• This AI Paper Introduces Shortest Majority Vote: An Improved Parallel Scaling Method for Enhancing Test-Time Performance in Large Language Models
    www.marktechpost.com
    Large language models (LLMs) use extensive computational resources to process and generate human-like text. One emerging technique to enhance reasoning capabilities in LLMs is test-time scaling, which dynamically allocates computational resources during inference. This approach aims to improve the accuracy of responses by refining the models reasoning process. As models like OpenAIs o1 series introduced test-time scaling, researchers sought to understand whether longer reasoning chains led to improved performance or if alternative strategies could yield better results.Scaling reasoning in AI models poses a significant challenge, especially in cases where extended chains of thought do not necessarily translate to better outcomes. The assumption that increasing the length of responses enhances accuracy is being questioned by researchers, who have found that longer explanations can introduce inconsistencies. Errors accumulate over extended reasoning chains, and models often make unnecessary self-revisions, leading to performance degradation rather than improvement. If test-time scaling is to be an effective solution, it must balance reasoning depth with accuracy, ensuring that computational resources are used efficiently without diminishing the models effectiveness.Current approaches to test-time scaling primarily fall into sequential and parallel categories. Sequential scaling extends the chain-of-thought (CoT) during inference, expecting that more extended reasoning will lead to improved accuracy. However, studies on models like QwQ, Deepseek-R1 (R1), and LIMO indicate that extending CoTs does not consistently yield better results. These models frequently use self-revision, introducing redundant computations that degrade performance. In contrast, parallel scaling generates multiple solutions simultaneously and selects the best one based on a predetermined criterion. Comparative analyses suggest that parallel scaling is more effective in maintaining accuracy and efficiency.Researchers from Fudan University and the Shanghai AI Laboratory introduced an innovative method called Shortest Majority Vote to address the limitations of sequential scaling. This method optimizes test-time scaling by leveraging parallel computation while factoring in solution length. The primary insight behind this approach is that shorter solutions tend to be more accurate than longer ones, as they contain fewer unnecessary self-revisions. By incorporating solution length into the majority voting process, this method enhances models performance by prioritizing frequent and concise answers.The proposed method modifies traditional majority voting by considering the number and length of solutions. Conventional majority voting selects the most frequently occurring answer among generated solutions, whereas Shortest Majority Vote assigns higher priority to answers that appear often but are also shorter. The reasoning behind this approach is that longer solutions tend to introduce more errors due to excessive self-revisions. Researchers found that QwQ, R1, and LIMO generate increasingly longer responses when prompted to refine their solutions, often leading to lower accuracy. The proposed method aims to filter out unnecessary extensions and prioritize more precise answers by integrating length as a criterion.Experimental evaluations demonstrated that Shortest Majority Vote method significantly outperformed traditional majority voting across multiple benchmarks. On the AIME dataset, models incorporating this technique showed an increase in accuracy compared to existing test-time scaling approaches. For instance, accuracy improvements were observed in R1-Distill-32b, which reached 72.88% compared to conventional methods. Similarly, QwQ and LIMO also exhibited enhanced performance, particularly in cases where extended reasoning chains previously led to inconsistencies. These findings suggest that the assumption that longer solutions always yield better results is flawed. Instead, a structured and efficient approach that prioritizes conciseness can lead to superior performance.The results also revealed that sequential scaling suffers from diminishing returns. While initial revisions may contribute to improved responses, excessive revisions often introduce errors rather than correcting them. In particular, models like QwQ and R1-Distill-1.5b tended to change correct answers into incorrect ones rather than improving accuracy. This phenomenon further highlights the limitations of sequential scaling, reinforcing the argument that a more structured approach, such as Shortest Majority Vote, is necessary for optimizing test-time scaling.The research underscores the need to rethink how test-time scaling is applied in large language models. Rather than assuming that extending reasoning chains leads to better accuracy, the findings demonstrate that prioritizing concise, high-quality solutions through parallel scaling is a more effective strategy. The introduction of Shortest Majority Vote provides a practical and empirically validated improvement over existing methods, offering a refined approach to optimizing computational efficiency in LLMs. By focusing on structured reasoning rather than excessive self-revision, this method paves the way for more reliable and accurate AI-driven decision-making.Check outthePaper.All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also,feel free to follow us onTwitterand dont forget to join our75k+ ML SubReddit. NikhilNikhil is an intern consultant at Marktechpost. He is pursuing an integrated dual degree in Materials at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Nikhil is an AI/ML enthusiast who is always researching applications in fields like biomaterials and biomedical science. With a strong background in Material Science, he is exploring new advancements and creating opportunities to contribute.Nikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper Introduces Diverse Inference and Verification: Enhancing AI Reasoning for Advanced Mathematical and Logical Problem-SolvingNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/Stanford Researchers Introduced a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Effective Social Deduction in AI CommunicationNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper from IBM and MIT Introduces SOLOMON: A Neuro-Inspired Reasoning Network for Enhancing LLM Adaptability in Semiconductor Layout DesignNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper from Apple Introduces a Distillation Scaling Law: A Compute-Optimal Approach for Training Efficient Language Models
