On an unremarkable Monday last February, Andrej Karpathy fired off a tweet that gave the internet its new favorite buzz-phrase: vibe coding.Within hours, people watched tools like Bolt, v0, and Lovable conjure apps from mock-ups never designed or developed.The internet cheered—speed looks spectacular in demo reels—but more senior groups were quietly wincing as AI began to add technical debt to large codebases at previously impossible rates.Why demo-first AI fails mature teamsHere’s how senior designers, developers, and marketers feel the pain.Designers: Prefab design systems ≠ your design systemToday’s one-click generators choose their own colors, border-radii, and fonts. The instant they collide with a house style they don’t recognize, they hard-code new hex values that overwrite your brand tokens, throw off the grid, and leave designers sending screenshots of mismatched styles to the bug tracker.When you draw a picture, you spend your time carefully crafting the shapes and lines. Great design comes from consistency of intention.Today’s AI designers give you a page full of chicken scratches, an eraser, and a “good luck.”Developers: One-shot codegen ≠ production code.A “fully-working” React page arrives as a single 1,200-line component—no tests, no accessibility tags, no separation of concerns. The diff looks like a CVS receipt.The dev who merges it now basically owns a tarball that will resist every future refactor. Code feels like inheriting a junior’s side project, but the junior in this case is an LLM that never sleeps and can’t be taught.Clean, maintainable code is measured by how many lines you can still cut. Without context of your existing codebase or a lot of fine-tuning, AI’s tendency is to be too verbose.Marketers: Fake data ≠ live experiments.Marketing can now crank out a landing page in fifteen minutes, but every testimonial, price, and CTA is still lorem ipsum.Wiring the page to the CMS—and to analytics—means rewriting half the markup by hand. Every 10x sprint lands on an engineering backlog.You can generate pages, sure, but you’re gonna have to wait on the revenue.What’s left for us?Call it all the 80/20 hangover: AI generates the first 80% of the job in 20% of the time… then teams grind through the next 80% of the time patching the final 20% of the work.It’s the perfect inversion of healthy collaboration. Humans drown in drudgery and plead with the machine to handle the craft. But here’s the thing: The lesson isn’t that AI is snake oil; it’s that big team problems aren’t solved by fast AI alone.Sure, “Make me a meal-planning app” is a fun toy, but as we’ve seen, speed without fidelity just moves the bottleneck downstream.What we need is to respect the craft already living in your components, tokens, data, and tests. We need AI for grown-ups.The two-sided contract of AI for grown-upsHere’s the proposal: what if we started building AI with competent teams in mind?For that kind of tooling, two mindset shifts need to happen, both from the builders of AI software and the professionals that use it.Builders need to…Respect the stack. Every pixel, prop, token, schema, and test that already lives in a repo becomes the rails, not a suggestion. Professionals should be able to easily predict what AI outputs will look like. Stay in their lane. Instead of inventing Yet-Another-Canvas, the tooling embeds itself in the software the best teams already use: Figma, IDEs, headless CMSes, etc. Professionals work hard to choose their tools, and AI alone is not a compelling enough reason to switch. Expose control. Codegen happens in daylight—via CLI hooks, readable diffs, and human review gates—so senior engineers can keep the quality bar where it belongs. Professionals are smart enough to handle the machine, so long as it shows them what it’s doing.It’s not up to the professional world to keep perfect pace with the runaway train of AI. It’s the tool builders’ responsibility to stop breaking so much stuff.Professionals need to…Feed the context. Put in the work to document processes, map prototypes to real components, hand over design tokens, and write the first round of tests. Give the model a fighting chance at fidelity. Builders will use this to make AI generations far more deterministic.Stay accountable. A merged PR is still a human name on the line for the most intricate of crafts: UX polish, performance budgets, sparkling copy, etc. Builders don’t have to design all-star AI; they can focus on making it consistent at the grunt-work.Recognize AI limits. Designers, developers, and marketers use AI primarily as the translation layer between deeply skillful fields. Builders don’t need to make AI that replaces teams, but rather AI that fosters communication in the handoffs.It’s not up to the Builders to anticipate every team’s exact use case. Instead, they can trust that professionals will rise to the challenge of adapting AI to their needs. How AI for grown-ups works on a given MondayWell, that’s all great: People focus on people things; AI focuses on AI things. But what does it look like in practice?Let’s take the perspective of our three personas again—designers, developers, and marketers—and see what an ideal world looks like for them.Designers, still in FigmaA designer adjusts the corner radius on the hero card and watches the live hand-off panel flag the exact React prop it will touch.A token audit bot pings him only if the value breaks the design system—no more screenshot spreadsheets.Freed from red-lining, he spends the afternoon nudging micro-interactions and pairing with motion design, really making everything sing.Way more time on polish. No more token-drift bugs filed.Developers, still in the IDEA developer pulls the latest “design-to-code” PR: it’s already split into sensible components, test stubs green-lit, and the diff is small enough to review over coffee.She runs the performance benchmark—numbers hold, thanks to preset budgets the generator never crosses.With boilerplate gone, she dives into accessible keyboard flows and edge-case logic that actually moves the product forward.Review cycles on layout bugs drop by half with AI taking over scaffolding.Marketers, still in the CMSA marketer duplicates last week’s landing page variant, swaps headline copy, and clicks “Stage Experiment.”The AI wires analytics, snapshots the control, and opens a PR tagged for growth-team review—no Jira ticket, no dev backlog delay.They schedule the A/B test in the same dashboard and spend their saved hour crafting social hooks for the launch.Campaign velocity doubles, while engineering time spent on “tiny copy changes” shrinks to near-zero.Same tools, less tedium, deeper ownership. Each role feeds context to the system, stays