Project Files: https://www.patreon.com/posts/126188799 . This is the 24th part of the tutorial series, where we are going to implement a Real Time Strategy game using Unreal Engine and C++. In this episode, we will work on how to validate the ground underneath for building placement. If we select a place where we can't place the building, the building mesh will become red, if it is a valid location, building will have original colors. We can only place buildings on free valid locations. Full C++ RTS Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNTm9yU0zou5_PYxEdjNbAgbVRn-daOga . Unreal Strategy game with Blueprints series: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNTm9yU0zou4Eulmi8YIfzHiNZEzfbSMk ► 👇 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 // 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐀 𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧! https://www.patreon.com/codelikeme ►Patrons will have access to project files of all the stuff I do in the channel and other extra benefits Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClb6Jh9EBV7a_Nm52Ipll_Q/join Like my facebook page for more content : https://www.facebook.com/gamedevelopersclub/ Follow me on twitter : https://twitter.com/CodeLikeMe2 Follow me on reddit : https://www.reddit.com/user/codelikeme #CodeLikeMe #unrealengine #ue5 #ue4 #indiegamedev

We’ve all been there: You’re hanging with a group of friends (either in real time or virtual), and one casually mentions doing something with the other — but neither explicitly mentions you. You’re faced with a dilemma. Inviting yourself when you’re not wanted could come off as intrusive at best, rude at worst. And not inviting yourself will leave you left out and feeling rejected.A new study now should put such anxieties to rest. In such situations, you’re more welcome than you think, according to an article in Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin. The Psychology Behind RejectionJulian Givi, a West Virginia University professor and an author of the study, first became interested in this issue when he explored the other side of rejection. He conducted a study that explored how hosts feel when a potential guest declines an invitation. The result? A “no” was far less psychologically devastating to the host than the potential guest estimated. In both cases, Givi wanted to understand not just the responses and their ramifications but the thought processes behind them. To pursue a solid, scientifically valid result, he conducted eight studies with several thousand participants.Thought Process Behind Informal InvitationsIn the first study, 340 participants were asked to remember scenarios from the last five years where they were either directly invited or “self-invited” to join a social activity. They described how they felt in each situation. Then, researchers analyzed the text of their responses with software. Later studies constructed role-playing scenarios where participants used structured scenarios to isolate specific psychological factors. Participants were randomly assigned roles as either “potential self-inviters” or “plan-holders.” Then they were asked to imagine situations where a mutual friend mentioned a plan but didn’t explicitly invite them or a situation when another person asked them along. Researchers then measured how irritated or annoyed they thought the other participants would be if they tagged along.The findings consistently found that potential self-inviters were less likely to attend than what the plan holders across studies said they would prefer. This held true even when the plan-holders had invited the self-inviter to past events or when they made efforts to ease logistical obstacles. Making Social AssumptionsThe researchers discovered that potential self-inviters made two common assumptions. First, they overestimated how annoyed the plan holder would be if the self-inviters asked to join. Second, they wrongly believed that the plan holders had considered inviting them and then decided not to, which felt like a form of social rejection. In reality, the people making plans often hadn’t thought about inviting others at all.So, why do people hold back from asking to join? The research pointed to two major factors. First, they incorrectly worried that the plan holders had thought about inviting them but decided to actively reject them.Such assumptions are based more on psychological phenomena like egocentrism. That leads to practices where self-inviters essentially try to mind-read the planners, then “…potential self-inviters exaggerate the likelihood that plan-holders had already considered inviting them but decided against it," the study said.The authors add that there are some exceptions, like formal situations. If you are not invited to a wedding, it's generally a good idea not to crash it.Article SourcesOur writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin. Self-Invitation Hesitation: How and Why People Fail to Ask to Join the Plans of OthersAmerican Psychology Association. Saying no: The negative ramifications from invitation declines are less severe than we think.Before joining Discover Magazine, Paul Smaglik spent over 20 years as a science journalist, specializing in U.S. life science policy and global scientific career issues. He began his career in newspapers, but switched to scientific magazines. His work has appeared in publications including Science News, Science, Nature, and Scientific American.

