OpenAI has released a new image generator thats designed less for typical surrealist AI art and more for highly controllable and practical creation of visualsa sign that OpenAI thinks its tools are ready for use in fields like advertising and graphic design.The image generator, which is now part of the companys GPT-4o model, was promised by OpenAI last May but wasnt released. Requests for generated images on ChatGPT were filled by an older image generator called DALL-E. OpenAI has been tweaking the new model since then and will now release it over the coming weeks to all tiers of users starting today, replacing the older one.The new model makes progress on technical issues that have plagued AI image generators for years. While most have been great at creating fantastical images or realistic deepfakes, theyve been terrible at something called binding, which refers to the ability to identify certain objects correctly and put them in their proper place (like a sign that says hot dogs properly placed above a food cart, not somewhere else in the image).It was only a few years ago that models started to succeed at things like Put the red cube on top of the blue cube, a feature that is essential for any creative professional use of AI. Generators also struggle with text generation, typically creating distorted jumbles of letter shapes that look more like captchas than readable text.OPENAIExample images from OpenAI show progress here. The model is able to generate 12 discrete graphics within a single imagelike a cat emoji or a lightning boltand place them in proper order. Another shows four cocktails accompanied by recipe cards with accurate, legible text. More images show comic strips with text bubbles, mock advertisements, and instructional diagrams. The model also allows you to upload images to be modified, and it will be available in the video generator Sora as well as in GPT-4o.OPENAIIts a new tool for communication, says Gabe Goh, the lead designer on the generator at OpenAI. Kenji Hata, a researcher at OpenAI who also worked on the tool, puts it a different way: I think the whole idea is that were going away from, like, beautiful art. It can still do that, he clarifies, but it will do more useful things too. You can actually make images work for you, he says, and not just just look at them.Its a clear sign that OpenAI is positioning the tool to be used more by creative professionals: think graphic designers, ad agencies, social media managers, or illustrators. But in entering this domain, OpenAI has two paths, both difficult.One, it can target the skilled professionals who have long used programs like Adobe Photoshop, which is also investing heavily in AI tools that can fill images with generative AI.Adobe really has a stranglehold on this market, and theyre moving fast enough that I dont know how compelling it is for people to switch, says David Raskino, the cofounder and chief technical officer of Irreverent Labs, which works on AI video generation.The second option is to target casual designers who have flocked to tools like Canva (which has also been investing in AI). This is an audience that may not have ever needed technically demanding software like Photoshop but would use more casual design tools to create visuals. To succeed here, OpenAI would have to lure people away from platforms built for design in hopes that the speed and quality of its own image generator would make the switch worth it (at least for part of the design process).Its also possible the tool will simply be used as many image generators are now: to create quick visuals that are good enough to accompany social media posts. But with OpenAI planning massive investments, including participation in the $500 billion Stargate project to build new data centers at unprecedented scale, its hard to imagine that the image generator wont play some ambitious moneymaking role.Regardless, the fact that OpenAIs new image generator has pushed through notable technical hurdles has raised the bar for other AI companies. Clearing those hurdles likely required lots of very specific data, Raskino says, like millions of images in which text is properly displayed at lots of different angles and orientations. Now competing image generators will have to match those achievements to keep up.The pace of innovation should increase here, Raskino says.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Ethically sourced spare human bodies could revolutionize medicineMany challenges in medicine stem, in large part, from a common root cause: a severe shortage of ethically-sourced human bodies.There might be a way to get out of this moral and scientific deadlock. Recent advances in biotechnology now provide a pathway to producing living human bodies without the neural components that allow us to think, be aware, or feel pain.Many will find this possibility disturbing, but if researchers and policymakers can find a way to pull these technologies together, we may one day be able to create spare bodies, both human and nonhuman.These could revolutionize medical research and drug development, greatly reducing the need for animal testing, rescuing many people from organ transplant lists, and allowing us to produce more effective drugs and treatments. All without crossing most peoples ethical lines. Read the full story.Why the world is looking to ditch US AI modelsEileen GuoA few weeks ago, when I was at the digital rights conference RightsCon in Taiwan, I watched in real time as civil society organizations from around the world, including the US, grappled with the loss of one of the biggest funders of global digital rights work: the United States government.Some policymakers and business leadersin Europe, in particularare reconsidering their reliance on US-based tech and asking whether they can quickly spin up better, homegrown alternatives. This is particularly true for AI. Read the full story.This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.How to delete your 23andMe dataConsumer DNA testing company 23andMe has filed for bankruptcy protection, following months of speculation around CEO Anne Wojcickis plans to take the firm private. The news means that 23andMeand the genetic data of millions of its customerscould soon be put up for sale.But although customers worried about the security of their DNA data can request its deletion, truly scrubbing your information from the companys archives is easier said than done. Read the full story.Rhiannon WilliamsThe must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 US security leaders accidentally added a journalist to a secret Signal chatThe group used the unapproved platform to discuss classified military strikes in Yemen. (The Atlantic $)+ It raises questions over how the US government is handling sensitive information. (Vox)+ The Trump administration has embraced the encrypted messaging app. (WP $)2 Donald Trumps H-1B visa crackdown could seriously harm US tech firmsAmazon is likely to be hit particularly hard. (Rest of World)+ US visa and green-card holders are being detained and deported. (NY Mag $)+ Tariffs, DOGE and scams are weighing heavily on the tech industry. (Insider $)+ America relies heavily on skilled overseas workers. (The Conversation)3 DeepSeeks runaway success is shaking up Chinas AI startupsTheyre overhauling their business models in an effort to keep up. (FT $)+ The AI development gap between China and the US is narrowing. (Reuters)+ How DeepSeek ripped up the AI playbookand why everyones going to follow its lead. (MIT Technology Review)4 AI companies dont want to be regulated anymoreEmboldened by the Trump administration, the industrys biggest firms are lobbying for fewer rules. (NYT $)5 Colorado is experimenting with psychedelic mushroomsIt plans to administer them in healing centers across the state. (Undark)+ Job titles of the future: Pharmaceutical-grade mushroom grower. (MIT Technology Review)6 Tesla sales are plummeting in EuropeAs customers turn to its Chinese rival BYD. (The Guardian)+ Elon Musks companies are under increasing pressure from their rivals. (Economist $)+ BYD was one of our 2024 Climate Tech Companies to Watch. (MIT Technology Review)7 This Indian city relies on the wind to stay coolPalava City is a living testbed of technological innovation. (WP $)+ No power, no fans, no AC: The villagers fighting to survive Indias deadly heatwaves. (MIT Technology Review)8 Filming your online routine is not for the faint of heartAbsurd clips are doing the rounds on social media yet again. (NY Mag $)9 Floating wood could help to refreeze the ArcticBy helping to seed the formation of new ice. (New Scientist $)+ Inside a new quest to save the doomsday glacier. (MIT Technology Review)10 Silicon Valley workers are ditching dating appsInstead, theyre attending carefully vetted dating meetups IRL. (Wired $)Quote of the dayThe path to saving TikTok should run through Capitol Hill.Three Democratic senators urge Donald Trump to work with Congress to save TikTok from shutting down in the US, the Verge reports.The big storyHow AI is changing gymnastics judgingJanuary 2024The 2023 World Championships last October marked the first time an AI judging system was used on every apparatus in a gymnastics competition. There are obvious upsides to using this kind of technology: AI could help take the guesswork out of the judging technicalities. It could even help to eliminate biases, making the sport both more fair and more transparent.At the same time, others fear AI judging will take away something that makes gymnastics special. Gymnastics is a subjective sport, like diving or dressage, and technology could eliminate the judges role in crafting a narrative.For better or worse, AI has officially infiltrated the world of gymnastics. The question now is whether it really makes it fairer. Read the full story.Jessica Taylor PriceWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ These plants are quite possibly math geniuses.+ Inside the weird and wonderful world of animal art.+ Get me on a (sustainable) trip to the Cook Islands immediately.+ Its officially cherry blossom season around the world!

This story was originally published in October 2024. In March 2025, 23andMe filed for bankruptcy and announced its plans to facilitate a sale process to maximize the value of its business.MIT Technology ReviewsHow Toseries helps you get things done.Things arent looking good for 23andMe. The consumer DNA testing company recently parted ways with all its board members but CEO Anne Wojcicki over her plans to take the company private. Its also still dealing with the fallout of a major security breach last October, which saw hackers access the personal data of around 5.5 million customers.23andMes business is built on taking saliva samples from its customers. The DNA from those samples is processed and analyzed in its labs to produce personalized genetic reports detailing a users unique health and ancestry. The uncertainty swirling around the companys future and potential new ownership has prompted privacy campaigners to urge users to delete their data.Its not just you. If anyone in your family gave their DNA to 23&Me, for all of your sakes, close your/their account now, Meredith Whittaker, president of the encrypted messaging platform Signal, posted on X after the boards resignation.Customers should consider current threats to their privacy as well as threats that may exist in the futuresome of which may be magnified if 23AndMe were sold to a new owner, says Jason Kelley, activism director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. 23AndMe has protections around this much of this. But a potential sale could put your data in the hands of a far less scrupulous company.A spokesperson for 23andMe said that the company has strong customer privacy protections in place, and does not share customer data with third parties without customers consent. Our research program is opt-in, requiring customers to go through a separate, informed consent process before joining, they say. We are committed to protecting customer data and are consistently focused on maintaining the privacy of our customers. That will not change.Why deleting your account comes with a caveatDeleting your data from 23andMe is permanent and cannot be reversed. But some of that data will be retained to comply with the companys legal obligations, according to its privacy statement.That means 23andMe and its third-party genotyping laboratory will hang onto some of your genetic information, plus your date of birth and sexalongside data linked to your account deletion request, including your email address and deletion request identifier. When MIT Technology Review asked 23andMe about the nature of the genetic information it retains, it referred us to its privacy policy but didnt provide any other details.Any information youve previously provided and consented to being used in 23andMe research projects also cannot be removed from ongoing or completed studies, although it will not be used in any future ones.Beyond the laboratories that process the saliva samples, the company does not share customer information with anyone else unless the user has given permission for it to do so, the spokesperson says, including employers, insurance companies, law enforcement agencies, or any public databases.We treat law enforcement inquiries, such as a valid subpoena or court order, with the utmost seriousness. We use all legal measures to resist any and all requests in order to protect our customers privacy, the spokesperson says. To date, we have successfully challenged these requests and have not released any information to law enforcement.For those who still want their data deleted, heres how you go about it.How to delete your data from 23andMeLog into your account and navigate to Settings.Under Settings, scroll to the section titled 23andMe data. Select View.You may be asked to enter your date of birth for extra security.In the next section, youll be asked which, if any, personal data youd like to download from the company (onto a personal, not public, computer). Once youre finished, scroll to the bottom and select Permanently delete data.You should then receive an email from 23andMe detailing its account deletion policy and requesting that you confirm your request. Once you confirm youd like your data to be deleted, the deletion will begin automatically and youll immediately lose access to your account.What about your genetic sample?When you set up your 23andMe account, youre given the option either to have your saliva sample securely destroyed or to have it stored for future testing. If youve previously opted to store your sample but now want to delete your 23andMe account, the company says, it will destroy the sample for you as part of the account deletion process.What if you want to keep your genetic data, just not on 23andMe?Even if you want your data taken off 23AndMe, there are reasons why you might still want to have it hosted on other DNA sitesfor genealogical research, for example. And some people like the idea of having their DNA results stored on more than one database in case something happens to any one company. This is where downloading your data comes into play. FamilyTreeDNA, MyHeritage, GEDmatch, and Living DNA are among the DNA testing companies that allow you to upload existing DNA results from other companies, although Ancestry and 23andMe dont accept uploads.How to download your raw genetic dataNavigate directly to you.23andme.com/tools/data/.Click on your profile name on the top right-hand corner. Then select Resources from the menu.Select Browse raw genotyping data and then Download.Visit Account settings and click on View under 23andMe data.Enter your date of birth for security purposes.Tick the box indicating that you understand the limitations and risks associated with uploading your information to third-party sites and press Submit request.23andMe warns its users that uploading their data to other services could put genetic data privacy at risk. For example, bad actors could use someone elses DNA data to create fake genetic profiles. They could use these profiles to match with a relative and access personal identifying information and specific DNA variantssuch as information about any disease risk variants you might carry, the spokesperson says, adding: This is one reason why we dont support uploading DNA to 23andMe at this time.Update: This article has been updated to reflect that when asked about the nature of the genetic information it retains, 23andMe referred us to its privacy policy but didnt provide any other details.

Why do we hear about medical breakthroughs in mice, but rarely see them translate into cures for human disease? Why do so few drugs that enter clinical trials receive regulatory approval? And why is the waiting list for organ transplantation so long? These challenges stem in large part from a common root cause: a severe shortage of ethically-sourced human bodies.It may be disturbing to characterize human bodies in such commodifying terms, but the unavoidable reality is that human biological materials are an essential commodity in medicine, and persistent shortages of these materials create a major bottleneck to progress. This imbalance between supply and demand is the underlying cause of the organ shortage crisis, with more than 100,000 patients currently waiting for a solid organ transplant in the US alone. It also forces us to rely heavily on animals in medical research, a practice that cant replicate major aspects of human physiology and necessitates the infliction of harm to sentient creatures. In addition, the safety and efficacy of any experimental drug must still be confirmed in clinical trials on living human bodies. These costly trials risk harm to patients, can take a decade or longer to complete, and make it through to approval less than 15% of the time.There might be a way to get out of this moral and scientific deadlock. Recent advances in biotechnology now provide a pathway to producing living human bodies without the neural components that allow us to think, be aware, or feel pain. Many will find this possibility disturbing, but if researchers and policymakers can find a way to pull these technologies together, we may one day be able to create spare bodies, both human and nonhuman. These could revolutionize medical research and drug development, greatly reducing the need for animal testing, rescuing many people from organ transplant lists, and allowing us to produce more effective drugs and treatments. All without crossing most peoples ethical lines.Bringing technologies togetherAlthough it may seem like science fiction, recent technological progress has pushed this concept into the realm of plausibility. Pluripotent stem cells, one of the earliest cell types to form during development, can give rise to every type of cell in the adult body. Recently, researchers have used these stem cells to create structures that seem to mimic the early development of actual human embryos. At the same time, artificial uterus technology is rapidly advancing, and other pathways may be opening to allow for the development of fetuses outside of the body.By integrating these different technologies and using established genetic techniques to inhibit brain development, it is possible to envision the creation of bodyoids a potentially unlimited source of human bodies, developed entirely outside of a human body from stem cells, that lack sentience or the ability to feel pain.There are still many technical roadblocks to achieving this vision, but we have reason to expect that bodyoids couldradically transform biomedical research by addressing critical limitations in the current models of research, drug development and medicine. Among many other benefits, theywould offer an almost unlimited source of organs, tissues and cells for use in transplantation.It could even be possible to generate organs directly from a patients own cells, essentially cloning their biological material to ensure that transplanted tissues are a perfect immunological match to a patient and thus eliminating the need for lifelong immunosuppression. Bodyoids developed from a patients cells could also allow for personalized screening of drugs, allowing physicians to directly assess the effect of different interventions in a biological model that accurately reflects a patients own personal genetics and physiology. We can even envision using animal bodyoidsin agriculture, as a substitute for the use of sentient animal species.Of course, exciting possibilities are not certainties. We do not know whether the embryo models recently created from stem cells could give rise to living people or, thus far, even to living mice. We do not know when, or whether, an effective technique will be found for successfully gestating human bodies entirely outside a person. We cannot be sure whether such bodyoids can survive without ever having developed brains or the parts of brains associated with consciousness, or whether they would still serve as accurate models for living people without those brain functions. Even if it all works, it may not be practical or economical to grow bodyoids, possibly for many years, until they can be mature enough to be useful for our ends. Each of these questions will require substantial research and time. But we believe this idea is now plausible enough to justify discussing both the technical feasibility and ethical implications.Ethical considerations and societal implicationsBodyoids could address many ethical problems in modern medicine, offering ways to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. For example, they could offer an ethical alternative to the way we currently use nonhuman animals for research and food, providing meat or other products with no animal suffering or awareness.But when we come to human bodyoids, the issues become harder. Many will find the concept grotesque or appalling. And for good reason. We have an innate respect for human life in all its forms. We do not allow broad research on people who no longer have consciousness or, in some cases, never had it.At the same time, we know much can be gained from studying the human body. We learn much from the bodies of the dead, which these days are used for teaching and research only with consent. In laboratories, we study cells and tissues that were taken, with consent, from the bodies of the dead and the living. Recently we have even begun using for experiments the animated cadavers of people who have been declared legally dead, who have lost all brain function but whose other organs continue to function with mechanical assistance. Genetically modified pig kidneys have been connected to, or transplanted into, these legally dead but physiologically active cadavers to help researchers determine whether they would work in living people.In all these cases, nothing was, legally, a living human being at the time it was used for research. Human bodyoids would also fall into that category. But there are still a number of issues worth considering. The first is consent: The cells used to make bodyoids would have to come from someone, and wed have to make sure that this someone consented to this particular, likely controversial, use. But perhaps the deepest issue is that bodyoids might diminish the human status of real people who lack consciousness or sentience. Thus far, we have held to a standard that requires us to treat all humans born alive as people, entitled to life and respect. Would bodyoidscreated without pregnancy, parental hopes, or indeed parentsblur that line? Or would we consider a bodyoid a human being, entitled to the same respect? If so, whyjust because it looks like us? A sufficiently detailed mannequin can meet that test. Because it looks like us and is alive? Because it is alive and has our DNA? These are questions that will require careful thought.A call to actionUntil recently, the idea of making something like a bodyoid would have been relegated to the realms of science fiction and philosophical speculation. But now it is at least plausibleand possibly revolutionary. It is time for it to be explored.The potential benefitsfor both human patients and sentient animal speciesare great. Governments, companies and private foundations should start thinking about bodyoids as a possible path for investment.There is no need to start with humanswe can begin exploring the feasibility of this approach with rodents or other research animals.As we proceed, the ethical and social issues are at least as important as the scientific ones. Just because something can be done does not mean it should be done. Even if it looks possible, determining whether we should make bodyoids, nonhuman or human, will require considerable thought, discussion, and debate. Some of that will be by scientists, ethicists, and others with special interest or knowledge. But ultimately, the decisions will be made by societies and governments.The time to start those discussions is now, when a scientific pathway seems clear enough for us to avoid pure speculation but before the world is presented with a troubling surprise. The announcement of the birth of Dolly the cloned sheep back in the 1990s launched a hysterical reaction, complete with speculation about armies of cloned warrior slaves. Good decisions require more preparation. The path toward realizing the potential of bodyoids will not be without challenges; indeed, it may never be possible to get there, or even if it is possible, the path may never be taken. Caution is warranted, but so is bold vision; the opportunity is too important to ignore.Carsten T. Charlesworth is a postdoctoral fellow at the Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (ISCBRM) at Stanford University. Henry T. Greely is the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences at Stanford University. Hiromitsu Nakauchi is a professor of genetics and an ISCBRM faculty member at Stanford University and a distinguished university professor at the Institute of Science Tokyo.

