House of the Future | 1956 Photograph Exhibited at the 1956 Ideal Home Exhibition in London, the House of the Future by Alison and Peter Smithson is a visionary prototype that challenges conventions of domesticity. Set within the context of post-war Britain, a period marked by austerity and emerging optimism, the project explored the intersection of technology, material innovation, and evolving social dynamics. The Smithsons, already recognized for their theoretical rigor and critical stance toward mainstream modernism, sought to push the boundaries of domestic architecture. In the House of the Future, they offered not merely a dwelling but a speculative environment that engaged with the promise and anxieties of the atomic age. House of the Future Technical Information Architects: Alison and Peter Smithson Location: Ideal Home Exhibition, London, United Kingdom Client: Daily Mail Ideal Home Exhibition  Gross Area: 90 m2 | 970 Sq. Ft. Construction Year: 1956 Photographs: Canadian Centre for Architecture and Unknown Photographer The House of the Future should be a serious attempt to visualize the future of our daily living in the light of modern knowledge and available materials. – Alison and Peter Smithson 1 House of the Future Photographs 1956 Photograph © Klaas Vermaas | 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph 1956 Photograph Design Intent and Spatial Organization At the heart of the House of the Future lies a radical rethinking of spatial organization. Departing from conventional room hierarchies, the design promotes an open, fluid environment. Walls dissolve into curved partitions and adjustable elements, allowing for flexible reinterpretation of domestic spaces. Sleeping, dining, and social areas are loosely demarcated, creating a dynamic continuity that anticipates the contemporary concept of adaptable, multi-functional living. Circulation is conceived as an experiential sequence rather than a rigid path. Visitors enter through an air-lock-like vestibule, an explicit nod to the futuristic theme, and are drawn into an environment that eschews right angles and conventional thresholds. The Smithsons’ emphasis on flexibility and continuous movement within the house reflects their belief that domestic architecture must accommodate the evolving rhythms of life. Materiality, Technology, and the Future Materiality in the House of the Future embodies the optimism of the era. Plastics and synthetic finishes dominate the interior, forming seamless surfaces that evoke a sense of sterility and futility. Often associated with industrial production, these materials signaled a departure from traditional domestic textures. The smooth, malleable surfaces of the house reinforce the Smithsons’ embrace of prefabrication and modularity. Technological integration is a key theme. The design includes built-in appliances and concealed mechanical systems, hinting at a utopian and disquieting automated lifestyle. Bathrooms, kitchens, and sleeping pods are incorporated as interchangeable modules, underscoring the house as a system rather than a static structure. In doing so, the Smithsons prefigured later discourses on the “smart home” and the seamless integration of technology into daily life. This material and technological strategy reflects a critical understanding of domestic labor and convenience. The house’s self-contained gadgets and synthetic surfaces suggest a future in which maintenance and domestic chores are minimized, freeing inhabitants to engage with broader cultural and social pursuits. Legacy and Influence The House of the Future’s influence resonates far beyond its exhibition. It prefigured the radical experimentation of groups like Archigram and the metabolist visions of the 1960s. Its modular approach and embrace of technology also foreshadowed the high-tech movement’s fascination with flexibility and systems thinking. While the project was ephemeral, a temporary installation at a trade fair, its theoretical provocations endure. It questioned how architecture could not only house but also anticipate and shape new living forms. Moreover, it crystallized the Smithsons’ ongoing interrogation of architecture’s social role, from their later brutalist housing schemes to urban design theories. In retrospect, the House of the Future is less of a resolved design proposal and more of an architectural manifesto. It embodies a critical tension: the optimism of technological progress and the need for architecture to respond to human adaptability and social evolution. As we confront contemporary challenges like climate crisis, digital living, and shifting social paradigms, the Smithsons’ speculative experiment remains an evocative reminder that the architecture of tomorrow must be as thoughtful and provocative as the House of the Future. House of the Future Plans Axonometric View | © Alison and Peter Smithson via CCA Floor Plan | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Floor Plan | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Section | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Section | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Section | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Section | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA Section | © Alison and Peter Smithson, via CCA House of the Future Image Gallery About Alison and Peter Smithson Alison and Peter Smithson were British architects and influential thinkers who emerged in the mid-20th century, celebrated for their critical reimagining of modern architecture. Their work, including projects like the House of the Future, the Robin Hood Gardens housing complex, and the Upper Lawn Solar Pavilion, consistently challenged conventional notions of domesticity, urbanism, and materiality. Central to their practice was a belief in architecture’s capacity to shape social life, emphasizing adaptability, flexibility, and the dynamic interactions between buildings and their users. They were pivotal in bridging the gap between post-war modernism and the experimental architectural movements of the 1960s and 1970s. Credits and Additional Notes Banham, Reyner. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. MIT Press, 1960. Forty, Adrian. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. Thames & Hudson, 2000. Smithson, Alison, and Peter Smithson. The Charged Void: Architecture. Monacelli Press, 2001. OASE Journal. “Houses of the Future: 1956 and Beyond.” OASE 75, 2007. Vidler, Anthony. Histories of the Immediate Present: Inventing Architectural Modernism. MIT Press, 2008. Canadian Centre for Architecture (CCA). “House of the Future.”

