Trump pulls Isaacman nomination for space. Source: “NASA is f***ed”. "NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode" without Isaacman.
Not A Super Announcement
Trump pulls Isaacman nomination for space. Source: “NASA is f***ed”
"NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode" without Isaacman.
Eric Berger
–
May 31, 2025 5:22 pm
|
59
Jared Isaacman during training at SpaceX before the Polaris Dawn mission.
Credit:
SpaceX
Jared Isaacman during training at SpaceX before the Polaris Dawn mission.
Credit:
SpaceX
Story text
Size
Small
Standard
Large
Width
*
Standard
Wide
Links
Standard
Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
The Trump administration has confirmed that it is pulling the nomination of private astronaut Jared Isaacman to lead NASA.
First reported by Semafor, the decision appears to have been made because Isaacman was not politically loyal enough to the Trump Administration.
"The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump’s bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars," Liz Huston, a White House Spokesperson, said in a statement released Saturday. "It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump’s America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon."
The US Senate Commerce Committee approved Issacman's nomination by a vote of 19 to 9 one month ago, advancing his candidacy to the floor of the US Senate, with unanimous support from Republicans in that April vote. Approval was anticipated after the Memorial Day Holiday. But the tide started to turn against Isaacman late this past week, with the first rumblings of problems coming on Friday, May 30.
Not MAGA enough
On Saturday, far-right political activist Laura Loomer said on X, "Deep State operatives are trying to derail President Trump’s NASA Administrator pick Jared Isaacman before his Senate confirmation vote this week."
This was the first public sign that Isaacman's candidacy was imperiled.
So what happened? The waters of MAGA run murky, and the political machinations of the Trump administration are abstruse. However, the timing of Isaacman's derailment coincides with the recent departure of SpaceX founder Elon Musk from Washington. Musk had a central role in the Trump Administration during its first four months. In an interview on Tuesday, Musk told Ars that he has now "significantly" reduced his involvement in politics.
Musk was a key factor behind Isaacman's nomination as NASA administrator, and with his backing, Isaacman was able to skip some of the party purity tests that have been applied to other Trump administration nominees. One mark against Isaacman is that he had recently donated money to Democrats. He also indicated opposition to some of the White House's proposed cuts to NASA's science budget.
Musk's role in the government was highly controversial, winning him enemies both among opponents of Trump's "Make America Great Again" agenda as well as inside the administration. One source told Ars that, with Musk's exit, his opponents within the administration sought to punish him by killing Isaacman's nomination.
The loss of Isaacman is almost certainly a blow to NASA, which faces substantial budget cuts. The Trump Administration's budget request for fiscal year 2026, released Friday, seeks billion for the agency next year—a 24 percent cut from the agency's budget of billion for FY 2025.
Going out of business?
Isaacman is generally well-liked in the space community and is known to care deeply about space exploration. Officials within the space agency—and the larger space community—hoped that having him as NASA's leader would help the agency restore some of these cuts.
Now? "NASA is f---ed," one current leader in the agency told Ars on Saturday.
"NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode without Jared there to innovate," a former senior NASA leader said.
The Trump administration did not immediately name a new nominee, but two people told Ars that former US Air Force Lieutenant General Steven L. Kwast may be near the top of the list. Now retired, Kwast has a distinguished record in the Air Force and is politically loyal to Trump and MAGA.
However, his background seems to be far less oriented toward NASA's civil space mission and far more focused on seeing space as a battlefield—decidedly not an arena for cooperation and peaceful exploration.
Eric Berger
Senior Space Editor
Eric Berger
Senior Space Editor
Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.
59 Comments
#trump #pulls #isaacman #nomination #space
Trump pulls Isaacman nomination for space. Source: “NASA is f***ed”. "NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode" without Isaacman.
Not A Super Announcement
Trump pulls Isaacman nomination for space. Source: “NASA is f***ed”
"NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode" without Isaacman.
Eric Berger
–
May 31, 2025 5:22 pm
|
59
Jared Isaacman during training at SpaceX before the Polaris Dawn mission.
Credit:
SpaceX
Jared Isaacman during training at SpaceX before the Polaris Dawn mission.
Credit:
SpaceX
Story text
Size
Small
Standard
Large
Width
*
Standard
Wide
Links
Standard
Orange
* Subscribers only
Learn more
The Trump administration has confirmed that it is pulling the nomination of private astronaut Jared Isaacman to lead NASA.
First reported by Semafor, the decision appears to have been made because Isaacman was not politically loyal enough to the Trump Administration.
"The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump’s bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars," Liz Huston, a White House Spokesperson, said in a statement released Saturday. "It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump’s America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon."
The US Senate Commerce Committee approved Issacman's nomination by a vote of 19 to 9 one month ago, advancing his candidacy to the floor of the US Senate, with unanimous support from Republicans in that April vote. Approval was anticipated after the Memorial Day Holiday. But the tide started to turn against Isaacman late this past week, with the first rumblings of problems coming on Friday, May 30.
Not MAGA enough
On Saturday, far-right political activist Laura Loomer said on X, "Deep State operatives are trying to derail President Trump’s NASA Administrator pick Jared Isaacman before his Senate confirmation vote this week."
This was the first public sign that Isaacman's candidacy was imperiled.
So what happened? The waters of MAGA run murky, and the political machinations of the Trump administration are abstruse. However, the timing of Isaacman's derailment coincides with the recent departure of SpaceX founder Elon Musk from Washington. Musk had a central role in the Trump Administration during its first four months. In an interview on Tuesday, Musk told Ars that he has now "significantly" reduced his involvement in politics.
Musk was a key factor behind Isaacman's nomination as NASA administrator, and with his backing, Isaacman was able to skip some of the party purity tests that have been applied to other Trump administration nominees. One mark against Isaacman is that he had recently donated money to Democrats. He also indicated opposition to some of the White House's proposed cuts to NASA's science budget.
Musk's role in the government was highly controversial, winning him enemies both among opponents of Trump's "Make America Great Again" agenda as well as inside the administration. One source told Ars that, with Musk's exit, his opponents within the administration sought to punish him by killing Isaacman's nomination.
The loss of Isaacman is almost certainly a blow to NASA, which faces substantial budget cuts. The Trump Administration's budget request for fiscal year 2026, released Friday, seeks billion for the agency next year—a 24 percent cut from the agency's budget of billion for FY 2025.
Going out of business?
Isaacman is generally well-liked in the space community and is known to care deeply about space exploration. Officials within the space agency—and the larger space community—hoped that having him as NASA's leader would help the agency restore some of these cuts.
Now? "NASA is f---ed," one current leader in the agency told Ars on Saturday.
"NASA's budget request is just a going-out-of-business mode without Jared there to innovate," a former senior NASA leader said.
The Trump administration did not immediately name a new nominee, but two people told Ars that former US Air Force Lieutenant General Steven L. Kwast may be near the top of the list. Now retired, Kwast has a distinguished record in the Air Force and is politically loyal to Trump and MAGA.
However, his background seems to be far less oriented toward NASA's civil space mission and far more focused on seeing space as a battlefield—decidedly not an arena for cooperation and peaceful exploration.
Eric Berger
Senior Space Editor
Eric Berger
Senior Space Editor
Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.
59 Comments
#trump #pulls #isaacman #nomination #space
·153 Views