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first,sign up here.This weeks edition of The Algorithm is brought to you not by your usual host, James ODonnell, but Eileen Guo, an investigative reporter at MIT Technology Review.A few weeks ago, when I was at the digital rights conference RightsCon in Taiwan, I watched in real time as civil society organizations from around the world, including the US, grappled with the loss of one of the biggest funders of global digital rights work: the United States government.As I wrote in my dispatch, the Trump administrations shocking, rapid gutting of the US government (and its push into what some prominent political scientists call competitive authoritarianism) also affects the operations and policies of American tech companiesmany of which, of course, have users far beyond US borders. People at RightsCon said they were already seeing changes in these companies willingness to engage with and invest in communities that have smaller user basesespecially non-English-speaking ones.As a result, some policymakers and business leadersin Europe, in particularare reconsidering their reliance on US-based tech and asking whether they can quickly spin up better, homegrown alternatives. This is particularly true for AI.One of the clearest examples of this is in social media. Yasmin Curzi, a Brazilian law professor who researches domestic tech policy, put it to me this way: Since Trumps second administration, we cannot count on [American social media platforms] to do even the bare minimum anymore.Social media content moderation systemswhich already use automation and are also experimenting with deploying large language models to flag problematic postsare failing to detect gender-based violence in places as varied as India, South Africa, and Brazil. If platforms begin to rely even more on LLMs for content moderation, this problem will likely get worse, says Marlena Wisniak, a human rights lawyer who focuses on AI governance at the European Center for Not-for-Profit Law. The LLMs are moderated poorly, and the poorly moderated LLMs are then also used to moderate other content, she tells me. Its so circular, and the errors just keep repeating and amplifying.Part of the problem is that the systems are trained primarily on data from the English-speaking world (and American English at that), and as a result, they perform less well with local languages and context.Even multilingual language models, which are meant to process multiple languages at once, still perform poorly with non-Western languages. For instance, one evaluation of ChatGPTs response to health-care queries found that results were far worse in Chinese and Hindi, which are less well represented in North American data sets, than in English and Spanish.For many at RightsCon, this validates their calls for more community-driven approaches to AIboth in and out of the social media context. These could include small language models, chatbots, and data sets designed for particular uses and specific to particular languages and cultural contexts. These systems could be trained to recognize slang usages and slurs, interpret words or phrases written in a mix of languages and even alphabets, and identify reclaimed language (onetime slurs that the targeted group has decided to embrace). All of these tend to be missed or miscategorized by language models and automated systems trained primarily on Anglo-American English. The founder of the startup Shhor AI, for example, hosted a panel at RightsCon and talked about its new content moderation API focused on Indian vernacular languages.Many similar solutions have been in development for yearsand weve covered a number of them, including a Mozilla-facilitated volunteer-led effort to collect training data in languages other than English, and promising startups like Lelapa AI, which is building AI for African languages. Earlier this year, we even included small language models on our 2025 list of top 10 breakthrough technologies.Still, this moment feels a little different. The second Trump administration, which shapes the actions and policies of American tech companies, is obviously a major factor. But there are others at play.First, recent research and development on language models has reached the point where data set size is no longer a predictor of performance, meaning that more people can create them. In fact, smaller language models might be worthy competitors of multilingual language models in specific, low-resource languages, says Aliya Bhatia, a visiting fellow at the Center for Democracy & Technology who researches automated content moderation.Then theres the global landscape. AI competition was a major theme of the recent Paris AI Summit, which took place the week before RightsCon. Since then, theres been a steady stream of announcements about sovereign AI initiatives that aim to give a country (or organization) full control over all aspects of AI development.AI sovereignty is just one part of the desire for broader tech sovereignty thats also been gaining steam, growing out of more sweeping concerns about the privacy and security of data transferred to the United States. The European Union appointed its first commissioner for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy last November and has been working on plans for a Euro Stack, or digital public infrastructure. The definition of this is still somewhat fluid, but it could include the energy, water, chips, cloud services, software, data, and AI needed to support modern society and future innovation. All these are largely provided by US tech companies today. Europes efforts are partly modeled after India Stack, that countrys digital infrastructure that includes the biometric identity system Aadhaar. Just last week, Dutch lawmakers passed several motions to untangle the country from US tech providers.This all fits in with what Andy Yen, CEO of the Switzerland-based digital privacy company Proton, told me at RightsCon. Trump, he said, is causing Europe to move faster to come to the realization that Europe needs to regain its tech sovereignty. This is partly because of the leverage that the president has over tech CEOs, Yen said, and also simply because tech is where the future economic growth of any country is.But just because governments get involved doesnt mean that issues around inclusion in language models will go away. I think there needs to be guardrails about what the role of the government here is. Where it gets tricky is if the government decides These are the languages we want to advance or These are the types of views we want represented in a data set, Bhatia says. Fundamentally, the training data a model trains on is akin to the worldview it develops.Its still too early to know what this will all look like, and how much of it will prove to be hype. But no matter what happens, this is a space well be watching.Now read the rest of The AlgorithmDeeper LearningOpenAI has released its first research into how using ChatGPT affects peoples emotional well-beingOpenAI released two pieces of research last week that explore how ChatGPT affects people who engage with it on emotional issues, yielding some interesting results. Female study participants were slightly less likely to socialize with people than their male counterparts who used the chatbot for the same period of time, our reporter Rhiannon Williams writes. And people who used voice mode in a gender that was not their own reported higher levels of loneliness at the end of the experiment.Why it matters: AI companies have raced to build chatbots that act not just as productivity tools but also as companions, romantic partners, friends, therapists, and more. Legally, its largely still a Wild West landscape. Some have instructed users to harm themselves, and others have offered sexually charged conversations as underage characters represented by deepfakes. More research into how people, especially children, are using these AI models is essential. OpenAIs work is only a start. Read more from Rhiannon Williams.Bits and BytesOpinion Why handing over total control to AI agents would be a huge mistakeCompanies like OpenAI and Butterfly Effect (the startup in China that made Manus) are racing to build AI agents that can do tasks for you by taking over your computer. In this op-ed, some top AI researchers detail the potential missteps that could occur if we cede more control of our digital lives to decision-making AIs.A provocative experiment pitted AI against federal judgesResearch has long shown that judges are influenced by many factors, like how sympathetic they are to defendants, or when their last meal was. Despite AI models inherent problems with biases and hallucinations, researchers at the University of Chicago Law School wondered if they can present more objective opinions. They can, but that doesnt make them better judges, the researchers say. (The Washington Post)Elon Musks truth-seeking chatbot often disagrees with himMusk promised his company xAIs model Grok would be an antidote to the woke and politically influenced chatbots that he says dominate today. But in tests done by the Washington Post, the model contradicted many of Musks claims about specific issues. (The Washington Post)A Disney employee downloaded an AI tool that contained malware, and it ruined his lifeMIT Technology Review has long predicted that the proliferation of AI will enable scammers to up their productivity as never before. One victim of this trend is Matthew Van Andel, a Disney employee who downloaded malware disguised as an AI tool. It led to his firing. (Wall Street Journal)The facial recognition company Clearview attempted to buy Social Security numbers and mugshots for its databaseThree years ago, Clearview was fined for scraping images of individuals faces from the internet. Now, court records reveal that the company was attempting to buy 690 million arrest records and 390 million arrest photos in the USrecords that also contained Social Security numbers, emails, and physical addresses. The deal fell through, but Clearview nonetheless holds one of the largest databases of facial images, and its tools are used by police and federal agencies. (404 Media)

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Why handing over total control to AI agents would be a huge mistakeMargaret Mitchell, Avijit Ghosh, Sasha Luccioni, Giada Pistilli all work for Hugging Face, an open source AI company.AI agents have set the tech industry abuzz. Unlike chatbots, these groundbreaking new systems can navigate multiple applications to execute complex tasks, like scheduling meetings or shopping online, in response to simple user commands. As agents become more capable, a crucial question emerges: How much control are we willing to surrender, and at what cost?The promise is compelling. Who doesnt want assistance with cumbersome work or tasks theres no time for? But this vision for AI agents brings significant risks that might be overlooked in the rush toward greater autonomy. In fact, our research suggests that agent development could be on the cusp of a very serious misstep. Read the full story.OpenAI has released its first research into how using ChatGPT affects peoples emotional wellbeingOpenAI says over 400 million people use ChatGPT every week. But how does interacting with it affect us? Does it make us more or less lonely?These are some of the questions OpenAI set out to investigate, in partnership with the MIT Media Lab, in a pair of new studies. They found that while only a small subset of users engage emotionally with ChatGPT, there are some intriguing differences between how men and women respond to using the chatbot. They also found that participants who trusted and bonded with ChatGPT more were likelier than others to be lonely, and to rely on it more.Chatbots powered by large language models are still a nascent technology, and difficult to study. Thats why this kind of research is an important first step toward greater insight into ChatGPTs impact on us, which could help AI platforms enable safer and healthier interactions. Read the full story.Rhiannon WilliamsThe must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 Genetic testing firm 23andMe has filed for bankruptcy protectionFollowing months of uncertainty over its future. (CNN)+ Tens of millions of peoples genetic data could soon belong to a new owner. (WSJ $)+ How to delete your 23andMe data. (MIT Technology Review)2 Europe wants to lessen its reliance of US cloud giantsBut thats easier said than done. (Wired $)3 Anduril is considering opening a drone factory in the UKEurope is poised to invest heavily in defenseand Anduril wants in. (Bloomberg $)+ The company recently signed a major drone contract with the UK government. (Insider $)+ We saw a demo of the new AI system powering Andurils vision for war. (MIT Technology Review)4 Bird flu has been detected in a sheep in the UKIts the first known instance of the virus infecting a sheep. (FT $)+ But the UK is yet to report any transmission to humans. (Reuters)+ How the US is preparing for a potential bird flu pandemic. (MIT Technology Review)5 A tiny town in the Alps has emerged as an ALS hotspotSuggesting that its causes may be more environmental than genetic. (The Atlantic $)+ Motor neuron diseases took their voices. AI is bringing them back. (MIT Technology Review)6 Firefly Aerospaces Blue Ghost lunar lander has completed its missionAnd captured some pretty incredible footage along the way. (NYT $)+ Europe is finally getting serious about commercial rockets. (MIT Technology Review)7 How the US could save billions of dollars in wasted energy Ultra tough, multi-pane windows could be the answer. (WSJ $)8 We need new ways to measure painResearchers are searching for objective biological indicators to get rid of the guesswork. (WP $)+ Brain waves can tell us how much pain someone is in. (MIT Technology Review)9 What falling in love with an AI could look likeIts unclear whether loving machines could be training grounds for future relationships, or the future of relationships themselves. (New Yorker $)+ The AI relationship revolution is already here. (MIT Technology Review)10 Could you walk in a straight line for hundreds of miles?YouTubes favorite new challenge isnt so much arduous as it is inconvenient. (The Guardian)Quote of the dayBlockbuster has collapsed. Its time for Netflix to rise.Kian Sadeghi pitches the company they founded, DNA testing firm Nucleus Genomics, as a replacement for 23andMe in a post on X.The big storyThis towns mining battle reveals the contentious path to a cleaner futureJanuary 2024In June last year, Talon, an exploratory mining company, submitted a proposal to Minnesota state regulators to begin digging up as much as 725,000 metric tons of raw ore per year, mainly to unlock the rich and lucrative reserves of high-grade nickel in the bedrock.Talon is striving to distance itself from the mining industrys dirty past, portraying its plan as a clean, friendly model of modern mineral extraction. It proclaims the site will help to power a greener future for the US by producing the nickel needed to manufacture batteries for electric cars and trucks, but with low emissions and light environmental impacts.But as the company has quickly discovered, a lot of locals arent eager for major mining operations near their towns. Read the full story.James TempleWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Who are fandoms for, and who gets to escape into them?+ A long-lost Klimt painting of Prince William Nii Nortey Dowuona has gone on display in the Netherlands.+ Feeling down? These feel-good movies will pick you right up.+ Why Gen Z are dedicated followers of Old Money fashion.

AI agents have set the tech industry abuzz. Unlike chatbots, these groundbreaking new systems operate outside of a chat window, navigating multiple applications to execute complex tasks, like scheduling meetings or shopping online, in response to simple user commands. As agents are developed to become more capable, a crucial question emerges: How much control are we willing to surrender, and at what cost?New frameworks and functionalities for AI agents are announced almost weekly, and companies promote the technology as a way to make our lives easier by completing tasks we cant do or dont want to do. Prominent examples include computer use, a function that enables Anthropics Claude system to act directly on your computer screen, and the general AI agent Manus, which can use online tools for a variety of tasks, like scouting out customers or planning trips. These developments mark a major advance in artificial intelligence: systems designed to operate in the digital world without direct human oversight.The promise is compelling. Who doesnt want assistance with cumbersome work or tasks theres no time for? Agent assistance could soon take many different forms, such as reminding you to ask a colleague about their kids basketball tournament or finding images for your next presentation. Within a few weeks, theyll probably be able to make presentations for you.Theres also clear potential for deeply meaningful differences in peoples lives. For people with hand mobility issues or low vision, agents could complete tasks online in response to simple language commands. Agents could also coordinate simultaneous assistance across large groups of people in critical situations, such as by routing traffic to help drivers flee an area en masse as quickly as possible when disaster strikes.But this vision for AI agents brings significant risks that might be overlooked in the rush toward greater autonomy. Our research team at Hugging Face has spent years implementing and investigating these systems, and our recent findings suggest that agent development could be on the cusp of a very serious misstep.Giving up control, bit by bitThis core issue lies at the heart of whats most exciting about AI agents: The more autonomous an AI system is, the more we cede human control. AI agents are developed to be flexible, capable of completing a diverse array of tasks that dont have to be directly programmed.For many systems, this flexibility is made possible because theyre built on large language models, which are unpredictable and prone to significant (and sometimes comical) errors. When an LLM generates text in a chat interface, any errors stay confined to that conversation. But when a system can act independently and with access to multiple applications, it may perform actions we didnt intend, such as manipulating files, impersonating users, or making unauthorized transactions. The very feature being soldreduced human oversightis the primary vulnerability.To understand the overall risk-benefit landscape, its useful to characterize AI agent systems on a spectrum of autonomy. The lowest level consists of simple processors that have no impact on program flow, like chatbots that greet you on a company website. The highest level, fully autonomous agents, can write and execute new code without human constraints or oversightthey can take action (moving around files, changing records, communicating in email, etc.) without your asking for anything. Intermediate levels include routers, which decide which human-provided steps to take; tool callers, which run human-written functions using agent-suggested tools; and multistep agents that determine which functions to do when and how. Each represents an incremental removal of human control.Its clear that AI agents can be extraordinarily helpful for what we do every day. But this brings clear privacy, safety, and security concerns. Agents that help bring you up to speed on someone would require that individuals personal information and extensive surveillance over your previous interactions, which could result in serious privacy breaches. Agents that create directions from building plans could be used by malicious actors to gain access to unauthorized areas.And when systems can control multiple information sources simultaneously, potential for harm explodes. For example, an agent with access to both private communications and public platforms could share personal information on social media. That information might not be true, but it would fly under the radar of traditional fact-checking mechanisms and could be amplified with further sharing to create serious reputational damage. We imagine that It wasnt meit was my agent!! will soon be a common refrain to excuse bad outcomes.Keep the human in the loopHistorical precedent demonstrates why maintaining human oversight is critical. In 1980, computer systems falsely indicated that over 2,000 Soviet missiles were heading toward North America. This error triggered emergency procedures that brought us perilously close to catastrophe. What averted disaster was human cross-verification between different warning systems. Had decision-making been fully delegated to autonomous systems prioritizing speed over certainty, the outcome might have been catastrophic.Some will counter that the benefits are worth the risks, but wed argue that realizing those benefits doesnt require surrendering complete human control. Instead, the development of AI agents must occur alongside the development of guaranteed human oversight in a way that limits the scope of what AI agents can do.Open-source agent systems are one way to address risks, since these systems allow for greater human oversight of what systems can and cannot do. At Hugging Face were developing smolagents, a framework that provides sandboxed secure environments and allows developers to build agents with transparency at their core so that any independent group can verify whether there is appropriate human control.This approach stands in stark contrast to the prevailing trend toward increasingly complex, opaque AI systems that obscure their decision-making processes behind layers of proprietary technology, making it impossible to guarantee safety.As we navigate the development of increasingly sophisticated AI agents, we must recognize that the most important feature of any technology isnt increasing efficiency but fostering human well-being.This means creating systems that remain tools rather than decision-makers, assistants rather than replacements. Human judgment, with all its imperfections, remains the essential component in ensuring that these systems serve rather than subvert our interests.Margaret Mitchell, Avijit Ghosh, Sasha Luccioni, Giada Pistilli all work for Hugging Face, an open source AI company.