Scholars of gender and sexuality have been exploring ‘queer spaces’ for over six decades. While for many years homes and domesticity remained out of focus or at the margins of queer space research, a recent ‘domestic turn’ has brought queer people’s homes to the foreground. Queer Spaces (2022), a recollection of case studies of queer domestic spaces edited by Joshua Mardell and Adam Nathaniel Furman, is just one significant work within the recent shift to explore the intersection of queer identities and domesticity, for example. Disobedient Dollhouse No.1, 2023, Photography by Sophie Percival Over the past four years I have documented the homes of LGBTQ+ people and come to understand how they inhabit them through interviews, detailed spatial drawings and the creation of dollhouses. This methodology deliberately subverts traditional architectural model-making conventions, emphasising narrative over spatial clarity, interior qualities over façades, and incorporating elaborate details that standard architectural models typically avoid. While this may feel like a rather unusual pursuit for an architect, it’s also one I feel is necessary and urgent. Disobedient Dollhouse No.1, 2023, Photography by Sophie Percival My current research builds upon years of professional practice in London and scrutinises the limitations of standardised design approaches. Through interviews and detailed spatial surveys, I am examining how queer families navigate living spaces designed according to the London Plan’s Housing Design Guide.Advertisement Early findings from my field work show a chasm between the queer daily lives of some of London’s LGBTQ+ families and the rigid homes the standard produces. In cases where spatial flexibility is available within domestic architecture, wonderful, innovative, caring and radical uses of domestic space emerge, enabling queer forms of raising children or coexisting with current and former lovers. These are not just joyful nice-to-haves, but essential for my participants to live their queerness at home, in full. Homes should not just be where queer folk feel safe; they must also be spaces where our queerness flourishes. Disobedient Dollhouse No.1, 2023, Photography by Sophie Percival The housing emergency in the UK and most of the Western world has urged architects, planners and developers to focus on an increased delivery of ‘units of housing’. Perhaps unsurprisingly, my early findings suggest that this sense of urgency risks under-delivering on quality and space. Housing standards have codified aesthetic, functional, and spatial homogeneity. They reproduce conservative ideals of housing and family at a time when families are growing more and more diverse. All the while, with the expansion of permitted development rights, they are failing to deliver an overall improvement in size and quality of the UK’s housing stock. Disobedient Dollhouse No.1, 2023, Photography by Sophie Percival The need for an alternative, open-ended and, perhaps, queer toolkit to design homes – one that expands the ethical and aesthetic horizons of housing design – has never been more urgent. I am therefore also working on developing my ‘disobedient dollhouse making’ as a design tool. One that puts future users at the centre, allowing them to fabulate a different horizon for housing design. My aim is to use dollhouses as a ‘serious’ design game that enables participants to explore the true possibilities of housing beyond the ‘straightjacket’ of the standard. Follow Daniel Ovalle Costal’s research at @QueerDomCanon on Instagram 2025-06-03 Fran Williams comment and share

A small home in Wayne County, Missouri was torn apart by a tornado. An aerial image by Jeff Roberson taken on March 15 depicts chunks of stick-framed walls and half-recognizable debris strewn across a patchy lawn in an eviscerated orthography of middle-American life. Elisa Iturbe, assistant professor of Architecture at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design, describes this scene as “an image of climate impact, climate victimhood…these walls are doing the hard work of containment, of containing the rituals of human lifestyle.” Roberson’s image embodied the themes that emerged from the Projective Territories Symposium: The atomized fragility of contemporary American domesticity, the fundamental link between ways of living and modes of land tenure, and the necessary primacy of form in architecture’s response to the incoming upheaval of climate change. Lydia Kallipoliti talked about her 2024 book Histories of Ecological Design; An Unfinished Cyclopedia. (Andy Eichler) Projective Territories was hosted at Kent State University’s College of Architecture and Environmental