0 Comentários
0 Compartilhamentos
25 Visualizações
Diretório
Diretório
-
Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
-
ARSTECHNICA.COMHow did eastern North America form?laboring landmasses How did eastern North America form? Collisions hold lessons for how the edges of continents are built and change over time. Alexandra Witze, Knowable Magazine Apr 6, 2025 7:11 am | 0 Mt. Washington is the highest peak in the Northeastern United States at 6,288.2 ft (1,916.6 m). Credit: Denis Tangney Jr. via Getty Images Mt. Washington is the highest peak in the Northeastern United States at 6,288.2 ft (1,916.6 m). Credit: Denis Tangney Jr. via Getty Images Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreWhen Maureen Long talks to the public about her work, she likes to ask her audience to close their eyes and think of a landscape with incredible geology. She hears a lot of the same suggestions: Iceland, the Grand Canyon, the Himalayas. Nobody ever says Connecticut, says Long, a geologist at Yale University in New Haven in that state.And yet Connecticutalong with much of the rest of eastern North Americaholds important clues about Earths history. This region, which geologists call the eastern North American margin, essentially spans the US eastern seaboard and a little farther north into Atlantic Canada. It was created over hundreds of millions of years as slivers of Earths crust collided and merged. Mountains rose, volcanoes erupted and the Atlantic Ocean was born.Much of this geological history has become apparent only in the past decade or so, after scientists blanketed the United States with seismometers and other instruments to illuminate geological structures hidden deep in Earths crust. The resulting findings include many surprisesfrom why there are volcanoes in Virginia to how the crust beneath New England is weirdly crumpled.The work could help scientists better understand the edges of continents in other parts of the world; many say that eastern North America is a sort of natural laboratory for studying similar regions. And thats important. The story that it tells about Earth history and about this set of Earth processes [is] really fundamental to how the Earth system works, says Long, who wrote an in-depth look at the geology of eastern North America for the 2024 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.Born of continental collisionsThe bulk of North America today is made of several different parts. To the west are relatively young and mighty mountain ranges like the Sierra Nevada and the Rockies. In the middle is the ancient heart of the continent, the oldest and stablest rocks around. And in the east is the long coastal stretch of the eastern North American margin. Each of these has its own geological history, but it is the story of the eastern bit that has recently come into sharper focus.For decades, geologists have understood the broad picture of how eastern North America came to be. It begins with plate tectonics, the process in which pieces of Earths crust shuffle around over time, driven by churning motions in the underlying mantle. Plate tectonics created and then broke apart an ancient supercontinent known as Rodinia. By around 550 million years ago, a fragment of Rodinia had shuffled south of the equator, where it lay quietly for tens of millions of years. That fragment is the heart of what we know today as eastern North America.Then, around 500 million years ago, tectonic forces started bringing fragments of other landmasses toward the future eastern North America. Carried along like parts on an assembly line, these continental slivers crashed into it, one after another. The slivers glommed together and built up the continental margin.During that process, as more and more continental collisions crumpled eastern North America and thrust its agglomerated slivers into the sky, the Appalachian Mountains were born. To the west, the eastern North American margin had merged with ancient rocks that today make up the heart of the continent, west of the Appalachians and through the Midwest and into the Great Plains. When one tectonic plate slides beneath another, slivers of Earths crust, known as terranes, can build up and stick together, forming a larger landmass. Such a process was key to the formation of eastern North America. Credit: Knowable Magazine By around 270 million years ago, that action was done, and all the worlds landmasses had merged into a second single supercontinent, Pangaea. Then, around 200 million years ago, Pangaea began splitting apart, a geological breakup that formed the Atlantic Ocean, and eastern North America shuffled toward its current position on the globe.Since then, erosion has worn down the peaks of the once-mighty Appalachians, and eastern North America has settled into a mostly quiet existence. It is what geologists call a passive margin, because although it is the edge of a continent, it is not the edge of a tectonic plate anymore: That lies thousands of miles out to the east, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.In many parts of the world, passive continental margins are just