Nature, Published online: 09 April 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00982-8A poor working relationship with a supervisor or manager can result in lost opportunities, creating an unexplained gap in an early-career researcher’s publication record.

The Acer Aspire Vero 16 is engineered to be as sustainable as it can possibly be — but there isn't much that impresses beyond that.

At least they didn't crash Blender this time around: https://80.lv/articles/watch-two-anime-girls-throwing-ui-elements-at-each-other-in-this-fourth-wall-breaking-animation/ submitted by /u/80lv [link] [comments]

Mostly counterproductive, not simply wastefulMario Nawfal: JORDAN PETERSON: THE NGO GRAVY TRAIN HAS CEASED TO OPERATE“It wouldn't surprise me in the least if half the money that the American government spent or the Canadian government is utter waste or even positively counterproductive. Elon is the kind of managerial businessman

Motorola has announced the launch date of its Moto Book 60 laptop in India. The Lenovo-owned brand will make its debut in the laptop market with the new device. The company will also unveil the Moto Pad 60 Pro tablet alongside its new laptop. Both devices are confirmed to go on sale through Flipkart in the country. The e-commerce website is teasing the arrival of the new Motorola devices. The Moto Book 60 is confirmed to have a 14-inch 2.8K OLED panel, while the Moto Pad 60 Pro will boast a 12.7-inch 3K resolution display. Additionally, alleged renders of the upcoming Motorola laptop and tablet have leaked online.Moto Pad 60 Pro, Book 60 Launch Date AnnouncedFlipkart has confirmed the India launch date of the Moto Book 60 and Moto Pad 60 Pro via dedicated landing pages on its website. They will be announced on April 17. The listings reveal the design, colourways, and key specifications of upcoming products.The Moto Book 60 is teased in Bronze Green and Wedge Wood colourways with a 14-inch 2.8K OLED display with 500 nits peak brightness. It will come with an Intel processor and 60Wh battery with a 65W fast charger. It will weigh 1.4kg. It will offer features like Smart Connect, Smart Clipboard and File Transfer.Meanwhile, the Moto Pad 60 Pro is shown in a Bronze Green shade with a 12.7-inch LCD screen with 3K resolution and 144Hz refresh rate. It will come equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 chipset and a 10,200mAh battery with 45W charging support. It includes a quad-speaker unit tuned by JBL with Dolby Atmos support. The tablet will come with a Moto Pen Pro stylus in the box.Additionally, 91mobiles has shared alleged renders of the Moto Book 60 and Moto Pad 60 Pro. The renders show the laptop in green and blue colours, but Motorola has already confirmed the names of these shades. They show narrow bezels, Dolby Atmos branding, and USB Type-C ports on the left side alongside a 3.5mm headphone jack.The unofficial renders of Moto Pad 60 Pro suggest a stylus and a 13-megapixel single rear camera unit alongside an LED flash. The USB Type-C port and speaker grilles are shown at the bottom.Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details. For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube. Further reading: Moto Book 60, Moto Pad 60 Pro, Moto Pad 60 Pro Specifications, Moto Book 60 Specifications, Motorola Nithya P Nair Nithya P Nair is a journalist with more than five years of experience in digital journalism. She specialises in business and technology beats. A foodie at heart, Nithya loves exploring new places (read cuisines) and sneaking in Malayalam movie dialogues to spice up conversations. More