Design on April 3 and 4. Organized and led by the CAED’s assistant professor Paul Mosley, the symposium brought Iturbe, Columbia University’s associate professor Lydia Kallipoliti, California College of the Arts’ associate professor Neeraj Bhatia, and professor Albert Pope of Rice University to Kent, Ohio, to discuss the relationship between territory and architecture in the face of climate change. “At its core, territory is land altered by human inhabitation,” read Mosley’s synopsis. “If ensuring a survivable future means rethinking realities of social organization, economy, and subsistence, then how might architecture—as a way of thinking and rethinking the world—contribute to these new realities?” Projective Territories kicked off on the afternoon of April 3 with a discussion of Bhatia’s Life After Property exhibition hosted at the CAED’s Armstrong Gallery. The exhibition collected drawings, renderings, and models by Bhatia’s practice The Open Workshop on a puzzle-piece shaped table constructed from plywood and painted blue. Nestled into the table’s geometric subtractions, Bhatia, Pope, Mosley, and CAED associate professor Taraneh Meshkani discussed Bhatia’s research into the commons: A system of land tenure by which communities manage and share resources with minimal reliance on the state through an ethic of solidarity, mutualism, and reciprocity. Neeraj Bhatia presented new typologies for collective living. (Andy Eichler) The symposium’s second day was organized into a morning session, “The Erosion of Territory,” with lectures by Kallipoliti and Iturbe, and an afternoon session, “The Architecture of Expanding Ecologies,” with lectures by Bhatia and Pope. Mosley’s introduction to “The Erosion of Territory” situated Kallipoliti and Iturbe’s work in a discussion about “how territories have been historically shaped by extraction and control and are unraveling under strain.” Lydia Kallipoliti’s lecture “Ecological Design; Cohabiting the World” presented questions raised by her 2024 book Histories of Ecological Design; An Unfinished Cyclopedia, which she described as “an attempt to clarify how nature as a concept was used in history.” Kallipoliti proposed an ecological model that projects outward from domestic interiors to the world to generate a “universe of fragmented worldviews and a cloud of stories.” Iturbe’s “Transgressing Immutable Lines” centered on her research into the formal potentials for Community Land Trusts—nonprofits that own buildings in trust on existing real estate. Iturbe described these trusts as “Not just a juridical mechanism, but a proposal for rewriting the relationship between land and people.” “Ecology is the basis for a more pleasurable alternative,” said Mosley in his introduction to the day’s second session. “Cooperation and care aren’t the goals, but the means of happiness.” An exhibition complementing the symposium shared drawings, renderings, and models. (Andy Eichler) Neeraj Bhatia’s lecture “Life After Property” complemented the previous days’ exhibition, problematizing the housing crisis as an ideological commitment to housing rooted in market speculation. Bhatia presented new typologies for collective living with the flexibility to formally stabilize the interpersonal relationships that define life in the commons. Albert Pope finished the day’s lectures with “Inverse Utopia,” presenting work from his 2024 book of the same name, which problematizes postwar American urban sprawl as an incapability to visualize the vast horizontal expansion of low-density development. Collectively, the day’s speakers outlined a model that situated the American domestic form at the center of the global climate crisis. Demanding complete separation from productive territories, this formal ideology of the isolated object is in a process of active dismemberment under climate change. The speakers’ proposed solutions were unified under fresh considerations of established ideas of typology and form, directly engaging politics of the collective as an input for shaping existing space. As Friday’s session drew to a close, the single-family home appeared as a primitive relic which architecture must overcome. Albert Pope’s images of tower complexes in Hong Kong and council estates in London that house thousands appeared as visions of the future. “The only way we can begin to address this dilemma is to begin to understand who we are in order to enlist the kinds of collective responses to this problem,” said Pope. Walker MacMurdo is an architectural designer, critic, and adjunct professor who studies the relationship between architecture and the ground at Kent State University’s College of Architecture and Environmental Design.