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·33 Views
  • Amazon Boss Jeff Bezos Asks Who Fans Would Pick as the Next James Bond, and the Answer Is Loud and Clear
    www.ign.com
    Following the shock news that Amazon has taken full creative control over James Bond, with long-term Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson stepping back, the question on everyones lips is: who should be the next 007?Thats the question Amazon boss Jeff Bezos asked his followers on X / Twitter, and the answer was loud and clear.Yes, some are calling for the likes of Venom star Tom Hardy, the MCU's Idris Elba, Professor X actor James McAvoy, Magneto actor Michael Fassbender, and Kravens Aaron Taylor-Johnson (who was previously rumored to be top of the list) to be given the role. But the clear fan-favorite is Henry Cavill.It didnt take long after Bezos tweet for Henry Cavill to trend online, and thats because of the sheer number of James Bond enthusiasts calling for the Superman and Witcher actor to take over where Daniel Craig left off.Some are now wondering whether Cavills odds of playing the worlds most famous spy have risen now Amazon is pulling all the strings. Cavill signed on to star in and produce Amazons hotly anticipated Warhammer 40,000 project. Could he also sign on to star as Bond?Of course, Cavill famously auditioned to play James Bond during casting for 2006s Casino Royale (and you can even see that audition online). Casino Royale director Martin Campbell has called the audition "tremendous, but the then 23-year-old Cavill lost out to Daniel Craig because he was deemed too young.During a 2023 interview with The Express, Campbell said of Cavill: He looked great in the audition. His acting was tremendous. And look, if Daniel didnt exist Henry would have made an excellent Bond. He looked terrific, he was in great physical shape very handsome, very chiseled. He just looked a little young at that time back then.It was ultimately down to, and this is what Ive been told, it was just down to me and Daniel, and I was the younger option, said Cavill in an interview with Josh Horowitz. They obviously went with Daniel and I think it was an amazing choice to go with Daniel. I probably wasnt ready at the time and I think Daniel did an incredible job over the past movies, so Im happy they made that choice.Its no secret that 007s producers were on the lookout for the next James Bond after Daniel Craig left the franchise behind with No Time to Die. But could Cavill now play Bond? By the time Daniel got to [No Time To Die] really he was at an age where one more would have been too old for him, added Campbell.I think they sign on for three Bonds, Im not absolutely 100% certain of that. I know with Pierce [Brosnan] he had to sign on to three when we did him. So, thats going to take, what, six years of your life maybe? I suspect Daniel [had] the same deal. And the next guys going to have to do that.Henrys 40, so by the time hes done the third one hes going to be 50. Anything beyond thats two, three years per Bond. Hes in good shape Henry, hes a good guy. He did very well in the audition, but ironically, he was too young.Wesley is the UK News Editor for IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·36 Views
  • IGN UK Podcast 788: Singing in the Nightreign
    www.ign.com
    Cardy, Matt, and Mat are back for some February Friday fun and frolicking as a range of delights are explored, including first impressions of the multiplayer spin-off Elden Ring Nightreign. There's also time for a look at awards contender The Brutalist, new Adult Swin animation Common Side Effects, and visual novel dice-roller Citizen Sleeper 2.Remember to send us your thoughts about all the new games, TV shows, and films you're enjoying or looking forward to: ign_ukfeedback@ign.com.IGN UK Podcast 788: Singing in the NightreignPlay
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·38 Views
  • Apple TV+s Next Big Sci-Fi Gamble Could Outdo Blade Runner But Theres a Catch
    www.denofgeek.com
    Science fiction is, almost by definition, an invitation to create anachronisms. By the time the present catches up with the future, various aesthetic and narrative choices within a sci-fi story can suddenly seem silly or outdated. In a best-case scenario, like the 60s Star Trek, certain analog technology can seem to generate nostalgia that allows us to compensate for any sort of plausibility gap. Or in the case of something like Blade Runner, we can casually accept that the future it projected of Los Angeles, November 2019 takes place in an alternate timeline. When Blade Runner 2049 was made in 2017, we all shrugged our shoulders and agreed that this future was built on an alternate past. No technological retcon was needed; as long as the audience does a bit of mental gymnastics.But, now, after 41 years, a close sci-fi sibling of Blade Runner is finally going to be adapted for the screen. William Gibsons seminal cyberpunk masterpiece, Neuromancer is being produced by Apple TV+ and has started to announce various cast members, including, Callum Turner as Case, Briana Middleton as Molly Millions, and Mark Strong as Armitage. The show is created byGraham Roland and J.D. Dillard with Gibson serving as an executive producer. For fans of the