
Highest earners from A+U Framework revealed
www.architectsjournal.co.uk
Data obtained from the Greater London Authority (GLA) by The Architects Journal shows 83 contracts worth 11.27 million were let via the 10-lot framework between its launch in February 2023 and 10 March 2025.A Karakusevic Carson Architects-led consortium is the highest earner to date from the four-year framework, netting mroe than 2 million in fees, with Hawkins\Brown and Archio each also earning more than 800,000.Just 32 of the 66 practices or consortia with places on the framework have been directly commissioned to date, although the data obtained through a Freedom of Information bid does not show which firms have worked as a subcontractor for others.AdvertisementThe framework, which succeeded the former ADUP II roster of practice, is used by the GLA and other public sector clients. The information released shows that 3.21 million (28 per cent) of fees paid was for work outside of London.Practice/consortium nameTotal fees earnedKarakusevic Carson Architects (with K Bava Architects, Office Sian, Pedder & Scampton, Sarha Hersi, & Saya Hakamata)2,131785.14Hawkins\Brown955,163.00Archio875,000.00We Made That686,519.50RCKa634,780.00Al Jawad Pike516,899.00Landolt + Brown486,914.59Studio Weave450,000.00Haworth Tompkins349,283.60LDA Design288,482.00IF_DO278,927.00Publica270,221.44DK-CM249,166.48Freehaus235,478.00Weston Williamson + Partners196,657.00Feix&Merlin184,088.00Adam Khan Architects146,486.00Muf architecture/art141,819.35JA Projects141,000.00Arup87,500.00Periscope79,898.005th Studio75,000.00Wright & Wright Architects73,000.00East Architecture60,000.00Morris+Company and Gort Scott (MCGS)49,999.00Fletcher Priest Architects40,258.00Sanchez Benton40,000.00Alison Crawshaw35,000.00MICA29,932.00GLA data shows 27 projects worth 4.66 million have been procured through the framework since the start of April 2024, when the AJ first revealed how much practices had won from the framework.Of these latest projects, 11 have been completed, 11 are in progress and five are yet to start. Three of the 11 projects have been by architecture practices led by people from under-represented backgrounds.Since the start of April 2024, London boroughs have been responsible for 44 per cent of projects let; Transport for London has been behind 22 per cent; and the GLA Group for 15 per cent.More than a third of fees paid in this period (1.76 million) were to practices or consortia procured via lot nine transport infrastructure interface: overstation/station development.AdvertisementAccording to the data, no money was paid to companies procured via lot seven small sites housing. Meanwhile just 49,000 was paid via lot 10 transport design: specialist infrastructure and 40,000 was paid via lot two sustainable cities.Analysis Russell Curtis, director at RCKaWed all welcome more work coming through the A+U framework. The estimated 40 million was always a bit of a stretch, but RCKa is on three lots and there have been slim pickings: although we won two projects through Lot 5, were only aware of a single opportunity thats been tendered through lots 3 and 7 given the considerable effort involved in getting onto the framework, its not too much to expect a few more projects to come through.Theres also a question as to why some of the London Boroughs (eg Southwark, Barking & Dagenham) have set up their own frameworks independently of A+U. What is it that A+U doesnt offer that they feel the need to go it alone?As last year, the figures need to be treated with some caution. Our own experience is that more than half the fee income weve received through A+U projects has been paid out to subcontractors. This places a considerable burden on the winning architects, as the public sector clients are increasingly offloading their responsibilities onto their supply chain. Not only does this increase the administrative burden on the lead consultant having to manage a large pool of suppliers but also artificially boosts annual turnover whilst at the same time narrowing our profit margins. A consequence of this is that were having to pay larger Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) premiums