Casa SA207 | © Diego Vázquez Mellado Casa SA207 by Vázquez Mellado is situated in the historic city of Querétaro, Mexico, on a narrow site measuring 8.70 meters in width and extending 37 meters in depth. The lot’s proportions posed a particular challenge, which the architects addressed by drawing inspiration from the traditional courtyard houses in Querétaro’s historic center. In these historic residences, the courtyard, or patio, serves as a passive climate moderator and a spatial and social nucleus. Casa SA207 revisits this typology through a contemporary lens, offering a nuanced response to privacy, density, and domesticity in the urban fabric. Casa SA207 Technical Information Architects1-3: Vázquez Mellado Location: Querétaro, Mexico Area: 362.47 m2 | 3,900 Sq. Ft. Completion Year: 2025 Photographs: © Diego Vázquez Mellado The patio is not just a spatial element but the heart of the home. It welcomes, shelters, and connects, offering a sense of peace and belonging within the density of the city. – Diego Vázquez Mellado Casa SA207 Photographs © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado © Diego Vázquez Mellado Spatial Organization and Domestic Hierarchies The project’s street-facing façade is entirely closed off, with no visible windows or apertures. This gesture reinforces privacy and anonymity within the city while turning the house inward. At the rear of the property, the architects introduced a direct connection to a neighboring public park, anchoring the residence within both private and communal realms. The courtyard, centrally within the linear plan, acts as a fulcrum that mediates light, views, and circulation. It is both the spatial heart and the conceptual axis of the home. The house is organized into a two-level scheme, with the ground floor dedicated to shared family life and the upper floor reserved for private functions. The spatial strategy intentionally encourages daily activity and interaction on the ground level. The living and dining rooms are placed at the far end of the house, adjacent to the public park. These areas are balanced by a kitchen and TV room positioned toward the front of the lot. Both rooms are oriented toward the central courtyard, promoting visual connectivity and natural ventilation. On the upper level, bedrooms and a modest study are distributed linearly. These spaces are compact by design, reinforcing their function as retreats for rest and contemplation rather than prolonged daytime activity. The reduced footprint of the upper floor emphasizes the hierarchy of domestic life envisioned by the architects: a house where familial engagement and collective routines unfold at ground level and where privacy is quiet and unobtrusive. The courtyard acts as the project’s spatial and psychological anchor. Its tall enclosing walls and dense vegetation cultivate a sense of introspection, calm, and disconnection from the surrounding city. It is not merely a source of daylight or ventilation but a place of stillness, where time slows, and attention turns inward. Materiality and Constructive Logic The project is defined materially by the use of clay brick, chosen for its durability, thermal properties, and ability to age gracefully over time. This decision reflects a clear commitment to low-maintenance living and constructive honesty. The brick’s modularity also provides flexibility for future adaptations without disrupting the architectural language of the house. One of the project’s defining features is the 6-meter-high wall that borders the courtyard. This vertical surface acts as a visual barrier while allowing the interior spaces to remain open to the patio without compromising privacy. The wall also contributes to a sense of enclosure and sanctuary within the house, allowing residents to draw their curtains or leave them open without concern for external views. Throughout the project, the material palette is restrained, composed primarily of exposed brick, wood, and concrete. This simplicity reinforces the architectural clarity of the design and allows spatial relationships to take precedence over decorative elements. The detailing is modest and measured, aligning with the overall ethos of the project. Reflections on Typology and Contemporary Living Casa SA207 thoughtfully explores the courtyard as an enduring architectural typology. By foregrounding the patio not just as a design feature but as the organizing principle of the entire house, the architects offer a model for contemporary living that prioritizes inwardness, serenity, and slow rhythms. The house precisely negotiates the tension between urban density and domestic refuge, creating a spatial narrative grounded in tradition and responsive to present-day needs. The project demonstrates how compact urban living does not necessitate compromise in spatial quality. Through careful program, form, and material orchestration, Casa SA207 invites reconsidering how architecture can shape the conditions