authors work, this will be the second major TV series to tackle his cyberpunk ethos, following the tragically underrated 2022 Amazon series, The Peripheral, based on Gibsons 2014 book of the same name. But, theres a big difference between adapting a 2014 Gibson cyberpunk book and a 1984 cyberpunk book, and it all comes down to just how this new show will handle those pesky anachronisms.Future NostalgiaThe cyberpunk hard guys of science fiction, with their sharp black suits and their surgically implanted silicon chips, already have a certain nostalgic romance about them, William Gibson wrote for Time Magazine in 2000, in an essay entitled Will We Have Computer Chips in Our Heads? Essentially, hes been aware of this wrinkle for two decades, well after Neuromancer became a hit book. As he puts it in the same essay: In hindsight, the most memorable images of science fiction have more to do with our anxieties in the past (the writers present) than with those singular and ongoing scenarios that make up our life as a species; or real futures, our ongoing present.And its in this dichotomous split between aesthetic power and future fidelity that the new Neuromancer series will have to make a very important choice. Will it go the Blade Runner 2049 route and simply exist in an anachronistic alternate past, or fundamentally alter the nature of Neuromancer to make it more realistic for todays audiences?To recap, the story of Neuromancer takes place in the near future, and in it, data that can be hacked in cyberspace translates to a booming criminal business. The story revolves around one former hacker, a cowboy named Case, who, after having his nerve-endings fried by some crooks he tried to double-cross, is pulled back into the hacking game by a shadowy organization. The epic story takes Case across a dystopian future world, including a massive city called The Sprawl, and eventually has him facing down with not one, but two different AIs. Heres the thing though: The book was written in 1984, so Case talks about stuff like trying to sell Three megabytes of hot RAM while living in a high-tech world without cell phones. As Gibson jokes in his 2004 introduction to the novel, The Sky Above the Port, there are several moments in the book that could jar a contemporary reader, such as Cases puzzlingly urgent demand, when the going gets tough, for a modem.In Gibsons 1984 imagination, the concept of cyberspace is more like what we saw in The Lawnmower Man, or Tron than the more mundane version of the internet we actually got. In the cyberpunk future of Neuromancer, the pull between the analog world and the digital world is more interesting, more pronounced, and extreme than the slightly lazier, and depressing way we access the internet now. Theres no need to jack in to cyberspace today, and nobody needs to be as cool as Case to find weird pieces of data or a meddling AI online. In Neuromancer, the menacing AI Wintermute was scary and memorable as hell. (Mission: Impossibles The Entity is a near-total ripoff of Wintermute from Neuromancer.)Today, some of us struggle with trying to turn off various glitchy AI assistants that are ruining our Word docs or Zoom calls. If Im nostalgic for anything, its AI that is actually messing up my life in a cool way rather than whatever it is Gemini is doing to my search resultsUpdate the Tech, Lose the AppealThis is where it seems almost impossible for Neuromancer to try to update the technology of the book to match it with contemporary culture. In a sense, the romance of the book, the reason why it is so readable and such a classic is found in the 1980s cyberpunk aesthetics. Remaking the world of Neuromancer would be like remaking The Matrix, but this time, Neo isnt allowed to wear shades, and instead, has to be dressed like Mark Zuckerberg. The basic coolness of Neuromancer is inextricably tied up in the texture of the books imagery, whether those exist in the virtual world, or the real world.Sure, there are certain things a contemporary update of Neuromancer could pull off without having to build the narrative on a future history in which cell phones dont exist. The nature of Night City, The Sprawl, and the coffins that Case sleeps in can all work in an updated future as well as an anachronistic one. Mollys retractable razor claws can work just fine whether she has a TikTok account or not, but theres something about imagining these characters with contemporary references that just feels off.It would be easy to handwave this away and use something like Westworld as an example of how to walk this line effectively. Once that series left the robot amusement parks in season three, the future world it presented felt similar to ours, with some minor differences. The key to Westworlds aesthetic success was a minimalist approach. But, shows like Westworld, and Altered Carbon, inherently dealt with analog things in a cyberpunk context: Robot bodies, clone bodies, and the like. Neuromancer is somewhat the opposite, while the analog real world (complete with payphones and jacking in) is a big part of the book, the virtual world is equally important to the story.And its here, in the nostalgic version of William Gibsons conception of cyberspace that the Apple TV+ version of Neuromancer will have to make the hardest decisions. Theres no way to predict which kind of science fiction will age well nor what we even mean by that phrase. Arguably, Blade Runner with its Atari Signs and video call payphones has aged well not in spite of its anachronisms, but because of them. And it seems likely that if the TV version of Neuromancer wants to capture the essence of what makes the book great, it will avoid the temptation to fix things that arent broken. Science fiction is an artform that endures because we understand imagination runs into the past and future. By letting Neuromancer remain a cellphone-less world, were letting science fiction be its purest, most interesting self.Join our mailing listGet the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox!