thatpassive, and pretty geologically boring. Think of the eastern edge of South America or the coastline around the United Kingdom; these arent places with active volcanoes, large earthquakes, or other major planetary activity.But eastern North America is different. Theres so much going on there that some geologists have humorously dubbed it a passive-aggressive margin. The eastern edge of North America, running along the US seaboard, contains fragments of different landscapes that attest to its complex birth. They include slivers of Earths crust that glommed together along what is now the east coast, with a more ancient mountain belt to their west and a chunk of even more ancient crust to the west of that. Credit: Knowable Magazine That action includes relatively high mountainsfor some reason, the Appalachians havent been entirely eroded away even after tens to hundreds of millions of yearsas well as small volcanoes and earthquakes. Recent east-coast quakes include the magnitude-5.8 tremor near Mineral, Virginia, in 2011, and a magnitude-3.8 blip off the coast of Maine in January 2025. So geological activity exists in eastern North America. Its just not following your typical tectonic activity, says Sarah Mazza, a petrologist at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts.Crunching data on the crustOver decades, geologists had built up a history of eastern North America by mapping rocks on Earths surface. But they got a much better look, and many fresh insights, starting around 2010. Thats after a federally funded research project known as EarthScope blanketed the continental United States with seismometers. One aim was to gather data on how seismic energy from earthquakes reverberated through the Earths crust and upper mantle. Like a CT scan of the planet, that information highlights structures that lie beneath the surface and would not otherwise be detected.With EarthScope, researchers could suddenly see what parts of the crust were warm or cold, or strong or weakinformation that told them what was happening underground. Having the new view was like astronomers going from looking at the stars with binoculars to using a telescope, Long says. You can see more detail, and you can see finer structure, she says. A lot of features that we now know are present in the upper mantle beneath eastern North America, we really just did not know about.And then scientists got even better optics. Long and other researchers began putting out additional seismometers, packing them in dense lines and arrays over the ground in places where they wanted even better views into what was going on beneath the surface, including Georgia and West Virginia. Team members would find themselves driving around the countryside to carefully set up seismometer stations, hoping these would survive the snowfall and spiders of a year or two until someone could return to retrieve the data.The approach workedand geophysicists now have a much better sense of what the crust and upper mantle are doing under eastern North America. For one thing, they found that the thickness of the crust varies from place to place. Parts that are the remains of the original eastern North America landmass have a much thicker crust, around 45 kilometers. The crust beneath the continental slivers that attached later on to the eastern edge is much thinner, more like 25 to 30 kilometers thick. That difference probably traces back to the formation of the continent, Long says. Seismic studies have revealed in recent years that Earths crust varies dramatically in thickness along the eastern seaboarda legacy of how this region was pieced together from various landmasses over time. Credit: Knowable Magazine But theres something even weirder going on. Seismic images show that beneath parts of New England, its as if parts of the crust and upper mantle have slid atop one another. A 2022 study led by geoscientist Yantao Luo, a colleague of Long, found that the boundary that marks the bottom of Earths crustoften referred to as the Moho, after the Croatian seismologist Andrija Mohoroviiwas stacked double, like two overlapping pancakes, under southern New England.The result was so surprising that at first Long didnt think it could be right. But Luo double-checked and triple-checked, and the answer held. Its this super-unusual geometry, Long says. Im not sure Ive seen it anywhere else.Its particularly odd because the Moho in this region apparently has managed to maintain its double-stacking for hundreds of millions of years, says Long. How that happened is a bit of a mystery. One idea is that the original landmass of eastern North America had an extremely strong and thick crust. When weaker continental slivers began arriving and glomming on to it, they squeezed up and over it in places.How the Moho is workingThe force of that collision could have carried the Moho of the incoming pieces up and over the older landmass, resulting in a doubling of the Moho there, says Paul Karabinos, a geologist at Williams College in Williamstown, Massachusetts. Something similar might be happening in Tibet today as the tectonic plate carrying