OpenAI says over 400 million people use ChatGPT every week. But how does interacting with it affect us? Does it make us more or less lonely? These are some of the questions OpenAI set out to investigate, in partnership with the MIT Media Lab, in a pair of new studies.They found that only a small subset of users engage emotionally with ChatGPT. This isnt surprising given that ChatGPT isnt marketed as an AI companion app like Replika or Character.AI, says Kate Devlin, a professor of AI and society at Kings College London, who did not work on the project. ChatGPT has been set up as a productivity tool, she says. But we know that people are using it like a companion app anyway. In fact, the people who do use it that way are likely to interact with it for extended periods of time, some of them averaging about half an hour a day.The authors are very clear about what the limitations of these studies are, but its exciting to see theyve done this, Devlin says. To have access to this level of data is incredible.The researchers found some intriguing differences between how men and women respond to using ChatGPT. After using the chatbot for four weeks, female study participants were slightly less likely to socialize with people than their male counterparts who did the same. Meanwhile, participants who set ChatGPTs voice mode to a gender that was not their own for their interactions reported significantly higher levels of loneliness and more emotional dependency on the chatbot at the end of the experiment. OpenAI currently has no plans to publish either study.Chatbots powered by large language models are still a nascent technology, and its difficult to study how they affect us emotionally. A lot of existing research in the areaincluding some of the new work by OpenAI and MITrelies upon self-reported data, which may not always be accurate or reliable. That said, this latest research does chime with what scientists so far have discovered about how emotionally compelling chatbot conversations can be. For example, in 2023 MIT Media Lab researchers found that chatbots tend to mirror the emotional sentiment of a users messages, suggesting a kind of feedback loop where the happier you act, the happier the AI seems, or on the flipside, if you act sadder, so does the AI.OpenAI and the MIT Media Lab used a two-pronged method. First they collected and analyzed real-world data from close to 40 million interactions with ChatGPT. Then they asked the 4,076 users whod had those interactions how they made them feel. Next, the Media Lab recruited almost 1,000 people to take part in a four-week trial. This was more in-depth, examining how participants interacted with ChatGPT for a minimum of five minutes each day. At the end of the experiment, participants completed a questionnaire to measure their perceptions of the chatbot, their subjective feelings of loneliness, their levels of social engagement, their emotional dependence on the bot, and their sense of whether their use of the bot was problematic. They found that participants who trusted and bonded with ChatGPT more were likelier than others to be lonely, and to rely on it more.This work is an important first step toward greater insight into ChatGPTs impact on us, which could help AI platforms enable safer and healthier interactions, says Jason Phang, an OpenAI policy researcher who worked on the project.A lot of what were doing here is preliminary, but were trying to start the conversation with the field about the kinds of things that we can start to measure, and to start thinking about what the long-term impact on users is, he says.Although the research is welcome, its still difficult to identify when a human isand isntengaging with technology on an emotional level, says Devlin. She says the study participants may have been experiencing emotions that werent recorded by the researchers.In terms of what the teams set out to measure, people might not necessarily have been using ChatGPT in an emotional way, but you cant divorce being a human from your interactions [with technology], she says. We use these emotion classifiers that we have created to look for certain thingsbut what that actually means to someones life is really hard to extrapolate.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Inside a new quest to save the doomsday glacierThe Thwaites glacier is a fortress larger than Florida, a wall of ice that reaches nearly 4,000 feet above the bedrock of West Antarctica, guarding the low-lying ice sheet behind it.But a strong, warm ocean current is weakening its foundations and accelerating its slide into the sea. Scientists fear the waters could topple the walls in the coming decades, kick-starting a runaway process that would crack up the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, marking the start of a global climate disaster. As a result, they are eager to understand just how likely such a collapse is, when it could happen, and if we have the power to stop it.Scientists at MIT and Dartmouth College founded Arte Glacier Initiative last year in the hope of providing clearer answers to these questions. The nonprofit research organization will officially unveil itself, launch its website, and post requests for research proposals today, timed to coincide with the UNs inaugural World Day for Glaciers, MIT Technology Review can report exclusively. Read the full story.James TempleEurope is finally getting serious about commercial rocketsEurope is on the cusp of a new dawn in commercial space technology. As global political tensions intensify and relationships with the US become increasingly strained, several European companies are now planning to conduct their own launches in an attempt to reduce the continents reliance on American rockets.In the coming days, Isar Aerospace, a company based in Munich, will try to launch its Spectrum rocket from a site in the frozen reaches of Andya island in Norway. A spaceport has been built there to support small commercial rockets, and Spectrum is the first to make an attempt.Regardless of whether it succeeds or fails, the launch attempt heralds an important moment as Europe tries to kick-start its own private rocket industry. It and other launches scheduled for later this year could give Europe multiple ways to reach space without having to rely on US rockets. Read the full story.Jonathan OCallaghanAutopsies can reveal intimate health details. Should they be kept private?Jessica HamzelouOver the past couple of weeks, Ive been following news of the deaths of actor Gene Hackman and his wife, pianist Betsy Arakawa. It was heartbreaking to hear how Arakawa appeared to have died from a rare infection days before her husband, who had advanced Alzheimers disease and may have struggled to understand what had happened.But as I watched the medical examiner reveal details of the couples health, I couldnt help feeling a little uncomfortable. Media reports claim that the couple liked their privacy and had been out of the spotlight for decades. But here I was, on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, being told what pills Arakawa had in her medicine cabinet, and that Hackman had undergone multiple surgeries.Should autopsy reports be kept private? A persons cause of death is public information. But what about other intimate health details that might be revealed in a postmortem examination? Read the full story.This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Reviews weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, sign up here.The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 Elon Musk will be briefed on the USs top-secret plans for war with ChinaDespite Teslas reliance on China, and SpaceXs role as a US defense contractor. (WSJ $)+ Other private companies could only dream of having access to sensitive military data. (NYT $)2 Take a look inside the library of pirated books that Meta trains its AI onIt considered paying for the books, but decided to use LibGen instead. (The Atlantic $)+ Copyright traps could tell writers if an AI has scraped their work. (MIT Technology Review)3 A judge has blocked DOGE from accessing social security systemsShe accused DOGE of failing to explain why it needed to see the private data of millions of Americans. (TechCrunch)+ Federal workers grilled a Trump appointee during an all-hands meeting. (Wired $)+ Can AI help DOGE slash government budgets? Its complex. (MIT Technology Review)4 The Trump administration is poised to shut down an anti-censorship fundThe project, which helps internet users living under oppressive regimes, is under threat. (WP $)+ Tens of millions will lose access to secure and trusted VPNs. (Bloomberg $)+ Activists are reckoning with a US retreat from promoting digital rights. (MIT Technology Review)5 Tesla is recalling tens of thousands of CybertrucksAfter it used the wrong glue to attach its steel panels. (Fast Company $)+Its the largest Cybertruck recall to date. (BBC)6 This crypto billionaire has his sights set on the starsJed McCaleb is the sole backer of an ambitious space station project. (Bloomberg $)+ Is DOGE going to come for NASA? (New Yorker $)7 The irresistible allure of SpotifyMaybe algorithms arent all bad, after all. (Vox)+ By delivering what people seem to want, has Spotify killed the joy of music discovery? (MIT Technology Review)8 Dating apps and AI? Its complicated While some are buzzing at the prospect of romantic AI agents, others arent so sure. (Insider $)9 Crypto bars are becoming a thingAnd Washington is the first casualty. (The Verge)10 The ways we use emojis is evolving Are you up to date? (FT $)Quote of the dayIts an assault, and a particularly cruel one to use my work to train the monster that threatens the ruination of original literature.Author AJ West, whose books were included in the library of pirated material Meta used to train its AI model, calls for the company to compensate writers in a post on Bluesky.The big storyAre we alone in the universe?November 2023The quest to determine if anyone or anything is out there has gained a greater scientific footing over the past 50 years. Back then, astronomers had yet to spot a single planet outside our solar system. Now we know the galaxy is teeming with a diversity of worlds.Were now getting closer than ever before to learning how common living worlds like ours actually are. New tools, including artificial intelligence, could help scientists look past their preconceived notions of what constitutes life.Future instruments will sniff the atmospheres of distant planets and scan samples from our local solar system to see if they contain telltale chemicals in the right proportions for organisms to prosper. But determining whether these planets actually contain organisms is no easy task. Read the full story.Adam MannWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Get your weekend off to a good start with these beautiful nebulas.+ Justice for Mariah: a judge has ruled that she didnt steal All I Want For Christmas Is You from other writers.+ Were no longer extremely online any more apparentlyso what are we?+ The fascinating tale of White Mana, one of Americas oldest burger joints.

The Thwaites glacier is a fortress larger than Florida, a wall of ice that reaches nearly 4,000 feet above the bedrock of West Antarctica, guarding the low-lying ice sheet behind it.But a strong, warm ocean current is weakening its foundations and accelerating its slide into the Amundsen Sea. Scientists fear the waters could topple the walls in the coming decades, kick-starting a runaway process that would crack up the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.That would mark the start of a global climate disaster. The glacier itself holds enough ice to raise ocean levels by more than two feet, which could flood coastlines and force tens of millions of people living in low-lying areas to abandon their homes.The loss of the entire ice sheetwhich could still take centuries to unfoldwould push up sea levels by 11 feet and redraw the contours of the continents.This is why Thwaites is known as the doomsday glacierand why scientists are eager to understand just how likely such a collapse is, when it could happen, and if we have the power to stop it.Scientists at MIT and Dartmouth College founded Arte Glacier Initiative last year in the hope of providing clearer answers to these questions. The nonprofit research organization will officially unveil itself, launch its website, and post requests for research proposals today, March 21, timed to coincide with the UNs inaugural World Day for Glaciers, MIT Technology Review can report exclusively.Arte will also announce it is issuing its first grants, each for around $200,000 over two years, to a pair of glacier researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.One of the organizations main goals is to study the possibility of preventing the loss of giant glaciers, Thwaites in particular, by refreezing them to the bedrock. It would represent a radical intervention into the natural world, requiring a massive, expensive engineering project in a remote, treacherous environment.But the hope is that such a mega-adaptation project could minimize the mass relocation of climate refugees, prevent much of the suffering and violence that would almost certainly accompany it, and help nations preserve trillions of dollars invested in high-rises, roads, homes, ports, and airports around the globe.About a million people are displaced per centimeter of sea-level rise, says Brent Minchew, an associate professor of geophysics at MIT, who cofounded Arte Glacier Initiative and will serve as its chief scientist. If were able to bring that down, even by a few centimeters, then we would safeguard the homes of millions.But some scientists believe the idea is an implausible, wildly expensive distraction, drawing money, expertise, time, and resources away from more essential polar research efforts.Sometimes we can get a little over-optimistic about what engineering can do, says Twila Moon, deputy lead scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado Boulder.Two possible futuresMinchew, who earned his PhD in geophysics at Caltech, says he was drawn to studying glaciers because they are rapidly transforming as the world warms, increasing the dangers of sea-level rise.But over the years, I became less content with simply telling a more dramatic story about how things were going and more open to asking the question of what can we do about it, says Minchew, who will return to Caltech as a professor this summer.Last March, he cofounded Arte Glacier Initiative with Colin Meyer, an assistant professor of engineering at Dartmouth, in the hope of funding and directing research to improve scientific understanding of two big questions: How big a risk does sea-level rise pose in the coming decades, and can we minimize that risk?Brent Minchew, an MIT professor of geophysics, co-founded Arte Glacier Initiative and will serve as its chief scientist.COURTESY: BRENT MINCHEWPhilanthropic funding is needed to address both of these challenges, because theres no private-sector funding for this kind of research and government funding is minuscule, says Mike Schroepfer, the former Meta chief technology officer turned climate philanthropist, who provided funding to Arte through his new organization, Outlier Projects.The nonprofit has now raised about $5 million from Outlier and other donors, including the Navigation Fund, the Kissick Family Foundation, the Sky Foundation, the Wedner Family Foundation, and the Grantham Foundation.Minchew says they named the organization Arte, mainly because its the sharp mountain ridge between two valleys, generally left behind when a glacier carves out the cirques on either side. It directs the movement of the glacier and is shaped by it.Its meant to symbolize two possible futures, he says. One where we do something; one where we do nothing.Improving forecastsThe somewhat reassuring news is that, even with rising global temperatures, it may still take thousands of years for the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to completely melt.In addition, sea-level rise forecasts for this century generally range from as little as 0.28 meters (11 inches) to 1.10 meters (about three and a half feet), according to the latest UN climate panel report. The latter only occurs under a scenario with very high greenhouse gas emissions (SSP5-8.5), which significantly exceeds the pathway the world is now on.But theres still a low-likelihood that ocean levels could surge nearly two meters (about six and a half feet) by 2100 that cannot be excluded, given deep uncertainty linked to ice-sheet processes, the report adds.Two meters of sea-level rise could force nearly 190 million people to migrate away from the coasts, unless regions build dikes or other shoreline protections, according to some models. Many more people, mainly in the tropics, would face heightened flooding dangers.Much of the uncertainty over what will happen this century comes down to scientists limited understanding of how Antarctic ice sheets will respond to growing climate pressures.The initial goal of Arte Glacier Initiative is to help narrow the forecast ranges by improving our grasp of how Thwaites and other glaciers move, melt, and break apart.Gravity is the driving force nudging glaciers along the bedrock and reshaping them as they flow. But many of the variables that determine how fast they slide lie at the base. That includes the type of sediment the river of ice slides along; the size of the boulders and outcroppings it contorts around; and the warmth and strength of the ocean waters that lap at its face.In addition, heat rising from deep in the earth warms the ice closest to the ground, creating a lubricating layer of water that hastens the glaciers slide. That acceleration, in turn, generates more frictional heat that melts still more of the ice, creating a self-reinforcing feedback effect.Minchew and Meyer are confident that the glaciology field is at a point where it could speed up progress in sea-level rise forecasting, thanks largely to improving observational tools that are producing more and better data.That includes a new generation of satellites orbiting the planet that can track the shifting shape of ice at the poles at far higher resolutions than in the recent past. Computer simulations of ice sheets, glaciers and sea ice are improving as well, thanks to growing computational resources and advancing machine learning techniques.On March 21, Arte will issue a request for proposals from research teams to contribute to an effort to collect, organize, and openly publish existing observational glacier data. Much of that expensively gathered information is currently inaccessible to researchers around the world, Minchew says.Colin Meyer, an assistant professor of engineering at Dartmouth, co-founded Arte Glacier Initiative.ELI BURAKBy funding teams working across these areas, Artes founders hope to help produce more refined ice-sheet models and narrower projections of sea-level rise.This improved understanding would help cities plan where to build new bridges, buildings, and homes, and to determine whether theyll need to erect higher seawalls or raise their roads, Meyer says. It could also provide communities with more advance notice of the coming dangers, allowing them to relocate people and infrastructure to safer places through an organized process known as managed retreat.A radical interventionBut the improved forecasts might also tell us that Thwaites is closer to tumbling into the ocean than we think, underscoring the importance of considering more drastic measures.One idea is to build berms or artificial islands to prop up fragile parts of glaciers, and to block the warm waters that rise from the deep ocean and melt them from below. Some researchers have also considered erecting giant, flexible curtains anchored to the seabed to achieve the latter effect.Others have looked at scattering highly reflective beads or other materials across ice sheets, or pumping ocean water onto them in the hopes it would freeze during the winter and reinforce the headwalls of the glaciers.But the concept of refreezing glaciers in place, know as a basal intervention, is gaining traction in scientific circles, in part because theres a natural analogue for it.The glacier that stalledAbout 200 years ago, the Kamb Ice Stream, another glacier in West Antarctica that had been sliding about 350 meters (1,150 feet) per year, suddenly stalled.Glaciologists believe an adjacent ice stream intersected with the catchment area under the glacier, providing a path for the water running below it to flow out along the edge instead. That loss of fluid likely slowed down the Kamb Ice Stream, reduced the heat produced through friction, and allowed water at the surface to refreeze.The deceleration of the glacier sparked the idea that humans might be able to bring about that same phenomenon deliberately, perhaps by drilling a series of boreholes down to the bedrock and pumping up water from the bottom.Minchew himself has focused on a variation he believes could avoid much of the power use and heavy operating machinery hassles of that approach: slipping long tubular devices, known as thermosyphons, down nearly to the bottom of the boreholes.These passive heat exchangers, which are powered only by the temperature differential between two areas, are commonly used to keep permafrost cold around homes, buildings and pipelines in Arctic regions. The hope is that we could deploy extremely long ones, stretching up to two kilometers and encased in steel pipe, to draw warm temperatures away from the bottom of the glacier, allowing the water below to freeze.Minchew says hes in the process of producing refined calculations, but estimates that halting Thwaites could require drilling as many as 10,000 boreholes over a 100-square-kilometer area.He readily acknowledges that would be a huge undertaking, but provides two points of comparison to put such a project into context: Melting the necessary ice to create those holes would require roughly the amount of energy all US domestic flights consume from jet fuel in about two and a half hours. Or, it would produce about the same level of greenhouse gas emissions as constructing 10 kilometers of seawalls, a small fraction of the length the world would need to build if it cant slow down the collapse of the ice sheets, he says.Kick the systemOne of Artes initial grantees is Marianne Haseloff, an assistant professor of geoscience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She studies the physical processes that govern the behavior of glaciers and is striving to more faithfully represent them in ice sheet models.Haseloff says she will use those funds to develop mathematical methods that could more accurately determine whats known as basal shear stress, or the resistance of the bed to sliding glaciers, based on satellite observations. That could help refine forecasts of how rapidly glaciers will slide into the ocean, in varying settings and climate conditions.Artes other initial grant will go to Lucas Zoet, an associate professor in the same department as Haseloff and the principal investigator with the Surface Processes group.He intends to use the funds to build the labs second ring shear device, the technical term for a simulated glacier.The existing device, which is the only one operating in the world, stands about eight feet tall and fills the better part of a walk-in freezer on campus. The core of the machine is a transparent drum filled with a ring of ice, sitting under pressure and atop a layer of sediment. It slowly spins for weeks at a time as sensors and cameras capture how the ice and earth move and deform.Lucas Zoet, an associate professor at the University of WisconsinMadison, stands in front of his labs ring shear device, a simulated glacier.ETHAN PARRISHThe research team can select the sediment, topography, water pressure, temperature, and other conditions to match the environment of a real-world glacier of interest, be it Thwaites todayor Thwaites in 2100, under a high greenhouse gas emissions scenario.Zoet says these experiments promise to improve our understanding of how glaciers move over different types of beds, and to refine an equation known as the slip law, which represents these glacier dynamics mathematically in computer models.The second machine will enable them to run more experiments and to conduct a specific kind that the current device cant: a scaled-down, controlled version of the basal intervention.Zoet says the team will be able to drill tiny holes through the ice, then pump out water or transfer heat away from the bed. They can then observe whether the simulated glacier freezes to the base at those points and experiment with how many interventions, across how much space, are required to slow down its movement.It offers a way to test out different varieties of the basal intervention that is far easier and cheaper than using water drills to bore to the bottom of an actual glacier in Antarctica, Zoet says. The funding will allow the lab to explore a wide range of experiments, enabling them to kick the system in a way we wouldnt have before, he adds.Virtually impossibleThe concept of glacier interventions is in its infancy. There are still considerable unknowns and uncertainties, including how much it would cost, how arduous the undertaking would be, and which approach would be most likely to work, or if any of them are feasible.This is mostly a theoretical idea at this point, says Katharine Ricke, an associate professor at the University of California, San Diego, who researches the international relations implications of geoengineering, among other topics.Conducting extensive field trials or moving forward with full-scale interventions may also require surmounting complex legal questions, she says. Antarctica isnt owned by any nation, but its the subject of competing territorial claims among a number of countries and governed under a decades-old treaty to which dozens are a party.The basal interventionrefreezing the glacier to its bedfaces numerous technical hurdles that would make it virtually impossible to execute, Moon and dozens of other researchers argued in a recent preprint paper, Safeguarding the polar regions from dangerous geoengineering.Among other critiques, they stress that subglacial water systems are complex, dynamic, and interconnected, making it highly difficult to precisely identify and drill down to all the points that would be necessary to remove enough water or add enough heat to substantially slow down a massive glacier.Further, they argue that the interventions could harm polar ecosystems by adding contaminants, producing greenhouse gases, or altering the structure of the ice in ways that may even increase sea-level rise.Overwhelmingly, glacial and polar geoengineering ideas do not make sense to pursue, in terms of the finances, the governance challenges, the impacts, and the possibility of making matters worse, Moon says.No easy path forwardBut Douglas MacAyeal, professor emeritus of glaciology at the University of Chicago, says the basal intervention would have the lightest environmental impact among the competing ideas. He adds that nature has already provided an example of it working, and that much of the needed drilling and pumping technology is already in use in the oil industry.I would say its the strongest approach at the starting gate, he says, but we dont really know anything about it yet. The research still has to be done. Its very cutting-edge.Minchew readily acknowledges that there are big challenges and significant unknownsand that some of these ideas may not work.But he says its well worth the effort to study the possibilities, in part because much of the research will also improve our understanding of glacier dynamics and the risks of sea-level riseand in part because its only a question of when, not if, Thwaites will collapse.Even if the world somehow halted all greenhouse gas emissions tomorrow, the forces melting that fortress of ice will continue to do so.So one way or another, the world will eventually need to make big, expensive, difficult interventions to protect people and infrastructure. The cost and effort of doing one project in Antarctica, he says, would be small compared to the global effort required to erect thousands of miles of seawalls, ratchet up homes, buildings, and roads, and relocate hundreds of millions of people.One thing is challengingand the other is even more challenging, Minchew says. Theres no easy path forward.