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·37 Views
  • BaxEnergy Italia SRL: Senior Site Reliability Engineer
    weworkremotely.com
    We need a senior SRE, highly skilled in DevOps, CI/CD and databases. Help us maintain, optimize and automate CI/CD and software systems of the company! We seek people who are enthusiastic about code quality, helping teams grow, and nurturing more engineers.What You Will DoInfrastructure: create, maintain and update the tech stack to ensure that infrastructure is running smoothly and that systems and tools are working as expectedProcess optimization: optimize and enhance processes regarding maintenance and support with regards to the current as well as future product infrastructure requirementsAutomation: implement and continuously improve automation of tasks to improve the agility and resilience of systemsMonitoring, SLO/SLI: responsible for the deployment and configuration of systems within development as well as production environments and the continuous monitoring of reliability metrics such as availability, uptime and response timeAbout YouSmart and gets things doneYou have 5+ years experience as a Senior Site Reliability Engineer, with a strong portfolio of completed projectsYou have a strong understanding of database and queue administrationYou have experience with cloud platforms and containerizationYou are a master of CI/CD pipelines and DevOps practicesYou have a 4-hour overlap with CET/CEST time zones as our teams are globally distributedYoure eligible to obtain a visa and can travel to Italy within three months of hiringWhy Join UsWe are a remote-first company and this is a fully remote positionWe build amazing teams with brilliant, happy, and motivated developersWe do not waste your time! All interviews are conducted in a single dayEarn Euro-level salaries with over 30 days of vacation, sick pay, and other benefitsThe role is a permanent full-time position. We invest in people and understand great things happen if we doBe part of our amazing company trajectory over the next five yearsTravel to Sicily, Italy once a year for a fully paid company retreatApply NowLet's start your dream job Apply now
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·35 Views
  • The foundations of Americas prosperity are being dismantled
    www.technologyreview.com
    Ever since World War II, the US has been the global leader in science and technologyand benefited immensely from it. Research fuels American innovation and the economy in turn. Scientists around the world want to study in the US and collaborate with American scientists to produce more of that research. These international collaborations play a critical role in American soft power and diplomacy. The products Americans can buy, the drugs they have access to, the diseases theyre at risk of catchingare all directly related to the strength of American research and its connections to the worlds scientists. That scientific leadership is now being dismantled, according to more than 10 federal workers who spoke to MIT Technology Review, as the Trump administrationspearheaded by Elon Musks Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)slashes personnel, programs, and agencies. Meanwhile, the president himself has gone after relationships with US allies. These workers come from several agencies, including the Departments of State, Defense, and Commerce, the US Agency for International Development, and the National Science Foundation. All of them occupy scientific and technical roles, many of which the average American has never heard of but which are nevertheless critical, coordinating research, distributing funding, supporting policymaking, or advising diplomacy. They warn that dismantling the behind-the-scenes scientific research programs that backstop American life could lead to long-lasting, perhaps irreparable damage to everything from the quality of health care to the publics access to next-generation consumer technologies. The US took nearly a century to craft its rich scientific ecosystem; if the unraveling that has taken place over the past month continues, Americans will feel the effects for decades to come. Most of the federal workers spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk or for fear of being targeted. Many are completely stunned and terrified by the scope and totality of the actions. While every administration brings its changes, keeping the US a science and technology leader has never been a partisan issue. No one predicted the wholesale assault on these foundations of American prosperity. If you believe that innovation is important to economic development, then throwing a wrench in one of the most sophisticated and productive innovation machines in world history is not a good idea, says Deborah Seligsohn, an assistant professor of political science at Villanova University who worked for two decades in the State Department on science issues. Theyre setting us up for economic decline. The biggest funder of innovation The US currently has the most top-quality research institutes in the world. This includes world-class universities like MIT (which publishes MIT Technology Review) and the University of California, Berkeley; national labs like Oak Ridge and Los Alamos; and federal research facilities run by agencies like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Defense. Much of this network was developed by the federal government after World War II to bolster the US position as a global superpower. Before the Trump administrations wide-ranging actions, which now threaten to slash federal research funding, the government remained by far the largest supporter of scientific progress. Outside of its own labs and