and dealing with large sums of money coming into and out of the business.Under the Construction Act we are prohibited from operating a pay when paid clause in our subcontract agreements, which can place our practices in jeopardy if client payments are not received in a timely fashion. This also makes it very difficult for smaller practices to compete as they are less likely to have the financial resilience to be able to accommodate large fees flowing through their accounts. If the GLA wants to improve accessibility to micro and fledgling businesses, this would be a very good place to start.Finally, there needs to be much more transparency over the size and proportion of subcontracting within these projects. I suspect that there are several large consultancy firms doing very well from A+U having had little involvement in the tendering process at the outset. Conversely, I suspect that there are a few smaller practices especially those from under-represented backgrounds whose names have been included within teams led by larger practices to achieve social value targets, but who have actually received very little income from the resulting project.It should be a condition of the use of the A+U framework there is transparent reporting not only of the headline consultancy fee, but also of the complete supply chain and not only for the initial award, but for subsequent changes to the scope and fees that inevitably occur post appointment.A total of 55 places on the framework representing 57 per cent of appointments across all ten lots were awarded to diverse-led enterprisesLot 1 Spatial Policy, Urban Strategies and ResearchDark Matter LaboratoriesDK-CMHAT ProjectsJas Bhalla Architects and AR UrbanismMetropolitan Workshopmuf architecture/artPublica AssociatesWe Made ThatLot 2 Sustainable CitiesGbolade Design StudioMikhail RichesOve Arup and PartnersPublic Works GroupUseful ProjectsLot 3 High Street and Town Centre Recovery and TransformationArchitecture00Hayatsu Architects in collaboration with Madeleine Kessler ArchitectureJas Bhalla Architects and AR UrbanismPublic Works GroupPublica AssociatesRCKaSanchez Benton ArchitectsJA ProjectsUrban MovementWe Made Thatwhat if: projectsLot 4 Landscape, Green Infrastructure and Public RealmEast Architecture, Landscape, Urban DesignHayatsu ArchitectsLDA Designmuf architecture/artnimtim architectsCollective Cultures (OMMX, Atelier ANF, Studio NYALI)Periscope Landscape and ArchitectsPublica AssociatesSanchez Benton ArchitectsStudio WeaveLot 5 Civic, Cultural and Social InfrastructureArchitecture00Asif KhanDK-CMFreehausHaworth TompkinsIF_DOPublic Works GroupRCKaJA ProjectsWright & Wright ArchitectsLot 6 Commercial, Workspace and IndustrialArchitecture00Elli Farrant ArchitectsFeix&MerlinFreehausHaworth TompkinsHenley HalebrownIF_DOPup ArchitectsStudio Egret West with Bell Phillips, HNNA & McCloy + MuchemwaLot 7 Small Sites HousingArchioArchitecture Doing PlaceBalaam MurphyBrisco LoranFourth Street Place Consultants (Fourth Street and Grounded)Jas Bhalla Architects and AR UrbanismNimtim ArchitectsCollective Cultures (OMMX, Atelier ANF, Studio NYALI)RCKaStudio Gil and Matthew Lloyd ArchitectsJA ProjectsLot 8 Housing and Mixed UseAdam Khan ArchitectsAl Jawad PikedRMMFarshid Moussavi ArchitectureGibson Thornley ArchitectsHaworth TompkinsHenley HalebrownKarakusevic Carson Architects with K Bava Architects, Office Sian, Pedder & Scampton, Sahra Hersi & Saya HakamataMae ArchitectsMikhail RichesMorris+Company with Gort ScottPeter Barber ArchitectsStephen Taylor ArchitectsLot 9 Transport Infrastructure Interface: Over Station/Station DevelopmentAllies and MorrisonArchioFletcher Priest ArchitectsGrimshaw ArchitectsHawkins\BrownJestico + Whiles + AssociatesKarakusevic Carson Architects with K Bava Architects, Office Sian, Pedder & Scampton, Sahra Hersi & Saya HakamataLandolt and BrownMangera Yvers ArchitectsMICA ArchitectsWeston Williamson + PartnersWilkinsonEyreLot 10 Transport Design Specialist Infrastructure5th StudioGrimshaw ArchitectsHaptic ArchitectsJohn Puttick AssociatesLandolt and BrownOve Arup and PartnersWeston Williamson + Partners
0 Commentarios
·0 Acciones
·9 Views