accountable, and lets the AI do the grunt work—that’s the contract in action.Keep your Cursor, keep your ChatGPT—the glue-layer AI just has to play nice with them while sitting squarely in the team’s shared stack. How we’re building toward AI for grown-upsSo, how close are we to that perfect Monday?At Builder, we find ourselves in a unique position to help, and we’ve been pivoting to meet the demand, especially for large teams.A tiny history lessonBuilder launched in 2019 as a headless CMS plus visual editor whose goal was simple: let developers surface their own JavaScript framework components, and then let non-developers arrange those components without touching code.To pull that off, we built our editor on Mitosis, an open-source layer that describes components once and compiles them to whatever JS framework a team already runs.Because of that early direction, three “grown-up parts” of our product were firmly in place before the generative-AI wave arrived:Fully-featured visual editing: Our Webflow-like editor creates space for designers and marketers to tweak components and pages that compile to any JS framework. Deterministic component mapping: Every Figma frame and its design tokens can round-trip with a real, version-controlled component—not a look-alike snippet. A data source with real content: The CMS holds marketing content, sure, but also all the data engineers need for accurate UI states.So when large language models became practical, we didn’t bolt AI onto a blank slate; we layered it onto an editor, a mapper, and a CMS that were already respecting the stack.That head-start is why our current AI features can focus on removing drudgery instead of reinventing fundamentals.What we’ve made so farOur product works as a bunch of incrementally adoptable layers. No big bang rewrites needed.Visual Editor → Code. Think Bolt or v0, but with Webflow-level tweakability. Prompt the AI to draft a page—or paste any URL for an instant, editable clone—then fine-tune any class, token, or breakpoint by hand. Drop in production-ready components from 21st.dev (or your own repo) and ship designs that respect your CSS, not ours.Figma → Visual Editor (and Code). Install the free Figma Visual Copilot plug-in, draw your frame, and click Export. Copilot converts the frame’s exact Auto-Layout geometry into clean, responsive framework code that can drop straight into the repo or open in Builder’s visual editor for tweaks. Designers still hand over a Figma link; developers run one CLI command to scaffold production-ready code—no guessing, no style drift.Repo → Visual Editor → Repo PR [coming soon]. We’ll be announcing a product shortly that allows anyone to import any GitHub repo to the Visual Editor and make changes that get auto-sent as a PR. Marketers and designers can file engineering tickets with the code already in nice shape.Component Mapping. Tell Builder which Figma button matches which code button once, click “Publish,” and you’re set. From then on, every design export that uses that component drops the real one from your repo into the generated diff—props, tokens, everything—so code reviews focus on ideas, not mismatched styles.Builder Publish: It’s not just a patch for lorem ipsum; it’s your entire headless CMS. Wire any page to real-time content and analytics so marketing can run A/B tests without tapping devs—and get the full schema, versioning, and single-source-of-truth perks that come with a modern CMS, all under the same roof.Where we’re still workingWe’re close, not finished. Next on our list:Less manual context. Auto-detect more tokens and components so mapping feels like autocomplete, not data entry. Deeper control. Let power users crack open every AI draft—props, tests, perf budgets—without leaving the editor. Broader design-system support. Shadcn today, your bespoke kit tomorrow. Mapping should be one click, not a weekend.That “perfect Monday” vision is where we’re headed, and our roadmap will get us there one feature at a time.We’re definitely interested in your feedback: What gaps do you still feel between design, code, and marketing, and where could an “AI for grown-ups” save you the most pain?Drop your thoughts in the comments or tag us on our socials (see footer for links).Turning the 80/20 right-side-upIf Software 2.0 taught us that networks can write code, and the Software 3.0 hype reminds us they can write whole interfaces, then the middle road we’ve walked today—call it Software 2.5—insists that learned programs still deserve linting, budgeting, and daylight.Boring constraints create extraordinary freedom.Speed is intoxicating, but alone it flips the 80/20 rule on its head, leaving humans elbow-deep in cleanup. AI for grown-ups reverses that trade.Tool builders promise rails, not rabbit holes. Professionals promise context and accountability. Every mapped component, every token lock, every human review makes the next generation more predictable—and predictability is what compounds into real velocity.We don’t need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the new world. We’re perfectly capable of walking there at our own pace, spending our hours on craft no model can fake. Introducing Visual Copilot: convert Figma designs to high quality code in a single click.Try Visual CopilotGet a demo

PC and mobile gamers will be able to play Persona 5: The Phantom X on June 26th, 2025. P5X features a brand new story set in a parallel universe to Persona 5. Sega and Atlus outlined the premise of the new spin-off in a news release on Thursday, and the game sounds like Persona, but gacha-fied.“Encompassed in the unique turn-based RPG gameplay and setting of Persona 5, players will lead a double life as a student and a Phantom Thief with a brand-new protagonist and band of Phantom Thieves,” the press release read. “During the day, players will build up life experience as a student and engage in various activities such as hanging out with their friends and part-time jobs, while at night, they will sneak into the cognitive dungeons to steal Treasures and change the twisted desires of corrupt adults!”Sega and Atlus also detailed some of the game’s key features, which include exclusive new mini-games, a PvE game mode called the Velvet Trials, new characters, and even familiar faces from Persona 5 who are “available through special contracts.” Furthermore, Persona 5: The Phantom X incorporates a new Guild feature allowing more social interaction amongst players in-game.A livestream for the upcoming title delved deeper into the lore behind the gacha game’s protagonist, Wonder, and his trusty owl companion, Lufel. The Phantom X’s livestream even included promotional footage illustrating the parallel universe and showing a bit about the game’s lore.Two guests on the stream played a bit of the game to give players a sense of the new gacha mechanics and microtransactions. The video also drew attention to how the developer, Perfect World Games, chose to differentiate P5X from Persona 5, citing changes to characters around fictionalized Tokyo, Japan, bosses, and more.To recap, Persona 5: The Phantom X is a gacha game, in case you haven’t realized by now.See More:

