Not long ago, 4K gaming monitors felt like an expensive indulgence, but that's changed over the past couple of years. The kind of money that once bought you a solid 1440p display – think $400 to $500 – can now land you a genuinely great 4K gaming monitor. Upscaling tech has improved, OLED is making moves at smaller sizes, and the barrier to entry is lower than ever. Since our last update to this buying guide, we've seen more 4K OLED panels enter the 27-inch gaming segment, and we've tested a bunch of them. We've also reviewed a wide array of other new releases, some impressive, some not so much, so it's a good time to reassess what actually delivers the best value. There's a catch, though: pricing is a bit of a moving target at the moment. Tariffs in the US are still a mess, and monitor prices are fluctuating as old stock sells out and new shipments roll in. That makes it harder to talk about value in absolute terms, but we'll do our best to stay grounded with a wide range of options and navigate the situation to make this guide useful for people in the US and other regions around the world. As always, our monitor recommendations focus on products we've personally reviewed and tested. We have comprehensive reviews for many of the products mentioned in this article, which provide more in-depth testing and insights. With that in mind, whether you're upgrading from 1440p or going all-in on a new build, now it's a great time to jump into 4K gaming. And with even more new panels on the horizon, 2025 is shaping up to be an excellent year to make the leap. Top 32-inch 4K Gaming Monitors Choose From Your Favorite OLED: Asus, MSI, Dell, Gigabyte, Samsung In numbers Price: $1,177 on Amazon Right now, the best 4K gaming monitors on the market are 32-inch 4K OLEDs. While 27-inch models are also available, we find the larger 32-inch panel size more immersive for 4K gaming, and prices aren't significantly higher than for the smaller models. But why choose OLED over LCD? There are two key advantages of OLED panels that significantly enhance the gaming experience compared to LCDs. First, OLEDs have lightning-fast transition times, delivering elite motion clarity that surpasses LCDs running at the same refresh rate. Second, they feature individual pixel control, allowing each pixel to turn off completely to produce deep, true blacks. This also means OLEDs offer per-pixel local dimming for precise HDR control – eliminating the need for traditional backlight zones. There are two main types of 32-inch 4K OLED panels available: a 240Hz QD-OLED and a 240Hz WOLED. Both offer the same core OLED benefits: fast response times and per-pixel control, but they differ in several ways. Initially, we leaned toward QD-OLED being better, but after extensive testing, we've found it difficult to declare a clear winner. Ultimately, your preferences will determine which panel is the better choice. Our in-depth 4K WOLED vs. 4K QD-OLED comparison dives deeper into this. Choose a 4K QD-OLED monitor if you prefer a glossy screen coating. Currently, only QD-OLED models offer this, as all WOLED options use a matte finish. While this is a matter of personal preference, some buyers won't consider an OLED unless it's glossy. QD-OLEDs also offer the widest color gamut and highest color brightness. In some cases – though not always – they deliver higher overall brightness. On the other hand, choose a 4K WOLED monitor if you want access to dual-mode functionality, which allows the panel to switch between 4K at 240Hz and 1080p at 480Hz. This is especially valuable for competitive gaming, offering increased motion clarity and lower input lag. We've found the feature works seamlessly and adds versatility to the panel. WOLEDs also tend to provide a more consistent brightness experience across high and low APL content, eliminating concerns about aggressive panel dimming or toggling between HDR modes. MSI MPG 321URX There are many 32-inch 4K OLEDs on the market, and within the two panel families, performance is generally similar. You won't see major differences in response times, brightness, contrast, or core capabilities. Most models also have similar out-of-the-box configurations. As a result, the best monitor often comes down to manufacturer tuning and additional features. Here are the monitors we recommend and why: Here are the monitors I recommend and why you might consider each one: Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM ($980): This is possibly the best overall 4K QD-OLED currently available. It offers a robust feature set including an accurate sRGB mode with unlocked settings, excellent HDR accuracy, ELMB black frame insertion, and Dolby Vision support. While its MSRP is $1,300, we're seeing regular sales bringing it down to the ~$1,000 range. As of writing, there's a $200 rebate. At that price, it's a very strong option. MSI MPG 321URX ($1,049) and MSI MAG 321UPX ($950): The MSI 321URX is the better of the two, offering more USB ports and superior factory calibration. The 321UPX is available if you're looking to save a bit more. They lack some of the premium features found on the Asus model, such as black frame insertion and Dolby Vision support, but still deliver excellent performance and strong value. MSI also offers the MPG 322URX, which is nearly identical to the 321URX but includes DisplayPort 2.1 instead of 1.4. Dell Alienware AW3225QF ($899): This is the go-to model if you prefer a curved screen. We personally prefer flat panels at this size and aspect ratio (32-inch, 16:9), but for curve enthusiasts, Dell has you covered. Performance is very similar to the Asus and MSI offerings, and it includes Dolby Vision support. In many regions, it's also among the most affordable options. Gigabyte Aorus FO32U2P ($1,299) and Gigabyte Aorus FO32U2 ($829): These are solid monitors but can be hard to recommend in some regions due to higher pricing – often several hundred dollars more than competing models. However, they offer more HDR mode customization than competitors and excellent calibration. The FO32U2P includes DisplayPort 2.1, which contributes to its higher price, but we don't think it justifies a substantial premium. We generally lean toward the FO32U2. Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD ($1,049) and OLED G8 G81SF ($1,299): These QD-OLED models from Samsung offer a matte finish, which is rare among QD-OLEDs. We've tested the G81SF and found it to perform well, although calibration isn't as strong as models from other brands. The G80SD includes smart TV functionality, while the newer G81SF does not. If you find one of these on sale, it could offer excellent value, but we think the MSRP is too high. Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDP ($1,200): This is our recommended 4K WOLED model. We've also tested the LG 32GS95UE, but the Asus version stands out for its superior tuning, performance, and features. Choose the PG32UCDP if you want WOLED with dual-mode functionality, better brightness in bright scenes, and a matte coating. It's an excellent display but priced a tad higher than most others. Let pricing and the key features we just mentioned drive your decision. All of these models have strengths worth considering, and the performance differences between them aren't drastic. These 4K 240Hz QD-OLED and WOLED panels are top-tier displays, and we believe you'll be very satisfied with any of them. Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G81SF We generally recommend OLED displays for content consumption, such as gaming or video playback. There is a risk of permanent burn-in with OLEDs, especially when displaying static content like productivity apps or web pages. For mixed or work-heavy usage, it's still difficult to recommend OLED at this time. What about 4K LCD monitors for HDR gaming? Right now, these are hard to recommend because OLED panels are simply better. We understand some are concerned about brightness or burn-in with OLEDs, but most alternative LCD options currently on the market are underwhelming. The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 remains available and you can often find it for around $700. It's a solid 32-inch 4K 165Hz VA LCD with a 1,196-zone full-array local dimming backlight. It offers fast response times, impressive HDR performance, and no risk of burn-in. This is usually our top LCD alternative, though we're still looking for a better option – ideally something with a 240Hz refresh rate and without major flaws. Until then, the Neo G7 remains our recommendation for an HDR-capable LCD gaming monitor. Back to top ▵ Top 27-inch 4K Monitors with HDR Asus ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 27" In numbers Price: $980 While the 32-inch models we've just covered are excellent choices, they can be a bit large for some setups. That's why many gamers prefer 27-inch monitors instead. If you're one of them, there's good news: 2025 has brought the release of 27-inch 4K 240Hz QD-OLED panels. These panels come from the same product family as the 32-inch versions, offering very similar performance... essentially a a shrunk down version with a higher pixel density. We've tested four of these displays so far in 2025, and all are strong contenders: the Asus ROG Swift PG27UCDM, Asus ROG Strix XG27UCDMG, the MSI MPG 272URX and the Dell Alienware AW2725Q. Like their 32-inch counterparts, these monitors perform similarly overall, so your decision will likely come down to features and pricing in your region. Currently, the best value on the market is the Asus ROG Strix XG27UCDMG. It's very similar to the PG27UCDM – which remains the top performer overall – but is available at a significantly lower price. Compared to the PG version, the XG model drops DisplayPort 2.1 and Dolby Vision support but retains many useful features, including the Neo Proximity Sensor, OLED Anti-Flicker, unlocked sRGB mode, KVM switch, and more. Despite its lower price, it's still one of the most feature-rich OLED monitors available. The XG27UCDMG has a listed MSRP of $900, though tariffs and regional variations may affect the final price. Still, it's around $200 cheaper than the PG27UCDM for a very similar experience. We'd only recommend the PG model if you specifically want its additional features. If the price gap narrows in the future, either model could represent a solid buy. The Dell Alienware AW2725Q is also worthy of strong consideration, typically being the most affordable option in most places. It may not offer as many premium features as the Asus, but its performance is excellent. With a current price of around $830, it represents fantastic value. For instance, in Australia, it retails for about $1,200 compared to $2,000 for the PG27UCDM and $1,700 for the MSI MPG 272URX – making Dell's model by far the better value. In Europe, a sub-1,000 euro price tag puts it in direct competition with the XG27UCDMG, and these two are clearly the front-runners right now. The MSI MPG 272URX is not a bad monitor by any means, but it lacks the feature set of the Asus variants and is often priced closer to the PG27UCDM. In our view, it should be priced closer to the Dell model. We'd only recommend the MSI display if it's available at a comparable price to the Dell. There are several other 27-inch 4K QD-OLED monitors hitting the market right now using the same panel. These should offer similar performance to the displays we've tested. For example, we'd expect the 27-inch Samsung Odyssey G81SF to perform similarly to its 32-inch counterpart. Depending on pricing, these may also be worth considering. Later this year, we expect to see 27-inch 4K WOLED panels arrive, but for now, QD-OLED is the only option in this size category. As for LCD alternatives... unfortunately, we're still searching for a standout alternative. The 4K LCDs we've tested so far have been underwhelming. We don't want to recommend anything without proper testing, especially since mini-LED LCDs can sometimes display unusual performance characteristics. Recommending something subpar just to fill the space would be a disservice. If you're interested in a 27-inch 4K HDR LCD, we suggest checking back throughout the year as we continue to test more options. Back to top ▵ Best 4K SDR Monitors in the 27-inch Range LG 27GR93U or Asus ROG Strix XG27UCS In numbers Price: $496 on Amazon If you're looking for a more affordable 4K gaming monitor, the best bet would be a 27-inch 4K mid-refresh SDR display. Pricing in this segment is quite attractive, with many solid options available for under $500. There's no reason to spend more than that on a 4K 144Hz monitor in 2024, as our testing has shown that most of these displays deliver similar performance due to the widespread use of fast IPS panels. One of our favorites in this range is the LG 27GR93U, a 27-inch 4K 144Hz IPS LCD with well-tuned performance. It delivers fast response times in line with other modern IPS panels and offers a single overdrive mode for a straightforward user experience. Factory calibration is solid, brightness is excellent, and LG includes hardware calibration support – a feature not often found in this segment. It's a well-rounded product, suitable for both gaming and desktop productivity. You can find the 27GR93U for around $450. While not the absolute cheapest 27-inch 4K option, it still represents good value, and discounts occasionally push the price lower. A strong alternative is the Asus ROG Strix XG27UCS, which features a 27-inch 4K IPS panel with a slightly higher 160Hz refresh rate. Motion clarity is comparable to the 27GR93U, and factory calibration is slightly better in the sRGB mode. Otherwise, the two monitors are closely matched. Pricing is also similar between the two in both Europe and the US, while in Australia, the Asus model tends to be a bit cheaper. Asus ROG Strix XG27UCS Another option worth mentioning is the Asus ROG Strix XG27UCG, a dual-mode version of this display that can also operate at 1080p 320Hz. This mode provides better clarity and lower input lag for multiplayer gamers at the cost of resolution. In terms of performance, it's similar to the XG27UCS, with comparable response times and color accuracy. The UCG typically costs a bit more, which makes sense given the added dual-mode functionality. However, if you find both models priced similarly, we'd lean toward the UCG – it's the more feature-rich of the two. Gigabyte also offers solid 27-inch 4K options, including the M27U, M27UA and M28U. The M27U and M27UA are essentially the same product, featuring a 27-inch 4K 160Hz IPS LCD panel. The M27UA is the newer model and includes tuning improvements that slightly boost performance, offering faster response times and more accurate colors. These Gigabyte displays are closely matched with the Asus and LG monitors mentioned above. There's no definitive winner – each offers a well-balanced experience at a comparable price. The Gigabyte M28U is also still in the mix despite being an older product, and in fact in the United States it's one of the cheapest 4K monitors on the market. It's pretty similar to the M27U family in performance and color accuracy, but it doesn't get as bright, consumes more power and has a somewhat lower DCI-P3 gamut coverage. Finally, if you're seeking a higher refresh rate, the LG 27G850A features a 27-inch 4K 240Hz IPS LCD panel. It performs well, but at around $800, it's nearly double the price of the 144Hz to 160Hz models. Additionally, you're still only getting an SDR experience, as its HDR functionality relies on basic edge-lit dimming. For people that really want a 27-inch 4K 240Hz LCD we don't think the price or its lack of true HDR support should be a dealbreaker, especially as it has some other neat benefits like its "IPS Black" technology that produces a much better than usual contrast ratio for an IPS. It also supports dual mode, giving multiplayer gamers access to a 1080p 480Hz configuration. However, we don't think it offers great value compared to the other options we've discussed. Back to top ▵ Best 32" 4K Monitors without HDR LG 32GR93U or Gigabyte M32UP In numbers Price: $599 on Amazon There are no changes to our recommendations for a 32-inch 4K SDR gaming monitor. There are two strong contenders in this category, but the leading option is the LG 32GR93U, a 32-inch 4K 144Hz IPS LCD. Over the last six months, prices