India rams into that of Asia and crumples the crust against the Tibetan plateau. Long and her colleagues are still trying to work out how widespread the stacked-Moho phenomenon is across New England; already, they have found more signs of it beneath northwestern Massachusetts.A second surprising discovery that emerged from the seismic surveys is why 47-million-year-old volcanoes along the border of Virginia and West Virginia might have erupted. The volcanoes are the youngest eruptions that have happened in eastern North America. They are also a bit of a mystery, since there is no obvious source of molten rock in the passive continental margin that could be fueling them.The answer, once again, came from detailed seismic scans of the Earth. These showed that a chunk was missing from the bottom of Earths crust beneath the volcanoes: For some reason, the bottom of the crust became heavy and dripped downward from the top part, leaving a gap. That now needs to be filled, says Mazza. Mantle rocks obligingly flowed into the gap, experiencing a drop in pressure as they moved upward. That change in pressure triggered the mantle rocks to meltand created the molten reservoir that fueled the Virginia eruptions.The same process could be happening in other passive continental margins, Mazza says. Finding it beneath Virginia is important because it shows that there are more and different ways to fuel volcanoes in these areas than scientists had previously thought possible: It goes into these ideas that you have more ways to create melt than your standard tectonic process, she says.Long and her colleagues are looking to see whether other parts of the eastern North American margin also have this crustal drip. One clue is emerging from how seismic energy travels through the upper mantle throughout the region. The rocks beneath the Virginia volcanoes show a strange slowdown, or anomaly, as seismic energy passes through them. That could be related to the crustal dripping that is going on there.Seismic surveys have revealed a similar anomaly in northern New England. To try to unravel what might be happening at this second anomaly, Longs team currently has one string of seismometers across Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire, and a second dense array in eastern Massachusetts. Maybe something like what went on in Virginia might be in process elsewhere in eastern North America, Long says. This might be a process, not just something that happened one time.Long even has her eyes on pushing farther north, to do seismic surveys along the continental margin in Newfoundland, and even across to Irelandwhich once lay next to the North American continental margin, until the Atlantic Ocean opened and separated them. Early results suggest there may be significant differences in how the passive margin behaved on the North American side and on the Irish side, Longs collaborator Roberto Masis Arce of Rutgers University reported at the American Geophysical Union conference in December 2024.All these discoveries go to show that the eastern North American margin, once deemed a bit of a snooze, has far more going for it than one might think. Passive doesnt mean geologically inactive, Mazza says. We live on an active planet.This article originally appeared inKnowable Magazine, a nonprofit publication dedicated to making scientific knowledge accessible to all.Sign up forKnowable Magazines newsletter.Alexandra Witze, Knowable Magazine Knowable Magazine explores the real-world significance of scholarly work through a journalistic lens. 0 Comments0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 33 Visualizações
-
WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COM'SNL' mocks Trump's tariff announcement as Mike Myers' Musk intros 'self-vandalizing' Teslas"SNL" stars James Austin Johnson and Mike Myers returned as President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. NBC 2025-04-06T12:03:01Z SaveSaved Read in app This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now.Have an account? "Saturday Night Live" took aim at President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement.James Austin Johnson's Trump said his plan was to "Make America Great Depression Again."Mike Myers' Elon Musk also joked about a new "self-vandalizing" Tesla.In its latest episode, "Saturday Night Live" somewhat inevitably went after President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement.James Austin Johnson returned as Trump during the NBC comedy show's cold open, recreating the president's Rose Garden speech from earlier this week, which saw him detail his controversial new import levies."Thank you all for coming out to hear about tariffs. My favorite word 'tariff' which, of course, is short for 'tariffic' idea," Johnson's Trump began."They're the backbone of my incredible plan for our economy. It's actually even better than a plan because it's a series of random numbers, like the numbers on the computer screen in "Severance," he continued.Trump's latest volley of tariffs put effective US tariff rates at the highest level in more than a century, Fitch Ratings