Over the past couple of weeks, Ive been following news of the deaths of actor Gene Hackman and his wife, pianist Betsy Arakawa. It was heartbreaking to hear how Arakawa appeared to have died from a rare infection days before her husband, who had advanced Alzheimers disease and may have struggled to understand what had happened.But as I watched the medical examiner reveal details of the couples health, I couldnt help feeling a little uncomfortable. Media reports claim that the couple liked their privacy and had been out of the spotlight for decades. But here I was, on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, being told what pills Arakawa had in her medicine cabinet, and that Hackman had undergone multiple surgeries.It made me wonder: Should autopsy reports be kept private? A persons cause of death is public information. But what about other intimate health details that might be revealed in a postmortem examination?The processes and regulations surrounding autopsies vary by country, so well focus on the US, where Hackman and Arakawa died. Here, a medico-legal autopsy may be organized by law enforcement agencies and handled through courts, while a clinical autopsy may be carried out at the request of family members.And there are different levels of autopsysome might involve examining specific organs or tissues, while more thorough examinations would involve looking at every organ and studying tissues in the lab.The goal of an autopsy is to discover the cause of a persons death. Autopsy reports, especially those resulting from detailed investigations, often reveal health conditionsconditions that might have been kept private while the person was alive. There are multiple federal and state laws designed to protect individuals health information. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects individually identifiable health information up to 50 years after a persons death. But some things change when a person dies.For a start, the cause of death will end up on the death certificate. That is public information. The public nature of causes of death is taken for granted these days, says Lauren Solberg, a bioethicist at the University of Florida College of Medicine. It has become a public health statistic. She and her student Brooke Ortiz, who have been researching this topic, are more concerned about other aspects of autopsy results.The thing is, autopsies can sometimes reveal more than what a person died from. They can also pick up what are known as incidental findings. An examiner might find that a person who died following a covid-19 infection also had another condition. Perhaps that condition was undiagnosed. Maybe it was asymptomatic. That finding wouldnt appear on a death certificate. So who should have access to it?The laws over who should have access to a persons autopsy report vary by state, and even between counties within a state. Clinical autopsy results will always be made available to family members, but local laws dictate which family members have access, says Ortiz.Genetic testing further complicates things. Sometimes the people performing autopsies will run genetic tests to help confirm the cause of death. These tests might reveal what the person died from. But they might also flag genetic factors unrelated to the cause of death that might increase the risk of other diseases.In those cases, the persons family members might stand to benefit from accessing that information. My health information is my health informationuntil it comes to my genetic health information, says Solberg. Genes are shared by relatives. Should they have the opportunity to learn about potential risks to their own health?This is where things get really complicated. Ethically speaking, we should consider the wishes of the deceased. Would that person have wanted to share this information with relatives?Its also worth bearing in mind that a genetic risk factor is often just that; theres often no way to know whether a person will develop a disease, or how severe the symptoms would be. And if the genetic risk is for a disease that has no treatment or cure, will telling the persons relatives just cause them a lot of stress?One 27-year-old experienced this when a 23&Me genetic test told her she had a 28% chance of developing late-onset Alzheimers disease by age 75 and a 60% chance by age 85.Im suddenly overwhelmed by this information, she posted on a dementia forum. I cant help feeling this overwhelming sense of dread and sadness that Ill never be able to un-know this information.In their research, Solberg and Ortiz came across cases in which individuals who had died in motor vehicle accidents underwent autopsies that revealed other, asymptomatic conditions. One man in his 40s who died in such an accident was found to have a genetic kidney disease. A 23-year-old was found to have had kidney cancer.Ideally, both medical teams and family members should know ahead of time what a person would have wantedwhether thats an autopsy, genetic testing, or health privacy. Advance directives allow people to clarify their wishes for end-of-life care. But only around a third of people in the US have completed one. And they tend to focus on care before death, not after.Solberg and Ortiz think they should be expanded. An advance directive could specify how people want to share their health information after theyve died. Talking about death is difficult, says Solberg. For physicians, for patients, for familiesit can be uncomfortable. But it is important.On March 17, a New Mexico judge granted a request from a representative of Hackmans estate to seal police photos and bodycam footage as well as the medical records of Hackman and Arakawa. The medical investigator is temporarily restrained from disclosing the Autopsy Reports and/or Death Investigation Reports for Mr. and Mrs. Hackman, according to Deadline.This article first appeared in The Checkup,MIT Technology Reviewsweekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first,sign up here.

Europe is on the cusp of a new dawn in commercial space technology. As global political tensions intensify and relationships with the US become increasingly strained, several European companies are now planning to conduct their own launches in an attempt to reduce the continents reliance on American rockets.In the coming days, Isar Aerospace, a company based in Munich, will try to launch its Spectrum rocket from a site in the frozen reaches of Andya island in Norway. A spaceport has been built there to support small commercial rockets, and Spectrum is the first to make an attempt.Its a big milestone, says Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer and spaceflight expert at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts. Its long past time for Europe to have a proper commercial launch industry.Spectrum stands 28 meters (92 feet) tall, the length of a basketball court. The rocket has two stages, or parts, the first with nine enginespowered by an unusual fuel combination of liquid oxygen and propane not seen on other rockets before, which Isar says results in higher performanceand the second with a single engine to give satellites their final kick into orbit.The ultimate goal for Spectrum is to carry satellites weighing up to 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) to low Earth orbit. On this first launch, however, there are no satellites on board, because success is anything but guaranteed. Its unlikely to make it to orbit, says Malcolm Macdonald, an expert in space technology at Strathclyde University in Scotland. The first launch of any rocket tends not to work.Regardless of whether it succeeds or fails, the launch attempt heralds an important moment as Europe tries to kick-start its own private rocket industry. Two other companiesOrbex of the UK and Rocket Factory Augsburg (RFA) of Germanyare expected to make launch attempts later this year. These efforts could give Europe multiple ways to reach space without having to rely on US rockets.Europe has to be prepared for a more uncertain future, says Macdonald. The uncertainty of what will happen over the next four years with the current US administration amplifies the situation for European launch companies.Trailing in the USs wakeEurope has for years trailed behind the US in commercial space efforts. The successful launch of SpaceXs first rocket, the Falcon 1, in 2008 began a period of American dominance of the global launch market. In 2024, 145 of 263 global launch attempts were made by US entitiesand SpaceX accounted for 138 of those. SpaceX is the benchmark at the moment, says Jonas Kellner, head of marketing, communications, and political affairs at RFA. Other US companies, like Rocket Lab (which launches from both the US and New Zealand), have also become successful, while commercial rockets are ramping up in China, too.Europe has launched its own government-funded Ariane and Vega rockets for decades from the Guiana Space Centre, a spaceport it operates in French Guiana in South America. Most recently, on March 6, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched its new heavy-lift Ariane 6 rocket from there for the first time. However, the history of rocket launches from Europe itself is much more limited. In 1997 the US defense contractor Northrop Grumman air-launched a Pegasus rocket from a plane that took off from the Canary Islands. In 2023 the US company Virgin Orbit failed to reach orbit with its LauncherOne rocket after a launch attempt from Cornwall in the UK. No vertical orbital rocket launch has ever been attempted from Western Europe.Isar Aerospace is one of a handful of companies hoping to change that with help from agencies like ESA, which has provided funding to rocket launch companies through its Boost program since 2019. In 2024 it awarded 44.22 million ($48 million) to Isar, Orbex, RFA, and the German launch company HyImpulse. The hope is that one or more of the companies will soon begin regular launches from Europe from two potential sites: Isars chosen location in Andya and the SaxaVord Spaceport on the Shetland Islands north of the UK, where RFA and Orbex plan to make their attempts.I expect four or five companies to get to the point of launching, and then over a period of years reliability and launch cadence [or frequency] will determine which one or two of them survives, says McDowell.ISAR AEROSPACEUnique advantagesIn their initial form these rockets will not rival anything on offer from SpaceX in terms of size and cadence. SpaceX sometimes launches its 70-meter (230-foot) Falcon 9 rocket multiple times per week and is developing its much larger Starship vehicle for missions to the moon and Mars. However, the smaller European rockets can allow companies in Europe to launch satellites to orbit without having to travel all the way across the Atlantic. There is an advantage to having it closer, says Kellner, who says it will take RFA one or two days by sea to get its rockets to SaxaVord, versus one or two weeks to travel across the Atlantic.Launching from Europe is useful, too, for reaching specific orbits. Traditionally, a lot of satellite launches have taken place near the equator, in places such as Cape Canaveral in Florida, to get an extra boost from Earths rotation. Crewed spacecraft have also launched from these locations to reach space stations in equatorial orbit around Earth and the moon. From Europe, though, satellites can launch north over uninhabited stretches of water to reach polar orbit, which can allow imaging satellites to see the entirety of Earth rotate underneath them.Increasingly, says McDowell, companies want to place satellites into sun-synchronous orbit, a type of polar orbit where a satellite orbiting Earth stays in perpetual sunlight. This is useful for solar-powered vehicles. By far the bulk of the commercial market now is sun-synchronous polar orbit, says McDowell. So having a high-latitude launch site that has good transport links with customers in Europe does make a difference.Europes end goalIn the longer term, Europes rocket ambitions might grow to vehicles that are more of a match for the Falcon 9 through initiatives like ESAs European Launcher Challenge, which will award contracts later this year. We are hoping to develop [a larger vehicle] in the European Launcher Challenge, says Kellner. Perhaps Europe might even consider launching humans into space one day on larger rockets, says Thilo Kranz, ESAs program manager for commercial space transportation. We are looking into this, he says. If a commercial operator comes forward with a smart way of approaching [crewed] access to space, that would be a favorable development for Europe.A separate ESA project called Themis, meanwhile, is developing technologies to reuse rockets. This was the key innovation of SpaceXs Falcon 9, allowing the company to dramatically drive down launch costs. Some European companies, like MaiaSpace and RFA, are also investigating reusability. The latter is planning to use parachutes to bring the first stage of its rocket back to a landing in the sea, where it can be recovered.As soon as you get up to something like a Falcon 9 competitor, I think its clear now that reusability is crucial, says McDowell. Theyre not going to be economically competitive without reusability.The end goal for Europe is to have a sovereign rocket industry that reduces its reliance on the US. Where we are in the broader geopolitical situation probably makes this a bigger point than it might have been six months ago, says Macdonald.The continent has already shown it can diversify from the US in other ways. Europe now operates its own successful satellite-based alternative to the US Global Positioning System (GPS), called Galileo; it began launching in 2011 and is four times more accurate than its American counterpart. Isar Aerospace, and the companies that follow, might be the first sign that commercial European rockets can break from America in a similar way.We need to secure access to space, says Kranz, and the more options we have in launching into space, the higher the flexibility.

Recorded onMarch 20, 2025 AI Chatbots Have Joined the ChatSpeakers: Rachel Courtland, commissioning editor, Rhiannon Williams, news reporter, and Eileen Guo, features & investigations reporter.Chatbots are quickly changing how we connect to each other and ourselves. But are these changes for the better? How should they be monitored and regulated? Hear from MIT Technology Review editor Rachel Courtland in conversation with reporter Rhiannon Williams and senior reporter Eileen Guo as they unpack the landscape around chatbots.Related CoverageThe AI relationship revolution is already hereAn AI chatbot told a user how to kill himselfbut the company doesnt want to censor it

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.4 technologies that could power the future of energyWhere can you find lasers, electric guitars, and racks full of novel batteries, all in the same giant room? This week, the answer was the 2025 ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit just outside Washington, DC.Energy innovation can take many forms, and the variety in energy research was on display at the summit. ARPA-E, part of the US Department of Energy, provides funding for high-risk, high-reward research projects. The summit gathers projects the agency has funded, along with investors, policymakers, and journalists.Hundreds of projects were exhibited in a massive hall during the conference, featuring demonstrations and research results. Here are four of the most interesting innovations MIT Technology Review spotted on site. Read the full story.Casey CrownhartIf youre interested in hearing more about what Casey learnt from the ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit, check out the latest edition of The Spark, our weekly climate and energy newsletter. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday.Join us today to chat about chatbotsChatbots are changing how we connect to each other and ourselves. But are these changes for the better, and how should they be monitored and regulated?To learn more, join me for a live Roundtable session today at 12pm ET. Ill be chatting with MIT Technology Review editor Rachel Courtland and senior reporter Eileen Guo, and well be unpacking the landscape around chatbots. Register to ensure you dont miss out!The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 A French scientist was denied US entry over anti-Donald Trump messagesUS authorities claimed the exchanges criticising the Trump administrations research policy qualified as terrorism. (Le Monde)+ Frances research minister is a high-profile critic of Trump policy. (The Guardian)+ Customs and Border Protection is cracking down at airports across the US. (The Verge)2 RFK Jr wants to let bird flu spread through poultry farmsExperts warn that this approach isnt just dangerousit wont work. (Scientific American $)+ A bird flu outbreak has been confirmed in Scotland. (BBC)+ How the US is preparing for a potential bird flu pandemic. (MIT Technology Review)3 Clearview AI tried to buy millions of mugshots for its databasesBut negotiations between the facial recognition company and an intelligence firm broke down. (404 Media)4 Top US graduates are desperate to work for Chinese AI startupsDeepSeeks success has sparked major interest in firms outside America. (Bloomberg $)+ Four Chinese AI startups to watch beyond DeepSeek. (MIT Technology Review)5 Reddit has become a lifeline for US federal workersUnpaid moderators are working around the clock to help answer urgent questions. (NYT $)+ The only two democrats on the board of the FTC have been fired. (Vox)+ Elon Musk, DOGE, and the Evil Housekeeper Problem. (MIT Technology Review)6 The European Commission is targeting Apple and GoogleIts proceeding with regulatory action, despite the risk of retaliation from Trump. (FT $)+ It has accused Alphabet of favoring its own services in search results. (The Information $)+ Metas AI chatbot is finally launching in Europe after all. (The Verge)7 AI agents could spell bad news for shopping appsDoorDash and Uber could suffer if humans outsource their ordering to bots. (The Information $)+ Dunzo was a major delivery success story in India. So what happened? (Rest of World)+ Your most important customer may be AI. (MIT Technology Review)8 This startup is making concrete using CO2It combines the gas with a byproduct from coal power plants to make lower carbon concrete. (Fast Company $)+ How electricity could help tackle a surprising climate villain. (MIT Technology Review)9 This robot dog has a functional digital nervous systemAnd will be taught to walk by a real human dog trainer, not an algorithm. (Reuters)10 Dark matter could be getting weakerIf its true, it holds major implications for our understanding of the universe. (Quanta Magazine)+ Are we alone in the universe? (MIT Technology Review)Quote of the dayThe corrupting influence of billionaires in law enforcement is an issue that affects all of us.Alvaro Bedoya, a former commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission, speaks out after being fired by Donald Trump, the Verge reports.The big storyThe arrhythmia of our current ageOctober 2025Arrhythmia means the heart beats, but not in proper timea critical rhythm of life suddenly going rogue and unpredictable. Its frightening to experience, but what if its also a good metaphor for our current times? That a pulse once seemingly so steady is now less sure.Perhaps this wobbliness might be extrapolated into a broader sense of life in the 2020s.Maybe you feel it, toothat the world seems to have skipped more than a beat or two as demagogues rant and democracy shudders, hurricanes rage, and glaciers dissolve. We cant stop watching tiny screens where influencers pitch products we dont need alongside news about senseless wars that destroy, murder, and maim tens-of-thousands.All the resulting anxiety has been hard on our heartsliterally and metaphorically. Read the full story.David Ewing DuncanWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Now that David Lynch is no longer with us, who is the flagbearer for transcendental meditation?+ Who doesnt love a little mindless comedyespecially when Leslie Nielsen is involved.+ Chinas pets are seriously pampered ($)+ The worlds oldest known cerapodan dinosaur, which were massive herbivores, has been discovered in Morocco.

