in 2023, was made of palm reed walls. Standing on sand that was raked five times a day, the light enclosure invoked the simplicity of temporary musallas, or prayer spaces, that used to be created along pilgrimage routes. As the installations title suggests, anywhere can be a place of worship.Excavated soil was consolidated with corn starch and water, and rammed into walls to create the 110m-long and 1.5m-deep crack in the desert landscape of AlUla. The installation, called When the Earth Began to Look at Itself, was part of the 2024 Desert X AlUla biennialCredit:Lance Gerber / Courtesy of The Royal Commission for AlUlaSpare and humble yet acutely sensitive to their surroundings, these two installations incarnate Syn Architects research-driven practice. The name Syn derives from the synchronicity between collaborators and the two co-founders, Nojoud Alsudairi and Sara Alissa, who met while working on independent restoration projects Alissa with Henning Larsen and Alsudairi at the Misk Art Institute. They came together in 2015 for Shamalat, the restoration and extension of mud houses into a cultural centre in Diriyah, on the outskirts of Saudi capital Riyadh, which opened to the public in 2023. It was such a good learning exercise for us, Alsudairi remembers, noting that the process opened up questions that would become foundational to their practice. What does it mean to restore? To repurpose? What can adapative reuse look like here? It was their first time working with earthen architecture, and they were keen to introduce contemporary materials and design elements. They would go on to set up their practice in 2019. The Quran holds that man was created from sounding clay moulded from black mud, the kind that cracks and clatters as it dries. This is the beginning, and also the end to which humans will return: ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Earth equally forms the basis of vernacular Najdi architecture in Saudi Arabias central plain, where Riyadh is located, typified by mudbrick structures, geometric openings and crenellated battlements. In what has now become a full-throated architectural revival, these treatments are blithely applied to facades across the capital. Suturing the future to the past in this way serves a dual purpose. For outsiders, it promotes cultural tourism as the country moves to diversify away from oil under the aegis of its Vision 2030 blueprint. For Saudis, it reintroduces modern citizenry to their heritage and cultural identity.Old earthen walls and new stone facades make up Shamalat, a new cultural centre located in Diriyah, on the outskirts of Saudi Arabias capital RiyadhCredit:Laurian GhinioiuIt was not always like this. When artist Maha Malluh purchased a pair of disused mud houses in the historic adobe town of Diriyah in 2012, earthen architecture was still associated with pre-oil-boom poverty, with having less. Malluh named the cultural centre Shamalat, after the twin peaks of an epic Jahili poem about forbidden love, and enlisted the help of her architect daughter, Alissa. The result is a cultural centre that brings together an artists residence, facilities such as a workshop, darkroom and library, as well as exhibition spaces, artisanal shops and a caf.The project unfolded in distinct restoration and addition phases, with clear material demarcations between them. Rather than replastering the entire facade, Syn kept the original and just touched up the mud plaster where it fell off, working with preservation expert Mahmoud Bendakir to understand more technical elements such as the roof. The walls of straw-bound mud brick contrast with the new volumes made of white Riyadh limestone, sourced from a nearby quarry. We try not only to understand the scale, but how the material relates to what is next to it, Alsudairi explains. The stone acts as a blank canvas, a backdrop to the earthen buildings.Syn Architects sensitive yet decidedly contemporary intervention integrates remnants of the constructions that previously occupied thesite, seen both on theoutside andthe insideCredit:Hassan Al ShattiThe work on Shamalat coincided with the governments own efforts to restore Diriyah, the ancestral home of the Al Saud dynasty. Largely abandoned in 1818 as its denizens moved to Riyadh following a bloody Ottoman siege, Diriyah was resettled in the late 20th century, with residents building new mudbrick homes, and the government began renovating its ruins in the 1990s. After the citadel of At-Turaif was named a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2010, authorities turned their sights to developing the surrounding area into a US$63 billion giga-project under the roadmap Vision 2030, filled with Najdi-ish shopping centres, hotels, museums and other dining and entertainment venues that seek to deliver the promised Diriyah: City of Earth tagline.Alsudairi notes it is important to acknowledge the watershed societal transformations that have accompanied Vision 2030. After her undergraduate architectural engineering course at Prince Sultan University a recently launched programme she describes as a significant leap forward for womens architectural education in Saudi all her internship applications were rejected for the fact that firms did not have a then-mandated segregated space for women. Imagine how much things have changed in the past eight years. I think we take it for granted, but new leadership has revolutionised how women exist in workplaces. Were integrated, and it has really impacted our careers significantly.Within the last decade or so, much of Diriyah also became a protected site. Shamalat luckily fell just outside it the protected sites boundary wall is right across the street. Still, red tape was a major challenge. When Malluh acquired the site, permits to restore and extend a building did not exist, Alissa remembers. You would either completely demolish the existing and build anew, or carry out a meticulous restoration, faithful to the original, with no new elements. When the area changed hands to the Diriyah Gate Development Authority (DGDA), launched by royal decree in 2017 and replete with a new suite of regulations, Syn had to redo the arduous permission and design approval process they had previously completed with the local municipality. This led to a two-year delay, followed by further slowdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic.There were design impositions too. Syn were, for instance, asked to integrate a series of furjat, the small openings in this case triangular used to improve daylight and ventilation that have now become a lazy synecdoche for the Najdi style. Since the original houses did not feature them, the architects argued they did not see a value in aesthetics for aesthetics sake. The protracted battle took about a year of back and forth, but their case was heard. Instead, the pair draw from the essence of Najdi architecture in the variation of their modular but non-uniform and decidedly non-triangular openings. Each opening is indexical and frames a particular view: looking back at the original building, for example, or to the wadi (seasonal river) just a few steps away.This unconventional approach was met with resistance from the purists who romanticise adobe and who would prefer to freeze, ossify even, Diriyah in time. A lot of restoration around Saudi is for very traditional, museumified archaeological sites, Alissa explains. Shamalat was not supposed to be a pristine but unusable space, a site that would just get looked at by visitors, so functionality took precedence instead. The priority was that every part of it would get used, Alsudairi adds. Our approach is very practical inserting a floor, hiding all the ducting, electrical wiring and the central AC and its a way to keep these buildings alive.The duo is adamant that architectural heritage should not be restricted to a particular era or material, but stretch to the present and encompass the post-oil modernist movement too. In 2020, Syn launched the non-profit research project Saudi Architecture to archive and examine the countrys significant modernist buildings as well as modernist sites at threat of demolition. As designers, we tend to move on and build new projects and new districts, but there is value in documenting, maintaining and restoring the existing built environment. This is also what being an architect is, Alsudairi says. This enquiry into architectural identity finds resonance in similar initiatives across the country, including Bricklabs Saudi Modern project in Jeddah.Another research-based offshoot is the Um Slaim Collective, which Syn launched in 2021 to document fast-fading typologies of Najdi architecture in the eponymous central Riyadh neighbourhood, densely packed with still-inhabited mud houses. The aim is not to advocate revival of the vernacular, but rather its integration in the contemporary city. The architects initially had their eyes on an adobe house, but faced a moratorium on all restoration of mud houses in the area allowing developers to demolish them and profit from increased land value. They chose to rent an old cafeteria instead as a home for the Um Slaim urban research lab. Encompassing ethnography, pedagogy and art exhibitions, the lab considers traditional restoration practices as well as more contemporary and ad hoc ones such as the ongoing maintenance of mud houses by primarily low-income Pakistani tenants, which does not stem from a will to preserve, but instead to retain liveable and affordable bedspaces. Many criticise these tenants efforts, but theyre the reason why these houses are still standing, and still alive, Alissa notes. If they were left empty, they would have just decayed naturally.The duo is also interested in preserving the more intangible heritage associated with these architectures. Earthen constructions carry a lot of inherited values that are lost in contemporary practices, such as the respect of the environment theyre constructed in, explains Alsudairi. For the Saudi Pavilion exhibition at this years Venice Biennale, Syn will present the work of the Um Slaim Collective and launch the Um Slaim School, an alternative pedagogical platform to disseminate their research and grounded approach to practice. They hope it will be, like the Prince Sultan University programme for women, another leap forward for architectural education in Saudi.

For Ashleigh Killa, co-founder of The MAAK in South Africa, buildings are an expression of care and engagementAshleigh Killa is shortlisted in the 2025 Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementMost of the Western Capes sprawling Winelands towns have two stories to tell: one of idyllic luxury destinations; and the other, visible just as you take the next corner, of the lives of seasonal farmworkers and manual labourers who service that luxury. The littleknown town of RiebeekKasteel, about an hour outside Cape Town along its West Coast Way, is no exception.A few minutes drive from RiebeekKasteel is a remnant of apartheid spatial planning which today remains a lowincome, coloured community. This suburb has been extended in the last five years, with the municipality providing serviced plots to the community, but no built structures. As a result, a whole new area of selfbuilt zinc homes New Rest Valley has developed. It is among these homes that the New Rest Valley Crche raises its head, at once a remarkable sight, and a beacon of hope not just for the families it services, but for the community at large. The only built infrastructure in the area, it was completed in 2023 on a narrow plot of land, sitting flush against selfbuilt homes at one end, while adjacent to vacant land earmarked for a public park on the other. That this land has remained vacant throughout the design, build and opening of the crche is telling. Government projects take a long time to come into fruition here, if indeed at all. New Rest Valley Crche was realised thanks to donor funding coordinated through the local volunteering organisation Rotary Club of Newlands, while the sustained management and maintenance of the facility is assured through the Vuya Foundation, a nonprofit organisation working in the province.With its clean lines, simple materiality and subtle detailing, the building is made to service around 90 children in three classrooms. The playground area runs along these classrooms, shaded by a wall of perforated blocks. Large openings in the roof sheltering the playground welcome in light, as well as allow the growth of wild pear trees, which aid in ventilation and cooling. Jutting out to the skies, these trees are as much an aesthetic detail as they are functional.The first floor of the building is designed as a caretakers quarters, with two rooms currently used as storage and a bathroom. This area is spacious enough to potentially function as an overflow classroom, though there has not yet been a need for this. The northfacing porthole windows on this level are a defining feature of the building, and provide a vantage point not just of the playground, but of the greater area.Pops of colour are thoughtfully used and appear throughout the crche, which is fitting given the little end users, who range in age from two to five years. These pops extend to the rubber surface of the playground. During the building process, architects The MAAK arranged a play day for children from the community, giving them the space to share the kinds of games they ordinarily play on the street. These games informed the shapes and patterns imprinted on the rubber, and send the crucial message that these childrens voices matter. As The MAAK co-founder Ashleigh Killa observes, we are not the experts in play any more. This gesture of carefully engaging with the people who will occupy the building is something the practice incorporates in all their projects. Killa favours an approach that is built on empathy, which she says can only truly be achieved by keeping quiet to make room for listening.The MAAK was founded by Killa and Max Melvill in 2016, with the goal of making social impact architecture an idealistic endeavour at the time. Her vision for this kind of work became clear after a stint at a Cape Townbased firm where Killa was designing extravagant homes for the 1 per cent in between her undergrad and postgrad years. It took being in that space to know where and how she wanted to focus her own practice. The MAAKs establishment was propelled by the commission to design a significant public building for the Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation, a nonprofit in the Cape Town township of Masiphumelele. Being exposed to a project of this scale in the very early days of the practice meant that they had the freedom to carve out their own rules and methods of working, alongside the guidance of mentors. It taught Killa the importance of knowing that you dont know.Killa is part of a generation of South Africans who came of age in the postapartheid Rainbow Nation, where the need for change was very real and urgent. As a result, she was set on an architecture that could effect change, even if that meant merely chipping at the surface. She believes that change can happen slowly and incrementally, and through small initiatives that probe bigger issues. For example, The MAAKs Follies in the Veld programme, which has taken place every year since the practices inception, offers a space for learning through collaboration. Comprising up to 20 volunteer participants from various backgrounds, each edition is themed around a different material, and concludes with a largescale installation, often in lowincome or rural settings. It provides an opportunity for experimentation and prototyping not just with design and materiality but exploring what can be achieved by building in community with each other.The MAAKs approach is strongly influenced by Yvonne Farrell and Shelley McNamaras Freespace Manifesto, which was issued in 2018 when the pair curated the Venice Architecture Biennale. The manifesto encourages designers to think beyond form and function in favour of a more peoplecentred, socially conscious approach to architecture. Freespace encompasses freedom to imagine, the free space of time and memory, binding past, present and future together, building on inherited cultural layers, weaving the archaic with the contemporary, reads the concluding line of the manifesto.One can see how this manifesto has been formative in Killas practice, and continues to inform The MAAKs projects. For the recently completed Rahmaniyeh Primary School Library in Cape Towns District Six, the practice thought carefully about the conditions of the site as a social space. Once more, The MAAK consulted learners in a series of workshops to get a better understanding from the expert end users themselves. For example, for the design of a bookshelf, learners were prompted to draw and make models of the space in which they felt the books should live. At the time of writing, these ideas were in the process of being built by local designers Pedersen + Lennard. It was in these workshops, too, that The MAAK were reminded of the ways in which the children best engage with books lying on their tummies in a calm, quiet space was the preference, and as a result, the library is fitted with soft finishings and various spaces for lying down and sitting. Childrens imaginations are so untamed, its a joy to tap into them to free us from our practical and compliant constraints, says Killa.Like New Rest Valley Crche, this project was funded by the Rotary Club of Newlands, while its operations are supported by the nonprofit Otto Foundation, which champions early literacy by encouraging reading for enjoyment. The foundation has an excellent track record with similar projects, and the architects worked very closely with the childcentred design specialist on the Otto team, Xanel Purn.In addition, the practice collaborated with land activist and artist Zayaan Khan to fire bricks containing rubble of the areas tragically demolished buildings to build the structure. In the 1960s, District Six was declared a whitesonly area under South Africas Group Areas Act. As a result, the vibrant and diverse communities of District Six were forcibly removed; its homes, places of gathering and all infrastructure demolished, leaving in its wake a trauma that the victims and their families are still grappling with today. This intervention by The MAAK and Khan (herself a descendant of evictees) is a sensitive acknowledgement of the deep and troubled context within which they are working.The MAAK has recently completed a new library for the Rahmaniyeh Primary School in CapeTowns District Six.Working alongside child-centred design specialist Xanel Purn, aswell as the children themselves, the architects arrived at a design for theinterior which will encourage the young endusers to read in variousways, both seatedand lying downCredit:The MAAKThe principles of the practices ethos are also being applied to a current public work in progress in Stellenbosch, the Kayamandi MultiSport Community Facility commissioned by the Open Play Foundation. With a brief to design a sports facilities hub for the benefit of the community, The MAAK are reimagining the space as a precinct that encompasses the surrounding activity and behaviours, with the potential to bring together people from both sides of the Stellenbosch privileged/underprivileged divide.The MAAKs projects are threaded with their capacity for empathy and listening, which Killa says is what architecture needs now. But such projects need better financing. At the moment architecture is reserved for people who can afford it, she says, but finding the projects that are delivering to anyone and everyone is really important otherwise we are obsolete. That is not to say things are at the same place they were when The MAAK founded their practice. Killa is confident that their work in this space is being recognised and understood. Corporate social investment and social impact partnerships are finally recognising these kinds of projects, says Killa, in ways that are incentivised, supportive and generative.2025-03-17Reuben J BrownShare AR March 2025W AwardsBuy Now

