London green belt development could include new towns, Sadiq Khan confirms
Sadiq Khan is considering allowing new towns of more than 10,000 homes to be built on London’s green belt, the mayor’s office has confirmed.
Planned communities such as Stevenage and Milton Keynes formed a major part of new housing delivery after World War II, and the current Labour government has revived the concept as part of its plans to ramp up housebuilding in the UK.
Source: Daniel Gayne
The government’s New Towns Taskforce is currently examining almost 100 proposals for new towns and will recommend locations to ministers in July.
London’s mayor announced his own radical plans to boost housebuilding in the city last Friday, including a major review of the capital’s green belt, which could see large swathes of land opened up for development.
Khan’s speech came alongside the publication of a consultation document, which gives the first indications of what the next London Plan might look like.
“Opportunities for large-scale developmentin London’s green belt are being considered in areas with good public transport access,” it said.
The document said there is ”significant potential with the government’s New Towns Taskforce”, which it said the Greater London Authority would be engaging with.
However, it said that ”any new homes delivered would need to count towards, not be additional to, meeting London’s nationally-established housing need of 88,000 homes per year”.
The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government’s current position is that new towns housing numbers would not count towards meeting the assessed housing need of the area in which they are built.
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: “We are doing all we can in London to help deliver the homes that are so desperately needed.
“The Mayor wants to work with the UK Government and New Towns Taskforce to make sure that any work on new towns goes hand in hand with the development of his next London Plan to deliver high quality and affordable homes.”
>> See also: ‘I make it a virtue that I’ve changed my mind’: Sadiq Khan makes a show of green belt housing U-turn, but where might the new homes actually be built?
As well as mooting possible new towns in London’s green belt, the consultation document also alludes to using the capital’s designated ‘Opportunity Areas’ as potential new town sites.
“We will also explore whether and how the government’s New Towns Taskforce work might apply within London’s current urban area to certain OAs of significant scale,” it said.
Opportunity Areas, many of which are in more central parts of the city, are locations identified in the London Plan as having major potential for new homes, jobs and infrastructure.
A report by Business LDN late last year said at least one new town should be built in the capital in order to address housing need.
The report, developed with consultants, architects and planners, including Arup and DP9, said the capital’s unique political structures made it relatively easy to launch new towns, with strategic plan-making through the London Plan, and a mayor with the power to establish development corporations and responsibility for much of the city’s transit system.
It did not pinpoint exact locations for a new town in London, but noted that 60% of London’s green belt was within 2km of an existing rail or tube station and that a number of those locations overlapped with existing ‘Opportunity Areas’, earmarked in the London plan as apt for new homes and infrastructure.
Jonathan Seager, policy delivery director at BusinessLDN, said at the time: “If the Government wants to move fast on new towns, London has the connectivity, demand and political set-up needed to get spades in the ground swiftly.
”The city is uniquely placed to house multiple types of these developments as part of the drive by Ministers to hit ambitious housing and growth targets.
”Building one or more new towns in the capital should be a no-brainer for both economic and social reasons.”
Earlier this week, the House of Lords built environment committee heard evidence in its inquiry into the practical delivery of new towns.
John Sturzaker, Ebenezer Howard chair of planning at the University of Hertfordshire, told the committee that public acceptance of the new towns would be heavily influenced by how well important infrastructure requirements are realised in advance.
Source: ShutterstockNew towns brought forward by the government may be significantly smaller than post-war developments like Milton Keynes”I think it’s really important that the infrastructure to support these communities is going in before, or at the very least, at the same time as new housing, whether that’s a village hall, whether it’s schools, whether it’s shops, so that you don’t have people living a sort of pioneer lifestyle,” he said
“We need to have an infrastructure first approach, which common in other parts of Europe”.
The professor also noted that the government’s definition of new towns would include much smaller developments than the post-war new towns.
”10,000 is not very big in terms of a new town. if you wanted a standalone new town like the traditional ones you might be looking at 10 or 20 times that,” he said, suggesting that the government was more likely to be looking at urban extensions or networks of smaller new towns.
Speaking to Housing Today’s sister title Building, he elaborated on his comments to the committee and addressed how the government could approach new town development within the M25.
“The traditional model of new towns that we’re familiar with in this country, places like Hatfield or Stevenage or Milton Keynes, would be too big to be within Greater London,” he said.
He referenced Chapelton in Aberdeenshire and Chelmsford Garden Community in Essex as examples of new towns of a smaller scale.
He said he wasn’t aware of any suitable sites in London but said he had “no doubt there will be some”.