facilities, it funded more than 50% of research and development across higher education, according to data from the National Science Foundation. In 2023, that came to nearly $60 billion out of the $109 billion that universities spent on basic science and engineering. The return on these investments is difficult to measure. It can often take years or decades for this kind of basic science research to have tangible effects on the lives of Americans and people globally, and on the USs place in the world. But history is littered with examples of the transformative effect that this funding produces over time. The internet and GPS were first developed through research backed by the Department of Defense, as was the quantum dot technology behind high-resolution QLED television screens. Well before they were useful or commercially relevant, the development of neural networks that underpin nearly all modern AI systems was substantially supported by the National Science Foundation. The decades-long drug discovery process that led to Ozempic was incubated by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Institutes of Health. Microchips. Self-driving cars. MRIs. The flu shot. The list goes on and on. In her 2013 book The Entrepreneurial State, Mariana Mazzucato, a leading economist studying innovation at University College London, found that every major technological transformation in the US, from electric cars to Google to the iPhone, can trace its roots back to basic science research once funded by the federal government. If the past offers any lesson, that means every major transformation in the future could be shortchanged with the destruction of that support. The Trump administrations distaste for regulation will arguably be a boon in the short term for some parts of the tech industry, including crypto and AI. But the federal workers said the presidents and Musks undermining of basic science research will hurt American innovation in the long run. Rather than investing in the future, youre burning through scientific capital, an employee at the State Department said. You can build off the things you already know, but youre not learning anything new. Twenty years later, you fall behind because you stopped making new discoveries. A global currency The government doesnt just give money, either. It supports American science in numerous other ways, and the US reaps the returns. The Department of State helps attract the best students from around the world to American universities. Amid stagnating growth in the number of homegrown STEM PhD graduates, recruiting foreign students remains one of the strongest pathways for the US to expand its pool of technical talent, especially in strategic areas like batteries and semiconductors. Many of those students stay for years, if not the rest of their lives; even if they leave the country, theyve already spent some of their most productive years in the US and will retain a wealth of professional connections with whom theyll collaborate, thereby continuing to contribute to US science. The State Department also establishes agreements between the US and other countries and helps broker partnerships between American and international universities. That helps scientists collaborate across borders on everything from global issues like climate change to research that requires equipment on opposite sides of the world, such as the measurement of gravitational waves. The international development work of USAID in global health, poverty reduction, and conflict alleviationnow virtually shut down in its entiretywas designed to build up goodwill toward the US globally; it improved regional stability for decades. In addition to its inherent benefits, this allowed American scientists to safely access diverse geographies and populations, as well as plant and animal species not found in the US. Such international interchange played just as critical a role as government funding in many crucial inventions. Several federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, also help collect and aggregate critical data on disease, health trends, air quality, weather, and more from disparate sources that feed into the work of scientists across the country. The National Institutes of Health, for example, has since 2015 been running the Precision Medicine Initiative, the only effort of its kind to collect extensive and granular health data from over 1 million Americans who volunteer their medical records, genetic history, and even Fitbit data to help researchers understand health disparities and develop personalized and more effective treatments for disorders from heart and lung disease to cancer. The data set, which is too expensive for any one university to assemble and maintain, has already been used in hundreds of papers that will lay the foundation for the next generation of life-saving pharmaceuticals. Beyond fueling innovation, a well-supported science and technology ecosystem bolsters US national security and global influence. When people want to study at American universities, attend international conferences hosted on American soil, or move to the US to work or to found their own companies, the US stays the center of global innovation activity. This ensures that the country continues to get access to the best people and ideas, and gives it an outsize role in setting global scientific practices and priorities. US research norms, including academic freedom and a robust peer review system, become global research norms that lift the overall quality of science. International agencies like the World Health Organization take significant cues from American guidance. US scientific leadership has long been one of the countrys purest tools of soft power