The AI Divide: Lack of Equitable Access for India’s Downtrodden4 min read·Just now--Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries, reshaping economies, and defining the future of work. However, in a country as diverse and stratified as India, AI is far from being equitable. The marginalized communities, which include economically weaker sections, rural populations, and historically disadvantaged groups, remain largely excluded from AI’s potential benefits.Despite the Indian government’s gradual push towards AI infrastructure, the gap in accessibility and affordability remains stark. This article explores the inequities in AI access, using data, case studies, and policy analysis to underline the urgency for democratization.India’s AI Budget and the Global RaceThe Indian government has recognized the potential of AI and allocated a substantial budget towards its development. In the 2023–24 budget, India set aside ₹7,000 crore ($850 million) for digital transformation initiatives, including AI research. The National AI Strategy, spearheaded by NITI Aayog, aims to propel AI innovation. However, when compared to global AI investments, India lags significantly. The United States has committed $249 billion in AI funding since 2019, while China’s AI investment surpasses $190 billion. India’s budgetary allocation reflects intent but not competitive scalability.While AI research hubs like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune flourish, these advancements rarely trickle down to rural India, where over 65% of the population resides. The government’s AI initiatives often cater to urban corporate sectors, leaving villages and underprivileged groups behind.The AI Literacy and Digital DivideA 2022 report by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) found that only 43% of Indians have access to the internet, with even lower numbers in rural areas. AI-based learning, digital literacy, and computational education are practically nonexistent in many government-run schools.Consider the story of Akram, a 19-year-old gig entrepreneur from the outskirts of Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh. Akram, who drives an auto-rickshaw in Mumbai, earns between ₹700-₹1,100 per day but has no exposure to AI-driven platforms that could enhance his livelihood. Digital platforms that utilize AI for financial planning, skill development, and market insights remain inaccessible due to lack of internet literacy and financial constraints.Contrast this with an urban student in Mumbai who has access to AI-powered learning tools, coding boot camps, and mentorship programs. This disparity isn’t just about access but about the entire ecosystem’s failure to accommodate the marginalized in the AI revolution.The private sector has surged ahead in AI adoption. Startups and tech giants like TCS, Infosys, and Reliance are investing billions in AI-driven automation. However, only 18% of Indian MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) have access to AI tools, as per a 2023 Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) report.Even within government schemes, AI-driven welfare initiatives remain inaccessible to those who need them the most. For example, AI-powered agricultural advisory platforms help farmers optimize yield, but only 27% of small farmers in India have access to such digital solutions due to affordability and lack of digital literacy.Need for AI DecentralizationTo bridge the AI divide, India must take a democratic, decentralized approach to AI literacy and accessibility:AI in Schools: AI education should be integrated into the curriculum of government and low-income private schools, ensuring that children from marginalized backgrounds are not left behind.Community AI Centers: Similar to the Common Service Centers (CSCs) established for digital literacy, AI knowledge hubs should be created in villages, allowing community-driven AI learning.Affordable AI Infrastructure: The government must push for subsidized AI-driven tools for MSMEs, small businesses, and self-employed individuals, allowing them to compete in the AI economy.Public-Private Collaboration: Tech giants investing in AI should have mandatory community AI outreach programs, ensuring that AI does not remain an urban privilege.Linguistic AI Inclusion: AI tools must cater to India’s linguistic diversity, supporting regional languages for wider accessibility.Need For A More Inclusive AI FutureAI is a defining force in the global economy, but its benefits must not remain exclusive to urban elites. With India’s commitment to becoming a $5 trillion economy, equitable AI access is crucial to uplifting its vast marginalized population.By investing in AI education, community-driven initiatives, and digital inclusivity, India can truly democratize AI and ensure that no one — irrespective of their socio-economic background — is left behind in this technological revolution.The AI revolution must not mirror historical injustices but instead serve as a tool for equitable progress. The time for action is now.(This blog was first published on Aurix)

A multiplayer action football game isn’t exactly what you’d expect to see from Sifu and Absolver developer Sloclap, but excitement surrounding Rematch has been high since it was unveiled in December, and now we know exactly when it will be releasing.  Sloclap has announced that Rematch will launch on June 19. The indie developer has also released a new gameplay trailer for the multiplayer title that highlights what it calls the “golden rules” around with Rematch’s gameplay experience is built, including keepers playing as sweepers who won’t just stick to their box, players being vulnerable when they’re in possession of the ball, and more. Check out the trailer below.  Upon its launch, Rematch will be available for PS5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC, priced at $29.99. Sloclap has announced that the game will also be available via Game Pass at launch. An open beta will also be available on PC from April 18 to April 19.