for a more deliberate and connected way of living. In its restraint, the house resists spectacle and offers a quiet, rigorous architecture rooted in site, culture, and human experience. Casa SA207 Plans Ground Level | © Vázquez Mellado Upper Level | © Vázquez Mellado Roof Level | © Vázquez Mellado Section | © Vázquez Mellado Elevation | © Vázquez Mellado Casa SA207 Image Gallery About Vázquez Mellado Vázquez Mellado is a Mexican architectural design studio based in Querétaro. They are known for their thoughtful reinterpretation of traditional typologies through contemporary forms and materials. Led by Jorge and Diego Vázquez Mellado, the firm explores spatial intimacy, privacy, and material honesty across residential and cultural projects. Credits and Additional Notes Lead Architects: Jorge Vázquez Mellado, Diego Vázquez Mellado Collaborators: Elvia Torres, Adelfo Pérez, Norma Velázco, Jorge Uribe Landscape Design: Matorral Estudio

The Missing Room / Carroccera CollectiveSave this picture!•Italy Architects: Carroccera Collective Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2025 Photographs Photographs: Lead Architects: Gianfrancesco Brivio Sforza, Dariia Nepop, Nacha Palomeque Coll, Caspar Schols, Angelica Rimoldi More SpecsLess Specs Save this picture! Text description provided by the architects. The Missing Room is a living space designed to encourage new rituals and patterns of use, offering an opportunity to enter an alternative time zone and experience a passage between a human-controlled environment and an untamed natural one. It is a room that has escaped the rigid confines of a defined house, choosing to exist without walls or a ceiling – a place where nature becomes the main inhabitant and visitors are invited to act as respectful guests. As one enters the Carroccera landscape, the search begins. Meandering through the land, the Missing Room gradually reveals itself, with the wanderer catching shimmering glimpses of smaller secondary structures shining through the forest greenery. This collection of visual fragments prepares the visitor for the main encounter, enriching the landscape with its enigmatic shapes and forms.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!The Missing Room is not simply a shelter but a space that invites discovery. A collection of abstract forms with a core activated by water and fire, it reimagines the most primal human rituals: resting, eating, cleansing, and conversing. These activities mix in unexpected yet harmonious ways. While guests cook over a crackling open fire, another inhabitant bathes in a heated bath, and a cow drinks from an integrated trough—all beneath a ceiling of tree canopies and the open sky. This space encourages visitors to set their own pace and redefine their pre-existing notions of domesticity. At the core of the Missing Room stands a seven-meter-tall monolith: a multifunctional chimney. On one side, the fire powers the ovens, while on the other, it heats water for bathing and warms the area at the front of the space. This towering form responds to the scale of the surrounding trees, rising like a beacon above the canopies, marking its presence in the landscape and guiding visitors with its smoke signals.Save this picture!Save this picture!Water, like fire, plays a central role in activating the hidden features of the structure. The water flow is released at the entrance of the structure, filling the main collection channel that distributes the flow into various basins throughout the structure. Users are encouraged to interact with the water systems by adding or removing plugs as needed to direct the flow; to fill the bath, use the sink or supply water to the cattle trough. The bath next to the water channel has a built-in natural convection system and comfortably accommodates three to four people. For solo use, the bath's size can be reduced with a partitioning panel and a removable lock to conserve water. Once closed, the bath can be transformed into a heated surface and used as a resting place to sleep at night under the stars.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!A bespoke sail canopy can be set up to offer shade or protection from rain. Using the chimney as a mast, the fabric is raised with a series of ropes and tensioned at the corners with ground pegs. By day, the canopy catches dappled shadows cast by the surrounding foliage; by night, it reflects light from built-in recessed lighting, transforming the structure into a glowing lantern. The Missing Room reconnects us with the rhythms of nature that have been lost in the contemporary world by reducing the act of dwelling to its very essence. Forest debris is gathered and converted into heat while the wastewater from bathing and cooking is filtered and safely dispersed into the field, providing irrigation and wet areas that contribute to the overall biodiversity of the forest.Save this picture!