estimated.A baseline 10% tariff on trading partners came into effect on Saturday, while higher rates on certain nations are set to begin on April 9.Many have pointed out that the last time the US tried to impose similarly high tariffs during the Great Depression it only succeeded in making things worse.And Johnson's Trump did not miss the opportunity to make that link, saying that before "Make America Wealthy Again" must come "MAGDA.""Make America Great Depression Again," he explained. " It'll be better than great. It'll be a fantastic, unbelievable depression, the likes of which you've never seen before.""You know, this depression is going to be so great, we'll be the ones eating the cats and the dogs," Johnson as Trump joked, referencing the real president's comments about Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, during last year's presidential race. Before "MAWA," or "Make America Wealthy Again," must come "Make America Great Depression Again," James Austin Johnson's Trump said in the sketch. NBC Later in the sketch, Mike Myers returned as Elon Musk, crashing the announcement in a Green Bay Packers "cheesehead" hat and saying he'd just arrived from Wisconsin where the real Musk spent millions of dollars in a failed bid to back a Republican judge for a seat in the state's Supreme Court."I tried to buy the election in Wisconsin. I'm an idiot. I should have just bought Wisconsin," Myers' Musk joked, before turning his attention to the billionaire's embattled electric vehicle maker, Tesla, which has been facing sharp drops in sales, protests outside showrooms, and widespread vandalism amid growing backlash against Musk and his role in Trump's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency."Our dealerships have been the target of many attacks, and, suddenly no one likes Tesla cars. So I asked myself, 'Why?' And then I answered myself: "Because of me," he said.He then announced a new Tesla "Model V" "the first electric car in history to be fully self-vandalizing," which he said comes with self-smashing headlights, self-slashing tires, and AI-powered graffiti.Before the sketch ended, Myers' Musk also weighed in on Trump's tariffs."I'm really smart, and these tariffs sound really dumb," he told Johnson's Trump, who hastily replied: "OK, Elon, good luck on Mars."Recommended video0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 35 Visualizações
-
WWW.VOX.COMMy boyfriend wants to pay my expenses. Am I a bad feminist if I let him?Your Mileage May Vary is an advice column offering you a unique framework for thinking through your moral dilemmas. To submit a question, fill out this anonymous form or email sigal.samuel@vox.com. Heres this weeks question from a reader, condensed and edited for clarity:Im getting married and struggling with what is fair when it comes to combining incomes and sharing expenses. My boyfriend makes twice as much as I do, but isnt necessarily harder-working or more successful (would you believe that having a PhD in a technical field can justlead to more money?). Accordingly, he wants to pay for more of our shared expenses, like rent. I understand why this would be considered fair but am really resisting it. When others pay, it feels like theyre trying to control me or encroach on my independence. Yet I do think that there is something obstinate and rigidly, falsely feminist in the way I insist on 50/50 in our relationship. What should I do?Dear Fair Fianc,Theres a very normie way to answer this question: I could advise you to make a list of all the ways your boyfriend is actually dependent on you emotional labor, household chores, whatever the case may be so you wont feel like youre disproportionately falling into a dependent role if he pays for more than half of your shared expenses. In other words, I could try to convince you that your relationship is still 50/50; its just that hes contributing more financially, and youre contributing more in other ways.Which, to be clear, could be true! And it could be a very valuable thing to reflect on. But if I left it at that, I think Id be cheating you out of a deeper opportunity. Because this struggle isnt just offering you the chance to think about stuff like joint bank accounts and rental payments. Its offering you a chance at spiritual growth.I say that because your struggle is about love. Real love is an omnivore: It will eat its way through all your pretty illusions. It will, if youre lucky, pulverize your preconceived notions. As the Brazilian writer Clarice Lispector once wrote in a wonderfully weird short story:Few people desire true love because love shakes our confidence in everything else. And few can bear to lose all their other illusions. There are some who opt for love in the belief that love will enrich their personal lives. On the contrary: love is poverty, in the end. Love is to possess nothing. Love is also the deception of what one believed to be love.What are the illusions that love destroys? Chief among them are things you mentioned: independence, control. Believe me, it brings me no joy to say this, becauseI love feeling independent! I love feeling like