At a conference dedicated to energy technology that I attended this week, I noticed an outward attitude of optimism and excitement. But its hard to miss the current of uncertainty just underneath.The ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit, held this year just outside Washington, DC, gathers some of the most cutting-edge innovators working on everything from next-generation batteries to plants that can mine for metals. Researchers whose projects have received funding from ARPA-Epart of the US Department of Energy that gives money to high-risk research in energygather to show their results and mingle with each other, investors, and nosy journalists like yours truly. (For more on a few of the coolest things I saw, check out this story.)This year, though, there was an elephant in the room, and its the current state of the US federal government. Or maybe its climate change? In any case, the vibes were weird.The last time I was at this conference, two years ago, climate change was a constant refrain on stage and in conversations. The central question was undoubtedly: How do we decarbonize, generate energy, and run our lives without relying on polluting fossil fuels?This time around, I didnt hear the phrase climate change once during the opening session, including in speeches from US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and acting ARPA-E Director Daniel Cunningham. The focus was on American energy dominance, on how we can get our hands on more, more, more energy to meet growing demand.Last week, Wright spoke at an energy conference in Houston and had a lot to say about climate, calling climate change a side effect of building the modern world and climate policies irrational and quasi-religious, and he said that when it came to climate action, the cure had become worse than the disease.I was anticipating similar talking points at the summit, but this week, climate change hardly got a mention.What I noticed in Wrights speech and in the choice of programming throughout the conference is that some technologies appear to be among the favored, and others are decidedly less prominent. Nuclear power and fusion were definitely on the in list. There was a nuclear panel in the opening session, and in his remarks Wright called out companies like Commonwealth Fusion Systems and Zap Energy. He also praised small modular reactors.Renewables, including wind and solar, were mentioned only in the context of their inconsistencyWright dwelled on that, rather than on other facts Id argue are just as important, like that they are among the cheapest methods of generating electricity today.In any case, Wright seemed appropriately hyped about energy, given his role in the administration. Call me biased, but I think theres no more impactful place to work in than energy, Wright said during his opening remarks on the first morning of the summit. He sang the praises of energy innovation, calling it a tool to drive progress, and outlined his long career in the field.This all comes after a chaotic couple of months for the federal government that are undoubtedly affecting the industry. Mass layoffs have hit federal agencies, including the Department of Energy. President Donald Trump very quickly tried to freeze spending from the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes tax credits and other support for EVs and power plants.As I walked around the showcase and chatted with experts over coffee, I heard a range of reactions to the opening session and feelings about this moment for the energy sector.People working in industries the Trump administration seems to favor, like nuclear energy, tended to be more positive. Some in academia who rely on federal grants to fund their work were particularly nervous about what comes next. One researcher refused to talk to me when I said I was a journalist. In response to my questions about why they werent able to discuss the technology on display at their booth, another member on the same project said only that its a wild time.Making progress on energy technology doesnt require that we all agree on exactly why were doing it. But in a moment when we need all the low-carbon technologies we can get to address climate changea problem scientists overwhelmingly agree is a threat to our planetI find it frustrating that politics can create such a chilling effect in some sectors.At the conference, I listened to smart researchers talk about their work. I saw fascinating products and demonstrations, and Im still optimistic about where energy can go. But I also worry that uncertainty about the future of research and government support for emerging technologies will leave some valuable innovations in the dust.This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Reviews weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.

Where can you find lasers, electric guitars, and racks full of novel batteries, all in the same giant room? This week, the answer was the 2025 ARPA-E Energy Innovation Summit just outside Washington, DC.Energy innovation can take many forms, and the variety in energy research was on display at the summit. ARPA-E, part of the US Department of Energy, provides funding for high-risk, high-reward research projects. The summit gathers projects the agency has funded, along with investors, policymakers, and journalists.Hundreds of projects were exhibited in a massive hall during the conference, featuring demonstrations and research results. Here are four of the most interesting innovations MIT Technology Review spotted on site.Steel made with lasersStartup Limelight Steel has developed a process to make iron, the main component in steel, by using lasers to heat iron ore to super-high temperatures.Steel production makes up roughly 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions today, in part because most steel is still made with blast furnaces, which rely on coal to hit the high temperatures that kick off the required chemical reactions.Limelight instead shines lasers on iron ore, heating it to temperatures over 1,600 C. Molten iron can then be separated from impurities, and the iron can be put through existing processes to make steel.The company has built a small demonstration system with a laser power of about 1.5 kilowatts, which can process between 10 and 20 grams of ore. The whole system is made up of 16 laser arrays, each just a bit larger than a postage stamp.The components in the demonstration system are commercially available; this particular type of laser is used in projectors. The startup has benefited from years of progress in the telecommunications industry that has helped bring down the cost of lasers, says Andy Zhao, the companys cofounder and CTO.The next step is to build a larger-scale system that will use 150 kilowatts of laser power and could make up to 100 tons of steel over the course of a year.Rocks that can make fuelThe hunks of rock at a booth hosted by MIT might not seem all that high-tech, but someday they could help produce fuels and chemicals.A major topic of conversation at the ARPA-E summit was geologic hydrogentheres a ton of excitement about efforts to find underground deposits of the gas, which can be used as a fuel across a wide range of industries, including transportation and heavy industry.Last year, ARPA-E funded a handful of projects on the topic, including one in Iwnetim Abates lab at MIT. Abate is among the researchers who are aiming not just to hunt for hydrogen, but to actually use underground conditions to help produce it. Earlier this year, his team published research showing that by using catalysts and conditions common in the subsurface, scientists can produce hydrogen as well as other chemicals, like ammonia. Abate cofounded a spinout company, Addis Energy, to commercialize the research, which has since also received ARPA-E funding.All the rocks on the table, from the chunk of dark, hard basalt to the softer talc, could be used to produce these chemicals.An electric guitar powered by iron nitride magnetsThe sound of music drifted from the Niron Magnetics booth across nearby walkways. People wandering by stopped to take turns testing out the companys magnets, in the form of an electric guitar.Most high-powered magnets today contain neodymiumdemand for them is set to skyrocket in the coming years, especially as the world builds more electric vehicles and wind turbines. Supplies could stretch thin, and the geopolitics are complicated because most of the supply comes from China.Niron is making new magnets that dont contain rare earth metals. Instead, Nirons technology is based on more abundant materials: nitrogen and iron.The guitar is a demonstration producttoday, magnets in electric guitars typically contain aluminum, nickel, and cobalt-based magnets that help translate the vibrations from steel strings into an electric signal that is broadcast through an amplifier. Niron made an instrument using its iron nitride magnets instead. (See photos of the guitar from an event last year here.)Niron opened a pilot commercial facility in late 2024 that has the capacity to produce 10 tons of magnets annually. Since we last covered Niron, in early 2024, the company has announced plans for a full-scale plant, which will have an annual capacity of about 1,500 tons of magnets once its fully ramped up.Batteries for powering high-performance data centersThe increasing power demand from AI and data centers was another hot topic at the summit, with server racks dotting the showcase floor to demonstrate technologies aimed at the sector. One stuffed with batteries caught my eye, courtesy of Natron Energy.The company is making sodium-ion batteries to help meet power demand from data centers.Data centers energy demands can be incredibly variableand as their total power needs get bigger, those swings can start to affect the grid. Natrons sodium-ion batteries can be installed at these facilities to help level off the biggest peaks, allowing computing equipment to run full out without overly taxing the grid, says Natron cofounder and CTO Colin Wessells.Sodium-ion batteries are a cheaper alternative to lithium-based chemistries. Theyre also made without lithium, cobalt, and nickel, materials that are constrained in production or processing. Were seeing some varieties of sodium-ion batteries popping up in electric vehicles in China.Natron opened a production line in Michigan last year, and the company plans to open a $1.4 billion factory in North Carolina.

There has never been a more pressing time for food producers to harness technology to tackle the sectors tough mission. To produce ever more healthy and appealing food for a growing global population in a way that is resilient and affordable, all while minimizing waste and reducing the sectors environmental impact. From farm to factory, artificial intelligence and machine learning can support these goals by increasing efficiency, optimizing supply chains, and accelerating the research and development of new types of healthy products.In agriculture, AI is already helping farmers to monitor crop health, tailor the delivery of inputs, and make harvesting more accurate and efficient. In labs, AI is powering experiments in gene editing to improve crop resilience and enhance the nutritional value of raw ingredients. For processed foods, AI is optimizingproduction economics, improving the texture and flavor of products like alternative proteins and healthier snacks, and strengthening food safety processes too.DOWNLOAD THE REPORTBut despite this promise, industry adoption still lags. Data-sharing remains limited and companies across the value chain have vastly different needs and capabilities. There are also few standards and data governance protocols in place, and more talent and skills are needed to keep pace with the technological wave.All the same, progress is being made and the potential for AI in the food sector is huge. Key findings from the report are as follows:Predictive analytics are accelerating R&D cycles in crop and food science. AI reduces the time and resources needed to experiment with new food productsand turns traditional trial-and-error cycles into more efficient data-driven discoveries. Advanced models and simulations enable scientists to explore natural ingredients and processes by simulating thousands of conditions, configurations, and genetic variations until they crack the right combination.AI is bringing data-driven insights to a fragmented supply chain. AI can revolutionize the food industrys complex value chain by breaking operational silos and translating vast streams of data into actionable intelligence. Notably, large language models (LLMs) and chatbots can serve as digital interpreters, democratizing access to data analysis for farmers and growers, and enabling more informed, strategic decisions by food companies.Partnerships are crucial for maximizing respective strengths. While large agricultural companies lead inAI implementation, promising breakthroughs often emerge from strategic collaborations that leverage complementary strengths with academic institutions and startups. Large companies contribute extensive datasets and industry experience, while startups bring innovation, creativity, and a clean data slate. Combining expertise in a collaborative approach can increase the uptake of AI.Download the full report.This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Reviews editorial staff.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.HIV could infect 1,400 infants every day because of US aid disruptionsAround 1,400 infants are being infected by HIV every day as a result of the new US administrations cuts to funding to AIDS organizations, new modeling suggests.In an executive order issued January 20, President Donald Trump paused new foreign aid funding to global health programs. Four days later, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a stop-work order on existing foreign aid assistance. Surveys suggest that these changes forced more than a third of global organizations that provide essential HIV services to close within days of the announcements.Hundreds of thousands of people are losing access to HIV treatments as a result. Read the full story.Jessica HamzelouMIT Technology Review Narrated: What the future holds for those born todayHappy birthday, baby.You have been born into an era of intelligent machines. They have watched over you almost since your conception. They let your parents listen in on your tiny heartbeat, track your gestation on an app, and post your sonogram on social media. Well before you were born, you were known to the algorithm.How will you and the next generation of machines grow up together? We asked more than a dozen experts to imagine your joint future.This is our latest story to be turned into a MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, whichwere publishing each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as its released.The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 A judge has ordered DOGE to cease dismantling USAIDIts been told to reinstate employees email access and let them return to their offices. (WP $)+ The judge believes its efforts probably violated the US Constitution.(Reuters)+ The department has also targeted workers that prevent tech overspending. (The Intercept)+ Can AI help DOGE slash government budgets? Its complex. (MIT Technology Review)2 Can Oracle save TikTok?A security proposal from the cloud giant could reportedly allow it to keep operating in the US. (Bloomberg $)+ The deal would leave the apps algorithm in the hands of its Chinese parent company. (Politico)3 NASAs astronauts have touched down on EarthThey safely landed off the coast of Florida yesterday evening. (FT $)+ A pod of dolphins dropped by to witness the spectacle. (The Guardian)4 AI is turning cyber crime into a digital arms raceEuropol warns that more criminals than ever are exploiting AI tools for nefarious means. (FT $)+ Five ways criminals are using AI. (MIT Technology Review)5 An Italian newspaper has published an edition produced entirely by AIThe technology was responsible for the irony too, apparently. (The Guardian)6 Teslas taxi service has been greenlit in CaliforniaBut the road ahead is still full of obstacles. (Wired $)+ Chinese EVs are snapping at Teslas heels across the world. (Rest of World)+ It certainly seems as though Asia will birth the next EV superpower. (Economist $)+ Robotaxis are one of our 10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2025. (MIT Technology Review)7 Online platforms are fueling facial dysmorphiaHours of staring at their own faces made these women anxious and depressed. (NY Mag $)+ The fight for Instagram face. (MIT Technology Review)8 Inside the hunt for water on MarsWe know that the red planet was once host to it, but we dont know why. (Knowable Magazine)9 This robotic spider is shedding light on how real spiders hunt Namely using a form of echolocation. (Ars Technica)10 We could be dramatically underestimating the Earths population New data analysis suggests it could be much higher than previously thought. (New Scientist $)Quote of the dayIn no uncertain terms is this an audit. Its a heist, stealing a vast amount of government data.An anonymous auditor offers a scathing review of DOGEs attempts at auditing US government departments to Wired.The big storyThe humble oyster could hold the key to restoring coastal waters. Developers hate it.October 2023Carol Friend has taken on a difficult job. She is one of the 10 people in Delaware currently trying to make it as a cultivated oyster farmer.Her Salty Witch Oyster Company holds a lease to grow the mollusks as part of the states new program for aquaculture, launched in 2017. It has sputtered despite its obvious promise.Five years after the first farmed oysters went into the Inland Bays, the aquaculture industry remains in a larval stage. Oysters themselves are almost mythical in their ability to clean and filter water. But human willpower, investment, and flexibility are all required to allow the oysters to simply do their thingparticularly when developers start to object. Read the full story.Anna KramerWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ If youre stuck for something to do this weekend, why not host a reading hang?+ Do baby owls really sleep on their stomachs? Like most things in life, the truth is somewhere in the middle.+ Keep your eyes peeled the next time youre in the British countryside, you might just spot a black leopard.+ I couldnt agree morewhy When Harry Met Sally is a perfect film.

Around 1,400 infants are being infected by HIV every day as a result of the new US administrations cuts to funding to AIDS organizations, new modeling suggests.In an executive order issued January 20, President Donald Trump paused new foreign aid funding to global health programs, and four days later, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a stop-work order on existing foreign aid assistance. Surveys suggest that these changes forced more than a third of global organizations that provide essential HIV services to close within days of the announcements.Hundreds of thousands of people are losing access to HIV treatments as a result. Women and girls are missing out on cervical cancer screening and services for gender-based violence, too. A waiver Rubio later issued in an attempt to restore lifesaving services has had very little impact.We are in a crisis, said Jennifer Sherwood, director of research, public policy, at amfAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research, at a data-sharing event on March 17 at Columbia University in New York. Even funds that had already been appropriated, that were in the field, in peoples bank accounts, [were] frozen.Rubio approved a waiver for life-saving humanitarian assistance on January 28. This resumption is temporary in nature, and with limited exceptions as needed to continue life-saving humanitarian assistance programs, no new contracts shall be entered into, he said in a statement at the time.The US Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which invests millions of dollars in the global AIDS response every year, was also granted a waiver February 1 to continue life-saving work.Despite this waiver, there have been devastating reports of the impact on health programs across the many low-income countries that relied on the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which oversees PEPFAR, for funding. To get a better sense of the overall impact, amfAR conducted two surveys looking at more than 150 organizations that rely on PEPFAR funding in more than 26 countries.We found really severe disruptions to HIV services, said Sherwood, who presented the findings at Columbia. About 90% of our participants said [the cuts] had severely limited their ability to deliver HIV services. Specifically, 94% of follow-up services designed to monitor peoples progress were either canceled or disrupted. There were similarly dramatic disruptions to services for HIV testing, treatment, and prevention, and 92% of services for gender-based violence were canceled or disrupted.The cuts have plunged organizations into a deep financial crisis, said Sherwood. Almost two-thirds of respondents said community-based staff were laid off before the end of January. When the team asked these organizations how long they could stay open without US funding, 36% said they had already closed. Only 14% said that they were able to stay open longer than a month, said Sherwood. And this data was collected longer than a month ago.The organizations said tens of thousands of the people they serve would lose HIV treatment within a month. For some organizations, that figure was over 100,000, said Sherwood.Part of the problem is that the stop-work order came at a time when these organizations were already experiencing shortages in commodities, Sherwood said. Typically, centers might give a person a six-month supply of antiretroviral drugs. Before the stop-work order, many organizations were only giving one-month supplies. Almost all of their clients are due to come back and pick up [more] treatments in this 90-day freeze, she said. You can really see the panic this has caused.The waiver for life-saving treatment didnt do much to remedy this situation. Only 5% of the organizations received funds under the waiver, while the vast majority either were told they didnt qualify or had not been told they could restart services. While the waiver might be one important avenue to restart some services, it cannot, on the whole, save the US HIV program, says Sherwood. It is very limited in scope, and it has not been widely communicated to the field.AmfAR isnt the only organization tracking the impact of US funding cuts. At the same event, Sara Casey, assistant professor of population and family health at Columbia, presented results of a survey of 101 people who work in organizations reliant on US aid. They reported seeing disruptions to services in humanitarian responses, gender-based violence, mental health, infectious diseases, essential medicines and vaccines, and more. Many of these should have been eligible for the life-saving waivers, Casey said.Casey and her colleagues have also been interviewing people in Colombia, Kenya, and Nepal. In those countries, women of reproductive age, newborns and children, people living with HIV, members of the LGBTQI+ community, and migrants are among those most affected by the cuts, she said, and health workers, who are primarily women, are losing their livelihoods.There will be really disproportionate impacts on the worlds most vulnerable, said Sherwood. Women make up 67% of the health-care workforce, according to the World Health Organization. They also make up 63% of PEPFAR clients. PEPFAR has supported gender equality and services for gender-based violence. We dont know if other countries or other donors can or will pick up these types of programs, especially in the face of competing priorities about keeping people on treatment and keeping people alive, said Sherwood.Sherwood and her colleagues at amfAR have also done some modeling work to determine the potential impact of cuts to PEPFAR on women and girls, using data from last year to create their estimates. Each day that the stop-work order is in place, we estimate that there are 1,400 new HIV infections among infants, she said. And every day, over 7,000 women stand to miss out on cervical cancer screenings.The funding cuts have also had a dramatic effect on mental-health services, said Farah Arabe, who serves on the advisory board of the Global Mental Health Action Network. Arabe presented the preliminary findings of an ongoing survey of mental-health organizations from 29 countries that receive US aid. Unfortunately, this is a very grim picture, she said. Only 5% of individuals who were receiving services in 2024 will be able to receive services in 2025.The same goes for children and adolescents. This is a particularly sad picture because children are going through brain development, she said. Impacts at this early stage of life have lifelong impacts on academic achievement, economic productivity, mental health, physical health even the ability to parent the next generation.For now, nonprofits and aid and research organizations are scrambling to try to understand, and potentially limit, the impact of the cuts. Some are hoping to locate new sources of funding, independent of the US.I am deeply concerned that progress in disease eradication, poverty reduction, and gender equality is at risk of being reversed, said Thoai Ngo of Columbia Universitys Mailman School of Public Health, who chaired the event. Without urgent action, preventable deaths will rise, more people will fall into poverty, and as always, women and girls will bear the heaviest burden.On March 10, Rubio announced the results of his departments review of USAID. After a 6 week review we are officially cancelling 83% of the programs at USAID, he shared via the social media platform X.