© Alessandro NanniConstructed with a focus on material and structural sustainability, the stainless steel refuge is durable, recyclable, and resistant to weathering. To protect the land, the modular structure and use of a non-invasive screw-pile foundation ensures that no traces are left behind if the house is required to be removed from the site. The Missing Room is a space for all – humans and non-humans – to share. Above all, the Carroccera Collective conceived of the room as a place to enjoy the very act of being. To invite our guests to slow down, reorient the senses, and rediscover the sensory richness and simplicity of the natural environment. As nature has vanished from our daily rituals and gone missing from our human lives, the room is a space to reveal the forgotten.Save this picture! Project gallerySee allShow less Project locationAddress:Carroccera site, Piedmont, ItalyLocation to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address.About this office MaterialSteelMaterials and TagsPublished on May 23, 2025Cite: "The Missing Room / Carroccera Collective" 23 May 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1030385/the-missing-room-carroccera-collective&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否 You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

Cabin in Woods | © Egemen Karakaya Set on the Kozak Plateau near Pergamon in western Turkey, Cabin in Woods by Ediz Demirel Works presents a compelling investigation into the relationship between architecture, landscape, and inhabitation. Modest in scale but conceptually rigorous, the 36-square-meter structure explores dualities in materiality, spatial experience, and construction technique. Its design resists conventional tropes of vernacular mimicry, opting instead for conscious contrast. This architectural gesture neither disappears into the land nor dominates it but negotiates a dynamic tension between embeddedness and autonomy. Cabin in Woods Technical Information Architects1-2: Ediz Demirel Works Location: Kozak Plateau, Pergamon, Izmir, Turkey Area: 36 m2 | 387 Sq. Ft. Completion Year: 2025 Photographs: © Egemen Karakaya The identity of the structure is shaped by the interplay of two opposing tectonic approaches in terms of materials, construction techniques, production methods, and the contrast between locality and foreignness. – Ediz Demirel  Cabin in Woods Photographs © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya © Egemen Karakaya Design Intent and Conceptual Framework The cabin occupies a terrace wall from a former vineyard, utilizing the dry stone retaining wall as a literal and conceptual foundation. This gesture roots the project within the existing agricultural topography, establishing a minimal intervention approach. Yet from this grounded base, the cabin rises as an artificial insertion. Its steel frame and corten cladding introduce a formal and material vocabulary foreign to the rural surroundings, underscoring a deliberate dialectic between context and object. At the heart of the project is a sunken conversation pit, an introspective space that anchors the plan and serves as the primary social node. This recessed area draws the inhabitant downward into the landscape, offering a tactile and spatial contrast to the protective shell above. The lowered core reframes domesticity in spatial terms, allowing for a gathering space that privileges horizontality, intimacy, and thermal mass. Around this core, other functional programs such as wet areas, storage, and circulation are deployed as appendages. Above, a mezzanine floor is delicately inserted within the steel shell, creating zones for sleeping and working without compromising the spatial clarity of the core below. Spatial Organization and Experiential Strategy Despite its compact footprint, the cabin achieves a high degree of spatial complexity. This is accomplished not through planimetric manipulation but through sectional richness and the careful calibration of views, light, and thresholds. A singular horizontal aperture cuts through the shell, framing a panoramic view of the forested hills. This gesture provides more than visual access; it actively orchestrates a dialogue between the interior and the broader ecological context. The facade, punctuated with small cantilevered openings, introduces sculptural moments that protrude into the landscape. These elements operate simultaneously as light sources, thermal breaks, and spatial cues. They animate the exterior envelope while mediating the inhabitant’s sensory experience from within. The strategy reveals an architectural sensibility attuned to the nuances of perception, perspective, and phenomenology. The sunken core, in particular, reinforces this experiential ambition. It is not merely a spatial curiosity but a site of temporal deceleration, a hearth-like void where fire, conversation, and reflection converge. In this sense, the project subtly reinvigorates domestic rituals through spatial articulation, encouraging modes of living that