An AI tool aims to wade through mountains of government feedback and understand what the public is trying to say.UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said: “No one should be wasting time on something AI can do quicker and better, let alone wasting millions of taxpayer pounds on outsourcing such work to contractors.This digital assistant, aptly named ‘Consult’, just aced its first big test with the Scottish Government.The Scottish Gov threw Consult in at the deep end, asking it to make sense of public opinion on regulating non-surgical cosmetic procedures such as lip fillers and laser hair removal. Consult came back with findings almost identical to what human officials had pieced together.Now, the plan is to roll this tech out across various government departments. The current way of doing things is expensive and slow. Millions of pounds often go to outside contractors just to analyse what the public thinks.Consult is part of a bigger push to build a leaner, more responsive UK government—one that can deliver on its ‘Plan for Change’ without breaking the bank or taking an age to do it.So, how did it fare in Scotland? Consult chewed through responses from over 2,000 people. Using generative AI, it picked out the main themes and concerns bubbling up from the feedback across six key questions.Of course, Consult wasn’t left completely to its own devices. Experts in the Scottish Government double-checked and fine-tuned these initial themes. Then, the AI got back to work to sort individual responses into these categories. Officials ended up with more precious time to consider what people were saying and what it meant for policy.Because this was Consult’s first live outing, the Scottish Government went through every single response by hand too—just to be sure. Figuring out exactly what someone means in a written comment and then deciding which ‘theme’ it fits under can be a bit subjective. Even humans don’t always agree.When the government compared Consult’s handiwork to human analysis, the AI was right most of the time. Where there were differences, they were so minor they didn’t change the overall picture of what mattered most to people.Consult is part of a bigger AI toolkit called ‘Humphrey’—a suite of digital helpers designed to free up civil servants from admin and cut down on those contractor bills. It’s all part of a grander vision to use technology to sharpen up public services, aiming to find £45 billion in productivity savings. The goal is a more nimble government that is better at delivering that ‘Plan for Change’ we keep hearing about.“After demonstrating such promising results, Humphrey will help us cut the costs of governing and make it easier to collect and comprehensively review what experts and the public are telling us on a range of crucial issues,” added Kyle.“The Scottish Government has taken a bold first step. Very soon, I’ll be using Consult, within Humphrey, in my own department and others in Whitehall will be using it too – speeding up our work to deliver the Plan for Change.”Over in Scotland, Public Health Minister Jenni Minto said: “Using the tool was very beneficial in helping the Scottish Government understand more quickly what people wanted us to hear and our respondents’ range of views.“Using this tool has allowed the Scottish Government to move more quickly to a focus on the policy questions and dive into the detail of the evidence we’ve been presented with, while remaining confident that we have heard the strong views expressed by respondents.”Of course, like many AI deployments in government, it’s still early days, and Consult is officially still in the trial phase. More number-crunching and testing are on the cards to make sure it’s working just as it should before any big decisions about a full rollout are made.But the potential here is huge. The government runs about 500 consultations every year. If Consult lives up to its promise, it could save officials a staggering 75,000 days of analysis annually.And what did the civil servants who first worked with Consult think? They were reportedly “pleasantly surprised,” finding the AI’s initial analysis a “useful starting point.” Others raved that it “saved [them] a heck of a lot of time” and let them “get to the analysis and draw out what’s needed next” much faster.Interestingly, they also felt Consult brought a new level of fairness to the table. As one official put it, its use “takes away the bias and makes it more consistent,” preventing individual analysts from, perhaps unconsciously, letting their “own preconceived ideas” colour the findings.Some consultations receive tens, even hundreds of thousands of responses. Given how well Consult has performed in these early tests, it won’t be long before it’s used on these massive consultations.It’s worth noting that humans aren’t being kicked out of the loop. Consult has been built to keep the experts involved every step of the way. Officials will always review the themes the AI suggests and how it sorts the responses. They’ll have an interactive dashboard to play with, letting them filter and search for specific insights. It’s about AI doing the heavy lifting, so the humans can do the smart thinking.This move towards AI in government isn’t happening in a vacuum, and experts are watching closely.Stuart Harvey, CEO of Datactics, commented: “Using AI to speed up public consultations is a great example of how technology can improve efficiency and save money. But AI is only as good as the data behind it. For tools like this to work well and fairly, government departments need to make sure their data is accurate, up-to-date, and properly managed.“People need to trust the decisions made with AI. That means making sure the process is clear, well-governed, and ethical. If the data is messy or poorly handled, it can lead to biased or unreliable outcomes.