and diplomacy as well. Countries keen to learn from the American innovation ecosystem and to have access to American researchers and universities have been more prone to partner with the US and align with its strategic priorities. Just one example: Science diplomacy has long played an important role in maintaining the USs strong relationship with the Netherlands, which is home to ASML, the only company in the world that can produce the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. These are critical for both AI development and national security. International science cooperation has also served as a stabilizing force in otherwise difficult relationships. During the Cold War, the US and USSR continued to collaborate on the International Space Station; during the recent heightened economic competition between the US and China, the countries have remained each others top scientific partners. Actively working together to solve problems that we both care about helps maintain the connections and the context but also helps build respect, Seligsohn says. The federal government itself is a significant beneficiary of the countrys convening power for technical expertise. Among other things, experts both inside and outside the government support its sound policymaking in science and technology. During the US Senate AI Insight Forums, co-organized by Senator Chuck Schumer through the fall of 2023, for example, the Senate heard from more than 150 experts, many of whom were born abroad and studying at American universities, working at or advising American companies, or living permanently in the US as naturalized American citizens. Federal scientists and technical experts at government agencies also work on wide-ranging goals critical to the US, including building resilience in the face of an increasingly erratic climate; researching strategic technologies such as next-generation battery technology to reduce the countrys reliance on minerals not found in the US; and monitoring global infectious diseases to prevent the next pandemic. Every issue that the US faces, there are people that are trying to do research on it and there are partnerships that have to happen, the State Department employee said. A system in jeopardy Now the breadth and velocity of the Trump administrations actions has led to an unprecedented assault on every pillar upholding American scientific leadership. For starters, the purging of tens of thousandsand perhaps soon hundreds of thousandsof federal workers is removing scientists and technologists from the government and paralyzing the ability of critical agencies to function. Across multiple agencies, science and technology fellowship programs, designed to bring in talented early-career staff with advanced STEM degrees, have shuttered. Many other federal scientists were among the thousands who were terminated as probationary employees, a status they held because of the way scientific roles are often contractually structured. Some agencies that were supporting or conducting their own research, including the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, are no longer functionally operational. USAID has effectively shuttered, eliminating a bastion of US expertise, influence, and credibility overnight. Diplomacy is built on relationships. If weve closed all these clinics and gotten rid of technical experts in our knowledge base inside the government, why would any foreign government have respect for the US in our ability to hold our word and in our ability to actually be knowledgeable? a terminated USAID worker said. I really hope America can save itself. Now the Trump administration has sought to reverse some terminations after discovering that many were key to national security, including nuclear safety employees responsible for designing, building, and maintaining the countrys nuclear weapons arsenal. But many federal workers I spoke to can no longer imagine staying in the public sector. Some are considering going into industry. Others are wondering whether it will be better to move abroad. Its just such a waste of American talent, said Fiona Coleman, a terminated federal scientist, her voice cracking with emotion as she described the long years of schooling and training she and her colleagues went through to serve the government. Many fear the US has also singlehandedly kneecapped its own ability to attract talent from abroad. Over the last 10 years, even as American universities have continued to lead the world, many universities in other countries have rapidly leveled up. That includes those in Canada, where liberal immigration policies and lower tuition fees have driven a 200% increase in international student enrollment over the last decade, according to Anna Esaki-Smith, cofounder of a higher-education research consultancy called Education Rethink and author of Make College Your Superpower. Germany has also seen an influx, thanks to a growing number of English-taught programs and strong connections between universities and German industry. Chinese students, who once represented the largest share of foreign students in the US, are increasingly staying at home or opting to study in places like Hong Kong, Singapore, and the UK. During the first Trump administration, many international students were already more reluctant to come to the US because of the presidents hostile rhetoric. With the return and rapid escalation of that rhetoric, Esaki-Smith is hearing from some universities that international students are declining their admissions offers. Add to that the other recent developmentsthe potential dramatic cuts in federal research funding, the deletion of scores of rich public data sets on health and the environment, the clampdown on academic freedom for research that appears related to diversity, equity, and inclusion and the fear that these restrictions could ultimately encompass other politically charged topics like climate change or vaccinesand many more international science and engineering students could decide to head elsewhere. Ive been hearing this increasingly from several postdocs and early-career professors, fearing the cuts in NIH or NSF grants, that theyre starting to look for funding or job opportunities in other countries, Coleman told me. And then were going to be training up the USs competitors. The attacks could similarly weaken the productivity of those who stay at American universities. While many of the Trump administrations actions are now being halted and scrutinized by US judges, the chaos has weakened a critical prerequisite for tackling the toughest research problems: a long-term stable environment. With reports that the NSF is combing through research grants for words like women, diverse, and institutional to determine whether they violate President Trumps executive order on DEIA programs, a chilling effect is also setting in among federally funded academics uncertain whether theyll get caught in the dragnet. To scientists abroad, the situation in the US government has marked American institutions and researchers as potentially unreliable partners, several federal workers told me. If international researchers think collaborations with the US can end at any moment when funds are abruptly pulled or certain topics or keywords are suddenly blacklisted, many of them could steer clear and look to other countries. Im really concerned about the instability were showing, another employee at the State Department said. Whats the point in even engaging? Because science is a long-term initiative and process that outlasts administrations and political cycles. Meanwhile, international scientists have far more options these days for high-caliber colleagues to collaborate with outside America. In recent years, for example, China has made a remarkable ascent to become a global peer in scientific discoveries. By some metrics, it has even surpassed the US; it started accounting for more of the top 1% of most-cited papers globally, often called the Nobel Prize tier, back in 2019 and has continued to improve the quality of the rest of its research. Where Chinese universities can also entice international collaborators with substantial resources, the US is more limited in its ability to offer tangible funding, the State employee said. Until now, the US has maintained its advantage in part through the prestige of its institutions and its more open cultural norms, including stronger academic freedom. But several federal scientists warn that this advantage is dissipating. America is made up of so many different people contributing to it. Theres such a powerful global community that makes this country what it is, especially in science and technology and academia and research. Were going to lose that; theres not a chance in the world that were not going to lose that through stuff like this, says Brigid Cakouros, a federal scientist who was also terminated from USAID. I have no doubt that the international science community will ultimately be okay. Itll just be a shame for the US to isolate themselves from it.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·39 Views
  • Listing for swooping, manta ray-like Welsh leisure centre
    www.architectsjournal.co.uk
    Wrexham Waterworld, a still-operational leisure centre just off the A5152, has been granted Grade II-listed status by Cadw, the Welsh governments historic environment body.The centres most striking characteristic is its reinforced concrete roof, described as a swooping, manta ray-like hyperbolic parabaloid by architectural heritage campaigners The Twentieth Century Society (C20).The 47 x 47m structure, built between 1967-70 to designs by architect Frederick D Williamson and engineer Gerald A Williamson, is the only hyperbolic paraboloid roof in Wales, according to the campaign group.AdvertisementThe diamond-shaped leisure centre incorporates a swimming pool with a water slide and viewing area, a gym and other leisure facilities.C20 has hailed the building as the key surviving example of an indoor swimming pool of the post-war period in Wales [which] displays technological innovation and virtuosity as the first hypar roof in Wales, built on a scale that far exceeded any of its UK predecessors.A previous attempt to have the centre listed failed in 2014 after Cadw determined that the leisure centre had been altered too significantly to be considered as an exemplar building of its type.But the heritage organisation changed its mind after C20 Cymru submitted a second listing application in October 2022, prompting a re-assessment of its architectural worth.C20s most recent listing bid formed part of a campaign by the organisation, launched in 2022, to celebrate the architecture of the leisure centre and to protect the most historic examples.AdvertisementPosting on X on Thursday (20 February), C20 Society and C20 Cymru said they were celebrating the fifth Leisure Centre to be listed as a result of our ongoing nationwide campaign.Wrexham Waterworld is the first leisure centre in Wales to be listed as part of the campaign and follows four listings for buildings in England among them FaulknerBrowns inventive 1980s Doncaster Dome and Trevor Skemptons 1970s Richard Dunn Sports Centre in Bradford.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·35 Views
  • Best Internet Providers in Melbourne, Florida
    www.cnet.com
    While the broadband options are limited in Melbourne, we recommend these ISPs for a reliable connection.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·46 Views