I have control! And I, too, really struggle if I feel like anyone is encroaching on those things. But, alas, I do think theyre illusions that we use to shield ourselves from our own vulnerability. No one is truly independentMany philosophers have long recognized that, however independent we like to think we are, were actually inherently interdependent. This was one of the Buddhas key ideas. When he lived around 500 BCE in India, it was common to believe that each person has a permanent self or soul a fixed essence that makes you an individual, persisting entity. The Buddha rejected that premise. He argued that even though you use words like me and I, which suggest that youre a static substance separate from others, thats just a convenient shorthand a fiction. Have a question for this advice column?Fill out this anonymous form or email sigal.samuel@vox.com.In reality, the Buddha said, you dont have a fixed self. Your self is always changing in response to different conditions in your environment. In fact, its nothing but the sum total of those conditions your perceptions, experiences, moods, and so on just like a chariot is nothing but its wheels, axles, and other component parts. In Western philosophy, it took a while for this idea to gain prominence, largely because the idea of the Christian soul was so entrenched. But in the 18th century, the Scottish philosopher David Hume who was influenced not only by British empiricists but also potentially by Buddhism wrote:For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call myself, I always stumble on some particular perception or other, of heat or cold, light or shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never can catch myself at any time without a perception, and never can observe anything but the perception.He added that a person is nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement.Why does this matter? Because if youre nothing but a bundle of different perceptions in perpetual flux, theres no you that exists independently of your boyfriend and all the other people youre in contact with: They are literally making you in every moment by furnishing your perceptions, experiences, moods. That means the idea of a you thats separate from others is, at the deepest level, just an illusion. You are interdependent with them for your very you-ness.The Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh, who died just a few years ago, had a lovely term for this: interbeing. He would say that you inter-are with your boyfriend: You are made, in part, by all the ways that his actions and words have affected you (just like youre also made by your ancestors, teachers, and cultural heritage).At first glance, this might seem hard to reconcile with feminism. Arent we supposed to be strong, independent women? How can we do that without the independent bit? But take a closer look at feminist thought, and youll see that thats a serious misinterpretation. From Simone de Beauvoir onward, feminists havent been trying to eliminate interdependence altogether theyve been fighting against structurally unequal interdependence, where women have no choice but to rely on men financially because their work outside the home is underpaid relative to men, and their work inside the home gets no pay at all. Thats a nonconsensual, unequal form of interdependence, and the goal was a world where partners can meet as equals. The goal was never a world where we all live as islands.In fact, many feminist philosophers argue that being fully independent is neither desirable nor possible. As thinkers like Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings have pointed out, we all depend on others at different points in our lives as kids, when were sick, as we get older. They champion a world that acknowledges the reality of interdependence. That would include government policies like appropriate pay for child care and elder care, as well as greater social recognition for the value of emotional labor and household chores, like I mentioned above.But we still dont live in that world. American society is especially hyper-individualistic. It recognizes interdependence neither on the metaphysical level ( la Buddha and Hume) nor on the social policy level ( la Gilligan and Noddings). No wonder many women are still wary of financial dependence!Even though you live in that wider context, Id encourage you to take a close look at the specifics of your personal situation and consider a crucial distinction: real financial dependence versus felt financial dependence. If you have your own job or could readily return to the workforce, youre not actually financially dependent on your boyfriend, even if hes covering more than half the rent. In that case, the real fear here is not about finances at all. Its about facing up to the terrifying, beautiful, messy fact a fact that love is now revealing to you that you are and have always been interdependent.Believe me, I know thats not easy. It feels painfully vulnerable. Yet if you trust that your boyfriend genuinely sees you as equals if hes demonstrated that through both his words and actions