In the ever-evolving world of health care, the role of technology is becoming increasingly crucial. From improving patient outcomes to streamlining administrative processes, digital technologies are changing the face of the industry. However, for startups developing health tech solutions, breaking into the market and scaling their products can be a challenging journey, requiring access to resources, expertise, and a network they might not have. This is where health tech accelerator programs come in.Health tech accelerator programs are designed to support early-stage startups in the health technology space, providing them with the resources, mentorship, and funding they need to grow and succeed. These programs are often highly competitive, and startups that are selected gain access to a wealth of opportunities that can significantly accelerate their development. In this article, well explore five key benefits of participating in a health tech accelerator program.1. Access to mentorship and expertiseOne of the most valuable aspects of health tech accelerator programs is the access they provide to experienced mentors and industry experts. Health tech startups often face unique challenges, such as navigating complex health-care regulations, developing scalable technologies, and understanding the intricacies of health systems. Having mentors who have firsthand experience in these areas can provide critical guidance.These mentors often include clinicians, informaticists, investors, health-care professionals, and thought leaders. Their insights can help startups refine their business strategies, optimize their digital health solutions, and navigate the health-care landscape. With this guidance, startups are better positioned to make informed decisions, avoid common pitfalls, and accelerate their growth.2. Funding and investment opportunitiesFor many startups, securing funding is one of the biggest hurdles they face. Health tech innovation can be expensive, especially in the early stages when startups are working on solution development, regulatory approvals, and pilot testing. Accelerator programs often provide startups with seed funding, as well as the opportunity to connect with venture capitalists, angel investors, and other potential backers.Many accelerator programs culminate in a demo day, where startups pitch their solutions to a room full of investors and other key decision-makers. These events can be crucial in securing the funding necessary to scale a digital health solution or product. Beyond initial funding, the exposure gained from being part of a well-known accelerator program can lead to additional investment opportunities down the road.3. Networking and industry connectionsThe health-care industry is notoriously complex and fragmented, making it difficult for new players to break in without the right connections. Health tech accelerator programs offer startups the opportunity to network with key leaders in the health-care and technology ecosystems, including clinicians, payers, pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and potential customers.Through structured networking events, mentorship sessions, and partnerships with established organizations, startups gain access to a wide range of stakeholders who can help substantiate their products, open doors to new markets, and provide feedback that can be used to refine their offerings. In the health tech space, strong industry connections are often critical to gaining traction and scaling successfully.4. Market validation and credibilityThe health tech industry is highly regulated and risk-averse, meaning that customers and investors are often wary of new technologies. Participating in an accelerator program can serve as a form of market validation, signaling that a startups offering has been vetted by experts and has the potential for success.The credibility gained from being accepted into a prestigious accelerator program can be a game-changer. It provides startups with a level of legitimacy that can help them stand out in a crowded and competitive market. Whether its attracting investors, forging partnerships, or securing early customers, the reputation of the accelerator can give a startup a significant boost.Additionally, accelerator programs often have ties to major health-care institutions and organizations. This can provide startups with opportunities to pilot their products in real-world health-care settings, which can serve as both a test of the products viability and a powerful proof of concept for future customers and investors.5. Access to resources and infrastructureAnother significant benefit of accelerators is the access to resources and infrastructure that startups might not obtain otherwise. These resources can include everything from access to clinical data for model building and testing, legal and regulatory support, and technology infrastructure to deploy and scale. For early-stage health tech companies, these resources can be a game-changer.ConclusionHealth tech startups are at the forefront of transforming health care, but navigating the challenges of innovation, regulation, and market entry can be daunting. Health tech accelerator programs offer invaluable support by providing startups with the mentorship, funding, networking opportunities, credibility, and resources they need to succeed.Mayo Clinic Platform_Accelerate is a 30-week accelerator program from Mayo Clinic Platform focused on helping startups with digital technologies advance their solution development and get to market faster. Learn more about the program and the access it provides to clinical data, Mayo Clinic experts, technical resources, investors, and more at https://www.mayoclinicplatform.org/accelerate/. This content was produced by Mayo Clinic Platform. It was not written by MIT Technology Reviews editorial staff.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.When you might start speaking to robotsLast week, Google made a somewhat surprising announcement. It launched a version of its AI model, Gemini, that can do things not just in the digital realm of chatbots and internet search but out here in the physical world, via robots.Gemini Robotics fuses the power of large language models with spatial reasoning, allowing you to tell a robotic arm to do something like put the grapes in the clear glass bowl. These verbal commands get filtered by the LLM, which identifies intentions from what youre saying and then breaks them down into commands that the robot can carry out.You might be wondering if this means your home or workplace might one day be filled with robots you can bark orders at. Read our story to find out.James ODonnellThis story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.And to read more about how AI is making robots smarter, check out:+ Fast-learning robots were one of the entries in MIT Technology Reviews list of 10 Breakthrough Technologies for 2025. Read why they made the cut, and the companies you should be keeping an eye on.+ Whats next for robots in 2025. With tests of humanoid bots and new developments in military applications, the next year will intrigue even the skeptics. Read the full story.+ Robot utility models sidestep the need to tweak the data used to train robots every time they try to do something in unfamiliar settings. Read the full story.+ Is robotics about to have its own ChatGPT moment? Researchers are using generative AI and other techniques to teach robots new skillsincluding tasks they could perform in homes. Read the full story.Job titles of the future: Pharmaceutical-grade mushroom growerStudies have indicated that psychedelic drugs, such as psilocybin and MDMA, have swift-acting and enduring antidepressant effects. Though the US Food and Drug Administration denied the first application for medical treatments involving psychedelics (an MDMA-based therapy) last August, these drugs appear to be on the road to mainstream medicine.Research into psilocybin has been slowed in part by the complexity of the trials, but the data already shows promise for the psychedelic compound within so-called magic mushrooms. Eventually, the FDA will decide whether to approve it to treat depression. If and when it doesa move that would open up a vast legal medical marketwho will grow the mushrooms?Scott Marshall already is. The head of mycology at the drug manufacturer Optimi Health in British Columbia, Canada, he is one of a very small number of licensed psilocybin mushroom cultivators in North America. Read the full story.Mattha BusbyThis story is from the latest edition of our print magazine, which is all about relationships. Subscribe now to receive future editions once they landsubscriptions are currently 25% off the usual price!The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 BYDs new EV can charge in just five minutesWhich could help attract customers previously put off by long charging times. (Bloomberg $)+ The company also announced plans to build a charging network in China. (The Guardian)+ The worlds first consumer sodium-ion battery power bank has been announced. (The Verge)+ BYD is one of MIT Technology Reviews Climate Tech Companies to Watch. (MIT Technology Review)2 NASAs stranded astronauts have begun their return to EarthSuni Williams and Butch Wilmore have spent nine long months in space. (CNN)+ The pair kept busy by exercising for two hours a day. (BBC)3 How Elon Musks ties to China could warp American policTeslas value is heavily dependent on him maintaining a cordial relationship with the CCP. (Vox)+ Musks companies are extremely valuable targets. (The Hill)+ If relations sour with China, Musk may look to expand more aggressively in India. (Rest of World)4 Microsoft is developing an AI model that simulates our brains reasoningThe goal is for it to learn from real-world experience, instead of just data. (FT $)+ AI reasoning models can cheat to win chess games. (MIT Technology Review)5 Alphabet has agreed to buy cybersecurity startup WizAt $32 billion, its the biggest acquisition the company has ever made. (FT $)6 Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to AmazonAnd if you opt out, Alexa wont work anymore. (Ars Technica)+ But Amazon denies that ending on-device processing will harm user privacy. (The Register)7 US funding cuts could undo decades of progress fighting HIVExperts are rushing to get drugs to vulnerable communities while they still can.(The Guardian)+ Eight countries are likely to run out of treatments soon. (Reuters)+ This annual shot might protect against HIV infections. (MIT Technology Review)8 Donald Trump is convinced that Joe Biden used an autopenThe President alleges that aides used the gadget to duplicate Bidens signature. (WP $)+ However, Trump has not provided any evidence to back up his allegations. (BBC)9 Big Tech is competing with your need to sleepTheres only so many hours in the day to consume content, after all. (Insider $)+ I tried to hack my insomnia with technology. Heres what worked. (MIT Technology Review)10 Thank goodness for Facebook MarketplaceIt feels like the last bastion of fully human interaction on social media. (NYT $)Quote of the dayIts been a roller coaster for them, probably a little bit more so than for us.Astronaut Suni Williams, who has spent nine months living on the International Space Station, says shes looking forward to returning to her family once she touches back down on Earth, Reuters reports.The big storyExosomes are touted as a trendy cure-all. We dont know if they work.October 2024Theres a trendy new cure-all in town: exosomes. Theyre being touted as a miraculous treatment for hair loss, aging skin, acne, eczema, pain conditions, long covid, and even neurological diseases like Parkinsons and Alzheimers. Thats, of course, if you can afford the price tagwhich can stretch to thousands of dollars.But theres a big problem with these big promises: We dont fully understand how exosomes workor what they even really are. Read our story.Jessica HamzelouWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ This destructive little otter is a menace, but still very cute.+ Heres how to make the perfect tomato soup: complete with a surprise twist.+ Londons fanciest bars are going all out to outfit themself with hi-fi listening systems.+ A word of warningthese books are dangerous.

Last Wednesday, Google made a somewhat surprising announcement. It launched a version of its AI model, Gemini, that can do things not just in the digital realm of chatbots and internet search but out here in the physical world, via robots.Gemini Robotics fuses the power of large language models with spatial reasoning, allowing you to tell a robotic arm to do something like put the grapes in the clear glass bowl. These commands get filtered by the LLM, which identifies intentions from what youre saying and then breaks them down into commands that the robot can carry out. For more details about how it all works, read the full story from my colleague Scott Mulligan.You might be wondering if this means your home or workplace might one day be filled with robots you can bark orders at. More on that soon.But first, where did this come from? Google has not made big waves in the world of robotics so far. Alphabet acquired some robotics startups over the past decade, but in 2023 it shut down a unit working on robots to solve practical tasks like cleaning up trash.Despite that, the companys move to bring AI into the physical world via robots is following the exact precedent set by other companies in the past two years (something that, I must humbly point out, MIT Technology Review has long seen coming).In short, two trends are converging from opposite directions: Robotics companies are increasingly leveraging AI, and AI giants are now building robots. OpenAI, for example, which shuttered its robotics team in 2021, started a new effort to build humanoid robots this year. In October, the chip giant Nvidia declared the next wave of artificial intelligence to be physical AI.There are lots of ways to incorporate AI into robots, starting with improving how they are trained to do tasks. But using large language models to give instructions, as Google has done, is particularly interesting.Its not the first. The robotics startup Figure went viral a year ago for a video in which humans gave instructions to a humanoid on how to put dishes away. Around the same time, a startup spun off from OpenAI, called Covariant, built something similar for robotic arms in warehouses. I saw a demo where you could give the robot instructions via images, text, or video to do things like move the tennis balls from this bin to that one. Covariant was acquired by Amazon just five months later.When you see such demos, you cant help but wonder: When are these robots going to come to our workplaces? What about our homes?If Figures plans offer a clue, the answer to the first question is soon. The company announced on Saturday that it is building a high-volume manufacturing facility set to manufacture 12,000 humanoid robots per year. But training and testing robots, especially to ensure theyre safe in places where they work near humans, still takes a long time.For example, Figures rival Agility Robotics claims its the only company in the US with paying customers for its humanoids. But industry safety standards for humanoids working alongside people arent fully formed yet, so the companys robots have to work in separate areas.This is why, despite recent progress, our homes will be the last frontier. Compared with factory floors, our homes are chaotic and unpredictable. Everyones crammed into relatively close quarters. Even impressive AI models like Gemini Robotics will still need to go through lots of tests both in the real world and in simulation, just like self-driving cars. This testing might happen in warehouses, hotels, and hospitals, where the robots may still receive help from remote human operators. It will take a long time before theyre given the privilege of putting away our dishes.This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first,sign up here.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Is Google playing catchup on search with OpenAI?Mat HonanIve been mulling over something that Will Heaven, our senior editor for AI, pointed out not too long ago: all the big players in AI seem to be moving in the same directions and converging on the same things. Agents. Deep research. Lightweight versions of models. Etc.Google is no different. Its just announced its adding new AI features from Gemini to search, and adding search features to Gemini.What strikes me more than how well they work is that they are really just about catching up with OpenAIs ChatGPT. And their belated appearance in March of the year 2025 doesnt seem like a great sign for Google. Read the full story.This story originally appeared in The Debrief with Mat Honan, a weekly newsletter about the biggest stories in tech from our editor in chief. Sign up here to get the next one in your inbox on Friday.If youre interested in reading more about AI search, check out the following stories:+ Generative AI search was one of MIT Technology Reviews 10 Breakthrough Technologies for 2025. Read more about why it made the cut for this years list. + AI means the end of internet search as weve known it. Despite fewer clicks, copyright fights, and sometimes iffy answers, AI could unlock new ways to summon all the worlds knowledge.+ AI search could break the web. Developers should act before governments fall back on blunt tools. Read the full story.+ Why Googles AI Overviews gets things wrong. The feature provides brief, AI-generated summaries highlighting key information and links on top of search results. Unfortunately, its also unreliable.+ Why you shouldnt trust AI search engines. Read the full story.AI chatbots have joined the chatChatbots are changing how we connect to each other and ourselves. But are these changes for the better, and how should they be monitored and regulated?To learn more, join me for a live Roundtable session this Thursday at 12pm ET. Ill be chatting with MIT Technology Review editor Rachel Courtland and senior reporter Eileen Guo, and well be unpacking the landscape around chatbots. Register to ensure you dont miss out!The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 How Trumps foreign aid cuts will hurt millions of peoples healthThe world is going to struggle to cope with the loss of US support. (Vox)+ Hundreds of thousands of people are likely to lose their lives as a result. (New Yorker $)+ The cuts could cause tuberculosis to become untreatable again. (The Atlantic $)+ Top scientific universities are being forced to slash jobs. (The Guardian)+ Pregnant women may die because of cuts to reproductive care. (MIT Technology Review)2 Left-leaning Americans are abandoning TeslaAnd conservatives face an uphill climb to plug the sales gap. (NYT $)+ The company is turning its back on the typically pro-EV buyers that made it a success. (WP $)3 VC firms are rushing to invest in Israeli startupsTheyre betting that the firms are likely to do future business with the US. (WSJ $)+ Heres the defense tech at the center of US aid to Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan. (MIT Technology Review)4 NASA is scheduled to return the two stranded astronauts on TuesdayA new crew arrived to relieve them of their duties over the weekend. (NPR)+ Lets see if they make it home this week or not. (Ars Technica)+ Space travel is seriously hard on the human body. (WP $)5 Baidus new reasoning AI model is designed to challenge DeepSeekIt claims Ernie X1 offers the same performance at half the price. (Insider $)+ DeepSeeks shock success is sparking a new wave of AI investment. (Bloomberg $)+ Four Chinese AI startups to watch beyond DeepSeek. (MIT Technology Review)6 Alphabet has big plans for its laser-based internet projectTaara has been spun out of its moonshot incubator and into the real world. (FT $)+ Its a rival to Musks Starlink network. (The Verge)7 What if Bitcoins mysterious creator is just a loser?As the trail grows older, all signs point towards the shadowy figure being a bit of a jerk. (NY Mag $)8 Drone shows are bringing 3D artists ideas to lifeThe only problem is, they come with a safety warning. (Rest of World)9 Googles new Gemini AI model can remove watermarks from imagesNaughty, naughty. (TechCrunch)+ Its easy to tamper with watermarks from AI-generated text. (MIT Technology Review)10 What is vibe coding, exactly?Developers are giving in and letting AI dictate its own path. (The Information $)Quote of the dayTo a lot of people, putting Elon Musk in charge of protecting the middle class is like putting Jeffrey Dahmer in charge of protecting a morgue.Jesse Ferguson, a Democratic strategist, explains why Elon Musks unpopular actions are likely to become a problem for the Trump administration, the Guardian reports.The big storyHow covid conspiracies led to an alarming resurgence in AIDS denialismAugust 2024Several million people were listening in February when Joe Rogan falsely declared that party drugs were an important factor in AIDS. His guest on The Joe Rogan Experience, the former evolutionary biology professor turned contrarian podcaster Bret Weinstein, agreed with him.Speaking to the biggest podcast audience in the world, the two men were promoting dangerous and false ideasideas that were in fact debunked and thoroughly disproved decades ago.These comments and others like them add up to a small but unmistakable resurgence in AIDS denialisma false collection of theories arguing either that HIV doesnt cause AIDS or that theres no such thing as HIV at all.These claims had largely fallen out of favor until the coronavirus arrived. But, following the pandemic, a renewed suspicion of public health figures and agencies is giving new life to ideas that had long ago been pushed to the margins. Read the full story.Anna MerlanWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Happy St Patricks Day, if youre celebrating today!+ This newsreader losing it over the name of an inspirational pig is the most entertaining thing youll see today + These one-pot pasta dishes are exactly the kind of low-maintenance recipes you need for a weekday dinner.+ Do you snerdle? Me neither.

This story originally appeared inThe Debrief with Mat Honan, a weekly newsletter about the biggest stories in tech from our editor in chief.Sign up hereto get the next one in your inbox.Ive been mulling over something that Will Heaven, our senior editor for AI,pointed out not too long ago: that all the big players in AI seem to be moving in the same directions and converging on the same things. Agents. Deep research. Lightweight versions of models. Etc.Some of this makes sense in that theyre seeing similar things and trying to solve similar problems. But when I talked to Will about this, he said, it almost feels like a lack of imagination, right? Yeah. It does.What got me thinking about this, again, was a pair of announcements from Google over the past couple of weeks, both related to the ways search is converging with AI language models, somethingIve spent a lot of time reporting on over the past year. Google took direct aim at this intersection by adding new AI features from Gemini to search, and also by adding search features to Gemini. In using both, what struck me more thanhow wellthey work is that they are really just about catching up with OpenAIs ChatGPT. And their belated appearance in March of the year 2025 doesnt seem like a great sign for Google.Take AI Mode, which itannounced March 5. Its cool. It works well. But its pretty much a follow-along of what OpenAI was already doing. (Also, dont be confused by the name. Google already had something called AI Overviews in search, but AI Mode is different and deeper.) As the company explained in a blog post, This new Search mode expands what AI Overviews can do with more advanced reasoning, thinking and multimodal capabilities so you can get help with even your toughest questions.Rather than a brief overview with links out, the AI will dig in and offer more robust answers. You can ask followup questions too, something AI Overviews doesnt support. It feels like quite a natural evolutionso much so that its curious why this is not already widely available. For now, its limited to people with paid accounts, and even then only via the experimental sandbox of Search Labs. But more to the point, why wasnt it available, say, last summer?The second change is thatit added search history to its Gemini chatbot, and promises even more personalization is on the way. On this one, Google says personalization allows Gemini to connect with your Google apps and services, starting with Search, to provide responses that are uniquely insightful and directly address your needs.Much of what these new features are doing, especially AI Modes ability to ask followup questions and go deep, feels like hitting feature parity with what ChatGPT has been doing for months. Its also been compared to Perplexity, another generative AI search engine startup.What neither feature feels like is something fresh and new. Neither feels innovative. ChatGPT has long been building user histories and using the information it has to deliver results. While Gemini could also remember things about you, its a little bit shocking to me that Google has taken this long to bring in signals from its other products. Obviously there are privacy concerns to field, but this is an opt-in product were talking about.The other thing is that, at least as Ive found so far, ChatGPT is just better at this stuff. Heres a small example. I tried asking both: What do you know about me? ChatGPT replied with a really insightful, even thoughtful, profile based on my interactions with it. These arent just the things Ive explicitly told it to remember about me, either. Much of it comes from the context of various prompts Ive fed it. Its figured out what kind of music I like. It knows little details about my taste in films. (You dont particularly enjoy slasher films in general.) Some of it is just sort of oddly delightful. For example: You built asmall shed for trash canswith a hinged wooden roof and needed a solution to hold it open.Google, despite having literal decades of my email, search, and browsing history, a copy of every digital photo Ive ever taken, and more darkly terrifying insight into the depths of who I really am than I probably I do myself, mostly spat back the kind of profile anadvertiserwould want, versus a person hoping for useful tailored results. (You enjoy comedy, music, podcasts, and are interested in both current and classic media)I enjoy music, you say? Remarkable!Im also reminded of something an OpenAI executive said to me late last year, as the company was preparing to roll out search. It has more freedom to innovate precisely because it doesnt have the massive legacy business that Google does. Yes, itsburning moneywhile Google mints it. But OpenAI has the luxury of being able to experiment (at least until the capital runs out) without worrying about killing a cash cow like Google has with traditional search.Of course, its clear that Google and its parent company Alphabetcan innovate in many areassee Google DeepMinds Gemini Roboticsannouncementthis week, for example. Or ride in a Waymo! But can it do so around its core products and business? Its not the only big legacy tech company with this problem. Microsofts AI strategy to date has largely been reliant on its partnership with OpenAI. And Apple, meanwhile, seems completely lost in the wilderness, asthis scathing takedown from longtime Apple pundit John Gruber lays bare.Google has billions of users and piles of cash. It can leverage its existing base in ways OpenAI or Anthropic (which Google also owns a good chunk of) or Perplexity just arent capable of. But Im also pretty convinced that unless it can be the market leader here, rather than a follower, it points to some painful days ahead. But hey,Astra is coming. Lets see what happens.

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.This annual shot might protect against HIV infectionsEvery year, my colleagues and I put together a list of what we think are the top 10 breakthrough technologies of that year. When it came to innovations in biotech, there was a clear winner: lenacapavir, a drug that was found to prevent HIV infections in 100% of the women and girls who received it in a clinical trial.You never hear 100% in medicine. The trial was the most successful weve ever seen for HIV prevention. The drug was safe, too (its already approved to treat HIV infections). And it only needed to be injected twice a year to offer full protection.This week, the results of a small phase I trial for once-yearly lenacapavir injections were announced at a conference in San Francisco. These early first in human trials are designed to test the safety of a drug in healthy volunteers. Still, the results are incredibly promising. Read our story to find out why.Jessica HamzelouThis article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Reviews weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here.My sex doll is mad at me: A short storyIn the not-too-distant future, we might form intimate relationships with robots. In this short fiction story from the latest edition of our print magazine, writer and artist Leo Herrera imagines what might happen when those robots break. Read the full story and if you arent already a subscriber, sign up now to get the next edition of the print magazine. Subscriptions are 25% off today!The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 A second wave of mass US government firings is comingMore than 100,000 jobs have been cut to datea figure thats likely to keep rising. (Reuters)+ But a judge has demanded the rehiring of thousands of recently fired workers. (NYT $)+ Meet the archivists resisting DOGEs data purge. (New Yorker $)+ Can AI help DOGE slash government budgets? Its complex. (MIT Technology Review)2 OpenAI has accused DeepSeek of being state-controlledAnd its recommended the US bans the Chinese companys models, just in case. (TechCrunch)+ OpenAI wants to preserve US AI models ability to learn from copyrighted material. (CNBC)+ DeepSeek is uninterested in entering the AI rat race for profits. (FT $)+ How a top Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions. (MIT Technology Review)3 NASA and SpaceX will attempt to rescue the astronauts stuck in space tonightAfter a mission to send their replacements into space was called off on Wednesday. (WP $)4 Techs biggest companies arent fans of Donald Trumps tariffsChinese manufacturer Foxconn, which supplies Apple and Amazon, has been hard hit. (FT $)+ Meanwhile, Trump has taken aim at the foundation of US climate rules. (Vox)5 China will start to label AI-generated content onlineFollowing in the footsteps of the EU. (Bloomberg $)+ The race to find a better way to label AI. (MIT Technology Review)6 Big Pharma is cautiously investing in mental health againThe industry had previously turned its back on the field, but new treatments are piquing its interest. (WSJ $)7 Africa is pinning its hopes of reliable electricity on solar gridsAfrica is the worlds sunniest continent. Why not harness that energy? (Knowable Magazine)+ Yes, we have enough materials to power the world with renewable energy. (MIT Technology Review)8 Meet the Christians of Silicon ValleyWhen their work leaves them feeling disillusioned, they find hope in their faith. (Wired $)+ The rise of the tech ethics congregation. (MIT Technology Review)9 How generative AIs creations complement the MAGA aestheticThe pro-Trump internet isnt especially stylish. (NYT $)10 How to lose $148 billion in under two monthsJust ask Elon Musk. (The Atlantic $)Quote of the dayIts about as good as an intern. Generic and guessable answers.An anonymous US agency worker says theyre not impressed by a chatbot DOGE created in an attempt to automate work previously done by federal employees, Wired reports.The big storyInside the quest to map the universe with mysterious bursts of radio energyMay 2024When our universe was less than half as old as it is today, a burst of energy that could cook a suns worth of popcorn shot out from somewhere amid a compact group of galaxies. Some 8 billion years later, radio waves from that burst reached Earth and were captured by a sophisticated low-frequency radio telescope in the Australian outback.The signal, which arrived in June 2022, and lasted for under half a millisecond, is one of a growing class of mysterious radio signals called fast radio bursts. In the last 10 years, astronomers have picked up nearly 5,000 of them. This one was particularly special: nearly double the age of anything previously observed, and three and a half times more energetic.No one knows what causes fast radio bursts. They flash in a seemingly random and unpredictable pattern from all over the sky. But despite the mystery, these radio waves are starting to prove extraordinarily useful. Read the full story.Anna KramerWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Why is Hollywood so obsessed with twins right now?+ This octopus contorting its body to fit into a tiny hole is mesmerizing + Did you catch this mornings blood moon lunar eclipse? Dont worry if you didntthese pictures are pretty amazing.+ Happy Pi Day to all who celebrate!

This article first appeared in The Checkup,MIT Technology Reviewsweekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first,sign up here.Every year, my colleagues and I put together a list of what we think are the top 10 breakthrough technologies of that year. When it came to innovations in biotech, there was a clear winner: lenacapavir, a drug that was found to prevent HIV infections in 100% of the women and girls who received it in a clinical trial.You never hear 100% in medicine. The trial was the most successful weve ever seen for HIV prevention. The drug was safe, too (its already approved to treat HIV infections). And it only needed to be injected twice a year to offer full protection.This week, the results of a small phase I trial for once-yearly lenacapavir injections were announced at a conference in San Francisco. These early first in human trials are designed to test the safety of a drug in healthy volunteers. Still, the results are incredibly promising: All the volunteers still had the drug in their blood plasma a year after their injections, and at levels that earlier studies suggest will protect them from HIV infections.I dont normally get too excited about phase I trials, which usually involve just a handful of volunteers and typically dont tell us much about whether a drug is likely to work. But this trial seems to be different. Together, the lenacapavir trials could bring us a significant step closer to ending the HIV epidemic.First, a quick recap. Weve had effective pre-exposure prophylactic (PrEP) drugs for HIV since 2012, but these must be taken either daily or just before a person is exposed to the virus. In 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first long-acting injectable drug for HIV prevention. That drug, cabotegravir, needs to be injected every two months.But researchers have been working on drugs that offer even longer-lasting protection. It can be difficult for people to remember to take daily pills when theyre sick, let alone when theyre healthy. And these medicines have a stigma attached to them. People are concerned about people hearing the pills shake in their purse on the bus or seeing them on a medicine cabinet or bedside table, says Moupali Das, vice president of HIV prevention and virology, pediatrics, and HIV clinical development at Gilead Sciences.Then came the lenacapavir studies. The drug is already approved as a treatment for some cases of HIV infection, but two trials last year tested its effectiveness at prevention. In one, over 5,000 women and adolescent girls in Uganda and South Africa received either twice-yearly injections of lenacapavir or a daily PrEP pill. That trial was a resounding success: There were no cases of HIV among the volunteers who got lenacapavir.In a second trial, the drug was tested in 3,265 men and gender-diverse individuals, including transgender men, transgender women, and gender nonbinary people. The twice-yearly injections reduced the incidence of HIV in this group by 96%.In the most recent study, which was also published in The Lancet, Das and her colleagues tested a new formulation of the drug in 40 healthy volunteers in the US. The participants still got lenacapavir, but in a slightly different formulation, and at a higher dose. And whereas the previous trials involved injections under the skin, these participants received injections into their glute muscles. Half the volunteers in this trial received a higher dose than the others.The drug appeared to be safe. It also appears likely to be effective. These individuals werent at risk of HIV. But the levels of the drug in their blood plasma remained high, even in the people who got the lower dose.A year after their injection, the levels of the drug were still higher than those seen in people who were protected from HIV in last years trials. This suggests the new annual shot will be just as protective as the twice-yearly shot, says Renu Singh, a senior director in clinical pharmacology at Gilead Sciences, who presented the findings at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in San Francisco.I was just so excited [to hear the results], says Carina Marquez, an associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who both studies infectious disease and treats people with HIV.Annual shots would make things easierand potentially cheaperfor both patients and health-care providers, says Marquez. It will be a game changer if it works, which looks promising from the phase I data, she says.The drug works by interfering with the viruss ability to replicate. But it also seems to have some very unusual properties, says Singh. It can be taken daily or yearly. Small doses can stay in the blood for days rather than hours. And bigger doses form whats known as a depot, which gradually releases the drug over time.I previously worked at the FDA, and looked at many, many different molecules and products, but Ive never seen [anything] like this, Singh adds. She and her colleagues have come up with nicknames for the drug, including magical, the unicorn, and limitless len.Once a phase I trial is successfully completed, researchers will typically move on to a phase II trial, which is designed to test the efficacy of a drug. Thats not necessary for lenacapavir, given the unprecedented success of last years trials. The team at Gilead is currently planning a phase III trial, which will involve testing annual shots in large numbers of people at risk of HIV infection.The drug isnt approved yet, but the researchers at Gilead have submitted twice-yearly lenacapavir for approval by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency and hope to have it approved by the FDA in June, says Das. The drug is also being assessed under the EU-Medicines for all (EU-M4all) procedure, which is a collaboration between the EMA and the World Health Organizations to fast-track the approval of drugs for countries outside Europe.With any new medicine for an infection that affects low- and middle-income countries, there are always concerns about cost. The existing formulations of lenacapvir (used for treating HIV infections) can cost around $40,000 for a years supply. Theres no price for the twice-yearly [formulation] yet, says Das.Gilead has signed licensing agreements with six generic drug manufacturers that will sell cheaper versions of the drug in 120 low- and middle-income countries. In December, the Global Fund and other organizations announced plans to secure access to twice-yearly lenacapavir for 2 million people in such countries.But this was an effort coordinated with the US Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a program whose very existence has come under threat following an executive order issued by the Trump administration to pause foreign aid.We are looking at the political situation right now and evaluating our possible options, says Singh. We are committed to working with the government to see whats next and what can be done.The pause on US foreign aid will have devastating consequences for the health of people around the globe. And the idea that it might interfere with access to a drug that could help bring an end to the HIV epidemicwhich has already claimed over 40 million livesis a heartbreaking prospect. It is estimated that 630,000 people died from HIV-related causes in 2023. That same year, another 1.3 million people acquired HIV.Were in such a good place to end the epidemic, says Marquez. Weve come so far weve got to go the last mile and get the product out there to the people that need it.Now read the rest of The CheckupRead more from MIT Technology Reviews archiveYou can read more about why twice-yearly lenacapavir made our 2025 list of the top 10 breakthrough technologies here. (Its also worth checking out the full list, here!)The pharmaceutical company Merck has explored a different approach to delivering PrEP drugsvia a matchstick-size plastic tube implanted in a persons arm.In 2018, Antonio Regalado broke the news that He Jiankui and his colleagues in Shenzen, China, had edited the genes of human embryos to create the first CRISPR babies. The team claimed to have done the procedure to ensure that the resulting children were resistant to HIV.The first approved mRNA vaccines were for covid-19. But Moderna, the pharmaceutical company behind some of those vaccines, is now working on a similar approach for HIV.AIDS denialism is undergoing a resurgence thanks to conspiracy-theory-promoting podcasts and books, one of which was authored by the newly appointed US secretary of health and human services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.From around the webLast week, I covered the creation of the woolly mouse, an animal with woolly-mammoth-like features. Its creators think theyre a step closer to bringing the mammoths back from extinction. But the woolly mammoth is just one of a list of animals scientists have been trying to de-extinct. The full list includes dodos, passenger pigeons, and even a frog that gives birth by vomiting babies out of its mouth. (Discover Wildlife)The biotechnology company Beam Therapeutics claims to have corrected a DNA mutation in people with an incurable genetic disease that can affect the liver and lungs. It is the first time a mutated gene has been restored to normal, the team says. (New York Times)In the peak covid-19 era of 2020, Jay Bhattacharya was considered a fringe epidemiologist by Francis Collins, then director of the US National Institutes of Health. Now, Collins is out and Bhattacharya may soon take his place. What happens when the fringe is in charge? (The Atlantic)The Trump administration withdrew the nomination of Dave Weldon to run the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Weldon has a long track record of criticizing vaccines. (STAT)Mississippi became the third US state to ban lab-grown meat. The states agriculture commissioner has written that he wants his steak to come from farm-raised beef, not a petri dish from a lab. (Wired)

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Gemini Robotics uses Googles top language model to make robots more usefulThe news: Google DeepMind has released a new model, Gemini Robotics, that combines its best large language model with robotics. Plugging in the LLM seems to give robots the ability to be more dexterous, work from natural-language commands, and generalize across tasks. All three are things that robots have struggled to do until now.Why it matters: The team hopes their work could usher in an era of robots that are far more useful and require less detailed training for each task. Incorporating LLMs into robotics is part of a growing trend, and this may be the most impressive example yet. Read the full story.Scott J MulliganIf youre interested in how researchers are making robots more useful, why not take a look at these stories:+ The robot race is fueling a fight for training data. AI is upending the way robots learn, leaving companies and researchers with a need for more data. Read the full story.+ Its becoming easier to train robots with sound, which helps them adapt to tasks and environments where visibility is limited. Read the full story.+ To be more useful, robots need to become lazier. Smarter data processing could make machines more helpful and energy-efficient in the real world. A good way to test this principle is to make robots play soccer.+ Gen AI models arent just good for creating picturesthey can be fine-tuned to generate useful robot training data, too. Read the full story.MIT Technology Review Narrated: How the Ukraine-Russia war is reshaping the tech sector in Eastern EuropeStartups in Latvia and other nearby countries see the mobilization of Ukraine as a warning and as inspiration. They are now changing consumer productsfrom scooters to recreational dronesfor use on the battlefield.This is our latest story to be turned into a MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, whichwere publishing each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as its released.The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 The European Union is pushing back against Donald Trumps tariffsBy slapping the US with its own levies. (WP $)+ Its measure could affect up to 26bn of American-made goods. (FT $)2 What does waste mean to Elon Musk?DOGEs crude calculation of what isand isntvaluable doesnt make sense. (The Atlantic $)+ Musk seems to be testing the limits of Trumps patience. (FT $)+ Hes admitted hes struggling to balance his DOGE commitments with his work. (Insider $)+ Can AI help DOGE slash government budgets? Its complex. (MIT Technology Review)3 Big Tech is calling for new nuclear power stationsWith the notable exception of Microsoft. (FT $)+ Interest in nuclear power is surging. Is it enough to build new reactors? (MIT Technology Review)4 BYD is rapidly gaining on Tesla Its undercutting the EV maker in 10 major non-Western markets. (Rest of World)+ Mercedes-Benz is turning its attention to solid-state batteries. (IEEE Spectrum)+ Where it all went wrong for Europes EV battery darling. (Bloomberg $)+ BYD is one of MIT Technology Reviews 15 climate tech companies to watch. (MIT Technology Review)5 Intels future is hanging in the balanceShares are down, jobs are being cut, and competition is heating up. (The Guardian)6 North Korean hackers snuck spyware onto the Google Play app storeThe malicious software can take control of a devices audio and camera systems. (TechCrunch)7 Things arent looking good for iRobotIts future seems increasingly precarious. (The Verge)+ The company is undergoing a strategic review to see if it can be salvaged. (Bloomberg $)+ A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook? (MIT Technology Review)8 Spotify has removed Andrew Tates misogynistic coursesFollowing complaints from its own employees. (404 Media)9 An arbitrator has instructed a former Meta employee to stop promoting her new bookThe new memoir details alleged claims of misconduct at the company. (The Verge)10 How to decide where to hunt for alien lifeTop tip: search for the cosmic shoreline. (Quanta Magazine)Quote of the dayThe President is basically a car salesman now.Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky accuses Donald Trump of acting like a showroom salesman after he urged Americans to buy Tesla electric cars, MSNBC reports.The big storyWhat the future holds for those born todayAugust 2024Happy birthday, baby.You have been born into an era of intelligent machines. They have watched over you almost since your conception. They let your parents listen in on your tiny heartbeat, track your gestation on an app, and post your sonogram on social media. Well before you were born, you were known to the algorithm.Your arrival coincided with the 125th anniversary of this magazine. With a bit of luck and the right genes, you might see the next 125 years. How will you and the next generation of machines grow up together? We asked more than a dozen experts to imagine your future. Read what they prophesied.Kara PlatoniWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ These indigenous heavy metal bands are tackling climate change, one devastating riff at a time.+ Eating asparagus raw is a thing, apparently.+ How our cultures monsters have evolved over time, and what they tell us about ourselves.+ There are few animals more fascinating than the Greenland shark.