prioritize gathering and grounding over visual spectacle. Material Strategy and Construction Logic The architectural language of Cabin in Woods is structured around a deliberate contrast between local, irregular materials and prefabricated, controlled systems. The foundation, comprising a reinforced concrete slab cast directly into the existing dry stone terrace, extends the material logic of the landscape. This decision grounds the structure physically and symbolically, linking it to the region’s vernacular heritage. Conversely, the corten steel cladding and the structural steel frame are fabricated off-site and assembled locally. This bifurcation in construction methods aligns with the project’s conceptual division. The base engages the earth and honors the irregularity of place, while the shell expresses a technological detachment and formal precision. With its evolving patina and atmospheric depth, the use of corten adds a layer of temporal expression to the architectural language. It ages, oxidizes, and marks time, introducing a poetic dimension to the otherwise industrial envelope. Such a contrast is not merely aesthetic. It reflects a broader interrogation of architectural identity—how buildings can simultaneously belong, estrange, settle, and provoke. The tectonic opposition between ground and shell becomes a vehicle for this inquiry, inviting reflection on how architecture positions itself in relation to site and memory. Contextual and Critical Significance Beyond its immediate programmatic function as a short-term rental, Cabin in Woods engages with urgent disciplinary questions. How should contemporary architecture respond to rural contexts without defaulting to nostalgia? How can compact dwellings foster depth of experience without resorting to over-programming? And how might architecture embrace contradiction as a generative force rather than a problem to be resolved? Ediz Demirel’s response is measured yet assertive. Rather than dissolving into the landscape, the cabin asserts its autonomy while acknowledging the terrain. The project frames its site not as a passive backdrop but as an active participant in the architectural narrative. Its minimal footprint, precise detailing, and tectonic clarity demonstrate how small-scale interventions can yield disproportionately rich spatial and conceptual outcomes. Cabin in Woods Plans Floor Plan | © Ediz Demirel Works Section | © Ediz Demirel Works Elevations | © Ediz Demirel Works Details | © Ediz Demirel Works © Ediz Demirel Works Cabin in Woods Image Gallery About Ediz Demirel Works Ediz Demirel Works (EDWorks) is an Istanbul-based architectural studio founded in 2022 by Ediz Demirel. The practice focuses on small to medium-scale projects integrating design, construction, and development. EDWorks emphasizes material experimentation, site-specific strategies, and balancing traditional craftsmanship and contemporary tectonics. Notable projects include Cabin in Woods and Pergamon House in the Izmir region. The studio’s approach reflects a commitment to architectural clarity and contextual sensitivity. Credits and Additional Notes Design Architect: Ediz Demirel Site Architects: Ediz Demirel, Tuna Ökten

Mount Holly, Blue PrinceThis year’s surprise hit Blue Prince is a proper video game wonder. It’s an architectural puzzler in which you explore a transforming mansion left to you by an eccentric relative. The place is filled with secrets, and whenever you reach a door you get to pick the room on the other side from a handful of options. The whole game is a rumination on houses and how we live in them. Nostalgic and melancholic, it feels designed to make us look harder at what surrounds us.The Edison mansion, Maniac Mansion Photograph: Lucasfilm GamesThis Addams’-style Queen Anne with clapboard facades and dark windows is a classic haunted house, reportedly inspired by the Skywalker Ranch. The great twist of this early LucasArts adventure is that all kinds of spooky things are happening, but the fiends and monsters you meet are often surprisingly charming – the odd hamster-in-a-microwave incident aside. Maybe not a great place to live, but these guys would make memorable neighbours.Spencer mansion, Resident Evil Photograph: CapcomNestled amid the foreboding Arklay mountains outside Raccoon City, the Spencer mansion is what would have happened if the murderer from the Saw movies had become an architect. This vast country pile in the Second Empire style is lusciously adorned with oil paintings, antique furniture and hidden rooms. However, any potential buyers should know it’s essentially a vast trap, filled with puzzles and monsters, designed to kill anyone wanting to investigate the massive bio-research facility beneath it.Finch house, What Remains of Edith Finch Photograph: Giant SparrowBased on Goose Creek Tower in Alaska, Finch house is a monument to the doomed family who once lived there, which explains why the bedrooms are sealed off like museum