“As the government expands its use of AI in public services, it’s vital to invest in strong data practices. That includes building clear and consistent data systems, making data accessible for review, and keeping humans involved in key decisions—especially when it comes to hearing from the public.”This sentiment is echoed by academics. Professor Michael Rovatsos from the University of Edinburgh, for instance, acknowledges the benefits but also wisely cautions about the risks of AI biases and even the potential for these tools to be manipulated. He’s calling for tough safeguards and ongoing investment to make sure any AI tool used by the government remains reliable and fair.Stuart Munton, Chief for Group Operations at AND Digital, added: “The government’s use of AI to speed up public consultations is a welcome step toward smarter, more efficient public services. However, as AI adoption grows, we must ensure that people – not just technology – are at the heart of this transformation.”“Tools like this will only reach their full potential if we invest in equipping public sector teams with the right skills and training. Empowering diverse talent to work with AI will not only improve how these tools perform but also ensure that innovation is inclusive to real-world needs.”If done right, with these expert caveats in mind, AI tools like Consult have the potential to improve how governments listen, learn, and make policy based on public opinion. The UK government isn’t hanging about; the plan is to get Consult working across various departments by the end of 2025.(Photo by Scott Rodgerson)Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

Jerald of Rumare Oblivion Remastered's radiant quest hero is at it again: here's a Witcher-ish mod that lets warriors become full-time professional monster slayers They're seemingly planning on adding a heap more battles to the Imperial City's Arena next, because Adoring Fans call for bloodshed. Image credit: Bethesda/VG247 News by Mark Warren Senior Staff Writer Published on May 15, 2025 The Fighters Guild's the only of the big four main faction questlines in Oblivion and therefore also Oblivion Remastered in which warhammer-wielding juggernaughts don't feel a bit out of place (props to Gogron gro-Bolmog for defying stereotypes), and thanks to a new mod, I might actually think about abandoning my stealth archer to play one. Just the other day, modder ColdTyrant released an interesting mod that added a whole radiant contract system to the Dark Brotherhood, allowing you to go on killing forever and net some gacha rewards. Well, literally a day later, they're back at it again with the faction that ends up - spoilers - battling some tree sap drinkers. To see this content please enable targeting cookies. This latest entry in what's fast morphed into a series is called 'Fighter's Guild - Infinitum' and it adds "over 100 randomly selected, infinitely repeatable Monster Hunting contracts" to the titular faction, giving them a full radiant quest system. Much like with the Dark Brotherhood mod I mentioned earlier, it works by giving you a place to go to be given notes setting you off on missions to kill a specific target - this time different monsters in dungeons across Cyrodiil - then turn them in for a nice reward. Each target monster has been made to glow a bit so they stand out from the cave-dwelling crowd Sadly, there looks to be no Morrowindy gacha element to the dishing out of loot this time around. You'll get 500 gold per contract, plus two "Fighter's Commendations", the latter being a special currency you can spend to requisition gear from a new Fighter's Guild Store the mod adds to the basement of the faction's Leyawiin chapter. Then again, ColdTyrant does write that they've given you the option of making the top floor of the Leyawiin guildhall your hangout by switching around the NPC schedules, making it a bit harder to moan. All in all, it sounds cool, and an interesting option if you fancy creating a character that makes their living in a similar fashion to The Witcher's big Gerry. You might as well, it's Oblivion, so there's a 95% chance your character's appearance is already freaky in a way that might lead to them being shunned by most of society. If you fancy giving Fighter's Guild - Infinitum a go, you'll need to grab the mod's requirements - Oblivion Remastered's UE4SS and UE4SS TesSyncMapInjector. It's also worth noting that ColdTyrant's suggested in the mod page's comments section that their next project is going to be an Oblivion Remastered mod like this for the Imperial City's Arena. Say hi to Modryn Oreyn for me if you decide to join the Fighters Guild in your next playthrough, and make sure to check out the rest of our ongoing Oblivion Remastered mod coverage.

How co-development companies are navigating a turbulent industry in 2025 GamesIndustry.biz catches up with some of the top companies working in the co-dev space to see how they are faring given current industry headwinds Image credit: Bethesda Softworks Feature by Alex Calvin Contributor Published on May 15, 2025 In one form or another, co-development companies have nearly always been around in the games industry. For as long as people have been making games, there have been companies and developers who have made a living helping out other studios with their projects. For the most part, these companies had a low profile, sitting in the shadows of the developers they were working for; but with the growing scale of modern AAA projects, co-development firms are more visible than ever. "There's a growing awareness and desire among studios worldwide to leverage distributed development and external services," says Jake DiGennaro, the chief revenue officer at Virtuos, which, along with Bethesda, co-developed the recently released The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remastered. "Some reputable studios that have shipped their own IP are even embracing a co-op model, working on original IP development while offering co-development services to others. This approach has long been a tradition in Japan and is now becoming mainstream in North America and Europe." Alejandro Garcia-Tunon, the head of co-dev at Side, adds: "Co-development definitely remains a key part of the game development ecosystem – if anything, more so now than ever before. An increased number of development specialities, as well as scopes that are well beyond what the game industry has seen in the past, have increased costs. "Having a full-time team of experts in each field you'd need to cover just wouldn't make sense, so bringing in an expert is a great way for studios and publishers to tap into that talent without blowing up their budgets." Helping hand The work that co-development companies are being brought in to assist with varies wildly. Sometimes it's individual disciplines (art and animation are the most popular, according to research from the External Development Summit), but for others it is entire segments of a project. "What we are finding is that the balance of the co-development work is changing from coding or feature-focused 