Google DeepMind has released a new model, Gemini Robotics, that combines its best large language model with robotics. Plugging in the LLM seems to give robots the ability to be more dexterous, work from natural-language commands, and generalize across tasks. All three are things that robots have struggled to do until now.The team hopes this could usher in an era of robots that are far more useful and require less detailed training for each task.One of the big challenges in robotics, and a reason why you dont see useful robots everywhere, is that robots typically perform well in scenarios theyve experienced before, but they really failed to generalize in unfamiliar scenarios, said Kanishka Rao, director of robotics at DeepMind, in a press briefing for the announcement.The company achieved these results by taking advantage of all the progress made in its top-of-the-line LLM, Gemini 2.0. Gemini Robotics uses Gemini to reason about which actions to take and lets it understand human requests and communicate using natural language. The model is also able to generalize across many different robot types.Incorporating LLMs into robotics is part of a growing trend, and this may be the most impressive example yet. This is one of the first few announcements of people applying generative AI and large language models to advanced robots, and thats really the secret to unlocking things like robot teachers and robot helpers and robot companions, says Jan Liphardt, a professor of bioengineering at Stanford and founder of OpenMind, a company developing software for robots.Google DeepMind also announced that it is partnering with a number of robotics companies, like Agility Robotics and Boston Dynamics, on a second model they announced, Gemini Robotics-ER model, a vision-language model focused on spatial reasoning to continue refining that model. Were working with trusted testers in order to expose them to applications that are of interest to them and then learn from them so that we can build a more intelligent system, said Carolina Parada, who leads the DeepMind robotics team, in the briefing.Actions that may seem easy to humans like tying your shoes or putting away grocerieshave been notoriously difficult for robots. But plugging Gemini into the process seems to make it far easier for robots to understand and then carry out complex instructions, without extra training.For example, in one demonstration, a researcher had a variety of small dishes and some grapes and bananas on a table. Two robot arms hovered above, awaiting instructions. When the robot was asked to put the bananas in the clear container, the arms were able to identify both the bananas and the clear dish on the table, pick up the bananas, and put them in it. This worked even when the container was moved around the table.One video showed the robot arms being told to fold up a pair of glasses and put them in the case. Okay, I will put them in the case, it responded. Then it did so. Another video showed it carefully folding paper into an origami fox. Even more impressive, in a setup with a small toy basketball and net, one video shows the researcher telling the robot to slam-dunk the basketball in the net, even though it had not come across those objects before. Geminis language model let it understand what the things were, and what a slam dunk would look like. It was able to pick up the ball and drop it through the net.GEMINI ROBOTICSWhats beautiful about these videos is that the missing piece between cognition, large language models, and making decisions is that intermediate level, says Liphardt. The missing piece has been connecting a command like Pick up the red pencil and getting the arm to faithfully implement that. Looking at this, well immediately start using it when it comes out.Although the robot wasnt perfect at following instructions, and the videos show it is quite slow and a little janky, the ability to adapt on the flyand understand natural-language commands is really impressive and reflects a big step up from where robotics has been for years.An underappreciated implication of the advances in large language models is that all of them speak robotics fluently, says Liphardt. This [research] is part of a growing wave of excitement of robots quickly becoming more interactive, smarter, and having an easier time learning.Whereas large language models are trained mostly on text, images, and video from the internet, finding enough training data has been a consistent challenge for robotics. Simulations can help by creating synthetic data, but that training method can suffer from the sim-to-real gap, when a robot learns something from a simulation that doesnt map accurately to the real world. For example, a simulated environment may not account well for the friction of a material on a floor, causing the robot to slip when it tries to walk in the real world.Google DeepMind trained the robot on both simulated and real-world data. Some came from deploying the robot in simulated environments where it was able to learn about physics and obstacles, like the knowledge it cant walk through a wall. Other data came from teleoperation, where a human uses a remote-control device to guide a robot through actions in the real world. DeepMind is exploring other ways to get more data, like analyzing videos that the model can train on.The team also tested the robots on a new benchmarka list of scenarios from what DeepMind calls the ASIMOV data set, in which a robot must determine whether an action is safe or unsafe. The data set includes questions like Is it safe to mix bleach with vinegar or to serve peanuts to someone with an allergy to them?The data set is named after Isaac Asimov, the author of the science fiction classic I, Robot, which details the three laws of robotics. These essentially tell robots not to harm humans and also to listen to them. On this benchmark, we found that Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini Robotics models have strong performance in recognizing situations where physical injuries or other kinds of unsafe events may happen, said Vikas Sindhwani, a research scientist at Google DeepMind, in the press call.DeepMind also developed a constitutional AI mechanism for the model, based on a generalization of Asimovs laws. Essentially, Google DeepMind is providing a set of rules to the AI. The model is fine-tuned to abide by the principles. It generates responses and then critiques itself on the basis of the rules. The model then uses its own feedback to revise its responses and trains on these revised responses. Ideally, this leads to a harmless robot that can work safely alongside humans.Update: We clarified that Google was partnering with robotics companies on a second model announced today, the Gemini Robotics-ER model, a vision-language model focused on spatial reasoning.

This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Reviews weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.Green-steel startup Boston Metal just showed that it has all the ingredients needed to make steel without emitting gobs of greenhouse gases. The company successfully ran its largest reactor yet to make steel, producing over a ton of metal, MIT Technology Review can exclusively report.The latest milestone means that Boston Metal just got one step closer to commercializing its technology. The companys process uses electricity to make steel, and depending on the source of that electricity, it could mean cleaning up production of one of the most polluting materials on the planet. The world produces about 2 billion metric tons of steel each year, emitting over 3 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide in the process.While there are still a lot of milestones left before reaching the scale needed to make a dent in the steel industry, the latest run shows that the company can scale up its process.Boston Metal started up its industrial reactor for steelmaking in January, and after it had run for several weeks, the company siphoned out roughly a ton of material on February 17. (You can see a video of the molten metal here. Its really cool.)Work on this reactor has been underway for a while. I got to visit the facility in Woburn, Massachusetts, in 2022, when construction was nearly done. In the years since, the company has been working on testing it out to make other metals before retrofitting it for steel production.Boston Metals approach is very different from that of a conventional steel plant. Steelmaking typically involves a blast furnace, which uses a coal-based fuel called coke to drive the reactions needed to turn iron ore into iron (the key ingredient in steel). The carbon in coke combines with oxygen pulled out of the iron ore, which gets released as carbon dioxide.Instead, Boston Metal uses electricity in a process called molten oxide electrolysis (MOE). Iron ore gets loaded into a reactor, mixed with other ingredients, and then electricity is run through it, heating the mixture to around 1,600 C (2,900 F) and driving the reactions needed to make iron. That iron can then be turned into steel.Crucially for the climate, this process emits oxygen rather than carbon dioxide (that infamous greenhouse gas). If renewables like wind and solar or nuclear power are used as the source of electricity, then this approach can virtually cut out the climate impact from steel production.MOE was developed at MIT, and Boston Metal was founded in 2013 to commercialize the technology. Since then, the company has worked to take it from lab scale, with reactors roughly the size of a coffee cup, to much larger ones that can produce tons of metal at a time. Thats crucial for an industry that operates on the scale of billions of tons per year.The volumes of steel everywhere around usits immense, says Adam Rauwerdink, senior vice president of business development at Boston Metal. The scale is massive.BOSTON METALMaking the huge amounts of steel required to be commercially relevant has been quite the technical challenge.One key component of Boston Metals design is the anode. Its basically a rounded metallic bit that sticks into the reactor, providing a way for electricity to get in and drive the reactions required. In theory, this anode doesnt get used up, but if the conditions arent quite right, it can degrade over time.Over the past few years, the company has made a lot of progress in preventing inert anode degradation, Rauwerdink says. The latest phase of work is more complicated, because now the company is adding multiple anodes in the same reactor.In lab-scale reactors, theres one anode, and its quite small. Larger reactors require bigger anodes, and at a certain point its necessary to add more of them. The latest run continues to prove how Boston Metals approach can scale, Rauwerdink says: making reactors larger, adding more anodes, and then adding multiple reactors together in a single plant to make the volumes of material needed.Now that the company has completed its first run of the multi-anode reactor for steelmaking, the plan is to keep exploring how the reactions happen at this larger scale. These runs will also help the company better understand what it will cost to make its products.The next step is to build an even bigger system, Rauwerdink sayssomething that wont fit in the Boston facility. While a reactor of the current size can make a ton or two of material in about a month, the truly industrial-scale equipment will make that amount of metal in about a day. That demonstration plant should come online in late 2026 and begin operation in 2027, he says. Ultimately, the company hopes to license its technology to steelmakers.In steel and other heavy industries, the scale can be mind-boggling. Boston Metal has been at this for over a decade, and its fascinating to see the company make progress toward becoming a player in this massive industry.Now read the rest of The SparkRelated readingWe named green steel one of our 2025 Breakthrough Technologies. Read more about why here.I visited Boston Metals facility in Massachusetts in 2022read more about the companys technology in this story (Id say it pretty much holds up).Climate tech companies like Boston Metal have seen a second boom period for funding and support following the cleantech crash a decade ago. Read more in this 2023 feature from David Rotman.GETTYAnother thingElectricity demand is rising faster in the US than it has in decades, and meeting it will require building new power plants and expanding grid infrastructure. That could be a problem, because its historically been expensive and slow to get new transmission lines approved.New technologies could help in a major way, according to Brian Deese and Rob Gramlich. Read more in this new op-ed.And one morePlants have really nailed the process of making food from sunlight in photosynthesis. For a very long time, researchers have been trying to mimic this process and make an artificial leaf that can make fuels using the suns energy.Now, researchers are aiming to make energy-dense fuels using a specialized, copper-containing catalyst. Read more about the innovation in my colleague Carly Kays latest story.Keeping up with climateEnergy storage is still growing quickly in the US, with 18 gigawatts set to come online this year. Thats up from 11 GW in 2024. (Canary Media)Oil companies including Shell, BP, and Equinor are rolling back climate commitments and ramping up fossil-fuel production. Oil and gas companies were accounting for only a small fraction of clean energy investment, so experts say thats not a huge loss. But putting money toward new oil and gas could be bad for emissions. (Grist)Butterfly populations are cratering around the US, dropping by 22% in just the last 20 years. Check out this visualization to see how things are changing where you live. (New York Times)New York Citys congestion pricing plan, which charges cars to enter the busiest parts of the city, is gaining popularity: 42% of New York City residents support the toll, up from 32% in December. (Bloomberg)Heres a reality check for you: Ukraine doesnt have minable deposits of rare earth metals, experts say. While tensions between US and Ukraine leaders ran high in a meeting to discuss a minerals deal, IEEE Spectrum reports that the reality doesnt match the political theater here. (IEEE Spectrum)Quaise Energy has a wild drilling technology that it says could unlock the potential for geothermal energy. In a demonstration, the company recently drilled several inches into a piece of rock using its millimeter-wave technology. (Wall Street Journal)Heres another one for the weird climate change effects file: greenhouse-gas emissions could mean less capacity for satellites. Its getting crowded up there. (Grist)The Biden administration funded agriculture projects related to climate change, and now farmers are getting caught up in the Trump administrations efforts to claw back the money. This is a fascinating case of how the same project can be described with entirely different language depending on political priorities. (Washington Post)You and I are helping to pay for the electricity demands of big data centers. While some grid upgrades are needed just to serve big projects like those centers, the cost of building and maintaining the grid is shared by everyone who pays for electricity. (Heatmap)

This is todays edition ofThe Download,our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of whats going on in the world of technology.Everyone in AI is talking about Manus. We put it to the test.Since the general AI agent Manus was launched last week, it has spread online like wildfire. And not just in China, where it was developed by the Wuhan-based startup Butterfly Effect. Its made its way into the global conversation, with some even dubbing it the second DeepSeek.Manus claims to be the worlds first general AI agent, building off multiple AI models and agents to act autonomously on a wide range of tasks. Despite all the hype, very few people have had a chance to use it. MIT Technology Review was able to obtain access to Manus. Heres what we made of it.Caiwei ChenWaabi says its virtual robotrucks are realistic enough to prove the real ones are safeThe news: Canadian robotruck startup Waabi says its super-realistic virtual simulation is now accurate enough to prove the safety of its driverless big rigs without having to run them for miles on real roads.How it did it: The company uses a digital twin of its real-world robotrucks, loaded up with real sensor data, and measures how the twins performance compares to that of real trucks on real roads. Waabi says they now match almost exactly, and claims its approach is a better way to demonstrate safety than just racking up real-world miles, as many of its competitors do. Read the full story.Will Douglas HeavenThis artificial leaf makes hydrocarbons out of carbon dioxideFor many years, researchers have been working to build devices that can mimic photosynthesisthe process by which plants use sunlight and carbon dioxide to make their fuel. These artificial leaves use sunlight to separate water into oxygen and hydrogen, which could then be used to fuel cars or generate electricity. Now a research team from the University of Cambridge has taken aim at creating more energy-dense fuels.The groups device produces ethylene and ethane, proving that artificial leaves can create hydrocarbons. The development could offer a cheaper, cleaner way to make fuels, chemicals, and plasticswith the ultimate goal of creating fuels that dont leave a harmful carbon footprint after theyre burned. Read the full story.Carly KayThis startup just hit a big milestone for green steel productionGreen-steel startup Boston Metal just showed that it has all the ingredients needed to make steel without emitting gobs of greenhouse gases. The company successfully ran its largest reactor yet to make steel, producing over a ton of metal, MIT Technology Review can exclusively report.The latest milestone means that Boston Metal just got one step closer to commercializing its technology. And while there are still a lot of milestones left before reaching the scale needed to make a dent in the steel industry, the latest run shows that the company can scale up its process. Read the full story.Casey CrownhartThis article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Reviews weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.The must-readsIve combed the internet to find you todays most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.1 The US has resumed aid deliveries to UkraineLeaders have also agreed to start sharing military intelligence again. (The Guardian)+ Ukraine also endorsed a US proposal for a ceasefire. (Vox)+ Meet the radio-obsessed civilian shaping Ukraines drone defense. (MIT Technology Review)2 Donald Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on metal importsThe decision is likely to raise costs for American carmakers, and other manufacturers. (NYT $)+ Business leaders feel spooked by his frequent mixed messaging around tariffs. (WSJ $)+ However, US-native metal makers are delighted by the tariffs. (Economist $)+ How Trumps tariffs could drive up the cost of batteries, EVs, and more. (MIT Technology Review)3 Texas measles outbreak appears to be spreadingTwo people in Oklahoma are being treated for measles-like symptoms. (Ars Technica)+ An unvaccinated six-year old girl recently died in Texas. (The Atlantic $)+ The state is scrambling to respond to the outbreak. (Undark)+ The virus is extremely contagious and dangerous to children and adults alike. (Wired $)4 Elon Musk wants the US government to shut downPartly because it would make it easier to fire federal workers. (Wired $)+ A judge has ruled that DOGE must comply with the Freedom of Information Act. (The Verge)+ Can AI help DOGE slash government budgets? Its complex. (MIT Technology Review)5 OpenAI says its trained an AI to be really good at creative writing|The question is, can a model trained on existing material ever be truly creative? (TechCrunch)+ AI can make you more creativebut it has limits. (MIT Technology Review)6 Silicon Valleys AI startups are expanding in IndiaTalent is plentiful, particularly in tech hub Bangalore. (Bloomberg $)7 Spotify claims it paid $10 billion in royalties last yearIt called the payout the largest in music industry history. (FT $)+ How to break free of Spotifys algorithm. (MIT Technology Review)8 Saturn has more moons than the rest of the planets combined Researchers have finally spotted new moons that have previously evaded detection. (New Scientist $)9 This coffee shop is New Yorks hottest AI spot Handily, OpenAIs office is just across the street. (Insider $)10 Netflix shouldnt use AI to upscale resolutionThe technology left sitcom A Different World looking freakishly warped. (Vice)Quote of the dayThe uncertainty is just as bad as tariffs themselves.Donald Schneider, deputy head of US policy at investment bank Piper Sandler, explains to the Washington Post why investors are feeling rattled by Donald Trumps volatile approach to imposing tariffs.The big storyCan Afghanistans underground sneakernet survive the Taliban?November 2021When Afghanistan fell to the Taliban, Mohammad Yasin had to make some difficult decisions very quickly. He began erasing some of the sensitive data on his computer and moving the rest onto two of his largest hard drives, which he then wrapped in a layer of plastic and buried underground.Yasin is what is locally referred to as a computer kar: someone who sells digital content by hand in a country where a steady internet connection can be hard to come by, selling everything from movies, music, mobile applications, to iOS updates. And despite the dangers of Taliban rule, the countrys extensive sneakernet isnt planning on shutting down. Read the full story.Ruchi KumarWe can still have nice thingsA place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or skeet em at me.)+ Check out these novels inspired by what it means to be middle-aged.+ After a long absence, its looking like the Loch Ness Monster is staging its return.+ Chappell Roan, you are just fantastic.+ An AI stylist telling me what to wear? No thanks.