  • Best Internet Providers in North Dakota
    www.cnet.com
    From national providers to local fiber options, here are our top picks for the best internet service options in the Peace Garden State.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·43 Views
  • Hades 2 studio responds to accusations it's recast actor and refused to use SAG-AFTRA protected contract
    www.eurogamer.net
    Hades 2 studio responds to accusations it's recast actor and refused to use SAG-AFTRA protected contract"We offer the strongest AI protections in the industry."Image credit: Supergiant Games News by Ed Nightingale Deputy News Editor Published on Feb. 21, 2025 Supergiant Games has confirmed it hasn't recast any actors for Hades 2, following accusations from the voice actor of Athena the studio is unwilling to utilise the SAG-AFTRA interim agreement.The US actors' union is currently on strike due to concerns over the use of AI in the games industry, but an interim agreement is in place to ensure acting work can still continue until a full agreement is signed.Marin Miller, the voice behind Athena in both Hades and Hades 2, has accused Supergiant of recasting the character because the studio "refused to flip to an interim".Hades 2 - The Warsong Update TrailerWatch on YouTube"It's possible you may hear me get recast in a particular game that is very popular," they wrote on social media. "If I am, it was not because I stepped away from the character willingly. It's because the employer refused to flip to an interim."And while they didn't explicitly mention Supergiant, their follow up post wasn't subtle: "It would be SUPER helpful if you wrote a GIANT email asking them to flip for their actors."It would be SUPER helpful if you wrote a GIANT email asking them to flip for their actors. Marin M. Miller (@marinmmiller.com) 19 February 2025 at 18:43To see this content please enable targeting cookies.Supergiant has responded with a lengthy statement, confirming it has not re-cast any characters, but noted its games have not been subject to SAG-AFTRA contracts "for a variety of reasons"."Voice talent has been integral to each of our games," the statement begins. "Recently, questions arose here about how we work with our voice talent, which we want to address."Supergiant boasts it offers "the strongest AI protections in the industry to our talent, as we think their work is irreplaceable".It continues: "Our games are intentionally made by human beings; no generative AI is being used in the creation of the voiceover, artwork, or any other content that goes into them."We have not re-cast any of our characters in Hades 2, and wish to keep working with each and every member of our wonderful cast."We have respected and will continue to respect any actor needing to pause work during the ongoing SAG-AFTRA video game strike. While none of our games have ever been subject to SAG-AFTRA contracts for a variety of reasons, we wish SAG-AFTRA the best in their negotiations to compel larger signatory studios to provide the kinds of protections we think actors deserve."It's unclear what the reasons are for not using SAG-AFTRA contracts, though many of the voice actors from Hades 2 are either in-house staff or British (Final Fantasy 16's Ben Starr, Final Fantasy 14's Colin Ryan, Baldur's Gate 3's Amelia Tyler) and therefore not part of the US union. Or perhaps the studio believes its own protections are enough.Eurogamer has contacted Supergiant for more information.@supergiantgames.bsky.social) 20 February 2025 at 21:20To see this content please enable targeting cookies.In a follow up thread, Miller emphasised their reliance on SAG-AFTRA for protection, noting this is the seventh month of the strike. "SAG-AFTRA contracts are protected by their legal staff - I can't afford a lawyer without the union," they wrote."Clients keep asking me, 'If we include a no-AI rider, will you work non-union or on a 2020 agreement?' Will you be willing to cover the costs of my legal fees if you violate my agreement? Why are you refusing to sign a contract I can enforce?"The SAG-AFTRA strike began in July last year, with AI usage the primary concern of the union."We're not going to consent to a contract that allows companies to abuse AI to the detriment of our members," SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher said in a statement. "Enough is enough. When these companies get serious about offering an agreement our members can live - and work - with, we will be here, ready to negotiate."Audrey Cooling, a spokesperson for the video game producers that have signed the existing Interactive Media Agreement, responded: "We have already found common ground on 24 out of 25 proposals, including historic wage increases and additional safety provisions. Our offer is directly responsive to SAG-AFTRA's concerns and extends meaningful AI protections that include requiring consent and fair compensation to all performers working under the IMA. These terms are among the strongest in the entertainment industry."At the start of the year, Eurogamer spoke with celebrated voice actor Jennifer Hale (Mass Effect, Bayonetta 3) about the strike and why it's taking so long to reach a resolution."It's a huge issue for all of us and the repercussions are vast," she says. "So to me, it makes sense that everyone needs to take their time. As performers - and we saw this in the writers strike and the theatrical contract strike - we're just the canary in the coal mine."The news follows the second major update to Hades 2 revealed yesterday, as the game remains in early access, without a full release date.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·33 Views