#london #green #belt #development #could
London green belt development could include new towns, Sadiq Khan confirms
Sadiq Khan is considering allowing new towns of more than 10,000 homes to be built on London’s green belt, the mayor’s office has confirmed.
Planned communities such as Stevenage and Milton Keynes formed a major part of new housing delivery after World War II, and the current Labour government has revived the concept as part of its plans to ramp up housebuilding in the UK.
Source: Daniel Gayne
The government’s New Towns Taskforce is currently examining almost 100 proposals for new towns and will recommend locations to ministers in July.
London’s mayor announced his own radical plans to boost housebuilding in the city last Friday, including a major review of the capital’s green belt, which could see large swathes of land opened up for development.
Khan’s speech came alongside the publication of a consultation document, which gives the first indications of what the next London Plan might look like.
“Opportunities for large-scale developmentin London’s green belt are being considered in areas with good public transport access,” it said.
The document said there is ”significant potential with the government’s New Towns Taskforce”, which it said the Greater London Authority would be engaging with.
However, it said that ”any new homes delivered would need to count towards, not be additional to, meeting London’s nationally-established housing need of 88,000 homes per year”.
The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government’s current position is that new towns housing numbers would not count towards meeting the assessed housing need of the area in which they are built.
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: “We are doing all we can in London to help deliver the homes that are so desperately needed.
“The Mayor wants to work with the UK Government and New Towns Taskforce to make sure that any work on new towns goes hand in hand with the development of his next London Plan to deliver high quality and affordable homes.”
>> See also: ‘I make it a virtue that I’ve changed my mind’: Sadiq Khan makes a show of green belt housing U-turn, but where might the new homes actually be built?
As well as mooting possible new towns in London’s green belt, the consultation document also alludes to using the capital’s designated ‘Opportunity Areas’ as potential new town sites.
“We will also explore whether and how the government’s New Towns Taskforce work might apply within London’s current urban area to certain OAs of significant scale,” it said.
Opportunity Areas, many of which are in more central parts of the city, are locations identified in the London Plan as having major potential for new homes, jobs and infrastructure.
A report by Business LDN late last year said at least one new town should be built in the capital in order to address housing need.
The report, developed with consultants, architects and planners, including Arup and DP9, said the capital’s unique political structures made it relatively easy to launch new towns, with strategic plan-making through the London Plan, and a mayor with the power to establish development corporations and responsibility for much of the city’s transit system.
It did not pinpoint exact locations for a new town in London, but noted that 60% of London’s green belt was within 2km of an existing rail or tube station and that a number of those locations overlapped with existing ‘Opportunity Areas’, earmarked in the London plan as apt for new homes and infrastructure.
Jonathan Seager, policy delivery director at BusinessLDN, said at the time: “If the Government wants to move fast on new towns, London has the connectivity, demand and political set-up needed to get spades in the ground swiftly.
”The city is uniquely placed to house multiple types of these developments as part of the drive by Ministers to hit ambitious housing and growth targets.
”Building one or more new towns in the capital should be a no-brainer for both economic and social reasons.”
Earlier this week, the House of Lords built environment committee heard evidence in its inquiry into the practical delivery of new towns.
John Sturzaker, Ebenezer Howard chair of planning at the University of Hertfordshire, told the committee that public acceptance of the new towns would be heavily influenced by how well important infrastructure requirements are realised in advance.
Source: ShutterstockNew towns brought forward by the government may be significantly smaller than post-war developments like Milton Keynes”I think it’s really important that the infrastructure to support these communities is going in before, or at the very least, at the same time as new housing, whether that’s a village hall, whether it’s schools, whether it’s shops, so that you don’t have people living a sort of pioneer lifestyle,” he said
“We need to have an infrastructure first approach, which common in other parts of Europe”.
The professor also noted that the government’s definition of new towns would include much smaller developments than the post-war new towns.
”10,000 is not very big in terms of a new town. if you wanted a standalone new town like the traditional ones you might be looking at 10 or 20 times that,” he said, suggesting that the government was more likely to be looking at urban extensions or networks of smaller new towns.
Speaking to Housing Today’s sister title Building, he elaborated on his comments to the committee and addressed how the government could approach new town development within the M25.
“The traditional model of new towns that we’re familiar with in this country, places like Hatfield or Stevenage or Milton Keynes, would be too big to be within Greater London,” he said.
He referenced Chapelton in Aberdeenshire and Chelmsford Garden Community in Essex as examples of new towns of a smaller scale.
He said he wasn’t aware of any suitable sites in London but said he had “no doubt there will be some”.
#london #green #belt #development #could
·124 Visualizações