exhibits. Floors are piled up haphazardly and navigating the interior can feel like moving through the transformations of a pop-up book. Living here would be fascinating, but you’d need good joints, what with all the stairs. On the plus side, the bookcases are filled with works such as Gravity’s Rainbow, Slaughterhouse-Five and House of Leaves, so you’d get to catch up on your postmodernist reading.The mansion, Jet Set Willy Photograph: YouTubeOne of the great video-game homes, this strange mansion is left in disarray after an almighty booze-up. The rooms feel very much like a lurid hangover, incorporating stomping boots, chomping toilet seats and at one point, an entire tree. What makes this classic platformer so haunting is the juxtaposition of domesticity and surreal horror. The bedroom is out of bounds and the refrigerator threatens to extend for miles. Oh, and there’s an entrance to Hades on the floorplan.Island cottage, Animal Crossing: New Horizons Photograph: NintendoNintendo’s dreamy deconstruction of capitalism is so close to being a doll’s house for adults that it makes sense that you get your own home to decorate. Beyond choosing the wallpaper and adding just the right indoor plants, you also have an option to fill the air with recordings of music performed by a local dog. This sounds childlike, but the compulsion to refine layouts feels like a very middle-aged kind of obsession, and in one of many brutal lunges at realism, you don’t even get to enter your house without first being handcuffed to a gigantic mortgage.Snowpeak ruins, Zelda: Twilight Princess Photograph: NintendoWhat’s your favourite Zelda dungeon? Allow us to make the case for Snowpeak ruins, from the slightly under-loved Twilight Princess. There have been better puzzles in Zelda, and better rewards for beating a boss, but this cosy getaway high in the mountains is easily the most warmly domestic space in the entire series. It’s not just down to the warmth radiating from the many hearths or the juxtaposition to the icy chill outside. It’s the presence of two gentle Yetis, wandering around despite your dramatic arrival, tending to bubbling pots of stew.Croft Manor, Tomb Raider Photograph: Square EnixLara Croft’s country house may have started as a place for the games to tuck away a tutorial section, but the Manor quickly evolved into a vital part of the series’ appeal. Croft isn’t just gymnastic and deadly, she’s absolutely minted. Her house is filled with the strangely proportioned rooms you often got when PS1 games ventured indoors, and there’s often a hedge maze alongside a gymnasium. Croft has a room just for her harpsichord! And she has a butler who’s happy to wearily plod along behind her and endure an eternity locked in the freezer.Luigi’s Mansion Photograph: NintendoLuigi’s Mansion was the first game to give either one of Nintendo’s plumbers much in the way of a personality. It’s tempting to argue that’s because Luigi’s thrown in among ordinary domestic clutter here, rather than being let loose to jump and dance through worlds of colourful whimsy. The mansion in question may be filled with ghosts, but it’s also filled with bookshelves, hallway carpeting, light fixtures and a decent-sized kitchen. It’s the perfect place for the ever-roving Marioverse to settle down for a moment and offer a sustained depiction of a single place.The lighthouse, Beyond Good and Evil Photograph: MobygamesJade is a photojournalist rather than a soldier, exploring a fantasy world that’s based on Europe rather than the US or Japan. No wonder, then, that instead of a mansion or hi-tech HQ, she gets to live in a lighthouse on the misty shores of a quiet water world. The lighthouse doubles as a refuge and orphanage, and it’s a delight to spot the little details the designers have included, whether it’s the chummy mess in the living spaces, or the crayon drawings on the woodwork.Botany Manor Photograph: Whitethorn GamesPlayers are drawn to Botany Manor by the puzzles, which revolve around uncovering the conditions required to allow a series of flowers to grow and thrive. But the space itself is arguably the thing that draws everyone back until the game is complete. Here is a version of early 20th-century English elegance pitched somewhere between the worlds of Jeeves and Flora Poste. The colours and sense of expectant stillness, meanwhile, could come from a piece of Clarice Cliff Bizarre Ware pottery.The Carnovasch Estate, Phantasmagoria Photograph: SierraWhen novelist Adrienne Delaney moves into this remote New England property seeking inspiration, she loves the giant fireplaces, labyrinthine corridors and authentic gothic chapel but isn’t so keen on the presence of a wife-murdering demon intent on decapitating, stabbing or squashing residents to death. Heavily inspired by The Shining and the works of Edgar Allen Poe, adventure designer Roberta Williams built this mansion to be the ultimate gore-splattered horror house. Viewing recommended.