then at some point youve got to trust that he wont weaponize your vulnerability against you. If you dont, you will be cheating yourself out of the benefits that come with accepting interdependence. And in an important sense it will be you, not your boyfriend, wholl be making you poorer. Bonus: What Im readingRelated to the idea that the self is a fiction, this week, I read a near-apocalyptic short story titled And All the Automata of London Couldnt by Beth Singler, an expert on the intersection of AI and religion. I dont want to give too much of a spoiler, but suffice it to say it contains these sentences: Descartes little automata daughter, the clockwork doll that scared a bunch of sailors so much that they threw her overboard in their terror and superstition. A lovely bit of gossip to puncture the great philosophers pride! How dare he describe man as a machine! The starkest manifestation of human vulnerability is our mortality, and I wish people would do the hard work of facing up to loss instead of turning to AI-powered deadbots new tools that, as the New York Times explains, supposedly allow you to feel youre communicating with dead loved ones. In my experience, losing someone shatters your assumptive worldview your core beliefs about yourself and about life and thats extremely painful but also extremely generative: It forces you to make yourself anew.This Guardian article about a woman who quit her job, closed her bank account, and lives without money is quite something. I think Id be too terrified to live her lifestyle (and I also think her lifestyle is built on a bedrock of privilege), but this bit stuck out: I actually feel more secure than I did when I was earning money, she said, because all through human history, true security has always come from living in community.Youve read 1 article in the last monthHere at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country.Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.We rely on readers like you join us.Swati SharmaVox Editor-in-ChiefSee More:0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 34 Visualizações
-
GIZMODO.COMMiso Fermented in Space Has an Entirely Different TasteBy Adam Kovac Published April 6, 2025 | Comments (0) | The package of space miso, seen here before its trip to the ISS. Jimmy Day Forget chalky freeze-dried ice cream or some individually packaged mashed potatoes. Astronauts aboard the International Space Station have now proved that delectable fermented delicacies like the Japanese soybean paste known as miso can be prepared in space. This might sound like a big deal only to ISS residents who are craving some better meals, but it could have major implications for more ambitious space missions. One of the major issues with planning such voyages, which could include future trips to Mars, is the problem of keeping astronauts fed for extended periods of time. Being able to ferment their own ingredients could not only help with nutritionit could also provide some much-needed joy and comfort in the form of delicious meals. The road to this culinary breakthrough started in March 2020, when an international team of food scientists sent a package containing a mixture of soybeans, rice kji, and salt up to the ISS. Once it arrived, the astronauts aboard were tasked with running an experiment to see if the mixture would ferment, producing the tasty paste we know and love. The researchers who created the mixture described their reasons for picking miso in the journal iScience. Miso is experiencing a surge of interest within the food science community due to the the diversity and uniqueness of miso microbial communities, the researchers wrote. Other reasons were based more on practicality, as the pastes firm, solid structure reduced the chances of leaks (a major concern in the sensitive ISS environment), and the timeframe to ferment miso fit into the 30 days they had to run the experiment. Miso was also ideal thanks to its strong taste and high nutritional value. After 30 days, the now-fermented miso was returned to Earth, where its chemical and microbial composition was analyzed. The miso was also checked for potentially harmful microbes, and, of course, for taste.There were some doubts as to whether the experiment would succeed. After all, the environment on the ISS has some key differences from Earth. Theres the microgravity, but also the presence of increased levels of radiation. Both could have interfered with the fermentation process. Those fears, thankfully, were unfounded. However, despite the successful fermentation, when the researchers compared the space-made miso to samples created on Earth, they did find some differences. The ratios of various kinds of microbes were different, though they did conclude that the ISS miso was still, in fact, a miso.There are some features of the space environment in low Earth orbitin particular microgravity and increased radiationthat could have impacts on how microbes grow and metabolize and thus how fermentation works, said Joshua D. Evans, senior researcher and group leader at Technical University of