'team augmentation' to fully rounded content teams that can take on a whole section of games or even whole games, like we did with the delivery of Lego Horizon Adventures," explains Ashley Liu, the managing director of Keywords Studios' Create arm. Garcia-Tunon adds: "It runs the gamut from individual specialities, like AI, combat, physics, networking, and UI, to taking on entire chunks of a game like a full biome or boss. Sometimes we will cover different aspects even within a single project. Image credit: Konami "When we worked on Silent Hill 2 Remake with Bloober Team, we worked on two boss fights in very different ways. For the fight with Eddie's character, we were creative consultants, advising how we could lift the level from the previous version and make it more of a pivotal moment in the game. With Maria, the final boss fight, Bloober Team already had a vision in mind which we were able to help execute from a technical perspective." Despite co-development companies becoming a bigger part of the industry, the sector isn't immune to the broader economics of the games market. For a variety of reasons, publishers have chosen to be more conservative in funding projects, and fewer games in development means less work for those whose role it is to help out. "Demand grew very strongly over the past decade as games became larger and more complex – developers required additional support," explains Liu. "In the last 18 months, the volume of work reversed due to the overall contraction of the industry, but projects are starting to come back as the industry realises there's been an overcorrection. Players expecting more engaging content will drive some renewed demand." The turbulence in the market, however, does present something of an opportunity for co-development companies. In an uncertain world where publishers are being more risk-averse, partners that provide a great deal of flexibility can be useful. "There are opportunities for co-development, though they may not look like what we've seen in the past," Liu says. "Specifically, as our clients restructure their businesses, there are now more opportunities for partners to fill resource gaps. "There are also opportunities with clients that perhaps would like us to take over their older titles, especially as their best teams move on to new projects." "The headwinds that we face collectively as an industry have reached a breaking point where we can't continue to make games the way we did 20 years ago" Jake DiGennaro, Virtuos Garcia-Tunon adds: "The last couple of years have been an anomaly, no question, but the uncertainty has been really challenging. The co-dev space has historically been growing year over year because the entire industry has been growing – more games equals more people needing help to make games. Our opportunities have come from our ability to quickly adapt to fit client demands." Some co-development companies view themselves as somewhat indispensable. The fact that games now require so many people, so many hours of work, and so many disciplines means that it is tough to make them without external help. "The headwinds that we face collectively as an industry have reached a breaking point where we can't continue to make games the way we did 20 years ago and expect not to run into a wall eventually," DiGennaro believes. "With the rising costs of production, the economics of creating a successful game have become increasingly difficult. "We have to acknowledge the fact that there's something about the way we make games that needs a paradigm shift. While factors like discoverability, delivery, and distribution all play important roles, the process of how we build games is a critical part of the problem," DiGennaro continues. "More than seeing this as an opportunity for co-development companies, I think it's an opportunity to reshape the collective mentality and methodologies of our industry towards increased sustainability and reduced volatility." As always, big games companies are very anxious about their IP and will often go to great lengths to protect it. Before its official reveal, screenshots and marketing materials for The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remastered were leaked from Virtuos' backend on its Wordpress. "We have very strict processes and information controls at Side that have been honed over decades of work and thousands of games," Garcia-Tunon says. "But our business relies on our reputation – successful projects build great long-term relationships and recommendations from previous partners are worth their weight in gold." Image credit: Keywords Keywords' Liu adds: "Ensuring there are no leaks has always been a challenge in game development, especially for projects that take years to complete with hundreds of people working on it at different times. As with any studio, team composition changes throughout the project lifecycle, making leakages an ongoing area to monitor. "We can leverage experienced global IT and InfoSec departments to protect our client's IP and data. They oversee hundreds of projects, thousands of configurations, and have successfully dealt with a vast number of incidents, allowing us to bring a level of protection surpassing many of our competitors," Liu continues. "In the unlikely event of a data breach, we inform the client first and foremost and together we find a way to resolve the situation. Sometimes, because we are open and honest, the clients trust us more." What comes next Looking to the future, it's clear that co-development isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Modern video games are, by and large, too big and require too much specialist expertise to be made by one company, at least within a reasonable timeframe. Co-dev firms are here to stay. "Fundamentally, I think distributed co-development is how games will be – and should be – built moving forward," DiGennaro says. "It has the potential to make a profound impact in the sustainability of this industry." Liu adds: "Despite the layoffs and project cancellations, this industry will grow. We'll work with partners to release more creative content and better experiences, leveraging new technology to create games and mechanics that have never been seen before. We'll reach new artistic heights that truly engage players." But, as with the rest of the industry, change may be afoot in the near future. New technologies do look like they could have an impact on how games are made. "Workflows are already evolving to include developing technologies like AI," Garcia-Tunon admits. "That said, my outlook is positive – as long as we have humans playing games, we'll need humans to develop and discuss what games should look like."