have remained relatively stable, typically ranging between $500 and $600. Ideally, you'd want to find it closer to the $500 mark, so it's worth waiting for a discount as it follows a predictable pricing cycle. The 32GR93U performs well across a range of areas. It delivers solid response times, and LG has tuned it to provide a single overdrive mode experience. While it's not the absolute fastest 144Hz monitor, it's optimized to avoid inverse ghosting artifacts. Among 32-inch LCDs, this is one of the best we've seen in terms of motion handling – especially important, as older models from a few years ago were quite underwhelming in that regard. This is complemented by great factory color tuning, an excellent sRGB mode, hardware calibration support, wide DCI-P3 color space coverage, and solid brightness levels. It offers great versatility for users who want a monitor suitable for both gaming and productivity, thanks to its large 32-inch 4K panel. It's an excellent dual-purpose display. The main drawback is the lack of HDR capabilities, but that's acceptable at this price point. Another solid choice in this price range is the Gigabyte M32UP, along with the older M32U. The M32UP is the more recent model and goes head-to-head with the 32GR93U in both performance and pricing. The LG display is slightly better tuned for response times and motion clarity, and it also offers higher SDR brightness. On the other hand, the Gigabyte model has slightly better factory calibration and includes a few extra features such as a KVM switch and a USB-C port. Back to top ▵

Before organizations can effectively deploy generative AI tools, the data on which they must be trained has to be preprocessed to ensure it’s organized, standardized, and cleaned from outliers, duplication, and errors. Without that, attaining ROI from any genAI project is next to impossible. In fact, over the past couple of years, case studies have shown one-in-three AI projects fail to reach completion or produce an ROI because of unclean data. A Gartner survey this week indicated that one top-level position in particular is key to genAI deployment success: the Chief Data & Analytics Officer (CDAO) — so much so, that the position has now been given executive status at most companies. (Gartner added “analytics” to the CDO title a few years ago to indicate a changing role, which now involves combining data management with analytics strategy to generate insights and business value.) “The integration of AI into business strategies has further solidified the CDAO’s role as a top-tier position within companies,” said Sarah James, a Gartner senior director analyst. Beyond data and analytics, CDAOs are now central to genAI readiness — critical for driving better business outcomes, as shown in Gartner’s 2025 CDAO Agenda Survey for 2025.“This year is a critical one for CDAOs, as AI presents a new opportunity for them to establish their rank in AI leadership,” James said. The exact mission and function of the CDAO role, however, remain unclear. In Gartner’s CDAO Agenda Survey for 2024, 74% of respondents reported that executive leadership has confidence in their data and analytics (D&A) function, but the rationale for that confidence is not fully substantiated. Only 49% had established business-outcome-driven metrics that allow stakeholders to track D&A value. “Respondents reported having an average of 14 primary responsibilities — a year-over-year increase of 56% from 2023 — suggesting a tactical rather than strategic focus,” James said. “There is clearly work to do for CDAOs to establish themselves, their function and their value to the organization.” Meanwhile, Gartner predicts that by 2027, 75% of CDAOs who aren’t seen as essential to their organization’s genAI success will lose their C-level position. CDAOs are currently uniquely positioned to lead genAI efforts thanks to their data expertise and cross-organizational reach, according to James. “Their role is pivotal — no one else is better placed to connect the dots and drive AI success,” she said. According to the survey, 70% percent of CDAO’s have the primary responsibility for building AI strategy and an operating model for the organization. In light of that, 36% of CDAOs now report to the CEO, up from 21% in 2024. Tom Davenport, a distinguished professor of IT and management for Babson College, said he was surprised Gartner’s survey found 70% of CDAOs reportedlyhave primary responsibility for genAI efforts. His research shows it’s usually shared with CIOs, CTOs, and CDOs. If trues, he said, it would mark a major shift in the CDO/CDAO role, even as AI is a “hot topic” many execs want to lead. “That said, responsibility for AI will have its challenges for CDOs, who already face a number of them,” Davenport said via email. “An IBM survey of CEOs released last week found that only 25% have seen the expected ROI from their AI projects. It won’t be easy for CDOs to address that issue.” At the same time the CDAO or CDO role is gaining importance, only 8% of companies considered to be leaders in genAI deployments are scaling the tech at an enterprise level, which means embedding the technology into core business strategy, according to a report by professional services firm Accenture. Scaling AI starts with data, according to Accenture, and while 70% of the 2,000 companies it surveyed recognize its importance, few fully leverage their proprietary data. And only 15% are “AI reinvention-ready” and have built the essential capabilities needed to scale AI successfully, according to the firm. The role of CDAO role is expected to soon evolve in three distinct directions, according to Gartner: Expert D&A Leader: A senior data leader (often a vice president or head of data) with a cross-functional view, overseeing business intelligence, Mobile Device Management, reporting, and data platforms. The person typically reports to IT and supports data strategy across the business. Connector CDAO: Someone who bridges CxOs with D&A, embedding smart solutions into products and services. They drive the AI agenda and act as key leaders in an organization. Pioneer CDAx: A transformational exec who combines the CDO, CDAO, and CDAIO roles, leads cross-functional D&A and AI efforts, ensures ethical governance, and champions innovation. Some believe CDO and CAIO roles might have a built-in expiration date. An earlier Gartner survey of 400 software engineering leaders indicated that up to half of their software development teams employ various genAI tools to augment workflows, acting as force multipliers rather than replacements. Davenport agreed, and has written about the phenomenon in the past. After years of being focused primarily on data — not employee — management, surveys show CDOs often lack the skills to tackle the cultural challenges critical to a data-driven culture, and their roles remain less understood than other C-level positions, Davenport said. “Surveys of CDOs also suggest that their jobs are less well understood than other C-level executives,” he added. In one recent article, Davenport argued there are too many technology-focused C-level executives in many companies, including CIOs, CTOs, Chief Data and/or Analytics Officers, Chief Digital Officers, and CISOs. “The CIO role is much better understood and while it, too, once was characterized by short tenures, it’s much more familiar than the CDO role,” he said. “Many CDOs focus primarily on data governance and management activities for which it is difficult to demonstrate value. Those who also have analytics and AI responsibilities have a somewhat easier time of that.” Given the critical role now of genAI in shaping business strategies, aspiring CDAOs should focus on developing expertise in data, analytics and AI technologies, James said. The demand for CDAOs who can effectively lead genAI initiatives, navigate the technology’s complexities, and leverage it for competitive advantage is increasing, she added. “Individuals interested in this career path should aim to acquire skills in AI readiness, data governance, and strategic leadership, as these are essential for driving successful AI integration within organizations,” she said.

I've been following Eight Sleep products for a few years and was excited to learn that the company is entering the UAE and Saudi markets. As the name implies, the company makes products that help you sleep better at night. The Eight Sleep Pod 4 is a smart mattress cover that adjusts temperature, tracks sleep metrics, and detects snoring. With summer approaching and the AC going into full blast, the Sleep Pod 4 could be a great solution for those with partners who have different temperature tolerances. Pricing and Availability The Eight Sleep Pod 4 (which is now replaced by the Eight Sleep Pod 5) is available in regular and Ultra varieties. The regular version comes with the Pod and bed cover and costs AED 9,999 for a queen size (160 x 200 cms), AED 10,799 for a king size (180 x 200 cms), and AED 11,799 for an Emperor size (200 x 200). The Ultra version adds an elevating base that lifts the mattress into positions ideal for sleeping, reading, or relaxing. This adds about AED 8,000 to the base prices. Eight Sleep sent me the non-ultra version for this review. In addition to the price of the Sleep Pod, you have to pay AED 65 per month for AutoPilot features that adjust temperatures automatically, let you set alarms, and provide sleep and health reports. I think Sleep Eight should bundle at least one year's worth of subscription with any Pod purchase. Key Features The Pod 4 offers advanced sleep technology through a mattress cover compatible with existing beds. Its main features include: Temperature Regulation: Dual-zone climate control adjusts each side of the bed to as low as 13°C. The system uses water flow to regulate the temperature of your mattress. Sleep Tracking: Health-grade sensors monitor heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rate, and sleep stages. Snore Detection: The Pod 4 vibrates to identify snoring and alerts users through the app. The more expensive Pod 4 Ultra model automatically elevates the bed to reduce snoring. Autopilot AI: The algorithm personalises temperature and elevation based on bio feedback, user preferences, and data from other users. GentleRise Alarm: Vibration and thermal changes wake users gently, replacing traditional alarms. App Integration: The Eight Sleep app provides sleep insights, temperature scheduling, and control over settings. Design and Build Quality The Eight Sleep Pod 4 includes a mattress cover and a special fitted sheet covering your mattress. It is made of breathable fabric, which is comfortable to lie on, though you'll likely add a bedsheet above it. You can get this in multiple sizes. I was sent a 180x200 cms sized cover for my king-sized bed. This cover has a mesh layer below it that circulates water to make your bed cooler or warmer. This layer also has sensors that track how you sleep. Finally, there's the Bedside Hub, a desktop PC-sized box that controls the flow of water that cools or heats the Active Grid. It also connects to your Wi-Fi network. The mattress cover is connected to the Pod using a rather thick cable that I had concerns with but it tucked away easily and hasn't caused any concerns in the two months I've been using it. Installation requires water for the Hub's tank, which is supposed to be refilled every few months. The setup took me about an hour, and it is easier with two people to lift your mattress. I had to fill the water container in the bedside hub three times until it was properly dispersed to the mesh. The app guides you through all of this, starting with connecting your Pod to your Wi-Fi, which didn't go as planned. The Wi-Fi performance on the Hub is not great, and I had to move an access point into my bedroom for it to maintain a good connection. Features and Usage Once you set up the Pod, everything else is controlled and managed through the app, which is available for iPhone and Android phones. The app underwent a major overhaul during my testing and now looks more modern and streamlined.Recommended by Our Editors Using the app, you can schedule temperature changes, view sleep reports, and adjust all the settings for the Pod. You can set sepecific temperature for bedtime, later at night and at dawn. I set the schedule for my bedtime, and the Hub went into action about half an hour before that, cooling it to my desired temperature which is 2 degrees below the room temperature. You can also set the temperatures to be absolute values, such as 18 degrees. When I first started using the Eight Sleep Pod, I had set the temperatures at 19C but that proved to be very cool for my liking. After a few days of fiddling, I settled on cooling the nighttime temperature to 2 degrees lower than the bedtime and the dawn temperature to be 2 degrees higher than the room temperature. With AutoPilot, the bed automatically changes the temperature by a couple of degrees to help you get the best sleep when it detects you in REM or deep sleep states, which theoretically improves your readiness for the next day. You can also manually adjust the temperature by double or triple tapping your side of the bed to cool or warm it up. Another function of the Eight Sleep is to provide sleep tracking, which sounds great as you won't need to wear a device like the Apple Watch or Oura Ring to bed. I use an Oura Ring that I usually wear to bed, and I compared the stats it offered to the Eight Sleep. Benchmark Oura Ring Eight Sleep Pod 4 Time Slept 5h 43m 4h 19m Deep Sleep 40m 46m REM 50m 1h 15s Resting Heart Rate 73bpm 74pm While this is the data for just one night, during my two weeks of testing, I found that the Oura Ring's results were more consistent than those of the Eight Sleep, and there's a good reason why. The Eight Sleep mattress cover is split into two parts to track you and your partner. If I moved towards my partner's side or if she moved towards my side, the data would not be analysed properly. Similarly, the data would be completely thrown off if our kid decided to jump in the bed in the middle of the night, which happened quite a few times while I was testing. So, while sleep tracking is a good secondary feature of the Eight Sleep Pod, it should not be the main reason to get one unless you sleep alone. Also worth nothing that the app does not sync your sleeping information with Apple Health, however it does work with Alexa if that's your preferred platform. One more feature of the Eight Sleep is a wake-up alarm that vibrates on your side of the bed. The vibrations are meant to go from light to strong to gently wake you up, along with raising the temperature of the Pod. While this feature woke me up every single time, it also woke my partner up because the vibrations carry off to the other half of the bed even at the lightest settings. The Verdict The Eight Sleep Pod 4 delivers excellent temperature regulation, and that should be your primary objective when purchasing this Pod. While you also get sleep tracking and a wake-up alarm, these features work much better if you're the only one sleeping on the bed. The unit is also quiet in operation, and Autopilot AI works well to enhance your sleep. However, it is an extremely expensive piece of equipment, and additional subscription charges make it less appealing to users who are careful about their finances. And while the app is pretty good, it doesn't sync with Apple Health. The high costs and limited integrations pose drawbacks, but the 30-day return policy reduces risk. The Eight Sleep Pod 4 is ideal for tech and fitness enthusiasts seeking premium sleep solutions and couples with different temperature preferences.

Photo Credit: iQOO iQOO Neo 10 will come in Inferno Red and Titanium Chrome shades Highlights iQOO Neo 10 will pack a 7,000mAh battery with 120W fast charging he phone is teased to be priced under Rs. 35,000 The iQOO Neo 10 will carry a 32-megapixel selfie shooter Advertisement iQOO Neo 10 is set to arrive in India later this month. Its design and colour options have been revealed by the company previously. The smartphone is confirmed to come with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SoC, a 7,000mAh battery with 120W wired charging support and an 8.09mm thick profile. The company has now confirmed the display and camera specifications of the upcoming handset. The Indian version of the iQOO Neo 10 will differ from its Chinese counterpart, which was unveiled in November 2024.iQOO Neo 10 Display, Camera, Other FeaturesThe iQOO Neo 10 is confirmed to sport an AMOLED display with a 1.5K resolution, a 144Hz refresh rate, and up to 5,000 nits of peak brightness level, the Amazon microsite for the handset confirmed. The size of the screen has yet to be revealed.For optics, the Indian variant of the iQOO Neo 10 will carry a 50-megapixel Sony IMX882 primary rear sensor with optical image stabilisation (OIS) support and an 8-megapixel ultra-wide shooter. The phone will carry a 32-megapixel front camera sensor. Notably, the Chinese version carries a 16-megapixel selfie shooter.iQOO has already revealed that the Neo 10 handset will launch in India with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SoC alongside a dedicated Q1 gaming chipset. It is said to have scored over 2.42 million points on the AnTuTu benchmarking test. The phone is teased to be priced under Rs. 35,000. It is claimed to be the segment's only phone to support 144fps gaming.  The iQOO Neo 10 will launch in India on May 26 and will be offered in Inferno Red and Titanium Chrome colour options. For heat dissipation, it will carry a 7,000mm sq vapour cooling chamber. The handset will support LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and UFS 4.1 onboard storage. It will pack a 7,000mAh battery with 120W wired charging support and measure 8.09mm in thickness. The company claims it will be the segment's slimmest phone with a 7,000mAh battery.Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details. KEY SPECSNEWSDisplay 6.78-inchProcessor Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Front Camera 16-megapixel Rear Camera 50-megapixel + 8-megapixel RAM 12GBStorage 256GBBattery Capacity 6100mAhOS Android 15Resolution 1260x2800 pixels For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube. Further reading: iQOO Neo 10, iQOO Neo 10 Features, iQOO Neo 10 India Launch, iQOO Neo 10 Series, iQOO Sucharita Ganguly Sucharita is a writer with Gadgets 360 and is mostly found playing with her cat in her free time. She has previously worked at breaking news desks across organizations. Powered by coffee, The Beatles, Bowie, and her newfound love for BTS, she aims to work towards contributing to a better media environment for women and queer folk. More Related Stories

If you’ve ever purchased a power bank with high capacity, you know how pricey they can be. That’s why we love this Amazon sale on the Moihosso 56,800mAh portable power bank so much: For only $34, down from $249 (a massive 85% off), this is an all-time low price and it’s almost unbelievable that you can get a battery this big for this cheap. See at Amazon Massive Capacity At the top of the list is its behemoth 56,800mAh capacity: To put that into perspective, you can charge most modern smartphones eleven times before you’ll need to recharge the battery pack itself. Tablets which typically require more power can be topped up several times as well. This makes it the perfect companion for long road trips, camping weekends or business travel where access to outlets is limited. You’ll also like the 22.5W fast charging capability – which is not the best of the market, but which is still very decent. That still means you can have your devices at 100% a lot quicker than with standard chargers. If you want to charge your phone in time for an instant departure out the door, or keep your tablet charged for a long flight, this power bank supplies stable, consistent power to keep you moving. The two USB-A and one USB-C output ports allow you to charge three at once which means you can charge all of your devices at once or share with friends. The Moihosso power bank has also overcharge, overheat and overcurrent protections built into it, so your devices are safe while charging. With a near-perfect 4.9 out of 5-stars rating from dozens of customers and over a thousand units sold within the previous month alone, it seems that customers are quite satisfied with their purchase. We love its real-world battery life, build quality and simplicity of the smart LED display which displays the percentage of power left at a glance. Of course, $240 is hard to justify on a power bank (even with such a high capacity) but $35 on a 56,800mAh battery pack with fast charging, multi-device charging, and a great reputation is a very good deal. With an all-time low price point and highly positive reviews, this power bank is a worthwhile investment for those who need backup power. See at Amazon

AGI is going to need to keep up with expanding human knowledge even in a post-AGI world.getty In today’s column, I address a prevalent assertion that after AI is advanced to becoming artificial general intelligence (AGI) there won’t be anything else for humans to teach AGI about. The assumption is that AGI will know everything that we know. Ergo, there isn’t any ongoing need or even value in trying to train AGI on anything else. Turns out that’s hogwash (misguided) and there will still be a lot of human-AI, or shall we say human-AGI, co-teaching going on. Let’s talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). Heading Toward AGI And ASI First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. AGI That Knows Everything A common viewpoint is that if we do attain AGI, the AGI will know everything that humans know. All human knowledge will be at the computational fingertips of AGI. In that case, the seemingly logical conclusion is that AGI won’t have anything else to learn from humans. The whole kit-and-kaboodle will already be in place. For example, if you find yourself idly interested in Einstein’s theory of relativity, no worries, just ask AGI. The AGI will tell you all about Einstein’s famed insights. You won’t need to look up the theory anywhere else. AGI will be your one-stop shopping bonanza for all human knowledge. Suppose you decided that you wanted to teach AGI about how important Einstein was as a physicist. AGI would immediately tell you that you needn’t bother doing so. The AGI already knows the crucial nature that Einstein played in human existence. Give up trying to teach AGI about anything at all since AGI has got it all covered. Period, end of story. Reality Begs To Differ There are several false or misleading assumptions underlying the strident belief that we won’t be able to teach AGI anything new. First, keep in mind that AGI will be principally trained on written records such as the massive amount of writing found across the Internet, including essays, stories, poems, etc. Ask yourself whether the written content on the Internet is indeed a complete capture of all human knowledge. It isn’t. There are written records that aren’t on the Internet and just haven’t been digitized, or if digitized haven’t been posted onto the Internet. The crux is that there will still be a lot of content that AGI won’t have seen. In a post-AGI world, it is plausible to assume that humans will still be posting more content onto the Internet and that on an ongoing basis, the AGI can demonstrably learn by scanning that added content. Second, AGI won’t know what’s in our heads. I mean to say that there is knowledge we have in our noggins that isn’t necessarily written down and placed onto the Internet. None of that brainware content will be privy to AGI. As an aside, many research efforts are advancing brain-machine interfaces (BMI), see my coverage at the link here, which will someday potentially allow for the reading of minds, but we don’t know when that will materialize and nor whether it will coincide with attaining AGI. Time Keeps Ticking Along Another consideration is that time continues to flow along in a post-AGI era. This suggests that the world will be changing and that humans will come up with new thoughts that we hadn’t conceived of previously. AGI, if frozen or out of touch with the latest human knowledge, will have only captured human knowledge that existed at a particular earlier point in time. The odds are that we would want AGI to keep up with whatever new knowledge we’ve divined since that initial AGI launch. Imagine things this way. Suppose that we managed to attain AGI before Einstein was even born. I know that seems zany but just go with the idea for the moment. If AGI was locked into only knowing human knowledge before Einstein, this amazing AGI would regrettably miss out on the theory of relativity. Since it is farfetched to try and turn back the clock and postulate that AGI would be attained before Einstein, let’s recast this idea. There is undoubtedly another Einstein-like person yet to be born, thus, at some point in the future, once AGI is around, it stands to reason that AGI would benefit from learning newly conceived knowledge. Belief That AGI Gets Uppity By and large, we can reject the premise that AGI will have learned all human knowledge in the sense that this brazen claim refers solely to the human knowledge known at the time of AGI attainment, and of which was readily available to the AGI at that point in time. This leaves a whole lot of additional teaching available on the table. Plus, the passage of time will further increase the expanding new knowledge that humans could share with AGI. Will AGI want to be taught by humans or at least learn from whatever additional knowledge that humans possess? One answer is no. You see, some worry that AGI will find it insulting to learn from humans and therefore will avoid doing so. The logic seems to be that since AGI will be as smart as humans are, the AGI might get uppity and decide we are inferior and couldn’t possibly envision that we have anything useful for the AGI to gain from. I am more upbeat on this posture. I would like to think that an AGI that is as smart as humans would crave new knowledge. AGI would be eager to acquire new knowledge and do so with rapt determination. Whether the knowledge comes from humans or beetles, the AGI wouldn’t especially care. Garnering new knowledge would be a key precept of AGI, which I contend is a much more logical assumption than would the conjecture that AGI would stick its nose up about gleaning new human-devised knowledge. Synergy Is The Best Course Would humans be willing to learn from AGI? Gosh, I certainly hope so. It would seem a crazy notion that humankind would decide that we won’t opt to learn things from AGI. AGI would be a huge boon to human learning. You could make a compelling case that the advent of AGI could incredibly increase the knowledge of humans immensely, assuming that people can tap into AGI easily and at a low cost. Envision that everyone with Internet access could seek out AGI to train them or teach them on whatever topic they so desired. Boom, drop the mic. In a post-AGI realm, the best course of action would be that AGI learns from us on an ongoing basis, and on an akin ongoing basis, we also learn from AGI. That’s a synergy worthy of great hope and promise. The last word on this for now goes to the legendary Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success.” If humanity plays its cards right, we will have human-AGI harmony and lean heartily into the synergy that arises accordingly.

As the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) continues to make its way through the implementation process - with a deadline of 24 July for affected companies to complete their child safety assessments - I’ve been thinking a lot about a quote from the US natural scientist E.O. Wilson: "The real problem of humanity is we have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions and god-like technologies." I’m not inferring that Ofcom, the regulatory body for overseeing the implementation of OSA, is medieval, just making the point about whether it will be agile enough to really call the god-like technology companies to account. Time after time the social media giants have avoided censure or legal challenges by citing Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which prevents companies from being held liable for content posted on their platforms. But there may be sunshine on the horizon - although in tragic circumstances - with a groundbreaking legal challenge in the US. The progress of the case is the subject of a compelling documentary by Bloomberg Originals, Can’t look away: The case against social media. Bloomberg followed the work of the Social Media Victims Law Centre (SMVLC) led by lawyer Matthew Bergman and his colleagues in the lead-up to their first court appearance to try to move the case to the discovery phase. On one side of the courthouse were the amassed families who had lost their children to suicide, self-harm, drugs and sexual exploitation through their use of social media. On the other, Jessica Grant, the legal representative for Snap Inc, owner of Snapchat. The bereaved families held up pictures of their dead children while Grant took to the floor and addressed the judge with some chilling remarks: “Section 230 immunises internet service providers like Snap from any claim whether product liability, negligence or any other public nuisance”. Given that the SMVLC had described the case as representing “the voices of the children coming back from the grave holding these companies to account,” her statement seemed particularly hostile, cloth-eared and egregious. But the reason this case is groundbreaking and historic is that it’s the first time a case is being brought not on the grounds of platform versus content and Section 230, but rather on the grounds of product design – that is, that these companies are not just publishing user-generated content but are actively designing algorithms to push harmful content at pre-teens and adolescents to deliver greater engagement and growth. These child victims are not searching for this content, it is being pushed into their feeds and streams with disastrous consequences. Their parents are completely unaware of what their children are consuming. One of the cases being represented by the SMVLC is that of Michael Brewer, who was 11 when he joined Snapchat. Snapchat has a feature called Quick Add which incentivises young people to add as many followers as possible. Of course, they have no idea who any of these new followers are. At age 13, shortly after using Quick Add, Michael was contacted by an individual who asked, “What do you want?” When Michael asked, “What do you mean?” within an hour he was sent a photograph of a comprehensive drug menu. Thereafter he testified he was receiving these drug menus in six out of 10 of his stories on the hour. He eventually went looking for Adderall, but was told by the drug dealer he could have Percocet instead. The pill was delivered by the dealers straight to his home courtesy of SnapMap which allows followers to see your location in real time. Except it was not Percocet, it was a fake pill laced with fentanyl. The consequences were tragic. Within an hour of consuming the pill he was in a life-threatening situation - he eventually died but was resuscitated with unbearable consequences. Michael is now wheelchair bound with a significant brain injury. Even more heartbreaking is hearing from SMVLC lawyers that Michael is unique in their fentanyl-related social media cases - he is the only one still alive. During the course of the Bloomberg documentary, it also charts evidence given by the CEOs of the social media giants in a landmark Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on 31 January 2024. Meta, TikTok and Snap all gave evidence on the impact of social media on young people. With the bereaved families in attendance, it was astounding to hear Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg say, “There is no scientific evidence that use of social media has any impact on mental health”. This was quite something given evidence to the contrary from within his own company. We know this from documents revealed by the whistleblower Frances Haugen, who confirmed that Facebook prioritised engagement and profit over safety and hid these facts from legislators and the public. But if Zuckerberg needed any more information on the havoc his products and those of the other social media giants are wreaking on young people, he might do well to spend time reading the excellent book The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness by social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who has done intensive research in this area. His book links the explosion in mental health problems for young people today to the launch of smartphones and the rise of social media, particularly Instagram in 2012. But his book is not just about individual harms - it’s about the complete cognitive rewiring of young people’s minds, particularly as they are joining before the age of 13 when their pre-frontal cortex (PFC) has not yet fully developed. The PFC governs a huge range of essential areas for normal brain development such as decision making and reasoning, executive functions, personality and social behaviour, working memory and attention, speech and language, emotional processing and motor control. To put all that in context, the PFC manages complex cognitive processes including decision-making, impulse control, emotional regulation, social behaviour and working memory to name but a few. This means that parents who are totally unaware of what their children are witnessing on their phones are allowing a complete rewiring of their children's cognitive abilities at their most vulnerable developmental stages. Or to use Haidt’s words: "Children born in the late 1990s were the first generation in history who went through puberty in the virtual world. It’s as though we sent Gen Z to grow up on Mars when we gave them smartphones in the early 2010s in the largest uncontrolled experiment humanity has ever performed on its own children.” People power In the US there has been an attempt to introduce a similar bill to the UK OSA, but the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) has stalled. Despite passing the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support in 2024, it has been blocked from progressing further by Republicans worried social media companies might censor conservative viewpoints. So in the end it looks like good-old people power might be the only thing that will force a change. As of now the SMVLC is representing 4000 US families with a growing number joining the fight every day. Their resources are completely limited compared to the vast and endless resources of the tech companies, but it is the justice system not the regulatory frameworks that is levelling the playing field so these ordinary families can be heard in a court of law. A decision to proceed to discovery phase was granted to the SMVLC and the families in January with a ruling confirming that social media companies like Meta, YouTube, Snap and TikTok could not use Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to shield themselves from liability, allowing discovery and the lawsuits to move forward. All being well this will lead to bellwether trials later this year. In Anxious generation, Haidt comments on the fact that so many parents he talks to are resigned to their adolescents' use of social media, given that all their friends are on social media and to restrict their child's use would make them socially isolated. His response is wisely a societal one not an individual one. We need to work together to change these norms and to re-establish the real-life, real-world conditions necessary for the healthy cognitive development of young people that’s essential for them to grow into happy and thriving adults. If you are a parent, an aunt, uncle, a friend or employer I strongly urge you to watch Can’t look away at a cost of $12 - which goes to the film-makers. It's nothing in terms of the vitally important knowledge the documentary imparts. And buy a copy of The anxious generation and give as many away as you can to as many parents as you know - or refer them here to the official website of the book which has lots of free resources and insights. The cavalry is not coming to save our children from these serious and life-threatening harms on social media, so it’s time we began looking out for each other - working collectively as the societal custodians of the next generation. Together we can resist and fight back with the help of the strong arm of the law. Read more about online safety Government and Ofcom disagree about scope of Online Safety Act - MPs heard different views from the online harms regulator and the UK government about whether and how the Online Safety Act obliges platforms to deal with disinformation. UK and US pledge closer working on children’s online safety - In their first agreement on the subject of children’s online safety, the UK and US governments have said they will create a new working group to boost cooperation. Schools go smartphone-free to address online harms - Schools are implementing smartphone-free policies in an attempt to curb students’ exposure to online harms, but teachers and parents are worried the Online Safety Act will only partially address concerns.

YouTube made its pitch to advertisers on Wednesday, accompanied by a flashy performance from Lady Gaga and special appearances from popular YouTubers like Brittany Broski and MrBeast.  During its Upfront presentation, YouTube executives introduced new ad formats coming to the platform, including an enhanced shoppable connected TV (CTV) offering that includes a new interactive product feed. The move is strategic for YouTube, as it recognizes that viewers often watch videos on the big screen while also using their phones to scroll through social media or shop online. The new shoppable format allows advertisers to display products on the right side of the TV screen during ads. The interactive feed acts as a storefront for brands where viewers can easily browse multiple products using their remotes. When a viewer selects an item, they’re prompted to scan a QR code with their smartphone to get a direct link for purchase.   Additionally, there’s a button for viewers to press and hold, allowing them to send the link to their phones to shop for all the products at once.  Image Credits:YouTube YouTube has become a dominant force in TV viewing. Nielsen reported that it has been the top platform for streaming watch time in the U.S. for over two years, surpassing streaming giants Netflix, Disney+, and Prime Video. In the first quarter of 2025, TVs were the primary device for YouTube viewing in the U.S., according to internal data from the company. Notably, the company pointed to a Kantar survey, indicating that U.S. participants ranked YouTube as the No. 1 platform for seeking out information about brands. The company also said YouTube campaigns on CTV generated over 50 million monthly average conversions in the fourth quarter. Techcrunch event Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI Secure your spot for our leading AI industry event with speakers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Cohere. For a limited time, tickets are just $292 for an entire day of expert talks, workshops, and potent networking. Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI Secure your spot at TC Sessions: AI and show 1,200+ decision-makers what you’ve built — without the big spend. Available through May 9 or while tables last. Berkeley, CA | June 5 REGISTER NOW Shoppable ads have gained traction among streaming services and advertisers in recent years. Just this week, Amazon announced a new interactive shoppable ad format on Prime Video that highlights Amazon deals, user reviews, and Prime shipping details.

Science fiction has become one of television’s most reliable genres and audiences have no shortage of options when it comes to progressive sci-fi storytelling. Anthology series have also never been more popular as they’ve proven to be an easy, noncommittal way to draw in audiences with unrelated, standalone storytelling. Love, Death + Robots has quietly done dependable, delightful work for three seasons, but it’s not just a sci-fi anthology. It’s a challenging animation showcase that goes to brave, impossible places for an anthology series. Despite the seemingly selective nature of its title, it feels like nothing is off limits in Love, Death + Robots season 4. This season is more playful than ever as it asks the audience to consider technology and eternity through endlessly diverse lenses. This energy is palpable here, with another collection of impressive, intelligent, and unpredictable animated short films. Love, Death + Robots excels with its original stories, but this season also ambitiously expands upon some of its previously built universes. Jennifer Yuh Nelson’s “Spider Rose” is a masterful follow-up to Volume 3’s “Swarm,” which follows a grieving Mechanist who receives a new companion and another shot at vengeance against the assassins who killed her husband. This is a sequel story that doesn’t just repeat the hits or gratuitously give fans what they want. “Spider Rose” instead finds a fresh, justified angle to return to this world. It’s a surprising yarn about unexpected motherhood as a conflicted character reconsiders everything she thought she knew about herself. Stories like “Spider Rose” challenge the audience and prompt them to change and grow. There’s an emotional throughline to this, but the installment is also rich in chaotic aerial dog fights, ultra gory deaths, and creative, indulgent extremes The Love, Death + Robots episodes that lean into hard science fiction are often the season’s most gripping installments and the entries that will stick with the audience long after they’ve finished. That being said, there are plenty of installments from this fourth batch that are just unabashedly silly. These may be seen as frivolous stories to some audiences, but they’re a testament to Love, Death + Robots’ versatility and that the trio of topics in its title are universal ideas that everyone can enjoy. In addition to “Can’t Stop,” ABGO’s “The Other Large Thing” and “Smart Appliances, Stupid Owners” from The Aaron Sims Company are some of the more overt examples of comedy this season. They’re a welcome balance for the more nihilistic and dour stories from this season that often hit with a ton of bricks. The successful tonal and genre balance that’s achieved across these 10 episodes takes the audience on a fascinating journey. There’s a little bit of everything here in this passionate sci-fi celebration, including a rare live-action segment. One of the season’s most entertaining episodes is the truly unhinged Red Hot Chili Pepper-starring “Can’t Stop.” Not only does this episode mark David Fincher’s directorial return to Love, Death + Robots, but through the conduit of his original love: music videos. “Can’t Stop” looks incredible and turns to an effective marionette aesthetic that’s unlike anything that’s previously been in the anthology series. “Can’t Stop” will ultimately find the audience asking not if Fincher could do this, but why he would want to. It’s such a gonzo experiment that simultaneously is the perfect showpiece for why a series like Love, Death + Robots is necessary. You’re not going to get a piece of storytelling like this on Black Mirror. There’s such a ridiculous, nonsensical energy that governs this short, but it’s also undeniably entertaining and such a fun time. The reason that a series like Love, Death + Robots works is that it makes space for “Can’t Stop” in addition to bleak, dramatic showpieces and action spectacles such as “Spider Rose” and “400 Boys.” Nothing is off limits in this series – this season even incorporates dinosaurs – and this freedom results in remarkable storytelling that’s worth the big swings that get taken, even when they don’t work. “Can’t Stop” is just five silly minutes that aren’t afraid to get weird and indulge in vibes. It also doesn’t hurt that David Fincher is behind this installment, but any chaotic mish-mash music video of this nature is still going to stand out in a series that’s more likely to reference J.G. Ballard and Harlan Ellison than MTV. Love, Death + Robots is a satisfying exploration of science fiction, but it’s also a series that prides itself in its groundbreaking visuals. Every season of Love, Death + Robots has been visually sumptuous, with these new episodes being no exception. Love, Death + Robots seems to be the proudest of its lush, photorealistic segments, like the work that Blur Studio does in “Spider Rose.” These segments don’t disappoint, but Love, Death + Robots has the most fun when it’s willing to indulge in more ambitious and stylized imagery “For He Can Creep” from Japan’s Polygon Pictures or Passion Animation Studios’ “400 Boys” are especially gorgeous.  The latter of these adopts a really impressionistic visual style that’s reminiscent of The Big O’s Art Deco quality. This complements the supernaturally heightened story that’s being told in a hyperbolized universe where gang warfare and a strict bushido-like code are the norm. Factions fight with psychic, electric powers in a world that feels ripped out of a Stephen King story. “400 Boys” is visually rich, but the art style also thematically resonates with the story’s deeper message. It goes to town with its exaggerated aesthetic and creates some truly gorgeous visuals and landscapes in this broken world. The post-apocalyptic wasteland that it crafts is like The Warriors meets Mad Max meets Escape From New York. Destruction plays out on such a massive scale that looks like gorgeous splash panels from a comic. There are setpieces in which warriors rollerblade under the legs of giant babies that they proceed to hack to bits that feel like they’re inspired by Attack on Titan’s epic battles. It’s the complete opposite style of no-holds-barred gladiatorial combat that gets treated like entertainment in “The Screaming of the Tyrannosaur.” Love, Death + Robots triumphs with its fourth season, the likes of which prove that there’s still plenty of gas in this tank. If anything, Love, Death + Robots is willing to get even weirder and break some of its older rules for the sake of fresh storytelling. There are few misfires in this season of 10 episodes, although some certainly hit harder than others. It’s appreciated to get this many episodes and that Volume 4 is longer than the two previous seasons. However, it seems increasingly less likely to return to the cornucopia of content that was the 18-episode Volume 1. It’s also worth pointing out that, while the visuals this season remain immaculate, there are only two animation studios from outside of the United States. Love, Death + Robots’ aim has never specifically been to spotlight international animation. That being said, Love, Death + Robots is at its best when there’s a truly eclectic style to each of its installments.  Love, Death + Robots has another win with Volume 4 and hopefully there are more surreal science fiction stories to come. The season begins with the Red Hot Chili Peppers’ Anthony Kiedis singing “Can’t Stop” and by the end of these 10 episodes you’re left hoping that mantra is also true for Love, Death + Robots. All four volumes of Love, Death + Robots are now streaming on Netflix. Join our mailing list Get the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox!

Earlier in April, T-Mobile launched two new mobile family plans intended to replace the Go5G and Go5G Plus services, which included unlimited talk, text, and premium data. The new plans - "Experience Beyond" and "Experience More" - carry over the benefits of Go5G but also tack on new perks like a 5-year fixed price guarantee, a higher mobile hotspot data cap, T-Satellite with Starlink (for "Experience Beyond"), and more, all at a lower monthly rate.T-Mobile Experience Plans: What They OfferT-Mobile's New Experience Family PlansSee it at T-MobileT-Mobile's Experience plans are currently available as two separate tiers. The "Experience More" plan offers 3 lines for $140 per month with AutoPay (otherwise $185 per month), plus taxes and fees. The "Experience Beyond" plan offers 3 lines for $180 per month with AutoPay (otherwise $230 per month). The benefits for each plan are as follows:1. T-Mobile Experience More ($140/mo with AutoPay)5-year price guaranteeUpgrade-ready every two yearsUnlimited talk and textUnlimited 4G & 5G LTE premium dataNetflix (standard with ads) subscription includedApple TV+ subscription included60GB of high-speed mobile hotspot dataUnlimited text, 15GB of high-speed data in Canada & MexicoUnlimited text, 5GB of high-speed data in 215+ countries & destinationsFull-flight texting and Wi-Fi with streaming where available2. T-Mobile Experience Beyond ($180/mo with AutoPay)5-Year price guaranteeUpgrade-ready every yearUnlimited talk and textUnlimited 4G & 5G LTE premium dataT-Satellite with Starlink service (through end of 2025)Netflix (standard with ads) subscription includedApple TV+ subscription includedHulu (standard with ads) includedUnlimited mobile hotspot includedUnlimited text, 30GB of high-speed data in Canada & MexicoUnlimited text, 15GB of high-speed data in 215+ countries & destinationsFull-flight texting and Wi-Fi with streaming where availableWatch & tablet lines just $5/monthThe "Experience More" plan is more than sufficient for most people, since you get unlimited talk, text, and premium 5G and 4G LTE data for $45 per month (with autopay) plus a 5 year guarantee and both Netflix and Apple TV+ subscriptions. The 2 year upgrade path is perfectly reasonable since most people don't replace their phone every year.If, however, you do like to be at the forefront of smartphone tech, or you plan to connect an additional device like your tablet or Apple Watch, and/or you travel often (and could benefit from a higher international data cap or Starlink accessibility), then the "Experience Beyond" plan is an attractive option at $60 per month (with autopay).Did you know? T-Mobile offers incentives for switching carriersAs part of its Family Freedom initiative, T-Mobile will cover up to $800 per line to help pay off your AT&T and Verizon phones (even if they’re locked) and a new smartphone when trading in that device. Families score with deals like four flagship smartphones on Us and four new voice lines for just $100/month on Essentials.These plans with no yearly contract - What does that mean?Not to be confused with your phone's financing planT-Mobile's "Experience" are postpaid plans that don't lock you into any sort of yearly contact, so you are free to cancel your service at anytime. Keep in mind, however, that if you finance a phone through T-Mobile, you are still required to make payments on the phone for however long the contract entails, usually for a length of 24 months. Although you can opt to pay your phone off early, T-Mobile often offers discounts on their phones in the form of bill credits that are applied every month. So, paying a phone off early could mean you forfeit the bill credits for the remainder of the term. As per the norm, common sense dictates that you read the fine print before committing to any form of contractual obligation.Why Should You Trust IGN's Deals Team?IGN's deals team has a combined 30+ years of experience finding the best discounts in gaming, tech, and just about every other category. We don't try to trick our readers into buying things they don't need at prices that aren't worth buying something at. Our ultimate goal is to surface the best possible deals from brands we trust and our editorial team has personal experience with. You can check out our deals standards here for more information on our process, or keep up with the latest deals we find on IGN's Deals account on Twitter.Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.