An international contest is being held to reimagine a pedestrian underpass in the centre of Trenn, Slovakia (Deadline: 4 April)The single-stage competition seeks proposals for a permanent artistic-architectural intervention to upgrade the city centres main underpass attracting new visitors to the space, improving its illumination and enhancing the feeling of safety.Concepts will be expected to draw attention to Trenns status as joint European Capital of Culture Trenn 2026 and respond to the festival theme of Awakening Curiosity. Proposals may include light, sound or space interventions with digital panels highlighting events from the Trenn 2026 programme.Competition site: Trenn underpass, SlovakiaCredit:Image by Marek JanchAccording to the brief, Within the framework of the European Capital of Culture Trenn 2026 project, the Creative Institute Trenn announces an artistic-architectural competition. The aim of the competition is to show the potential of the underpass, to improve its overall impression for pedestrians, and at the same time to use this specific public space for the presentation of the activities of Trenn 2026.The aim of the competition is to define vision and strategy for the underpass and to transform the underground part of the underpass into a safe, pleasant, illuminated and accessible public space with elements of art and design. The intention, of course, is not to motivate people to spend their free time in the underpass, but to contribute to a change in the perception of the place.Located 95km northeast of Bratislava, Trenn is a historic city which developed around the third-largest castle in Slovakia. The settlement will be joint European Capital of Culture alongside Oulu in Finland next year.In 2023, the nearby City of Trnava launched an open international contest to masterplan a new 135ha urban extension.The latest contest comes two years after Londons Studio Egret West and Oslos Snhetta revealed their competition-winning designs for a major mixed-use development in Bratislava.Organised by Creative Institute Trenn the competition focusses on upgrading a key underpass located beneath the Square of the Slovak National Uprising in the centre of the city, connecting the historic core to a nearby park and train station.The project aims to transform the busy but dark and uninteresting underpass into a safe, pleasant, illuminated and accessible public space. Key aims include encouraging pedestrians and cyclists to slow down or stop briefly by having a memorable engagement with a light or sound installation.Judges will include the architect Jana Benkov; the artist and university lecturer Martin Piaek; Samu Forsblom, program director at European Capital of Culture Oulu 2026; and Vivien Doumpa, urbanist and board member of Placemaking Europe.The winner, to be announced in late April, will receive a 3,000 prize and 60,000 to deliver the intervention. A second prize of 2,400 and third prize of 1,800 will also be awarded.How to applyDeadline: 3pm, 4 AprilCompetition funding source: Trenn 2026, European Capital of CultureProject funding source: Trenn 2026, European Capital of CultureOwner of site(s): City of TrennContact details: hana.lassova@trencin2026.euVisit the competition website for more information

The Henrik F Obel Foundation has announced an open call for two teaching fellowships each worth 75,000 (Deadline: 1 August)Now in its third edition, the OBEL Award Teaching Fellowships support universities to incorporate new voices into their institutions and develop impactful courses which promote innovation.This years open call invites prospective academics and their host institutions to respond to the theme of Ready Made with proposals which promote deeper exploration, development, and dissemination of knowledge on this topic.OBEL Award Teaching Fellowships 2025Executive director of the OBEL Award Jesper Eis said: Supporting influential ideas and approaches that can drive architectural discourse is a key focus for the foundation.We are excited to welcome applications from around the world to gain diverse perspectives on the Ready Made agenda. Ultimately, we seek fellows who explore how new value and new values can be discovered through the materials and mechanisms of what already exists.Just like the Ready Made agenda, education works in a similar way: the essence of a fellowship is to take an existing body of knowledge and build upon it with new ideas and contributions.The fellowships are part of the annual Obel Award which is supported by the Henrik F Obel Foundation. The foundation was created by the Danish businessman Henrik Frode Obel and is based in Copenhagen. The first Obel Award of 100,000 was granted to Japanese architect Jun'ya Ishigami in 2019.The latest open call invites academics and universities to put forward proposals for new courses starting in 2026 or soon after. Two winning applicants will each receive 75,000 to cover the fellows salary, travel and teaching materials.Last years winners included Dele Adeyemo and the Department of Architecture & the Centre for Housing and Sustainable Development at The University of Lagos. Adeyemos course focuses on indigenous settlement practices in contemporary Nigerian cities.How to applyDeadline: 3pm, 4 AprilCompetition funding source: The Henrik F Obel FoundationProject funding source: The Henrik F Obel FoundationOwner of site(s): Not applicableContact details: hana.lassova@trencin2026.euVisit the competition website for more information

The director of cityLAB and UCLA professor of architecture discusses her ambitions for the competition for new small-scale, community focused housing concepts in Los AngelesDana CuffWhy are you holding a competition focusing on small underused sites in LA?LA needs to find as many means as possible to create new housing, especially after the fires in January, when so many people lost so much. Small residential lots are the DNA of LA, after all, and there are tens of thousands of these scattered across the city, ready for new housing. The competition foregrounds architectural prototypes that work in this context, so they simultaneously unlock myriad other development opportunities, incrementally shifting the fabric of LA. Furthermore, this city has a storied history of small-scale, multifamily development making LA the perfect place to host a competition focused on residential lots.What is your ambition for how sites like these could be transformed into new community-focused housing?Wed like to see submissions that focus on community at two scales: at the scale of the buildings themselves and at the scale of the neighbourhood. Especially in the face of an increasingly volatile climate, building housing that fosters community connections will be paramount. Weve set five complementary design goals for the competition: staying power, liveability, performance and replicability, resilience, and adaptability. There is more information available in the brief, but projects that successfully engage with these design principles will capture the housing qualities that LA, and other cities, need right now.What sort of teams would you like to see step forward for this unique opportunity?The competition is intentionally organized to accommodate a wide range of designers, from students to emerging design firms and established architectural practices. It would be great to see a variety of approaches, like fire-resilient building or manufactured housing strategies. Each site offers its own set of design challenges that should pique the interest of different types of firms. Its also important to remember that while LAs housing issues are acute, they represent many of the same forces driving housing affordability and sustainability issues worldwide. We welcome all creative ideas into this competition.2025-03-14Merlin Fulcher Share

This practices work in the Ecuadorian Amazon is shaped by the communities it servesMarialuisa Borja is shortlisted in the 2025 Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementThe Huaticocha community live in the untamed forest of the Sumaco National Park, in eastern Ecuador, a few hours drive from the countrys capital, Quito. In this protected area, the conservation of biodiversity is combined with the protection of ancestral Indigenous culture. Green dominates the landscape, the clouds descending to touch the canopy of the forest. In the Amazon, humidity envelops everything; the sounds ofthe jungle break the silence.It is here that practice Al Borde have designed the Yuyarina Pacha Library for theHuaticocha community, a group of largely Kichwa heritage, an Amazonian Indigenous people. The community hasdeveloped Witoca, an agricultural coffeeassociation that, together with the Sarawarmi Creative Laboratory, began an informal pilot education project for local children in 2019. Its success resulted in amore permanent school, for which the Huaticocha community decided that a newlibrary was required. They contacted AlBorde, a Quitobased architecture studio known for collaborating with Indigenous groups and realising their ambitions.Consisting of Marialuisa Borja, David Barragn, Pascual Gangotena and EstebanBenavides, Al Borde is more thanan architecture studio; it is a creative collective which integrates cultural, societal and environmental responsibilities into anarchitectural process. From their firstprojects, they have been committed to serving the most economically disadvantaged social groups, to find viable solutions to their needs. In 2009, Al Borde received anunusual commission to design and build aschool in the rural coastal community of Cabuyal in Ecuador, with a budget of only US$200. They managed to achieve this goal within budget with a single structure onthe beach, known as Escuela La Nueva Esperanza (NewHope School).Marialuisa Borja explains that in the Yuyarina Pacha Library, as in all Al Borde projects, the design process is shared by thefour members of the team in a dialectical dynamic. Projects are debated with users in a process that Borja describes as fundamental. Thanks to this dialogue, thecommunities with which Al Borde workcontribute their visions, knowledge and experiences. Informed by this, the team builds models and visits the site as many times as necessary, holding discussions withlocal people. This process means that the users take ownership of the projects, making them their own long before they arebuilt. Through discussions with members of the Huaticocha community, the brief transformed from a library into a multiuse space called Yuyarina Pacha, translating asspacetime to think.The library is located in a clearing in the forest an offering to the place as well as tothe Indigenous children who live there. Thestructure is perceived as a tree that is inhabited from the ground to its crown, with three levels that can be appropriated for different uses. The ground level is used for handson art and science classes and for all activities that require water, from cooking to painting; informal meetings can also be accommodated in the shade it offers. Like the local houses, the main space is elevated on columns, to protect from snakes and other animals. This openplan floor houses the collection of books arranged on open shelves, easily accessible to the children; itisalso large enough for public assemblies and other community activities. An upper mezzanine level runs along the perimeter ofthe room, accommodating, as well as books, digital resources, such as tablets andcomputers, and crucially an audio collection of stories that preserve the oral history oftheHuaticocha community. Reading tables overlook the large space below, like abalcony, and the pitched roof soars above.The building combines both enclosed andopen spaces, with permeable voids thatallow air to pass through and cool the interior a quality informed by the designs of local vernacular houses that breathe inthe same way. The magnificent, steeply sloping thatched roof skilfully withstands the regions copious rainfall and integrates aglass skylight, allowing natural light into the reading spaces.Al Bordes process means that users take ownership of projects, making them their own long before they are builtThe building adopts the qualities of the site as if it had always belonged to it. In fact, the materials with which it was built were collected from the site itself or its nearby surroundings, informed by the Huaticocha communitys experience and knowledge ofthe place, its conditions and products. Thestructure consists of a system of woodenbeams and columns, made of chonta (Iriartea deltoidea), a species of palm tree. As well as a building material, the tree also provides red fruit that is a food source for Indigenous peoples and wild animals alike. This wood is traditionally used in Amazonian houses, and is recognised for its structural durability, resistance to humidity and insects. In the library, the chonta columns are anchored to the ground withoutthe need for preservatives or coatings against humidity. The roof is made of paja, aplant fibre obtained from a local palm tree, which offers great flexibility and lightness, aswell as resistance to humidity.Al Borde have developed a project with minimal use of local resources to the greatest effect. Millimetre precision does not prevail in this architecture; the materials used are organic and irregular. Al Bordes approach allows for an adaptive architecture, in which solutions are found during construction onsite, responding to the imperfection of lowcost, organic and recycled materials. The building was constructed by members ofthe community under Al Bordes direction; though not always qualified builders, the residents gaps in experience were resolved by the architects, as well as the popular wisdom of others working on site. Al Borde persistently create spaces forlearning, not only in their architecture but inlife in general; what and how to do are as important as the final finished product.The project is built with the resources and techniques of the place, Borja explains, the traditions with which the community has built over time and has shared from generation to generation. Al Bordes architectural responses are always unique: solutions that were successful in some contexts may not necessarily be applied inothers. What can be applied, however, istheir method, which has at its heart participatory planning and determined collaboration between users and architects. In all cases, through this participatory process, the project ends up being for everyone: the key to its success.Each Al Borde project represents the will of people to commit to ideas, take risks and participate in decisionmaking, Borja insists. For example, the Casa Jardn, asinglefamily home designed for an environmentalist and completed in 2020, isbuilt from living elements; live trees generate spaces that grow from the garden.Outside Ecuador, at the 2023 Sharjah Architecture Triennial in the UAE, AlBordes pavilion, named Umbral Crudo (Raw Threshold), generates a welcoming space, providing shade created from palm mats that hang from a wooden structure. The project will last as long as space demands it, and the day will come when these materials degrade naturally, closing the cycle of their life in a harmonious way withnature.Al Borde is unlike a conventional architecture office: the practice structure iscollaborative, and they are constantly seeking to involve other professionals who share their perspective. The core team of four are consistently complemented by other architects and students who pass through the office who learn and are also learned from. We have discovered that our work is enhanced when we make decisions together, Borja explains. We cannot work alone. AlBorde proposes a flexible interpretation of professional practice; its members divide their time between various activities inparticular teaching, giving workshops, courses and conferences at schools of architecture around the world allowing them to survive economically and also benefit from new experiences.In Al Borde projects, without exception, aesthetics is important, but not supreme. Instead, the priorities are the ethics of the approach, the energy consumed and the participation of the end users in the process. In their world, or at least the one they are trying to build, being an architect carries theethical duty to resolve urgent needs with common sense, generosity, reflection, open participation and unlimited dedication.