Rewilding, Rigour and Radical Care: Practice Visits in CopenhagenCopenhagen’s architecture is generous to the public realm and Copenhagen’s architects were even more so to us. Day two began at the shared office space of Johansen Skovsted Arkitekter, Djernes & Bell and Kim Lenschow, over coffee and Baku pastries. In this collaborative, little ecosystem of a workplace, the three practices share lunch, end-of-year parties and knowledge – a testament to the collaborative nature that ran through all of the practices we visited. Johansen Skovsted’s extensive experience in architectural reuse, landscape rewilding and rewetting offered a fascinating approach to working within existing ecological systems and utilising architecture to improve components of that as opposed to reworking the entire structure of the landscape. It’s an approach that can inform our work in various remote Indigenous communities in Australia, where we should be looking for smaller-scale solutions that support existing social, cultural, and environmental systems, rather than attempting to rebuild them. As Djernes & Bell director Justine Bell reminded us, that is not the role of the architect.Bell remarked that the architect’s role in this work lies in our professional expertise in land use, existing structures, storytelling and the synergy in communicating potential futures – how landscapes can look and how buildings can feel. Their rigour in material testing and resource-mapping encouraged vigorous conversation around climactic materiality, vernacular architecture and construction methods. Bell, a South African architect, noted that both Australia and South Africa often look to Europe for answers, when, in fact, more relevant ideas are emerging from home. As many Australian architects grapple  with integrating colonial vernaculars with Indigenous knowledge systems, we can also look to vernacular architecture, not to overly romanticise it, but to understand and reinterpret these ideas through a contemporary lens. These kinds of projects rely on the humility of the architect to engage with experts in agriculture, biology, geology, rewetting and research.Through Copenhagen’s built environment principle of not building new, we’ve come to understand – through the lens of these architectural practitioners – the idea of making what is necessary with what is available. The labour involved in reusing existing buildings, conducting material research and constructing the architecture that has been redefining Copenhagen for the past decade reflects the same care that continues to be invested in a building throughout its life span.“Buildings that have included the most labour are taken care of the most,” said Bell. I’ve seen this ethos at work first-hand in my own work in regional and remote communities in Australia. When communities are involved in the design – through consultation, iterative design and revalidating form translation – and in the construction – by engaging local builders, sub-contractors, suppliers, ongoing contracts, the buildings are valued as more than just structure and form. They become  part of the system of the community: spatially, economically and culturally. The post DST Day 2 – Marni Reti appeared first on Australian Institute of Architects.

As we all know, there’s certainly nothing “blah” about Blå Station when it comes to their designs. With their 2025 collections, the Swedish brand continues to blur the lines between contract and residential furniture to show that playfulness and comfort can coexist in even the most functional spaces. We teased the new Villhem chair, designed by Thomas Bernstrand and Stefan Borselius, earlier this year when we got a glimpse of it at Stockholm Design Week. What is stunning about the design, beyond its architectural form and razor-sharp lines, is the the fact that it wasn’t pulled from a storied archive of prototypes – it’s a brand new design, and a fresh exploration of what it means to bring the comforts of home to the office. The name Villhem itself stems from its Swedish translation, “I want to go home!” – a sentiment that resonates through its inviting silhouette. With its padded elements and gently reclining seat that encourages a relaxed posture, Villhem offers ease in an office setting, making you feel just at home whether you’re at work or unwinding in a lounge. Constructed with a compression-molded wooden seat shell and armrests, Villhem balances structure with flexibility. Its steel frame provides a sturdy foundation, while every touchpoint where the body meets the chair can be customized with additional and separable padding, whether it’s the armrests, seat, backrest, or neck cushion. For those who prefer a little extra indulgence, Villhem is also available as an ultra-soft version, luxuriously padded in leather. Whether placed in a conference room or flanking a side table in a cozy living space, Villhem is poised to become the kind of classic design in line with the iconic greats. While Villhem is all about bringing home-like comfort to structured spaces, Decofunc is about turning structure into play. Designed by Osko + Deichmann, this modular wall system rethinks functionality as something flexible, dynamic, and ever-evolving. At first glance, Decofunc may seem like an abstract wall decor of geometric forms, but look closer, and you’ll find a system designed for endless customization. Built around a steel frame, Decofunc can be turned into four different directions, allowing an ever-changing visual composition of your own creation. The frame serves as a base for a variety of non-permanent add-ons, including solid wooden knobs for hanging objects, hot-molded recycled polyester felt, and flat inserts in wood, steel, or felt. This flexibility turns Decofunc from a static object into an interactive piece, one that serves as visual and functional decor. With Villhem innovating on workplace comfort and Decofunc turning everyday functionality into an interactive experience, Blå Station proves once again that design should never be static. Instead, it should adapt and evolve, always looking ahead to meet the need of the future. To learn more about the Villhem and Decofunc designs, visit blastation.com. Photography courtesy of Blå Station.

Rest as an Experience in a Space Rich with Symbolism: Insights from the Argentinian Pavilion at the 2025 Venice BiennaleSave this picture!© Federico CairoliThe proposal by Argentinian architects Marco Zampieron and Juan Manuel Pachué for the Argentinian Pavilion at the 19th Venice Architecture Biennale 2025 is clear from the outset: upon entering Siestario, visitors are immersed in a space of dim lighting and evocative sound, and immediately encounter—at the center of the room, stretched across its width, and acting as the undeniable protagonist—a large, inflated pink bag that instinctively invites repose. This is a silobag, an object commonly used in the Argentinian countryside to store grain and a potent symbol of the country’s export-driven economy. In this setting, the silobag becomes more than a spatial intervention; it also introduces a temporal dimension: an invitation to pause and reflect amid the relentless rhythm of the Biennale. Save this picture!Under the motto “Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective”, general curator and Italian architect Carlo Ratti invites participants to explore and debate the many meanings of these terms, setting the stage for a critical rethinking of contemporary architecture. Within this framework, both national pavilions and individual projects and installations engage with the tensions and possibilities that emerge between the natural, the artificial, and the collective—each from their own distinct perspective.Save this picture!Marco Zampieron and Juan Manuel Pachué — Rosario-based architects