Denmarks Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, in a press release. We wanted to explore the effects of these conditions. Now, for what you really want to know: How did the space miso taste? The ISS miso exhibits some clear sensory differences compared with the Earth misos, the scientists admitted in the paper, namely boasting a higher level of roasted and nutty aromas that affected the flavor. The findings are the latest example of how far space food has come since John Glenn became the first human to eat in space in 1962 (he partially consumed a tube of applesauce). In recent years, produce such as lettuce has been grown (and eaten) aboard the ISS. NASA has even made developing new food technologies into a competition.While missions to Mars and beyond are still years away from feasibility, figuring out how to keep astronauts fed without filling the entire spacecraft with snacks remains a logistical issue to be solved. This little bit of fermented, nutty miso could go a long wayliterally.Daily NewsletterYou May Also Like By Margherita Bassi Published April 1, 2025 By Passant Rabie Published March 27, 2025 By Passant Rabie Published March 17, 2025 By Margherita Bassi Published March 16, 2025 Adam Kovac and George Dvorsky Published February 21, 2025 By Adam Kovac Published February 20, 20250 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 48 Visualizações
-
WWW.YOUTUBE.COMStrange Connection #b3dSci-fi concept art created using the Random Flow add-on in Blender.Shops:blendermarket.com/creators/blenderguppygumroad.com/blenderguppyPatreon:patreon.com/blenderguppy#b3d #conceptart #blender3d #blenderaddon #blendermarket0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 38 Visualizações
-
WWW.POPSCI.COMUse OpenAI to find profitable stocks during the historic dipYouve seen headlines about the market crash and maybe even wondered if nows your shot at finally investing. But actually picking stocks? Investing your first dollar? Thats where most people freeze. A stock-picking tool powered by OpenAI is helping regular folks identify strong opportunities with minimal risk.Meet Sterling Stock Picker, the thing that could turn your savings account into an early retirement, extra travel funds, or whatever you wish. Rather than gambling with your hard-earned dollars, this tool helps you research options that match your preferences and risk tolerance, and a lifetime subscription is just $68.99 (reg. $486).Want to dive into the stock market but feel like youre reading a foreign language? Sterling Stock Picker makes it surprisingly simple. Begin with a quick, easy questionnaire. Think of it as a friendly chat about your money goals.Figuring out how to invest in stocks without losing your shirt is a question everyone asks. This platform gives you clear answers, using your questionnaire to pick stocks that match your comfort level, what you care about, and your money plans.Got questions? Dont worry; the app has an AI helper called Finley. You can ask anythingfrom Whats a stock? to Where do I go to invest my first dollar?and get answers in plain English.When youre ready to build a bigger portfolio, Sterling Stock Picker can do that for you, too. It uses your info to create a mix of investments that fit your style, making the whole thing feel less like gambling and more like, well, smart planning.Grab lifetime access to this beginner-friendly stock investing platform for $68.99no coupon needed (reg. $486).StackSocial prices subject to change.Sterling Stock Picker: Lifetime Subscription $68.99See DealWhat makes this deal specialThe recent stock market dip has created a rare window of opportunity for new investorsbut taking action is easier said than done. With prices lower across the board, now could be an ideal time to buy in, but most people arent sure where to start or what to buy. Powered by OpenAI, Sterling Stock Picker helps everyday people make sense of the chaos by identifying smart, low-risk investments tailored to their goals. A lifetime membership for just $68.99 (reg. $486) means youll have expert-level guidance at your fingertips.0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 29 Visualizações
-
WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COMScientists say these North American rivers 'shouldn't exist.' Here's why they do.At first glance, these waterways make no sense. A new review article details why they are the way they are.0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 33 Visualizações
-
V.REDD.ITTitanfall 1 Walk Cycle testTesting out my Atlas rig with a walk cycle! I made the rig and animation. Titan from EA/Respawn Entertainment submitted by /u/ryanlykos [link] [comments]0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 35 Visualizações
-
X.COM.@Sumineko_BeBe presented a short anime episode about a lonely girl created in Blender. Watch: https://80.lv/articles/check-out-this-short-blender-mad....@Sumineko_BeBe presented a short anime episode about a lonely girl created in Blender.Watch: https://80.lv/articles/check-out-this-short-blender-made-animation-about-lonely-girl/0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 48 Visualizações