The Co-founder of Neri&Hu Design and Research Office will review adaptive reuse projects for the 2025 awardsRossana Hu is a founding partner at Neri&Hu Design and Research Office and chair of the architecture department at the University of Pennsylvania Weitzman School of Design.Based in Shanghai, Neri&Hu Design and Research office is known for adaptive reuse projects including the transformation of a former Japanese Army headquarters in Shanghai into a hotel, for which the practice won the 2010 AR Emerging Awards, and the conversion of a Beijing textiles factory into the offices of a pastry brand. Their projects are contextual and varied, not defined by a single style but drawing from the global perspectives and cross-disciplinary approaches of their diverse staff. As well as architecture, the practice works on installation, furniture, product and branding projects.Alongside her design practice, Hu has been deeply committed to architectural education. As well as her position as department chair in Pennsylvania, she has taught and lectured at universities including the University of California, Berkeley, the Harvard Graduate School of Design, the Yale School of Architecture, the University of Hong Kong and Tongji University, Shanghai.Enter the AR New into Old awards today: extended deadline 21 MarchThe Waterhouse at South Bund by Neri & Hu Design and Research Office, an adaptive reuse project that transformed a former army headquarters into a hotelAs the need for sustainable alternatives to building anew becomes increasingly urgent, the AR New into Old awards celebrate the creative ways buildings are adapted and remodelled to welcome new contemporary uses. Launched in 2017, the awards recognise the imaginative appropriation of existing structures, from innovative insertions to ambitious adaptations, that offer buildings a new lease of life.For more information and to enter the AR New into Old awards, please clickhere.Extended Deadline: 21 March 20252025-03-12AR Editors Share 2025

Working from the Bogot savanna and with communities across the country, the founder of Organizmo prioritises material and cultural practices over architectural designAna Mara Gutirrez is shortlisted in the 2025 Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementArchitectures complicity in the destruction of the planet remains underacknowledged. Moments that spark awareness are few and far between. It began when I came back toColombia with my foreign diplomas and didnt know how to lay a brick, says Ana Mara Gutirrez. She was raised in Colombia with the thought the western thought imprinted in her mind from early on that it was better to leave the country. She started studying architecture at Universidad de los Andes in Bogot before going to New York on a scholarship. She studied at Parsons School of Design, then NYU, and started working as a architect, spending her days infront of a computer on a vast office floor.A workshop in Barichara, northern Colombia, introduced Gutirrez to earthen construction. The cobblestone streets of thissmall town are lined with buildings made of tapia pisada, or rammed earth, andhave remained untouched by time. Trampling mud with bare feet and learning about the infinite world of fibres and clay proved revelatory.In 2008, she traded the skyscrapers of Manhattan for the sacred mountains of Cundinamarca and founded Organizmo outside the town of Tenjo, an hour and ahalfs drive from Bogot. The family property she inherited sits at the foot of therocky outcrop of Pea de Juaica, a site deemed sacred by the Indigenous Muisca people who lived on this land before the arrival of Spanish colonists. Her grandfather had cows and a dairy farm here, and later her father rented the land for monocultures of corn, beans, potatoes and flowers. Today, she has transformed her 30 acres into a centre for bioconstruction and regeneration.All the structures built on the site over thepast 17 years have been opportunities to experiment, learn and teach. The very first house was made with PET bottles. Filled with soil, they are stacked and bound together to form the walls; a claystraw mix plugs the spaces in between, and the bottles colourful lids become decorative speckles onthe inside. Many other materials and techniques followed: adobe, clay plasters, compressed earth blocks, straw bales, bamboo and Colombias bahareque, where alattice of interwoven sticks or reeds is plastered with mud, similarly to wattle and daub. Other structures are inspired by more remotecultures and geographies: yurts, traditionally built by nomadic populations inthe Mongolian steppes, have been adapted with more permanent foundations, while afew domes on the site were built using theearthbag construction invented by IranianAmerican architect Nader Khalili.The joyful collection of catenary arches, hairy facades and conical roofs peppered around Organizmos vast outdoor laboratory is the product of many hours of workshops, facilitated by Gutirrez and her team as well as invited teachers and external visitors. In 2017, for example, architecture students from the University of Washington travelled to Tenjo with their tutor Travis Price; together with Organizmos team, they designed and built the structure referred to as the banco de semillas, or seed bank. The group consulted members of the Indigenous Muisca community of Sesquil (the town and sacred mountains to the southeast, opposite Juaica) to better understand their tending of the land and the myths that have moulded the place. The sinuous lines of the buildings stepped benches echo the morphology of the mountainous landscape, its cavelike interior now disappearing behind a thick curtain of medicinal plants.The most expressive building on the site isalso the most recent: the 10mtall casa de pensamiento, house of thought. Designed and constructed in collaboration with bamboo specialist Jaime Pea and his Mexicobased studio Arquitectura Mixta, this toroidal structure is made of a Guadua angustifolia, a tropical species of clumping bamboo native to South America. Curved lattice walls rise from the ground, forming abulging shell that is thatched midheight. Inside, a thin layer of soil, or raked sand patterns, depending on the occasion, cover the 200m2 of space used for gatherings, rituals and celebrations.All the structures built on the site over thepast 17 years have been opportunities to experiment, learn and teachEducational programmes are a crucial component of Organizmos model; they provide an enthusiastic workforce and contribute to the practices funding. At thebeginning of 2025, Organizmo launched, together with the ceramicist Mara Cano, who set up the studio Salvaje, a new and more structured course about clay, with 14 days of workshops spread between March and September. The lines blur between different scales, from artefacts to sculptures to buildings to landscape. Just like earth is achallenging, living material which requires constant upkeep, Gutirrez refers to the centre in Tenjo as a living school.Materials that lend themselves to building more ephemeral structures or require significant maintenance help change attitudes towards the built environment. Buildings are no longer hardwearing and static objects that resist the passage of time;instead, built matter is in constant transformation and needs to be looked after,with humans performing acts of maintenance and repair. Gutirrez adds thatthese more vulnerable materials reconnect us with the landscapes they comefrom, placing humans within a muchwider ecosystem and reminding usthat our livesare also ephemeral.Travelling to rural communities after her time in Barichara, Gutirrez observed that they dont build the house without planting the garden. Architecture stops being just about buildings and starts encompassing the crops we grow, the foods we eat, thespaces where we cook. This holistic perspective infuses everything she does, andthe huerta, the kitchen garden, is one ofthe most important classrooms of the centre. With more than 120 different types and species of plants, the compact plot abides by the principles of permaculture, provides ingredients and foods on a daily basis, and hosts workshops on agroecology, fermentation and composting.A few decades ago, when cattle used tograze in these fields, the grasses and eucalyptus they fed on was imported from Australia (the latter reduces methane emissions). An ecological abomination. Native species have been gradually reintroduced on the grounds; during myvisit, naturalist and environmental consultant Mateo Hernandez Schmidt, who works regularly with Organizmo, pointed to the first seeds dropped by a Camargo tree that was planted here three years ago.The boundaries that Gutirrez ispushing are institutional, disciplinary and politicalRegeneration of the landscape goes beyond planting trees, explains Gutirrez. She sees crafts from textiles to ironworks to architecture as cultural expressions that are tied to a territory and speak of millennial relations between raw materials and ecosystems. With more than 67,000 species of plants and animals, Colombia is home to one in 10 of the planets species. Learning experiences extend outside Tenjo to remote parts of the country, where jungles and rivers become new classrooms.With the support of a grant from the re:arc institute, Organizmo is currently working on a longterm project with the community of La Urbana, home to the Indigenous Piaroa people, in the Selva de Matavn from Bogot, the journey involves a short flight to Inrida, a town in the Colombian Amazon close to the border with Venezuela, followed by a fivehour boat ride. The Piaroa use palm to weave artefacts and as building material, but the skills are gradually getting lost. Together with the community, Organizmo has identified the need for aweaving school yet the design of its classrooms are seen by Gutirrez as more of an excuse than apriority. In her eyes, the work lies in understanding where and how the palm is grown, harvested and used; identifying the site for the school; setting upa local construction team; encouraging intergenerational transmission and communication; lobbying the government; making weaving part of the curriculum.The idea of a living school brings to mind Teaching to Transgress, in which bell hooks argued that education is the practice of freedom. Since systems of domination that are already at work in society penetrate theclassroom and architecture schools certain narratives control the curriculum, enforced by institutional power, while marginalised voices are silenced. The engaged pedagogy that hooks puts forward abolishes traditional hierarchies between teacher and student in pursuit of the possibilities to collectively imagine ways tomove beyond boundaries, to transgress.The boundaries that Gutirrez is pushing are institutional, disciplinary and political. Other architects before her have repented, leaving behind a corporate life and turning to ecological materials and social, as well as humanitarian, endeavours Khalili himself, but also Yasmeen Lari or Marc Held. Astheevolution of their practices has shown, sucha move expands the role of the architect, while matters of authorship lose significance. As a designer, Gutirrez admits she learns how to let go, but she believes a bigger part of the architects responsibility is to protect a culture. Her process is one oftrial and error she readily admits that earthen domes belong in the desert and should not live here in Tenjo but her strength lies in the many positions she iswilling to adopt: listener, collaborator, learner, facilitator, coordinator, activist, educator, director, guide, mother and leader,with all their inherent overlaps andcontradictions.

Architects, with the deep material entanglements their buildings embody, do well to engage with ecofeminist ideas and practicesAgroup of women huddle around a table, pulling nowatsome woollen thread, now at some reclaimed plasticrubbish.Together, they are crafting a compositionthat creatively resists planetary devastation. Across more than27 nations, groups of women have been gathering at museums, schools, universities and even at a girls juvenile detention centre, crocheting complex hyperbolic planes to form fibrous and frilly coral atolls, thereby contributing to a planetary consciousnessraising exercise. Mixing environmental activism withmathematics, sciences and the arts, they are handweaving aprosthetic accompaniment to the Great Barrier Reef and its kin. Located on the east coast of Australia, and arguably Earths largest organism, this impressive coral reef suffered its fifth mass bleaching event due to climate change last year. This constitutes a process ofslow death.In her 2016 book, Staying with the Trouble, Donna Haraway (ARFebruary 2022) celebrates the interdisciplinary knowledge andhandson loopy materialities of sisters Margaret and Christine Wertheims Crochet Coral Reef, a collective action that has been unfolding for nearly 20 years now. In the process, theAustralian sisters have been fostering what I would call anecofeminist practice of care, creating an art of living on this damaged planet. What can be witnessed in the Crochet Coral Reefisa remarkable performance of infrastructural love, suggesting ways of rethinking architectural practice as a material and spatial art that places us in intimate sympoietic (Haraways term for collective-creative) relationships with environmental milieus.Ecofeminism, also known as ecological feminism, makes the basicclaim that there is a profound connection between the domination of women and minority groups and the domination ofnature. Failing to acknowledge this connection means that werisk continuing to exploit both. This is something that First Nationspeople the world over have known as practical wisdom formillennia. Ecofeminism argues against the conceit of anthropocentrism and human exceptionalism, and in so doing asksdifficult questions about inherited western rationalist philosophical frameworks, and how they posit progress and growthas inherently good.The Crochet Coral Reef isan ongoing and evolving artwork that depends on a global community of hands to crochet forms for the worlds dying coral reefs. Organised by the sisters Christine and Margaret Wertheim since 2005, the Crochet Coral Reef is an impassioned and militantly un-tech response to the climate catastrophe, they write a one-stitch-at-a-time meditation on the anthropocene (lead image). In 1984, during a cross-country road trip, the US artist Betsy Damon observed many dried-up riverbeds caused by extensive damming and water diversion. They revealed to me the dried bones of the earth, she says. A Memory of Clean Water was her creative response: using handmade paper, she cast 75m of the Castle Creek riverbed in Utah (above), which haddried out after the construction of a dam upstream. The result was adeath mask of the riverCredit:Betsy DamonA contemporary understanding of ecofeminism emerged alongside the environmental movement of the late 1960s and 70s. French feminist, activist and prolific writer Franoise dEaubonne is usually credited with formulating the concept of ecofminisme in her 1974 manifesto Le Fminisme ou la Mort, recently translated by Verso into English as Feminism or Death in 2022. What dEaubonne calls for here is an end to the destructive manifestations of patriarchal power. At the time it was first written, the stark choiceit presented was understood in the context of nuclear catastrophe, and death was one of a planetary scale. Yet, in the halfcentury since it first came out, we have continued to pursue what feminist maintenance artistMierle Laderman Ukeles calls the death instinct whose characteristics are development, separatism and individualism over the life instinct, which Ukeles also calls maintenance, in the ongoing rape and plunder of planet Earth.Back in the 1990s, an orientation towards ecofeminism wasmarked by a special issue of the feminist journal Hypatia. Introducing the special issue, Karen J Warren claimed that the 1990s would be the decade of the environment. If that was the case,then the long 90s have extended into the present day whileplanetary systems have come unhinged, and no warnings notfromthe 1970s, nor from the 1990s have been heeded.More recently, in 2017, for Avery Review, N Claire Napawan, EllenBurke and Sahoko Yui offered an ecofeminist approach toenvironmental design. Drawing attention to a deeper history, theyturned to early work in the ecological sciences led by the US industrial and safety engineer Ellen Swallow at the Massachusetts Institute for Technology in the 1870s. Swallow drew attention to thepractical embodied knowledge associated with domestic duties, usually devalued as being mere womens work, and how a custodianship of the environment might be better managed based onthese insights. As the authors of the Avery Review article stress, practical connections can be forged between domestic ritual and thecreative process, as demonstrated in the work of artists like Ukeles and Jo Hanson. Through acts of public sweeping and cleaningperformatively, Ukeles and Hanson make visible the otherwise unseen labour of basic environmental care. Ecology, afterall, pertains to the household of nature, and what architects can learn is that the repetition of daily rituals, the cultivation ofgood habits, and material resourcefulness can go some way towards making a planetary difference. Those who spend a great number of unpaid hours performing reproductive labour within thehome already know this.Ecology pertains to the household of nature those who perform hours of unpaid reproductive labour within thehome already know thisIn 2023, Bryony Roberts and Abriannah Aiken locate ecofeminism on their volcanic Chronograms of Architecture, a vast map of feminist spatial practices from around the world charting how such practices are thoroughly interwoven with unfurling worldhistorical events. I call their lively cartography volcanic because it represents the power of feminist theories as something like dynamic geologic forces, rendered in fiery magenta, blazing orange and calm doses of green. It demonstrates that feminist discourse is not a sedentary nora settled affair but alive with collective actions. Such maps are crucial. They lay out for all to see the diversity of feminist theories and practices, including ecofeminism. Courage gleaned from this impressive feminist genealogy can help in unsettling thestatus quoof architecture by challenging the insistence of patriarchal, capitalist and colonialist systems. The protean ecofeminist architect can be motivated, write Roberts and Aiken, totry out experimental storytelling, communitybuilding, educating, materialtesting, and fabricating new architectures.In this regard I think of the tireless work of the architect Doina Petrescu. With the Parisbased Atelier dArchitecture Autogree, Petrescu, Constantin Petcou and their collective have been undertaking participatory work for nearly three decades now,spending months and then years embedded within local communities rebuilding relational ecologies through architectural acts of commoning and care. Their materials are drawn from a reduced palette, using simple building systems that a community might work on together, and in the process gain new knowledge. EcoBox, for example, is an early systemproject from 2001 which engaged marginalised migrant communities and matched them withunderutilised spaces in theLaChapelle area of Paris to developneighbourhood practices such as gardening. Importantly forPetrescu, as the concept of systemproject suggests, architecture is not just an object, but an unfolding process and aprompt for critical thinking. The rhizomatic connections between ecological and community concerns continue to develop in their praxis as they transfer knowledge from one systemproject to thenext.In Spmi, the scholar Karin Reisinger has been working alongside women from the local Smi community to embroider memories of the town ofMalmberget. Here, theSwedish state-run ironmine is displacing populations to make way for further extraction. This collage shows a 1957 drawing by architect Folke Hederus, together with Reisingers photograph of the housing being demolishedCredit:Karin Reisinger / ArkDes Collections / Photo: Bjrn StrmfeldtKarin Reisinger, a spatial practitioner of care from Austria, worksclosely with a collective of women in the far north of Swedenin a mining town called Malmberget. Her work is also one ofcommunitybuilding and learning, combining handicrafts with critical thinking. The community she visits embroiders memories of a town displaced to make way for the everexpanding, yawning hole that is a local iron ore mining pit. All the while, Reisinger listens keenly to crossspecies stories, understanding that the local ecology is animated by the concerns of many actors including the Smi andtheir cultural tradition of reindeer herding. Here, architecture isas simple as the embroidery thread that recomposes through stitches the memoryimages of a town that once was. As Reisinger observes, the humble work of this community contributes toarchitectural heritage work, documenting a town whose livelihoodand subsequent upheaval is entangled with largescalemineral extraction.On the other side of the world, a woman and her family, working with an expanding and contracting collective of creative practitioners in and around Naarm (Melbourne), Australia, clears invasive blackberries from a former quarry on Gadubanud Country in the Otways. Here, she convenes regular Quarry Camps as pedagogical events, calling on participants to take the time to slowdown and express care for the local ecologies upon which they depend. Her name is Millie Cattlin. She composes modest labels, likethose sewn on childrens clothing for their first day of school TheFuture is Maintenance, Give Us Space and Time deploying humble domestic arts to enunciate urgent environmental imperatives. These days she has been spending time with the humble container technology that is the jar, working on preservation and fermentation. Container technologies, as Ursula Le Guin and Zo Sofia argue, have been fundamental to human sustenance and cultural development for time immemorial. As LeGuinputs it, before the tool that forces energy outward, we made the tool that brings energy home. Architecture, for Cattlin and thecollective These Are the Projects We Do Together, intersects with the domestic arts, fostering opportunities for gathering andcollective learning. For the Quarry Camp, this has ledto theconstruction of the simplest of pavilions dedicated to bathing, eating, cooking, and gathering to listen and learn from oneanother. All the construction material is reclaimed, and only thescrews are new, because a screw facilitates not just assembly butdisassembly, meaning materials are at the ready for future adventures, rather than destined for the rubbish heap.Julieanna Preston, based in Wellington, New Zealand, combines feminist concerns with environmental ones as she engages in the mixed materials of local environmentworlds. While studying at the Cranbrook Academy of Art, she pursued many side jobs anything from repairing peoples houses, to gardening, to cleaning peoples homes. She explains how all these things composed a repertoire ofconcern dedicated to daily life and how one lives. Her creative practice persistently pushes the conceptual limits of what it might mean to undertake material tests. Endangering her own health, shehas hauled mud from a toxic river to a main street; wrapped herbody around coastal rocks seeking ecological communion; andwitha broom and cleaners dustcoat explored the legacy of maintenance art by drawing attention to all those marginalised, underrepresented and toooften racialised workers who render our environments liveable. For the ecofeminist the live body is involved, and certainly not inviolable. Her work acutely demonstrates the continuous tradition of feminist embodied and performative practice, including a recognition of the longtime focus of the feminist spatial practitioner on the material of their own body. Hercongress with rocks and stones, for instance, is reminiscent ofBetsy Damons early 80s feminist embodied project, Meditation with Stones for the Survival of the Planet, performed in front oftheAmerican Museum of Natural History in 1983 and on West Broadway in 1984, where the artist simply lay herself down on the pavement amid an assembly of gathered stones. Here, the continuity between the intuition of human embodiment and the vibrant material relations of environmentworlds is extended. The lesson tobe learnt: when our environments sour and wither, so do we.When a woman is penalised for pointing out that manels are not on, then your local institutional ecology has likely gone awry. A little bit weedy, a little bit toxicThere is an ecology of bad ideas, just as there is an ecology ofweeds: this helpful refrain from Gregory Bateson, reiterated byFlix Guattari in his essay The Three Ecologies, reminds us thatwe need to think with ecologies in an expansive sense. We need to think of worldwide webs of relations that weave together mental, social and environmental ecologies; that crosscut institutional milieus and threatened natural habitats. It is about thinkingfeeling inextricable connections. You will have read about the sour ecologiesblighting schools of architecture where toxic masculinity environmentally takes hold like an algae bloom. A great deal of feminist mopup work, as architect and theorist Jennifer Bloomer would put it, is needed to clean up these messes. It is no easy task transforming a culture inside a petri dish, and the work is often quiet, underpaid and undervalued. The ecofeminist claims sorority with Sara Ahmeds feminist killjoy, someone who calls out everyday misogyny and racism and argues that policies and visionary strategy statements are meaningless without material evidence of practice on the ground. So, for example, when a woman is penalised for pointing out, again and again, that the allmale critical review panel in architecture (a manel) is not on, then things in your local institutional ecology have likely gone awry. A little bit weedy, alittlebit toxic.Despite its resilience and perpetual return, feminism and its critical and creative methodologies are too often sidelined, and atworst, maligned. This means that the work of the ecofeminist must be vigilant and resolute, for violent reprisals are always closeat hand. Sometimes we need an amulet to ward off evil, anadornment to empower us as we make our way through the negativespaces ofurban landscapes. This is especially the case forBlack women, racialised subjects, and any who are forcibly othered, as Miriam Hillawi Abraham argues with her project Objectsfor the Othered. Abraham is a multidisciplinary designer from AddisAbaba, Ethiopia, with a collaborative practice called aIn its current form, the LosAngeles River consists of a concrete 1930s flood control measure funnelling wastewater from the city directly to the sea. Lauren Bon and the Metabolic Studios ongoing Bending the River project redirects a small portion of the lowflow channel through a wetland treatment centre, and then to a number of local parks.This collage of 500photographs taken byDavid Baine in 2021 shows the first 90m of vitrified clay pipes installed as part of the projectCredit:Courtesy of Metabolic StudioLike the monster, the maligned figure of the witch shares a genealogy with the ecofeminist spatial practitioner. Belgian philosopher Isabelle Stengers and US author and selfproclaimed witch Starhawk, for example, use the conceptual persona of the witch to draw attention to the historical and continued violence against women and their modes of practical knowledge and how their intuition of ecological relationality has been overlooked. Thewitch, like the ecofeminist, stands in for material knowledge practices in contact with environmentworlds, performing rituals and practices that have been denigrated or dismissed. Since at leastthe enclosure of the commons, the guardians of knowledge, asStengers calls them, have divided the world into Exclusive Knowledge Zones, much like Special Economic Zones. In vocal opposition, an ecofeminist fights for the commons as they fight fortheir life and the livelihood of their community. Rather than cordoning off knowledge practices, the ecofeminist shares their expertise and builds community relations, much as the Wertheim sisters have done. Witches and monsters are unlikely figures in the practice of architecture, but they can be reclaimed and celebrated by ecofeminists who aim to joyously and disobediently draw attention to counterpractices by challenging disciplinary and societal norms.What use have architects for ecofeminism? In architecture, aspeculative discipline dedicated to imagining new worlds, andaprofessional practice hooked on the highs of development andrenewal (mixed with the anxiety of where to secure the next job), practitioners forget at their peril that they are not outside theenvironment for which they design. Architects material admixtures and spatial ambitions have lingering aftereffects onhuman and nonhuman communities and ecosystems. Ecofeminism asks us to slow down, to consider the enduring impactof our actions, lift our eyes from the plans and sections thatwe have lovingly drafted to consider the ecological milieus inwhich our best intentions will hit the material ground. As Zosia Dzierawska and Charlotte Malterre-Barthes have argued (AR November 2021), this mightmean radically rethinking the kinds of jobs the architect should be training for: Maintenance architect? Materials nurse? Environmental housekeeper? The imperatives for planetary maintenance and caregleaned from the practices outlined read: Follow the material! Pay close attention! Cultivate curiosity! Andstay with the trouble what choice do we have?This is the Keynote essay from AR March 2025: W Awards. Buy your copy at the ARs online shop, or read more from the issue here2025-03-10Kristina RapackiShare AR March 2025W AwardsBuy Now

New Court, designed by Gort Scott for Girton College at the University of Cambridge, has been announced as this years overall winner, while two projects in Ghana and Armenia have been highly commendedNew Court is the most significant addition to Girton the UKs first full-time institution for the higher education of women since its foundation in 1869. New Court isconceived in the same democratic spirit as the original buildings: rooms are distributed to one side of generous corridors to create a flatter social and spatial hierarchy, taking their cue from the existing accommodation designed by three generations of the Waterhouse family. As well as accommodating more students, the project also incorporates a performance venue, reflecting the colleges musical traditions, with conference spaces, a museum and facilities for visiting scholars.Chosen by this years jury as overall winner of the AR Future Projects awards, as well as winning the education category, Gort Scotts project is architecture for 200 years rather than 25, according to the judging panel. This project reflects an ethos of building to consolidate the colleges longterm future. The jury concluded that the project succeeds on many levels: architectural, social and environmental.New Court by Gort Scott has won the AR Future Projects awards 2025This year, entries were reviewed by Mexican architect Loreta Castro Reguera, cofounder of Taller Capital; cofounder of design studio Space Caviar Joseph Grima; and Indy Johar, cofounder of Architecture00 and design and research practice Dark Matter Labs.Register your interest for AR Future Projects 2026 and be the first to find out when entries openThe winner is joined by two highly commended projects: the Osu Salem Presbyterian School in Accra, Ghana, designed by AP Valletta and David Kojo Derban which won the new and old category and Glkhatun archaeological field laboratory in Urtsadzor, Armenia, designed by Guillaume Othenin-Girard and the University of Hong Kong, the winner in the cultural regeneration category.Osu Salem Presbyterian School in Accra, Ghana, designed by AP Valletta and David Kojo Derban, highly commendedGlkhatun archaeological field laboratory in Urtsadzor, Armenia, designed by Guillaume Othenin-Girard and the University of Hong Kong, highly commendedAlongside the future project categories, the awards include three further prizes, judged by AR editors Manon Mollard and Eleanor Beaumont.This years competition entry prize is awarded to Museum of History and the Future in Finland by Atelier of Spatial Matters, a design that makes visible lowcarbon materials and technologies.Connor Curley, taught by Mark Parsons at University of Sheffield, wins the student prize for Ashpit Retreat an inclusive sanctuary built on the ruins of a power station.The sustainable research and design prize goes to Material Circulation in Zhoushan Village by Zhoushan Community Architecture Team, where research in low-carbon materials is tested on site.Learn about the winning and highly commended projects on Wednesday 9 April at Dropcity in Milan, during the Salone del Mobile. Find out more and register to attend for freeThe full list of 2025 winners:Civic and communityCommercial mixed useCultural regenerationEducationHealthHotels and leisureHousingNew and oldOfficesRegeneration and masterplanningTall buildingsCompetition entry prizeStudent prizeSustainable research and design prizeAll winners have been published in the 2025 Future Projects awards catalogueand you can purchase a copyhere

The winning installations in an international design competition for a series of C$15,000 (9,000) temporary winter installations on Torontos beaches have been unveiledThe 11th annual Winter Stations contest sought proposals for temporary structures to entice visitors to the area during winter. The winning concepts will remain on site throughout March on Kew and Woodbine beaches at the western end of Torontos beaches district, overlooking Lake Ontario.The theme for this years contest organised by RAW Design, Ferris + Associates and Curio was Dawn and participants are encouraged to explore how the annual Winter Stations initiative can adapt, grow and metamorphose in the coming years.Winners included Parade by Jesse Beus and Watch by Trae Horne, both from the United States; Ascolto by Ines Dessaint and Tonin Letondu from France; and Slice of Sun by Cludia Franco, Mariam Daudali and Thomas Byrom from Portugal.The exhibition also features two student designs from Toronto Metropolitan University and Waterloo Department of ArchitectureRAW Design architect Dakota Wares-Tani said: After celebrating a decade of Winter Stations last year, we really wanted to look forward and challenge artists and designers to consider the future of the Stations.In reviewing the hundreds of submissions, we feel the selected installations brought something unique and exciting to the beach for 2025 and we cant wait to see them enjoyed by the public this winter.Last years theme was Resonance and participants were encouraged to reinvent cherished installations from previous Winter Stations editions.The 2024 winners included We Caught A UFO! by Xavier Madden and Katja Banovic from Croatia and Australia, and the Canadian entries: A Kaleidoscopic Odyssey by Brander Architects, Making Waves by Adria Maynard and Purvangi Patel, and Nimbus by David Stein.The exhibition also features three student designs constructed by the Toronto Metropolitan University, University of Waterloo and the University of Guelph along with two designs from the Winter Stations Archive.Torontos beach district stretches from Victoria Park Avenue to Coxwell Avenue. It is popular with tourists, swimmers and volleyball players during the summer months but is notably less busy when cold weather arrives.Previous winners in 2021 included ARc de Blob by UK and Austria-based Aleksandra Belitskaja, Ben James and Shaun McCallum of 'mixed-reality design studio iheartblob. Kaleidoscope of the Senses by Charlie Sutherland of Edinburgh-based SUHUHA was one of several concepts selected for the 2020 instalment of the popular annual commission.Other previous winners of the contest, first launched in 2014, include Obstacle by UK-based Kien Pham, The Beacon by Portuguese practice Joo Arajo Sousa & Joana Correia Silva Arquitectura, Driftwood Throne by Londons DM_Studio, and Sauna Ice Bath by FFLO.

A universities competition is being held for large-scale Peace-Infrastructure art installations at Bethel Woods the site of Woodstock festival in 1969 (Deadline: 21 April)Academics, researchers and students are invited to submit proposals for creative timber art installations that promote peace and could be constructed on the 15ha rural site in New York state that hosted the original 1969 Woodstock Music & Art Fair.The call for concepts is part of BuildFest 2 the fourth year of the Bethel Woods Art & Architecture Festival. The winning concepts will be constructed on the site during a five-day live-work festival featuring self-build workshops, concerts, lectures and pop-ups.Rise, Repeat by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Image by Breyden AndersonCredit:Image by Breyden AndersonAccording to the brief: Bethel Woods Art and Architecture Festival 2025: BuildFest 2, Peace Rises invites university faculty in design, or a related field, to propose ideas for interactive wooden art installations to be built on the historic grounds of the 1969 Woodstock Festival.BuildFest 2: Peace Rises looks to explore how emerging technologies can be embraced convivially, serving human connection and ecological balance. It is an opportunity to question and reimagine a future where technology, like Prometheus fire, can be wielded for the collective good mindful of both its power to spread peace and its potential to harm.Bethel Woods Center for the Arts opened in 2006 on the site of the former 1969 Woodstock Music & Art Fair. Designed by DLR Group the $2 million complex includes an outdoor amphitheatre, museum and camping areas.The Bethel Woods Art & Architecture Festival explores the legacy of the original festival, which featured leading musicians such as Janis Joplin, Santana and Jimi Hendrix alongside large-scale participatory artworks.Nine winning concepts due to be announced on 12 May will be constructed in the Best Road Camping area near to where Hendrix stayed before performing at the festival in September. Proposals must engage with the festival theme, and the historic site while also demonstrating competency, feasibility, and durability.Last years winners included Curtain Call by Auburn University and Syracuse University; Timberlyn by Princeton University; MycoShell by Cornell University; Rise, Repeat by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; The Pen by Rochester Institute of Technology; Blocks by Kean University and Spring/Summer 24 by Arizona State University.This years winning teams will be invited to form self-organising teams of between eight and 12 people including students and faculty members who can participate in the self-build festival workshops.Six small-scale proposals such as seating or bars will each receive a $1,000 award while two medium-scale proposals such as small stages, shade structures or gateways will meanwhile receive a $3,000 award. A single $6,000 award will be granted to one larger scale pavilion proposal.The organisers will supply tools and three meals a day along with glamping tents, beds, sheets, blankets and pillows. Up to $500 in travel costs is also available for each team. Submissions should include a 250-word project statement, conceptual imagery, a project timeline and team biographies.How to applyDeadline: 21 AprilCompetition funding source: Think Wood, a program funded by the Softwood Lumber BoardProject funding source: Bethel Woods Center for the ArtsOwner of site(s): Bethel Woods Center for the Arts, 200 Hurd Road, Bethel, NY 12720Contact details: BuildFest@BethelWoodsCenter.orgVisit the competition website for more information

From breast pumps to maternity wards, the work of Designing Motherhood concerns not only parents but all humansDesigning Motherhood is the recipient of the Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture 2025, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementAt the centre of the gallery space in the Designing Motherhood exhibition, on display at ArkDes in Stockholm (27 September 2024 31 August 2025), sits a small machine behind glass. It is the Egnell SMB (Sister Maja Breast) pump, designed by Swedish civil engineer Einar Egnell in 1956 and named after nurse Sister Maja Kindberg, who tested the machine on nursing mothers in Sweden. The machine draws milk from a breast through a pumping mechanism, guiding the milk to bottles for collection via long plastic tubes. The machine is portable with a handle on the top. It looks like a toaster or a small coffee machine.The breast pump is one object of many that have been overlooked in the writing of design histories. The Designing Motherhood project unpacks the inherently political implications of objects and technologies for womens health and reproduction. The breast pump was developed at the same time as new welfare state institutions, homes and technologies were being constructed on display next door as part of ArkDess permanent exhibition, drawing from Swedens national architecture collection. As a piece of technology, the breast pump enabled breastfeeding mothers a new form of flexibility, and was developed as provisions were made in Sweden for women to enter the workforce for example, with organised public childcare and new modern technologies to alleviate domestic labour. As a design object, the breast pump is as emancipatory as it is biopolitical, and deeply interlinked with economy, politics of labour and the private lives of parents and their children to this day.The Designing Motherhood project has materialised in a series of exhibitions and a publication. Designing Motherhood: Things that Make and Break Our Births, edited by Michelle Millar Fisher and Amber Winick, was published in 2021, and five exhibitions have followed: at Mtter Museum, Philadelphia; MassArt Art Museum, Boston; Gates Foundation, Seattle; Houston Center for Contemporary Craft, Houston (on view until 15 March 2025); as well as at ArkDes the sixth instalment of the exhibition will open in New York in autumn 2025. Project curators Millar Fisher, Winick, Juliana Rowen Barton, Gabriella A Nelsonand Zo Greggs have worked collaboratively from the beginning, and the project is a culmination of the work and voices of many different people and institutions. In its conception and form, the project combines the work of design historians and curators with that of policy makers and activists, as well as doulas, midwives and birthing people. Each instalment of the project involves a new collaboration with an institution and a new group of collaborators. We could almost consider it a thinktank at this point, Winick suggests.The breast pump brought into view the issue at the core of Designing Motherhood. While working in the architecture and design department in a large museum, Millar Fisher hoped to acquire the object for the museums collection, and was greeted with a big fat no. We are constantly told that design and architecture is the discipline that is going to save the world, that this is the place where you can have interesting and knotty conversations, Millar Fisher explains. And it seemed, actually, a lie. There is a gap in the history of design and architecture that so far has not included these perspectives or scrutinised these objects and their political and personal implications, despite their relevance and impact not only for people experiencing pregnancy, but society at large. This project aims to address this omission.Designing Motherhood, in both the publication and exhibitions, addresses the arc of reproduction. Conception, contraception and womens agency over their bodies are explored through objects such as speculums, menstrual cups and protest posters, while the changing bodies of people experiencing pregnancy and motherhood are investigated through maternity clothes and pessaries for prolapse. Forceps, Csection drapes and birthing stools are offered as tools in the act of labour and the work of midwives, while breastfeeding demonstration sets, nipple shields and, of course, breast pumps are proposed as design objects shaping the practice of feeding newborns.The project also maps the movement of spaces for birth during the 20th century, from the bedroom to the hospital and back again. In the 1950s, the knowledge of doulas and midwives, passed down from generation to generation, was replaced by ultrasound and electronic foetal monitors, inverting the interior space of the womb. Midcentury American dream hospitals, funded by industrialist Henry J Kaiser and developed by surgeon Sidney R Garfield, included maternity wards with baby drawers which allowed for the transfer of newborns between their mothers and nurses in separate sterile spheres. These dream hospitals included the Panorama City Hospital, built in California in 1962 to designs by Clarence Mayhew and HL Theiderman; a circular maternity ward gave nurses unobstructed views of the mothers and babies in their care. In the 1970s, a renewed attention to the mothers experience during birth and an understanding of the importance of feeling at home brought the domestic sphere back as a birthing place through the homebirth movement.By bringing the steps and missteps in the histories of these spaces into view, the Designing Motherhood project advocates the expansion of access to culturally appropriate care and spaces for reproduction. The Maternity Waiting Village in Malawi by MASS Design Group, completed in 2015, seeks to reduce maternal mortality by fostering knowledgesharing and community in domestic settings, in close proximity to healthcare professionals providing an infrastructure of care within the city. The architecture of birthplaces can, as Designing Motherhood highlights, facilitate as well as hinder the safety, joy and dignity experienced during birth. The Designing Motherhood project originated in the US but includes global perspectives showing how different contexts need different culturally appropriate forms of care. Sweden is, for example, a very different political context to the US when it comes to womens rights over their bodies and the provision of reproductive healthcare, but these discussions still find resonance. Because healthcare provisions in Europe on the surface seem better than in the US, the real discrepancy between what is meant to exist and the actual lived experience of people might be harder to see, Millar Fisher explains. According to Winick, visitors to the Swedish iteration of the exhibition have explained that the trends described in the US are also happening in Sweden: It is different, but some things are the same. The exhibition in the Swedish context narrates a bigger story of the dismantling of the Swedish welfare state in recent years, and how the provision of healthcare has become both privatised and harder to come by. The film Kramp from 2023 by Yennifer Godin, for example, details the maternity care deserts that now exist in rural Sweden following the closure of hospitals. People in Sweden are now offered training so that they know how to deliver babies in cars or en route somewhere because of the long distance between hospitals.The objects included in the Designing Motherhood project are familiar, personal and intimate. As Millar Fisher and Winick write in the introduction to the publication, We dont just remember our first period, but also the technologies that first collected the blood. We dont just remember the way babies arrive but also what they were wrapped in when they finally reached our arms. The objects demand a response: on one visit to the exhibition at ArkDes, a group of young people giggle at posters for condoms; a dad with a baby in a carrier smiles at an advert about legislation allowing paternity leave; three older women debate the issues of closing hospitals in the north of the country; a couple of new mothers discuss their different experiences of giving birth and postpartum; and in front of a documentary film from the 1970s showing a birth in realtime, a retired couple watches, holding hands and maybe recalling a similar experience that they once shared. Designing Motherhood illustrates how the issues and questions relating to reproductive health are universal. As the curators point out in the introduction to the exhibition at ArkDes: These are not just womens issues. They are human issues. We have all been born, and the provision of, and access to, reproductive health affects individuals as well as communities and society at large. The display of these objects within the space of a public gallery allows their political and relational capacities to come into view, and certain (and important) conversations to take place. If the objects arent in the gallery, those conversations simply dont happen, Millar Fisher insists. Histories go completely unremarked. Experiences of reproductive health are personal and contextual, and as this project unpacks, unequal access to objects and spaces for reproductive health shapes and affects the provision of care to this day. The online version of this article has been amended to reflect Gabriella A Nelsons role as co-curator of Designing MotherhoodLead image: Incubators displayed at the 1939 New York Worlds Fair, occupied by real babies. Photo: Bengt Backlund / Upplandsmuseet, Uppsala, Sweden / Medela LLC2025-03-06Anna Livia VrselShare AR March 2025W AwardsBuy Now

The Palestinian conservation advocate and writer teaches spatial practitioners to imagine a built world beyond the rubbleIllustration: Yazan Abu Salameh for The Architectural ReviewCredit:Illustration: Yazan Abu Salameh for The Architectural ReviewSuad Amiry is the recipient of the Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture 2025, part of the W Awards. Read the full announcementSuad Amiry (1951) is not your typical architect; her legacy cannot be reduced to a single line of work. Rather, her work exemplifies a pattern that can be observed in prominent Palestinian figures: a disposition towards life, a multiplicity, an adaptability that withstands their rapidly splintering world. It is in that honourable, defiant legacy that Amirys work demonstrates how entire worlds can be created out of rubble.Amirys childhood memories from her birthplace of Damascus in Syria gave rise to her first exposure to architecture. Amiry went on to study architecture at the American University of Beirut and the University of Michigan. In 1981, she returned to Palestine via Jordan (where she had been brought up) and, on this first trip to her fathers homeland, visited hundreds of villages to study their traditional architecture and terraced lands. Villages across Palestine were sites of rapid economic and political transformations dating to the Ottoman land reforms of the mid1800s. Palestinian villages changed as they were integrated into larger economic flows dominated by Palestinian merchants, urban elites, Ottoman authorities and European markets, resulting in the erosion of farmers mode of subsistence and lifestyle. Such dynamics were further troubled and accelerated by the beginning of Zionist colonisation on Palestines coast in 1882, the British Mandates rule, and then eclipsed by the 1948 catastrophe, or Nakba, that saw the majority of Palestines population expelled by the Israeli protostate and militias.Suad Amiry was born inDamascus in Syria andgrew up in Jordan. Following her studies inarchitecture in Lebanonand the US, Amiry returned to Palestine, which her fathers family had been forced to leave during theNakba of 1948Credit:Leonardo Cendamo / GettyAgainst the grain of these transformations processes that aimed to erase what was left of Palestine Amiry turned her gaze to the material condition of rural Palestinian architecture. Some of the villages, she observed, included giant stone mansions in sharp contrast to more modest farmers housing. These mansions drew Amiry to the village of Deir Ghassaneh perched atop a hill in the Ramallah Governorate, an exemplary qaryat alkursi, or throne village, which had once been a regional centre of power. Amiry conducted research in Deir Ghassaneh for her PhD dissertation between 1982 and 1986, at which time the villages historic core was more or less intact and its houses were still inhabited. The way these traditional villages merged into the surrounding olive groves was truly enchanting, Amiry explains. That is what I miss the most today after the destruction of the rural landscape. It is not only lives but entire landscapes that have been harmed beyond recognition by the relentless forces of settlercolonialism, a transformation that if left unchallenged will result in the total destruction of Palestine.In her dissertation, Amiry followed in the footsteps of Palestinian physician and ethnographer Tawfiq Canaan. But unlike Canaan, Amiry is less preoccupied with classificatory knowledge. She goes much further, developing a hybrid method of inquiry that extrapolates spatial knowledge from stories, memories, even rumours.Through her conversations with the elders of Deir Ghassaneh, Amiry formulated her argument that both kinship and gender were central factors in the spatial organisation of the village. She explains that their stories, historic, real or fictional, were fundamental to understanding why village architecture and its surrounding landscape looked the way it did. Amirys methods of research are typically found in social and ethnographic studies but applying them to the field of architectural history was a brilliant move and necessary given the context of rural Palestine. Her dissertation was adapted into the book Space, Kinship and Gender: The Social Dimension of Peasant Architecture in Palestine, published in 1987.Upon completing her doctorate, Amiry could have moved on to greener less occupied pastures, but instead chose to dedicate herself to Palestine, the country from which her fathers family was expelled in 1948, and the country with which she wasThe question of conservation is no simple matter in Palestine. Palestinian buildings have become direct targets of settlercolonial destruction, using any and all available tools of destruction: bombs, bulldozers, military and zoning policies and neglect. Israels very founding was built on the destruction of about 530 villages between 1947 and 1949. This was a tactical, methodical process of ethnically cleansing Palestine of its native population. That, Amiry explains, is the reason why Riwaq was founded: to protect what remained of Palestines architecture.Riwaq began with very limited resources and as such opted to document cultural heritage. This became the Registry of Historic Buildings: a 13year project that includes histories, maps and photographs of approximately 420 villages in 16 districts across the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem. As restoration work began to take shape at Riwaq, Amiry explains that residents of the villages were initially sceptical of rehabilitating the old structures; over the last few decades the historic centres of Palestinian villages had become symbols of poverty and the majority of their residents were impoverished and elderly. Project by project, Riwaq transformed the public perception of these historic sites, by demonstrating their potential and beauty.For Amiry, Riwaqs work is not simply to care for the building but for the villages communities too. The projects produce jobs, generate income and transform ruins into usable buildings that often become community or cultural centres. Riwaqs vision further expanded from tactical incisions into fullscale historic centre renovations, an effort that was named the 50 Village Rehabilitation Project. One such project was the rehabilitation of AlDhahiriya village in the Hebron Governorate, an incremental effort that began in 2004. The effort led to the rehabilitation of a girls school in the village centre in 2007 and by 2011 to a significant portion of the historic core of the village. Another example is the Birzeit revitalisation project, with the aim of integrating the historic centre of the village with its territorial context through planning, strategic physical interventions and cultural work. This too began as a tactical intervention with the rehabilitation of one building for the Rozana Association in 2003. It then led to a protective plan, infrastructural work and cultural initiatives such as the Birzeit Annual Heritage Week and the Riwaq Biennale.One of Riwaqs most recent efforts includes the restoration of historic village cores in Jerusalems hinterland. These villages historically connected to Jerusalem and reliant on the city economically, politically and culturally were severed from Jerusalem, and from each other, when Israel built the annexation wall in the early 2000s. Riwaq dubbed this initiative the Life Jacket Project; one of its most successful manifestations was the restoration of the historic centre of the village Kafr Aqab. The project includes buildings for various local services, arts organisations and storytelling initiatives that transform the historic core into an experiment in social resilience.Through Riwaq, Amiry envisioned an architectural practice that worked with Palestinian adaptability and multiplicity from the bottom up. It was an enactment of sumud, the Palestinian tradition of steadfast perseverance, through architecture. In many ways, this building practice was a natural continuation of Amirys academic work which, in its attention to neglected buildings and their historic intertwining with dynamics of kinship and gender, provided a roadmap for a new type of architectural practice in Palestine one that engages with its challenges and changing context, that cares for details and memory, that integrates liberatory and restitutive purposes into its programme, and that constructs the possibility of Palestinian return to land. Amiry demonstrated this via her own return, and then through her stubborn dedication to seeing potential, and beauty, where no one else dared to intervene.One of the most striking aspects of Amirys legacy is that it is full of unexpected twists and turns. In 2002, under thenPrime Minister Ariel Sharon, Israel reoccupied the parts of the West Bank that had been given a short gasp for air following the Oslo Accords in 1993. This included Ramallah, where Amiry resides with her husband, the Palestinian sociologist Salim Tamari (they had met in 1991 just as Amiry had relocated to Palestine). The arbitrary and collective curfews imposed by the Israeli occupation meant that Amiry was forced to bring her 91yearold motherinlaw to live with her. Amirys fate was to continue spending time with her elders, except now she would tell the stories. She explains that the external occupation of Sharons army compounded by the occupation of my house led her to write her first autobiographical book Sharon and My MotherinLaw. The book was a tour de force: translated into 20 languages, it exposed the Israeli occupations cruelty and the absurdity of life in Ramallah at the time for the entire world to witness. Amiry continues to write, and is one of contemporary Palestines most globally recognised authors.Amirys legacy continues to lead the way for countless young practitioners who refuse to accept that certain worlds are destined for the bulldozer. In the summer of 2007, I was back in Palestine to volunteer with Riwaq on the restoration of an old stone farmhouse in the village of Taybeh. It was in Riwaqs office building in the heart of El Bireh that I first met Amiry. She taught us to approach architecture with curiosity and with an open heart, no matter in what state it presents itself. Every stone deserves to be cared for and every young Palestinian deserves the experience of building something, in Palestine, using our local materials and traditions. During that summer in Taybeh, I learnt to clean limestone and apply mortar to a stone facade, an experience that kickstarted my own scholarship in architecture and urbanism.Amirys ability to recognise potential in the destroyed architectures of occupied Palestine, and to find humour in moments of brutal violence, testifies to the ways in which, for her, architecture and storytelling are parallel conduits for the building of future worlds, namely a liberated Palestine. Amiry teaches young architects and urbanists, especially ones from destroyed worlds, to continue to envision the world they want to see, not the world in which they are forced to live.2025-03-05Reuben J Brown Share AR March 2025W AwardsBuy Now

Spains Concntrico 11 festival has named the winners of a trio of international contests for landmark architectural interventions in the city of LogrooThis year the festival held three separate open calls. The first dubbed Objects in the City sought proposals for temporary urban installations in Logroo and Bucharest.The second contest named Third Landscape sought proposals to transform marginal spaces within the urban environment while the third open call dubbed Picnic in the Vineyard sought ideas for a communal dining experience.The Objects in the City winners were Reciclar la Ecologa by Abad featuring Iker Abad Aguirre and Jon Abad Aguirre of Spain and Me Apunto! by Studio An-An featuring Zixuan Luo and Bella Wu of the USA.The two winning concepts will be constructed in small scale squares such as Plaza de la Inmaculada, Plaza Virgen de la Esperanza, or Plaza de Santa Ana in Logroo as well as in Calea Victoriei in Bucharest as part of the Romanian Design Week.The Third Landscape competition was won La Batalla del Jardinero Planetario by Borneo featuring Antonio De Paola, Flavio Mancuso and Antonio Seghini of Germany. The Picnic in the Vineyard contest was meanwhile won by Earth Cooking by JMBAD featuring Joseph Melka and Balthazar Auguste-Dormeuil of France.The winning teams will each receive a 2,500 top prize and see their concepts constructed out of Garnica plywood in time for the upcoming edition of the annual festival, which runs from 19 to 24 June 2025Logroo, in northern Spain, is a historic city overlooking the River Ebro and is the capital of the Rioja wine-producing province. The Logroo International Festival of Architecture and Design also known as Concntrico has delivered more than 70 pop-up installations and pavilions across the centre of the historic city since it was founded in 2015.In November, Concntrico revealed the four teams shortlisted in an international contest for a permanent new urban climate island installation in Felipe VI Park in Logroo.The winning 80,000 installation will be constructed around a lake in the city centre Felipe VI Park on a stretch of terracing featuring a hexagonal square.

An international student contest is being held for a series of three landmark new architectural installations at the Carrires du Boulonnais quarry in northern France (Deadline: 14 March)The PRIMA competition, organised by Paris-based Atelier 37.2 on behalf of French minerals company Groupe CB, invites individuals or pairs of students to propose a permanent micro-architectural work for the enormous industrial site located around 15km south of Calais.Now in its sixth edition, this years competition invites participants to explore ecological interaction and the potential of creating environments for both humans and non-human living organisms. Concepts may use stone, concrete and steel along with locally available natural elements such as soil, water, plants, seeds, fungi, or bacteria.2023 winner: Memento by Solena Citerne from Ecole de Cond NiceCredit:Image by Nicolas GuiraudThe call for proposals is free and open to all architecture schools in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Each school may submit a maximum of five paired student projects. A total of 15 concepts will be shortlisted and three overall winners will be constructed in 2025.According to the brief: This year's edition emphasises the interconnectedness of all living organisms and their environments, highlighting the intrinsic connection and dependence between humans and the broader community of life.Students are asked to design a space that invites and hosts diverse life forms, fostering opportunities for coexistence for human and non-human bodies. The proposed micro-architectures should aim to create the conditions to accommodate humans and non-human living organisms, allowing for proximity, intimacy, observation and potential interspecies exchanges.Projects may explore various levels of cohabitation, from simple coexistence, to symbiotic relationships, such as mutualism or commensalism, to more complex ecological interactions.On the fringes of Ferques, the 500-hectare Carrires du Boulonnais quarry was created in the late nineteenth century and is now the largest single open-pit quarry in the country producing around six million tonnes of limestone aggregates every year.The PRIMA project aims to forge new links between emerging design talents and the aggregates industry through an unprecedented art model built on the merging of clear artistic goals with an entrepreneurial strategy. It is organised by Atelier 37.2, an emerging Paris-based practice which has constructed a variety of unique architectural installations in culturally-significant landscapes across Europe and two pavilions on the PRIMA site.Participants must harness recycled or low-carbon materials in their proposal and consider how their structure can be occupied as a form of micro-architecture while also responding to important environmental issues raised by the anthropocene the present geological era in which human activity has fundamentally changed life on earth.2023 winner: Gravit by Margaux Croixmarie of ENSAP BordeauxThe first edition of the competition, launched in late 2019, received 114 entries from 202 students representing 41 schools of architecture and design from six countries France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, and the United Kingdom.Winners of the 2024 call for concepts included Second Souffle by Emilie Marzougui from Ides HOUSE in Lausanne, Switzerland; and Fragment by Ho Chun Au-Jeung and Weathering Pavilion by Tim Formgren both from the AA School of Architecture in London.The competition is planned to be held every year for several years resulting in around 2025 permanent installations being created on the site. Winning students, to be announced in March or April, will receive technical assistance from Atelier 37.2 and be invited to attend a residency on site to deliver their schemes in September.How to applyDeadline: 14 MarchCompetition funding source: Not suppliedProject funding source: Not suppliedOwner of site(s): Not suppliedContact details: da@prima-cb.comVisit the competition website for more information2025-03-05Merlin Fulcher Share

A young designers contest is being held for a new pop-up 16,500 (CZK 500,000) installation at Pragues landmark Manifesto Market (Deadline: 4 April)The Young Designers Open Call (YDOC) competition invites students, graduates and emerging practitioners from across Europe to draw up innovative concepts to enhance the marketplace which was designed by Chybik+Kristof in the Andl area of the Czech capital four years ago.Organised by global architecture platform reSite, the open call aims to provide a springboard for emerging talent and demonstrate the potential for public space interventions to adopt circular design practices. The winning concept will be announced in early April and will be constructed in time for a public opening in late May.Manifesto Market by Chybik+KristofCredit:Image by Alexandra SiebenthalAccording to the brief, YDOC challenges the participants to design and present innovative projects that redefine the use of public space. The winner will create a temporary outdoor installation, active from May to September, that enhances Manifesto Markets functionality and visitor experience during the bustling summer months.The installation must provide shade, enable smooth circulation for potentially thousands of visitors each day (80,000 in a single month), and seamlessly integrate with the high-quality architectural concept of Chybik+Kristof and the vibrant atmosphere of the market while maintaining its regular operations.YDOC participants will be tasked with building on Chybik + Kristof design, creating a forward-thinking concept that pays homage to Manifestos roots while reimagining its future potential as a temporal art, architecture and/or design installation.Completed in 2021, Manifesto Market is a 2,600m leisure and retail intervention featuring cafes, bars and a small pool created by Chybik+Kristof on a disused gap site located next to a bus station in the Andl neighbourhood of Prague.The latest contest comes several months after international competitions were announced for the 244 million upgrade of flood defences in Olomouc and to transform the disused Hotel Stroja in nearby Perov.Bjarke Ingels Group won an international contest organised by the City of Prague for a major new 204 million (CZK 6.1 billion) waterfront concert hall close to the Vltavsk metro station in May 2022.Benthem Crouwel Architects won an open international competition to redevelop one side of Pragues iconic Victory Square in 2023.Manifesto Market by Chybik+KristofCredit:Image by Studio FlusserThe YDOC contest invites emerging architects, designers and scenographers to imagine a small-scale intervention which draws on sustainable and circular design principles and helps to redefine the markets common space.Proposals may include shading, seating, water, light and interactive experiences. Submissions must include a site plan, section, perspectives, an estimated budget and 200 words of written description in either English or Czech.Judges will include Jana Zielinski, director of Designblok; Ondej Chybk, co-founder, Chybik + Kritof; Anna Mareov, founder of Anna Mareov Designers; Jakub Cigler, founder of Jakub Cigler Architekti; and Martin Joseph Barry, founder and chief executive of Manifesto Market.The overall winner, due to be announced on 11 April, will receive an estimated 2,000 (60,000 CZK) prize while a second prize of around 500 (15,000 CZK) and third prize of 330 (10,000 CZK) will also be awarded.How to applyDeadline: 4 AprilCompetition funding source: Not suppliedProject funding source: Not suppliedOwner of site(s): Not suppliedContact details: info@resite.orgVisit the competition website for more information

The ethos of this unusually discreet starchitect, one half of French practice Lacaton & Vassal, is both frugal and generous, a shining light in the climate emergencyAnne Lacaton is the recipient of the Jane Drew Prize for Architecture 2025, part of the 2025 W Awards. Read the full announcementIt is a warm and empty space overlooking the North Sea. In the distance, the cranes of the citys industrial harbour look like toys, and container ships as long as the Eiffel Tower fit within the palms of childrens hands. On the covered terrrace at the top of the FRAC Grand Large, the regional collection of contemporary art for the North of France, there is no work on display; no curation; no programming. Yet this is the museums most popular space. Visitors often locals loiter after a demanding meander through highbrow conceptual art in whitecubestyle temperaturecontrolled rooms. They watch the fastchanging shades of the landscape, the steelworks torch, the beach vanishing on the horizon. Nested under the buildings pitched roof, this vast, alltransparent hall makes an impression on visitors but does not crush them. It is welcoming, accessible and playful. Serving no obvious purpose, it is redundant and therefore luxurious. Like most of the work of Anne Lacaton and JeanPhilippe Vassal, this extra space at Dunkirks FRAC makes sense of oxymoronic associations: cheap and deluxe, visionary and downtoearth, modest and ambitious.The couple is a unit both in work and life. In no way can I speak only for myself, starts Lacaton. Its a joint effort. In France, we simply refer to lacatonvassal, fusing their names to form a mythical architectural figure. Shedding light on one half of a tightknit pair is perilous.Originally from the south-west of France, Anne Lacaton moved to Paris with her partner Jean-Philippe Vassal when they began working on the Palais de Tokyo. Their office is now just outside the Priphrique, in MontreuilCredit:Bruno LevyBorn in 1955 in SaintPardouxlaRivire, a town of little more than a thousand souls in rural Dordogne, Lacaton graduated from ENSAP Bordeaux, the nearest school of architecture, in 1980. She continued with a postgraduate degree in urban planning and, in 1987, cofounded Lacaton & Vassal with her partner, a year her senior, whom she had met while studying. That is it. Upbringing? Life story? Family? Favourite colour? Lacaton does not even have a page on French Wikipedia; neither does Vassal. When they won the Pritzker Prize in 2021, the Guardian called them an unflashy French duo. While most prominent (male) architects in France produce countless books, speak for hours on end on national radio about how they became architects, their relationship to wine, fame and their genitals (Rudy Ricciotti), there is impeccable dignity in Lacatons public presence. Not everything, says Lacaton, needs to be shared and explained. Both in their architecture and in their public personae, Lacaton and Vassal are modest yet courageous and innovative.Their first built project was Maison Latapie, in Floirac, a suburban town adjacent to Bordeaux. Delivered in 1993, it was not what the Latapie family had in mind when they reached out to the young practice. They had initially envisioned constructing a standard catalogue home of 6570m2, based on their budget. Since the plot of land they had bought did not fit the standard home, they needed an architect to adapt it. Lacaton and Vassal quickly opened new horizons, away from standardisation. We tried to understand their dreams, how they wanted to live, says Lacaton. The client had a camper van which they would drive south, to the beaches near Seville. They said the best moment was when they parked the vehicle and took out the table, served lunch or dinner at the seaside or slept under a starry sky. It was a beautiful understanding of living, and reminded the architects of the nomadic way of life they had discovered during travels in Africa.The 2004 manifesto Plus, articulates the idea of doing more with less: never demolishing, removing or replacing, butalways adding, transforming and reusingCredit:Druot, Lacaton & VassalLacaton and Vassal have a longstanding interest in the greenhouses that dot the landscapes of the countryside around Bordeaux, but also in the architecture of hot climates beyond France. After their studies, Lacaton regularly visited Vassal in Niger, where he worked at the urban planning department of Niamey in lieu of national service. Design elements from the nomadic architecture they admired came to influence their work and way of thinking: a striving for construction that is lightweight, modular and economical. When the Latapie family reached out for help, the duo easily convinced them to throw away the catalogue home and embark on an unconventional journey that would end up doubling the surface area of the house while remaining within their modest budget, equivalent to 55,000 today.The family home is based on a very simple twostorey rectangular volume, made from a metal frame and wood panelling. To the west, the street facade is opaque, clad in sheeting of fibre cement. To the back, another volume of the same size but made of transparent polycarbonate extends into the garden, effectively doubling the liveable surface area at 185m2, the home is three times larger than the clients original request. Like the top floor of Dunkirks FRAC, this winter garden is an extra space, a room that was not part of the initial programme and that becomes a playful space of freedom for both designers and client. As it faces east, the winter garden receives the first beams of sun in the morning and remains a warm, inhabitable space throughout the day, but its large openings can be closed or left ajar by inhabitants. The materials are modest and the overall construction low cost, but the design feels seamless and the space generous. We came to think that the ideal would be a 1:1 proportion between the extra and the programmed, Lacaton reflects. Since then, in every project weve done, weve included additional space in roughly this proportion.Transparent polycarbonate sheeting would become one of Lacaton & Vassals signature materials and critics have pointed to the poor recycling potential of this plastic polymer. Lacaton does not dodge the question: Theres still a lot of work to be done to improve the sustainability of any material we might use. With less than a millimetre of thickness, polycarbonate represents only a small quantity of what goes into a structure, and its lifespan is much longer than that of many insulated claddings, which often degrade rapidly. When he put the property on the market recently (asking price 580,000), the Latapie house owner decided to replace the polycarbonate sheets because they had lost their transparency but they were not structurally degraded.Seven years later, Lacaton and Vassal left Bordeaux for Paris national newspaper Le Monde compared them at the time to two sturgeons who had swum up to the capital city and temporarily relocated their office inside one of their largest projects to date: the retrofitting of the Palais de Tokyo. Despite its location in one of the poshest and sleepiest neighbourhoods of the city, the Palais de Tokyo quickly became one of the most hyped art centres in Paris. Lacaton & Vassals work came in two phases: 7,800m2 at the turn of the millennium and another 16,500m2 a decade later. Before their interventions, the 1937 art deco building was in the process of being redeveloped into a centre dedicated to film; the project collapsed and, overnight, all construction workers vacated the site, leaving behind what Lacaton remembers as a ruin. Having won the competition for a new contemporary art centre, Lacaton & Vassal inherited the abandoned construction site.The 16 million budget of the Palais de Tokyo might seem a far cry from the modest Latapie family house, and yet the essence remains the same: an economy of means and an effort to work with what is already there while leaving room for the unprogrammed. Designwise, they limited retrofitting to a minimum: they secured the structure and fluidified circulation by building a new staircase, for example, but left the walls in the rough state they had found them. They approached the site as a void to be repeatedly filled and emptied in Lacatons words, to leave maximum freedom to the artistic practices that would temporarily occupy it. The architects regret that todays management tries to fill these voids too much with permanent programming restaurants, a bookshop and polished white walls as if they were scared by undefined spaces, says Lacaton. But luckily, adds Vassal, the Palais de Tokyo is too big to be totally filled. Designers lamenting their clients decisions is classic of (st)architecture, but here it feels different; they regret the lack of ambition, and would prefer to see the idea that created meaning for the project being upheld.Lacaton and Vassal went from delivering private houses to flagship cultural buildings in Paris, Dunkirk and Lille, as well as university campuses in Bordeaux and Grenoble. In Nantes, they designed a large and luminous architecture school, with open concrete floors that can be appropriated by the students, teachers and staff according to their needs. It was a competition they won while camping in the Palais de Tokyo: The intimate, physical experience of that space shifted our approach to architecture into another dimension. Inside the Palais de Tokyo, we couldnt think small, says Vassal.Yet the practice truly made its mark on the global scene with the radical retrofitting of social housing blocks in Paris and Bordeaux. Highrises and their horizontal counterparts, the barres, that were built cheaply and in haste to address the severe housing shortage after the Second World War, are the most unloved typologies of French architecture. The Tour BoislePrtre, which stands by the ring road on the edge of Paris, is one of them. The City under a new Socialist mayor had decided against demolishing the tower, originally designed by Raymond Lopez in 1961, to instead fund an ambitious renovation of its 96 units. In collaboration with Frdric Druot, with whom they had published their Plus manifesto in 2004, Lacaton and Vassal won the competition with a radical proposal. The cladding put up in the 80s was removed and replaced by glazed sliding doors that open onto 2mdeep winter gardens encased in polycarbonate, and additional 1mdeep balconies around the tower perimeter. The combination of large openings with sunblocking and thermal curtains helps regulate temperature, warming or cooling the interior according to season and time of day. The winter gardens added 3,560m2 to the existing 8,900m2, increasing the size of each apartment by an average 36m2 while giving the tower a fresh and appealing look.Despite the current preference among architects to avoid demolition in favour of rehabilitation, Lacaton is cautious, if not pessimistic. Progress is too slow. Statistics on destruction remain appalling and what is lost is lost forever, she laments. We know we can do it. Its not that difficult, it doesnt cost more, and were running out of time. Lacaton does not conceal the initial struggle to make clients, partners and publicsector backers believe in the viability, affordability and longterm thermal performance of their designs. Tour BoislePrtre and projects like it have vindicated their approach. But they have also recently published a largescale appraisal of their building technique in Its Nice Today an unusual move for starchitects.If you want an encapsulation of Lacaton and Vassals approach, it remains the Lon Aucoc square in Bordeaux. In 1996, the City commissioned the duo to upgrade a public square. The design they submitted? Do nothing. Prune the trees, redo the gravel, clean more often. Voil. The square, argued Lacaton and Vassal, is perfect as it is.In Dunkirks harbour, Lacaton & Vassal left theoriginal boat shed AP2 untouched, to preserve its exceptional volume and potential for uses, and created itsmodern and lightweight twin (left). Asapair, they became theFRAC Grand Large in2015. While most of thenew volume is clad in polycarbonate panels, the architects used air-filled cushions in ETFE sheeting for the top floor, which offers striking views over the harbourCredit:Philippe Ruault

Three winners announced and two shortlists revealed for the W Awards 2025Shortlists for the MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice and Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture have been announced by The Architectural Review and the Architects Journal, as well as the winners of the Jane Drew Prize for Architecture, Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture, and the Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture.MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice 2025Photography credits from top to bottom, left to right: Johan Dehlin, Maddie Persent, Jack Hobhouse, Nick KaneThis prize, named in memory of inspirational architect MJ Long, celebrates architects who are excelling in practice. In recognition of the London home of the awards, the prize considers UK-based architects working for UK-based practices, and is judged on an overall body of work with an emphasis on a recently completed project.The MJ Long Prize shortlist comprises: Rachel Elliott of Lynch Architects, for Westminster Coroners Court in London Rebecca Kalbfell of HAT Projects, for Sunspot in Jaywick Sands Mathilda Lewis of dMFK Architects, for Voysey House in Chiswick Jacqueline Stephen of Nall McLaughlin Architects, for the Faith Museum in Bishop AucklandMoira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture 2025Photography credits from top to bottom, left to right: JAG Studio, Felipe Cotero, Kent Andreasen, Hassan Al ShattiWe are delighted to announce the architects shortlisted for this years Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture.The shortlist features architects based in South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Colombia and Ecuador, seeking original and tactical ways to navigate the contexts they work in to create spaces for the local community.This award recognises a bright future for designers under the age of 45 who are leading their own practices.The Moira Gemmill Prize shortlist comprises: Marialuisa Borja of Al Borde based in Ecuador Ana Maria Gutirrez of Organizmo based in Colombia Ashleigh Killa of The MAAK based in South Africa Sara Alissa and Nojoud Alsudairi of Syn Architects based in Saudi ArabiaThe jury for the Moira Gemmill and MJ Long Prizes includes: Cristina Monteiro of DK-CM; Sandra Barclay of Barclay Crousse; EvaJiin of AI Design; Anna Liu of Tonkin Liu; AlbertWilliamsonTaylor of AKT II; Karen Livingstone of the Fitzwilliam Museum; and Sal Wilson, educator and sustainability consultant.Jane Drew Prize for Architecture and Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture 2025Photography credits from left to right: Philippe Ruault, Columbia GSAPP / Wikimedia CommonsArchitect Anne Lacaton has been awarded the Jane Drew Prize for Architecture 2025, an award recognising an architectural designer who, through their work and commitment to design excellence, has raised the profile of women in architecture. Co-founder, with Jean-Philippe Vassal, of French firm Lacaton & Vassal, Lacaton has been instrumental in defining what it means to build responsibly in the 21st century. Often upending convention, Lacaton and Vassal are famed for their bare-bones renovation of Pariss Palais de Tokyo, and for wrapping existing housing stock in winter gardens a move which improves the thermal performance of homes while subtly extending them.Manon Mollard, Editor of The Architectural Review said: Far from pretensions to stardom, Anne Lacatons practice is considered and audacious, with a clarity of purpose that must be celebrated. With Jean-Philippe Vassal, she places residents and users at the centre, and designs buildings that are both frugal and generous. Their denunciation of demolition as madness, and advocacy for reuse and transformation is an urgent message for all architects, clients and politicians.Suad Amiry is the winner of the Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture 2025, which recognises individuals from fields adjacent to and that intersect with architecture, who have made a significant contribution to architecture and the built environment. Amiry is the founder of Riwaq, an organisation specialising in the preservation and reuse of historical buildings in Palestine. In addition to leading Riwaqs conservation work, Amiry is a prolific writer, having authored award-winning books such as Sharon and My Mother-in-Law (2003) and, most recently, Mother of Strangers (2022).Eleanor Beaumont, Deputy Editor at The Architectural Review said: In light of continuing and increasing violence and destruction in Palestine, Suad Amirys commitment to the restoration and reuse of historical Palestinian structures is vital. Amirys varied practice, combining both advocacy and writing, teaches spatial practitioners to imagine a world beyond the rubble.Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture 2025Designing Motherhood on display at Stockholms ArkDes. Credit: courtesy of ArkDesThe winner of this years Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture is the Designing Motherhood project. Noticing a gap in classrooms, exhibitions and writing on design for the arc of human reproduction, US design historians Michelle Millar Fisher and Amber Winick launched this research project in 2017. Today, it comprises a book published in 2021 by MIT Press; a touring exhibition currently in its fourth and fifth iterations at ArkDes in Stockholm, Sweden and the Houston Center for Contemporary Craft (curated with Juliana Rowen Barton and Zo Greggs); a popular Instagram account; and a series of local partnerships with maternal and infant health specialists, policy makers and activists.The Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture celebrates projects that investigate the complex relations between gender and the built environment, and challenge patriarchal spatial systems. Sited within architectural practice or outside it, in the homes, cities and landscapes we all inhabit, the prize recognises projects that are critical, educational and propositional in outlook, undertaken by individuals (of any gender) or collectives from around the world.Kristina Rapacki, Senior Editor at The Architectural Review said: Designing Motherhood is a multifaceted research project into the rich and largely unexplored design histories of human reproduction. By incorporating a multiplicity of voices, it reveals deep biopolitical stories of the buildings, objects and materials that have been used to control as well as emancipate birthing people and their bodies.We are delighted that this yearsW Awards will be hosted by ECC Italy in Venice on Friday 9 May, where the winners of the MJ Long and Moira Gemmill Prizes will be revealed. The event will be free to attend, and registration will open soon.2025-03-03AR EditorsShare

Suad Amiry | Anne Lacaton | HAT Projects | Nall McLaughlin Architects | dMFK Architects | Lynch Architects | Designing Motherhood | The MAAK | Organizmo | Syn | Al BordeEarlier this year, Bangladeshi architect Marina Tabassum was announced as the designer of the next Serpentine Pavilion. Zaha Hadid might have designed the first London pavilion in 2000, but she was followed by many men; it took another 18 years for the next sole female architect tobe commissioned. Frida Escobedo has since been followed bySumayya Vally, Lina Ghotmeh and now Tabassum.As the AR celebrates 10 years of co-organising the WAwards with the Architects Journal, we reflect on the past decade and how they have evolved. In 2016, the awards then known as Women inArchitecture focused on the work of lead female designers. In 2020, the awards were renamed and expanded to recognise the non-binary nature of gender. Then, in 2021, a new prize was introduced to make visible the contribution of architects who choose to work within practices rather than setting up their own. Twoyears ago, we added a prize celebrating research into gender and the built environment, acknowledging the many ways practitioners contribute to architectural culture.Gender is entangled with many threads, including the climate emergency. As Hlne Frichot explains in this issues keynote, there is a profound connection between the domination of women and minority groups and the domination ofnature. She suggests that an ecofeminist architect might instead be a materials nurse or an environmental housekeeper. The W Awards will continue to evolve as the role of architects must inevitably change.1519: W Awardscover (above) Ana MendietaIn the first iteration of her Silueta series (197377), Cuban-American artist Ana Mendieta lies in a Zapotec grave, her body strewn with white flowers. Drawing together themes of ritual burial, death andfertility, the series invokes ecofeminist entanglements. Credit: Imgen de Ygul, 1973 The Estate of Ana Mendieta Collection, LLC. Licensed by DACS, courtesy Alison Jacquesfolio (lead image) Teresa MargollesMexican artist Teresa Margolles created Mil Veces un Instante (AThousand Times in anInstant) for Londons Trafalgar Square in 2024. Featuring face casts of 726 people from trans and non-binary communities inMexico and the UK, itdraws on Mesoamerican monuments to mourn the victims of violence against these groups. Credit: SOPA Images Limited / AlamykeynoteEcofeminist housekeepingHlne Frichotada louise huxtable prize for contribution to architecturereputationsSuad AmiryMahdi Sabbaghjane drew prize for architecture reputationsAnne LacatonJustinien Tribillonmj long prize for excellence in practicebuildingSunspotRebecca Kalbfell, HAT ProjectsKristina RapackibuildingSunspotRebecca Kalbfell, HAT ProjectsKristina RapackibuildingFaith MuseumJacqueline Stephen, Nall McLaughlin ArchitectsNile BridgemanbuildingVoysey HouseMathilda LewisdMFK ArchitectsJoe LloydbuildingWestminster Coroners CourtRachel ElliottLynch ArchitectsEllie Duffyprize for research in gender and architectureessayDesigning MotherhoodMichelle Millar Fisher, Amber Winick and collaboratorsAnna Livia Vrselmoira gemmill prize for emerging architectureportfolioAshleigh Killa, The MAAKJehan LatiefportfolioAna Mara Gutirrez, OrganizmoManon MollardportfolioSara Alissa and Nojoud Alsudairi, Syn ArchitectsRahel AimaportfolioMarialuisa Borja, Al BordeRmulo Moya Peralta

Three winners announced and two shortlists revealed for the W Awards 2025Shortlists for the MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice and Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture have been announced by The Architectural Review and the Architects Journal, as well as the winners of the Jane Drew Prize for Architecture, Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture, and the Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture.MJ Long Prize for Excellence in Practice 2025Photography credits from top to bottom, left to right: Johan Dehlin, Maddie Persent, Jack Hobhouse, Nick KaneThis prize, named in memory of inspirational architect MJ Long, celebrates architects who are excelling in practice. In recognition of the London home of the awards, the prize considers UK-based architects working for UK-based practices, and is judged on an overall body of work with an emphasis on a recently completed project.The MJ Long Prize shortlist comprises:Rachel Elliott of Lynch Architects, for Westminster Coroners Court in LondonRebecca Kalbfell of HAT Projects, for Sunspot in Jaywick SandsMathilda Lewis of dMFK Architects, for Voysey House in ChiswickJacqueline Stephen of Nall McLaughlin Architects, for the Faith Museum in Bishop AucklandMoira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture 2025Photography credits from top to bottom, left to right: JAG Studio, Felipe Cotero, Kent Andreasen, Hassan Al ShattiWe are delighted to announce the architects shortlisted for this years Moira Gemmill Prize for Emerging Architecture.The shortlist features architects based in South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Colombia and Ecuador, seeking original and tactical ways to navigate the contexts they work in to create spaces for the local community.This award recognises a bright future for designers under the age of 45 who are leading their own practices.The Moira Gemmill Prize shortlist comprises:Marialuisa Borja of Al Bordebased in EcuadorAna Maria Gutirrez of Organizmo based in ColombiaAshleigh Killa of The MAAK based in South AfricaSara Alissa and Nojoud Alsudairi of Syn Architects based in Saudi ArabiaThe jury for the Moira Gemmill and MJ Long Prizes includes: Cristina Monteiro of DK-CM; Sandra Barclay of Barclay Crousse; EvaJiin of AI Design; Anna Liu of Tonkin Liu; AlbertWilliamsonTaylor of AKT II; Karen Livingstone of the Fitzwilliam Museum; and Sal Wilson, educator and sustainability consultant.Jane Drew Prize for Architecture and Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture 2025Photography credits from left to right: Philippe Ruault, Columbia GSAPP / Wikimedia CommonsArchitect Anne Lacaton has been awarded the Jane Drew Prize for Architecture 2025, an award recognising an architectural designer who, through their work and commitment to design excellence, has raised the profile of women in architecture. Co-founder, with Jean-Philippe Vassal, of French firm Lacaton & Vassal, Lacaton has been instrumental in defining what it means to build responsibly in the 21st century. Often upending convention, Lacaton and Vassal are famed for their bare-bones renovation of Pariss Palais de Tokyo, and for wrapping existing housing stock in winter gardens a move which improves the thermal performance of homes while subtly extending them.Manon Mollard, Editor of The Architectural Review said: Far from pretensions to stardom, Anne Lacatons practice is considered and audacious, with a clarity of purpose that must be celebrated. With Jean-Philippe Vassal, she places residents and users at the centre, and designs buildings that are both frugal and generous. Their denunciation of demolition as madness, and advocacy for reuse and transformation is an urgent message for all architects, clients and politicians.Suad Amiry is the winner of the Ada Louise Huxtable Prize for Contribution to Architecture 2025, which recognises individuals from fields adjacent to and that intersect with architecture, who have made a significant contribution to architecture and the built environment. Amiry is the founder of Riwaq, an organisation specialising in the preservation and reuse of historical buildings in Palestine. In addition to leading Riwaqs conservation work, Amiry is a prolific writer, having authored award-winning books such as Sharon and My Mother-in-Law (2003) and, most recently, Mother of Strangers (2022).Eleanor Beaumont, Deputy Editor at The Architectural Review said: In light of continuing and increasing violence and destruction in Palestine, Suad Amirys commitment to the restoration and reuse of historical Palestinian structures is vital. Amirys varied practice, combining both advocacy and writing, teaches spatial practitioners to imagine a world beyond the rubble.Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture 2025Designing Motherhood on display at Stockholms ArkDes. Credit: courtesy of ArkDesThe winner of this years Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture is the Designing Motherhood project. Noticing a gap in classrooms, exhibitions and writing on design for the arc of human reproduction, US design historians Michelle Millar Fisher and Amber Winick launched this research project in 2017. Today, it comprises a book published in 2021 by MIT Press; a touring exhibition currently in its fourth and fifth iterations at ArkDes in Stockholm, Sweden and the Houston Center for Contemporary Craft (curated with Juliana Rowen Barton and Zo Greggs); a popular Instagram account; and a series of local partnerships with maternal and infant health specialists, policy makers and activists.The Prize for Research in Gender and Architecture celebrates projects that investigate the complex relations between gender and the built environment, and challenge patriarchal spatial systems. Sited within architectural practice or outside it, in the homes, cities and landscapes we all inhabit, the prize recognises projects that are critical, educational and propositional in outlook, undertaken by individuals (of any gender) or collectives from around the world.Kristina Rapacki, Senior Editor at The Architectural Review said: Designing Motherhood is a multifaceted research project into the rich and largely unexplored design histories of human reproduction. By incorporating a multiplicity of voices, it reveals deep biopolitical stories of the buildings, objects and materials that have been used to control as well as emancipate birthing people and their bodies.We are delighted that this yearsW Awards will be hosted by ECC Italy in Venice on Friday 9 May, where the winners of the MJ Long and Moira Gemmill Prizes will be revealed. The event will be free to attend, and registration will open soon.2025-03-03AR EditorsShare

Settler-colonial violence and annexation continue to accelerate in Palestine despite the ceasefire in GazaWhile the ceasefire of 19 January 2025 offers a temporary decrease in the direct violence against the Palestinian population in Gaza, it has not stopped the underlying material conditions of the genocidal and settler-colonial violence inflicted on the territory and people of Palestine. Since the ceasefire, the West Bank has experienced a further escalation in violence from the Israeli military, including the recent near-complete forced evacuation of residents in Jenin refugee camp by the Israeli military as part of what they call Operation Iron Wall. The recent military campaign in Gaza since October 2023, along with the ongoing escalation in the West Bank, can be understood as ruptures in pace, marking a shift from the slow violence of blockades and settlements expansion, to the more acute and fast-paced violence of large-scale displacement, widespread destruction, territorial reorganisation and reconstruction.The rapid escalation of violence since October 2023 has not been an anomaly but part of a protracted settler-colonial project spanning all historic Palestine since the early 20th century. The State of Israel was established in 1948 on 78 per cent of historic Palestine, following an ethnic cleansing process that displaced over 750,000 Palestinians an event known as the Nakba. This territory was significantly larger than the 56 per cent allocated to the proposed Jewish state under the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which Palestinians rejected. The plan granted a majority of the land to the Jewish state, including several major Palestinian urban centres, despite Jewish ownership of only 6 per cent of historic Palestine at the time. In the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel further occupied the remaining 22 per cent of historic Palestine, comprising the Gaza Strip and the West Bank including the eastern part of Jerusalem. These territories have since been subjected to varying degrees of Israeli military occupation, settlement expansion and administrative control, further entrenching the territorial fragmentation of Palestine and displacement of Palestinian communities.Map of the territorial contraction of Palestine from the UN Partition Plan of 1947 (never implemented) to 2023Credit:Forensic Architecture 2025The 1948 and 1967 wars marked profound ruptures in the spatial and demographic organisation of historic Palestine, laying the groundwork for ongoing cycles of displacement and annexation. These wars represent acute, rapid phases of violence that served as a foundation for a slower, more insidious process of land appropriation and structural violence. Immediately following the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank in 1967, Israeli settlements were established in both regions. Between 1967 and 1977, the proposed Allon Plan aimed to annex significant portions of the West Bank and establish Jewish settlements in the Jordan Valley, near Jerusalem, and in the Hebron area, for security purposes.Israeli settlements in the 1960s and 70s were primarily concentrated in the Jordan Valley, serving as a so-called buffer zone established by the Israeli military between the recently occupied territory and Jordan, which had controlled the West Bank prior to the Israeli occupation. The primary objective was to establish control over the Jordan Valley, effectively separating Palestinian villages and cities from Jordan. This was achieved through first partitioning the territory with the construction of the Route 90 road in 1967, and then with the development of major Israeli settlements along this corridor. The Jordan Valley buffer zone notably coincides with some of the West Banks most fertile agricultural lands and water resources that had historically been essential to Palestinian sustenance, mirroring a pattern seen in Gaza where buffer zones in the north and south encompass crucial farmland that was vital for sustaining life in the besieged strip.The Jordan Valley buffer zone notably coincides with some of the West Banks most fertile agricultural lands and water resources that had historically been essential to Palestinian sustenanceSince then, the Israeli occupation has continued to expand settlements in the West Bank. The incremental expansion of settlements established a new status quo, with 60 per cent of the West Bank placed under Israeli military control an area designated as Area C under the Oslo Accords of 1995. The Palestinian Authority oversees most civil affairs including internal security in an area of only 18 per cent of the West Bank, made up of Palestinian built-up areas (classified as Area A), and manages education, health and the economy in a further 21 per cent of the West Bank (Area B). But in both Areas A and B, Israel retains security control, enabling its military to conduct raids or detain individuals at any time.Israeli settlements in the West Bank (present) and Gaza (19672005)Credit:Forensic Architecture 2025To consolidate control in the West Bank, multiple roads were constructed to further fragment Palestinian communities and isolate them from both each other and the Jordan Valley. A key example is the JerichoJerusalem (E1) corridor, which bisects the West Bank at its centre. The illegal Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, strategically positioned to sever the eastern part of Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, plays a central role in this fragmentation. It features a checkpoint located approximately 15km from the Container (Jabal An-Nar) checkpoint, which functions as the primary control point for Palestinian movement between the central and southern West Bank. These corridors not only divide Palestinian territories but also serve as mechanisms for asserting Israeli control and limiting Palestinian mobility.The corridors not only divide Palestinian territories but also serve as mechanisms for asserting Israeli control and limiting Palestinian mobilitySince the state of emergency was declared in October 2023, the violence in the West Bank has rapidly increased. This included the demolition of more than 1,200 Palestinian structures and the seizing of approximately 12km2 of land in March 2024, marking the largest land appropriation since the 1993 Oslo Accords. Some 40,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced and medical infrastructures have been attacked. Over 50 new military outposts and more than 13,000 new settlement units have been approved for construction. Plans have also been made to approve 2,350 additional homes in the illegal Israeli settlement of Ma'ale Adumim, 300 in Kedar and according to reports on 17 February nearly 1,000 in Efrat.In the Gaza Strip, Israeli settlements established since 1967 contributed to a similar pattern of fragmentation. After these settlements were dismantled in 2005 due to the increasing cost of securing them, the land was physically reconnected as the barriers that once divided different parts of Gaza were removed but a siege imposed on the strip effectively maintained territorial control through other means.Map of Gaza showing the expanded buffer zone, raid routes, and the Philadelphi and Netzarim Corridors as of 18 January 2025Credit:Forensic Architecture 2025On 13 October 2023, Israel ordered approximately 1.4 million Palestinians living north of the river Wadi Gaza to evacuate within 24 hours. While framed as a temporary security measure, this order effectively constituted forced displacement. Almost immediately after the evacuation order, a new military boundary was established, preventing those who fled from returning to their homes. Under the guise of emergency, this boundary known as the Netzarim corridor quickly assumed the characteristics of a permanent partition, dividing Gaza into two distinct halves: north and south. The corridor was solidified with the opening of a new road and the establishment of military checkpoints and bases along its length, marking the newly drawn border. This border extended far beyond the width of the road itself, encompassing a 4km-wide buffer zone of complete destruction 2km on either side of the corridor effectively carving through the strip and creating a significant zone of displacement and control. The corridors alignment along Wadi Gaza was not accidental, as this specific geographical feature has deep colonial resonance, historically regarded by multiple imperial powers as a natural boundary signifying a perceived end of Palestine. British Mandate-era documents, as well as later Israeli planning rhetoric, often cast Wadi Gaza as a strategic dividing line, reinforcing its function as a de facto frontier.Within a year, nearly 36 per cent of the Gaza Strip was designated as buffer zones, including areas along the Netzarim corridor, the Philadelphi corridor at the border with Egypt, and the further expansions of the already existing buffer zone along the north and east side of Gaza. These zones significantly reduced the land available for Palestinians to use, and would have acted as a basis for future annexation and settlement given that they largely coincide with the locations of former Israeli settlements in Gaza, including Netzarim, after which the corridor is named. A mutually reinforcing relationship exists between areas confiscated for buffer zones and those designated for Israeli settlements. Many settlements were established on land initially designated by Israel as buffer zones, yet the establishment and expansion of these settlements also required the creation of additional buffer zones to secure their perimeters and the construction of new roads to connect them while further partitioning Palestinian communities.A mutually reinforcing relationship exists between areas confiscated for buffer zones and those designated for Israeli settlementsThe mass evacuation in October 2023 was accompanied by the systematic destruction of conditions necessary for life, aimed at preventing Palestinians from remaining and returning to the area. When this destruction failed to completely displace the population, the Israeli military imposed yet another division in October 2024, splitting northern Gaza from Gaza City. This iteration of partitioning was marked by the construction of a new military corridor to segment northern Gaza and an intensification of destruction designed to force further displacement. These spatial practices are interconnected; the logic of partitioning and displacement is integral to Israels expansionist project and annexation strategies. Each division of land is followed by further fragmentation and displacement, creating a fractal-like repetition of partitioning and control across multiple scales and intensities.Spatial fragmentation of the West Bank (present) and Gaza (October 2023 to January 2025)Credit:Forensic Architecture 2025The recent genocidal violence in Gaza and the similar patterns of violence repeating in the West Bank are not isolated episodes but part of a protracted settler-colonial project; the underlying spatial logic aligns with previous and ongoing Israeli practices in Palestine. Incremental strategies such as settlement expansion lay the groundwork for rapid, large-scale escalations. Slow violence normalises structural control and limits resistance, while fast violence exploits emergencies to enact radical changes to the spatial and demographic landscape. In areas where immediate military-enforced mass displacement like the operations in Gaza and the Jenin refugee camp proves challenging, the continuous interplay between rapid military operations and gradual structural pressures serves to systematically empty targeted territories, enabling expanded military control and settlement growth.Each division of land is followed by further fragmentation and displacement, creating a fractal-like repetition of partitioning and controlThe recent events in the Jenin, Nur Shams and El Fara refugee camps in the West Bank, along with the violence of the past 15 months, signals a shift in Israeli military tactics in the West Bank that mirrors the destruction and mass displacement operations carried out in Gaza. Meanwhile, the dismantling of the Netzarim corridor, dividing northern and southern Gaza, as part of the ceasefire terms agreed on 19 January, marks the first time since the Nakba that Palestinians have achieved return in large groups. Despite the US administrations recent discourse of reconstructing Gaza, effectively through ethnic cleansing, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are returning to what remains of their homes in the north of Wadi Gaza. Such statements from the US government reaffirm and further expose the settler-colonial logicbehind Israels actions, seeking to normalise the settler imaginary even after the ceasefire. Such ruptures of violence whether rhetoricalor physical are not new and remain integral to this logic. The Palestinian return to northern Gaza is not merely about reuniting the Gaza Strip; it is also a vital act of resistance aimed at dismantling the settler-colonial project that, for generations, has torn apart and uprooted the Palestinian population.2025-02-28Kristina RapackiShare AR February 2025ExtensionsBuy Now

The International Space Station (ISS) was built as a series of extensions; each module was launched to orbit individually and docked to a previous one. The most recent additions were made in 2021. The ISS also represents the quest to extend human habitation beyond Earth. In June 2024, two NASA astronauts arrived at the station for a week-long mission. As the ARs February 2025 issue went to print, they were still there, waiting to come homeRead stories from theExtensions issue2025-02-28AR EditorsShare