and co-founders of Cooperativa — were selected through a public competition organized by the Argentine Foreign Ministry, in partnership with the Chamber of Urban Developers (CEDU), with their winning project to represent Argentina in this edition of the Biennale. Related Article Bahrain Wins the Golden Lion for Best National Participation at the 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale Save this picture!With the support of CEDU and Base Proyectos, ArchDaily was present at the inauguration of the Argentine Pavilion on May 9, at the extraordinary Arsenale in Venice. During the first days of the event, we had the opportunity to speak with the authors of Siestario about their experience participating in the Biennale, the creative process of the project, and other aspects related to their practice and understanding of architecture.Save this picture!AD (Paula Pintos): What was your motivation to participate in the competition to represent Argentina at the Venice Architecture Biennale 2025?Marco Zampieron & Juan Manuel Pachué (MZ & JP): As Cooperativa, our group is deeply engaged with competitions. We participate regularly, advocate for them as a valuable tool, and truly enjoy the process they entail. This one, in particular, stood out because, while it’s a national competition, it offers a strong international platform: it’s about representing the country on one of the most important global stages for architecture. Our studio operates as a collaborative collective that expands or contracts depending on the nature of each project. At its core, our practice revolves around competitions. We see them as a way to access commissions without requiring an extensive portfolio, a strong reputation, or an established body of work. That’s why we especially value competitions that are anonymous and transparent — they open the door to meaningful opportunities, such as building a public-scale pavilion with high visibility, through a more horizontal and equitable framework.Save this picture!AD: How does Siestario relate to the theme proposed by the Venice Biennale 2025 — Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective — and what possible interpretations did you envision based on that premise?MZ & JP: These mottos or curatorial texts often tend to be quite ambiguous — and we see that as something positive, because it opens the door to multiple interpretations. With so many people participating in the Biennale through diverse projects, it’s valuable for the thematic framework to be broad: it allows for a wide range of perspectives and approaches. From there, the question of how to represent Argentina naturally arises. Where do you anchor that representation? In our proposal, what comes through is our way of thinking about architecture, our understanding of the Biennale, and our perspective on the collective.Not only were the notions of intelligence, nature, and collectivity present, but there was also something that moved away from the idea of one place, one solution—a concept that truly captivated us. We find the idea of artificial intelligence somewhat challenging... perhaps we’re a bit romantic in that sense; there’s a certain resistance on our part. When we look at some international pavilions, we see a strong emphasis on technology and technical prowess. And while the artificial and the natural are in constant dialogue, what interests us is thinking about the artificial through the lens of local production—through cultural construction. Not as a race toward technological advancement, but as a way of drawing from the depth of knowledge that already exists within our own culture.It is also important that these competitions are resolved quickly, and often one starts from previous ideas or works. In our case, the collective already had a background, a sensitive research on the territory linked to art and certain key elements. This allowed us to connect with the Biennale's themes more deeply in a short time. We see this in other pavilions as well: many have a foundation of prior work and research. In our architecture — and also in art and other disciplines with which we engage — each person brings a background, certain interests, preferences, and tastes. From the place one comes from, what one observes, all of that forms a layer of information from which we project. We try to reflect on this to make it as conscious as possible, so that we can create something that feels close and authentic to us.Save this picture!Representing Argentina also forces us to ask ourselves what we want to say, how we want to speak about who we are. We are interested in a certain metaphor, a certain poetics. We think about the conditions the country is currently going through, both economically and politically, and this image of Argentina resting upon the Argentine countryside emerges, along with the cost of this rest. The proposal of Siestario suggests that the visitor to the Biennale, weary from seeing so much, could climb uphill to a silobag — that iconic symbol of Argentina's agricultural production — and rest, take a nap. But of course, that silobag is the one that stores soybeans, and soybeans, with all their symbolic, productive, and also destructive weight: they contaminate water, devastate forests, and affect local communities. So, Siestario doesn’t just offer a break; it also questions what that rest truly means. There’s a critique, a political stance, a reading on the artificial, on comfort, on the cost of being at ease. All of this emerges when the concepts are linked: the natural, the artificial, the collective. And here, the siesta also appears as a gesture, as a metaphor, as a critique, as a refuge.Save this picture!AD: What motivated you to use the silobag as the central element of the project? How was the process of re-signifying this object within the exhibition context of the Biennale? MZ & JP: The relationship with the silobag is not new to us; in fact, we had already worked with this element in previous projects, documenting and traveling through different towns. This prior research allowed us to see the silobag not just as a functional element, but also as an object loaded with meaning. The process of re-signifying it here at the Biennale involves decontextualizing it. We wanted to change its scale, give it a new role, and use it as a place for a nap, a space for rest. By doing so, the silobag transforms, ceasing to be just an agricultural object and becoming something more playful, connected to the body, fatigue, and the intimacy of the siesta. It’s a simple gesture, but a profound one: it proposes a space for people to recline and feel comfortable in it.Furthermore, the silobag becomes an object that, although it has strong rural and economic connotations, is reinterpreted within the exhibition context, adding a layer of reflection on the everyday and the collective. The intimacy of the siesta becomes social, as the act of resting in a shared space like this creates a collective moment. In the pavilion, we also worked with the atmosphere: the environment is designed to darken, with sounds and lights that induce a sense of relaxation, contributing to creating the right space for that collective rest.Save this picture!AD: What were you hoping to convey through this installation, and how did you expect visitors to experience or interpret the act of "pausing" within the exhibit's journey?MZ & JP: The proposal for this installation revolves around the idea of "stopping." Stopping to think, to look at what you’re doing, to know yourself, to decide. Ultimately, it’s an invitation to stop, to rest, to sleep. We aim for visitors to find that pause within themselves, to disconnect from the fast pace of their surroundings. Furthermore, this act of "pausing" becomes something desirable, almost like an object of desire: the urge to try it, to climb onto the silobag. We wanted to create a physical and experiential experience, not just a contemplative one. Walking through the pavilion becomes an invitation to interact with the space. It even allows walking on the silobag, changing heights, lying down, and resting.We know that at the Biennale, visitors tend to walk a lot and want to see as much as possible. However, this space demands that you stop, that you dedicate time to the experience. It’s not a place to just pass through quickly; it’s a space that asks you to stay for at least 15 or 20 minutes, to climb onto the silobag, to experience the physical effort of doing so, because it’s not a comfortable chair — it’s an experience that requires an investment of time and attention.The curation and design of the rest of the space, along with the projections, are intended so that the installation partially disappears as one moves through it, creating a visual and spatial effect that forces visitors to interact with the place, to stay alert. The project takes a risk; we know that, in the frenetic pace of the Biennale, some may not pay attention to this proposal. But we believe that, to truly enjoy it, it’s necessary to take that time, lie down, listen to the sounds, and be present.Save this picture!AD: How did you approach the relationship between architecture, space, and time within the Argentinian Pavilion?MZ & JP: Our approach has always been to give prominence to the public and collective. In the projects we develop, we try to make the ground floors open and accessible spaces where people can enter spontaneously, without the design being entirely directed toward exclusive use. We are interested in simplicity and clarity, in being radical in the sense of the purity of the idea. This pavilion, for example, uses a single element to express and resolve multiple layers of meaning. The design process seeks to simplify and refine complex ideas, ensuring that the result is direct and clear.In relation to time, we are interested in how architecture, over time, ages and transforms. In Venice, for example, one can see how the city and architecture are not static, how the passage of time causes materials to change, deteriorate, and feel lived in. This concept is present not only in the built architecture but also in the thinking and creation process. For us, time is not just a factor that affects buildings, but a constant in the design process. We value the time spent on physical models, on hand drawing, on processes that endure and allow us to generate something with more depth.Save this picture!Save this picture!AD: There is something disruptive about Siestario: by not displaying so much information or explicit context, the space becomes entirely an experience. What place did you give to the sensory aspect compared to the more direct information exhibition?MZ & JP: This approach is carried over to all our projects, not just the pavilion. We are interested in making spaces sensory experiences, where people not only see but also feel. We seek the space to invite reflection, but also for the enjoyment of the body, for people to engage directly with the environment. In the pavilion, in particular, we wanted the images to function as thresholds, leading you to other places, to the world of the dreamlike. This project, in particular, emphasizes the idea of pause, of stopping to reflect and rest, which connects with our broader vision of how we understand architecture: not just as something built, but as a lived experience.What we aim to create are silent spaces, ones that impose nothing, but at the same time offer power in their simplicity. This is something noticeable in other projects we've done, where the intervention is almost invisible, yet has a significant impact on people's experience, providing a space for them to claim it and inhabit it in their own way.Save this picture!AD: How was the curatorial process in constructing the space through the projections on the sides of the space?MZ & JP:  The curatorial proposal was built with the aim of integrating architecture, art, and landscape, bringing together the different actors. From the outset, we decided to organize the curation of images into three groups: one linked to architecture, another to art, and another to the very recording of the silobag in the field. This division not only provided the visitor with information about the origin and context of the project but also sought to establish a dialogue between architecture and art, something that is fundamental for us. Through the arts, we wanted to tell the story of our landscape and our territory, and we feel that artists have a special sensitivity to read and construct that landscape in a different way.The curatorial line was also guided by an idea that particularly interested us: that from naps emerge dreams, desires, and aspirations of a country. We wanted to propose a positive perspective within a critical reading, showcasing an Argentina that also produces art and architecture. The selected images engage in dialogue with the territory, and they do not respond to a specific temporal cut but rather bring together works from different moments, generating intersections across diverse times. We were interested in showing how these works relate to one another and how, through them, the variable of time appears in architectural production, in the territory, and in the contexts in which these works are being built.Save this picture!Additionally, there was significant archival work: we incorporated original drawings and unpublished material to add historical value. The selection included examples from across the country, even works that are not always associated with formal architecture, such as recreational or leisure spaces. We aimed to represent not only the major cities but also other realities, histories, and geographies. We also included maps and references to historical processes of urbanization and territorial defense, combining them with contemporary works to build the narrative.Save this picture!Save this picture!AD: What does it mean for you to represent Argentina at an event like the Venice Biennale, and how do you experience the responsibility and opportunity that this entails?MZ & JP: Representing Argentina at the Venice Biennale carries significant weight in the national architectural sphere. Winning the competition gave us a certain level of acceptance within the architecture community in Argentina. It’s difficult to fully reflect on the impact of this, as we are still in the process, but we do notice there is recognition. Our motivation was, above all, a genuine interest in participating in the competition, but upon taking on this responsibility, we realized the importance of representing our country at such a prominent event. For our careers, our studio, and our aspirations, this opportunity is significant. Being part of the Venice Biennale is something that makes us feel good because we know that what we do is part of a system that, although imperfect, allows us to reach places like this. It’s an important point in our trajectory and an achievement that fills us with satisfaction.Save this picture! Image gallerySee allShow less About this authorPaula PintosAuthor••• Cite: Pintos, Paula. "Rest as an Experience in a Space Rich with Symbolism: Insights from the Argentinian Pavilion at the 2025 Venice Biennale" [El Pabellón Argentino en la Bienal de Venecia 2025: La siesta como experiencia en un espacio cargado de simbolismos] 15 May 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1030139/rest-as-an-experience-in-a-space-rich-with-symbolism-insights-from-the-argentinian-pavilion-at-the-2025-venice-biennale&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否 You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream